You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

210 lines
6.7 KiB

Replace tracked_keys with a new LockTracker interface in TransactionDB (#7013) Summary: We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction. However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol. The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are: 1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback. 2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit. 3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`. Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation. In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components. After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`. Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D22163706 Pulled By: cheng-chang fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
4 years ago
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
#pragma once
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
Replace tracked_keys with a new LockTracker interface in TransactionDB (#7013) Summary: We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction. However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol. The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are: 1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback. 2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit. 3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`. Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation. In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components. After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`. Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D22163706 Pulled By: cheng-chang fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
4 years ago
#include <memory>
#include "rocksdb/rocksdb_namespace.h"
#include "rocksdb/status.h"
#include "rocksdb/types.h"
#include "rocksdb/utilities/transaction_db.h"
Replace tracked_keys with a new LockTracker interface in TransactionDB (#7013) Summary: We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction. However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol. The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are: 1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback. 2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit. 3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`. Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation. In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components. After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`. Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D22163706 Pulled By: cheng-chang fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
4 years ago
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
// Request for locking a single key.
struct PointLockRequest {
// The id of the key's column family.
ColumnFamilyId column_family_id = 0;
// The key to lock.
std::string key;
// The sequence number from which there is no concurrent update to key.
SequenceNumber seq = 0;
// Whether the lock is acquired only for read.
bool read_only = false;
// Whether the lock is in exclusive mode.
bool exclusive = true;
};
// Request for locking a range of keys.
struct RangeLockRequest {
// The id of the key's column family.
ColumnFamilyId column_family_id;
// The range to be locked
Endpoint start_endp;
Endpoint end_endp;
Replace tracked_keys with a new LockTracker interface in TransactionDB (#7013) Summary: We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction. However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol. The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are: 1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback. 2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit. 3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`. Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation. In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components. After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`. Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D22163706 Pulled By: cheng-chang fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
4 years ago
};
struct PointLockStatus {
// Whether the key is locked.
bool locked = false;
// Whether the key is locked in exclusive mode.
bool exclusive = true;
// The sequence number in the tracked PointLockRequest.
SequenceNumber seq = 0;
};
// Return status when calling LockTracker::Untrack.
enum class UntrackStatus {
// The lock is not tracked at all, so no lock to untrack.
NOT_TRACKED,
// The lock is untracked but not removed from the tracker.
UNTRACKED,
// The lock is removed from the tracker.
REMOVED,
};
// Tracks the lock requests.
// In PessimisticTransaction, it tracks the locks acquired through LockMgr;
// In OptimisticTransaction, since there is no LockMgr, it tracks the lock
// intention. Not thread-safe.
class LockTracker {
public:
virtual ~LockTracker() {}
// Whether supports locking a specific key.
virtual bool IsPointLockSupported() const = 0;
// Whether supports locking a range of keys.
virtual bool IsRangeLockSupported() const = 0;
// Tracks the acquirement of a lock on key.
//
// If this method is not supported, leave it as a no-op.
virtual void Track(const PointLockRequest& /*lock_request*/) = 0;
// Untracks the lock on a key.
// seq and exclusive in lock_request are not used.
//
// If this method is not supported, leave it as a no-op and
// returns NOT_TRACKED.
virtual UntrackStatus Untrack(const PointLockRequest& /*lock_request*/) = 0;
// Counterpart of Track(const PointLockRequest&) for RangeLockRequest.
virtual void Track(const RangeLockRequest& /*lock_request*/) = 0;
// Counterpart of Untrack(const PointLockRequest&) for RangeLockRequest.
virtual UntrackStatus Untrack(const RangeLockRequest& /*lock_request*/) = 0;
// Merges lock requests tracked in the specified tracker into the current
// tracker.
//
// E.g. for point lock, if a key in tracker is not yet tracked,
// track this new key; otherwise, merge the tracked information of the key
// such as lock's exclusiveness, read/write statistics.
//
// If this method is not supported, leave it as a no-op.
//
// REQUIRED: the specified tracker must be of the same concrete class type as
// the current tracker.
virtual void Merge(const LockTracker& /*tracker*/) = 0;
// This is a reverse operation of Merge.
//
// E.g. for point lock, if a key exists in both current and the sepcified
// tracker, then subtract the information (such as read/write statistics) of
// the key in the specified tracker from the current tracker.
//
// If this method is not supported, leave it as a no-op.
//
// REQUIRED:
// The specified tracker must be of the same concrete class type as
// the current tracker.
// The tracked locks in the specified tracker must be a subset of those
// tracked by the current tracker.
virtual void Subtract(const LockTracker& /*tracker*/) = 0;
// Clears all tracked locks.
virtual void Clear() = 0;
// Gets the new locks (excluding the locks that have been tracked before the
// save point) tracked since the specified save point, the result is stored
// in an internally constructed LockTracker and returned.
//
// save_point_tracker is the tracker used by a SavePoint to track locks
// tracked after creating the SavePoint.
//
// The implementation should document whether point lock, or range lock, or
// both are considered in this method.
// If this method is not supported, returns nullptr.
//
// REQUIRED:
// The save_point_tracker must be of the same concrete class type as the
// current tracker.
// The tracked locks in the specified tracker must be a subset of those
// tracked by the current tracker.
virtual LockTracker* GetTrackedLocksSinceSavePoint(
const LockTracker& /*save_point_tracker*/) const = 0;
// Gets lock related information of the key.
//
// If point lock is not supported, always returns LockStatus with
// locked=false.
virtual PointLockStatus GetPointLockStatus(
ColumnFamilyId /*column_family_id*/,
const std::string& /*key*/) const = 0;
// Gets number of tracked point locks.
//
// If point lock is not supported, always returns 0.
virtual uint64_t GetNumPointLocks() const = 0;
class ColumnFamilyIterator {
public:
virtual ~ColumnFamilyIterator() {}
// Whether there are remaining column families.
virtual bool HasNext() const = 0;
// Gets next column family id.
//
// If HasNext is false, calling this method has undefined behavior.
virtual ColumnFamilyId Next() = 0;
};
// Gets an iterator for column families.
//
// Returned iterator must not be nullptr.
// If there is no column family to iterate,
// returns an empty non-null iterator.
// Caller owns the returned pointer.
virtual ColumnFamilyIterator* GetColumnFamilyIterator() const = 0;
class KeyIterator {
public:
virtual ~KeyIterator() {}
// Whether there are remaining keys.
virtual bool HasNext() const = 0;
// Gets the next key.
//
// If HasNext is false, calling this method has undefined behavior.
virtual const std::string& Next() = 0;
};
// Gets an iterator for keys with tracked point locks in the column family.
//
// The column family must exist.
// Returned iterator must not be nullptr.
// Caller owns the returned pointer.
virtual KeyIterator* GetKeyIterator(
ColumnFamilyId /*column_family_id*/) const = 0;
};
// LockTracker should always be constructed through this factory.
// Each LockManager owns a LockTrackerFactory.
class LockTrackerFactory {
public:
// Caller owns the returned pointer.
virtual LockTracker* Create() const = 0;
virtual ~LockTrackerFactory() {}
};
Replace tracked_keys with a new LockTracker interface in TransactionDB (#7013) Summary: We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction. However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol. The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are: 1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback. 2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit. 3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`. Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation. In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components. After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`. Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D22163706 Pulled By: cheng-chang fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
4 years ago
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE
#endif // ROCKSDB_LITE