|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
|
|
|
|
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
|
|
|
|
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
|
|
|
// found in the LICENSE file. See the AUTHORS file for names of contributors.
|
|
|
|
|
fix rate limiter to avoid starvation
Summary:
The current implementation of rate limiter has the possibility to introduce resource starvation when change its limit.
This diff aims to fix this problem by consuming request bytes partially.
Test Plan:
```
./rate_limiter_test
[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.355712 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 1023], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 19.136564 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.783976 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 39.308144 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 40.318349 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 79.667396 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.807158 KB/sec, elapsed 2.30 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.659761 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.700990 KB/sec, elapsed 3.00 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 320 KB/sec, actual rate: 317.639481 KB/sec, elapsed 2.50 seconds
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.Rate (22618 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 5KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 10KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 160KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 320KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest (5002 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest (27620 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (27621 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 4 tests.
```
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, yiwu, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60207
9 years ago
|
|
|
#include "util/rate_limiter.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <chrono>
|
|
|
|
#include <cinttypes>
|
|
|
|
#include <cstdint>
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
#include <limits>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "db/db_test_util.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "port/port.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "rocksdb/system_clock.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "test_util/sync_point.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "test_util/testharness.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "util/random.h"
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO(yhchiang): the rate will not be accurate when we run test in parallel.
|
|
|
|
class RateLimiterTest : public testing::Test {
|
|
|
|
protected:
|
|
|
|
~RateLimiterTest() override {
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->DisableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->ClearAllCallBacks();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, OverflowRate) {
|
|
|
|
GenericRateLimiter limiter(std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max(), 1000, 10,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::Mode::kWritesOnly,
|
|
|
|
SystemClock::Default(), false /* auto_tuned */);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_GT(limiter.GetSingleBurstBytes(), 1000000000ll);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, StartStop) {
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<RateLimiter> limiter(NewGenericRateLimiter(100, 100, 10));
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, GetTotalBytesThrough) {
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<RateLimiter> limiter(NewGenericRateLimiter(
|
|
|
|
200 /* rate_bytes_per_sec */, 1000 * 1000 /* refill_period_us */,
|
|
|
|
10 /* fairness */));
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i <= Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(limiter->GetTotalBytesThrough(static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i)),
|
|
|
|
0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::int64_t request_byte = 200;
|
|
|
|
std::int64_t request_byte_sum = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i < Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
limiter->Request(request_byte, static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i),
|
|
|
|
nullptr /* stats */, RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
request_byte_sum += request_byte;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i < Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(limiter->GetTotalBytesThrough(static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i)),
|
|
|
|
request_byte)
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to track total_bytes_through_ correctly when IOPriority = "
|
|
|
|
<< static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(limiter->GetTotalBytesThrough(Env::IO_TOTAL), request_byte_sum)
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to track total_bytes_through_ correctly when IOPriority = "
|
|
|
|
"Env::IO_TOTAL";
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, GetTotalRequests) {
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<RateLimiter> limiter(NewGenericRateLimiter(
|
|
|
|
200 /* rate_bytes_per_sec */, 1000 * 1000 /* refill_period_us */,
|
|
|
|
10 /* fairness */));
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i <= Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(limiter->GetTotalRequests(static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i)), 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::int64_t total_requests_sum = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i < Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
limiter->Request(200, static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i), nullptr /* stats */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
total_requests_sum += 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i < Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(limiter->GetTotalRequests(static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i)), 1)
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to track total_requests_ correctly when IOPriority = "
|
|
|
|
<< static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(limiter->GetTotalRequests(Env::IO_TOTAL), total_requests_sum)
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to track total_requests_ correctly when IOPriority = "
|
|
|
|
"Env::IO_TOTAL";
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, GetTotalPendingRequests) {
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<RateLimiter> limiter(NewGenericRateLimiter(
|
|
|
|
200 /* rate_bytes_per_sec */, 1000 * 1000 /* refill_period_us */,
|
|
|
|
10 /* fairness */));
|
|
|
|
int64_t total_pending_requests = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i <= Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(limiter->GetTotalPendingRequests(
|
|
|
|
&total_pending_requests, static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i)));
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(total_pending_requests, 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This is a variable for making sure the following callback is called
|
|
|
|
// and the assertions in it are indeed excuted
|
|
|
|
bool nonzero_pending_requests_verified = false;
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->SetCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::Request:PostEnqueueRequest", [&](void* arg) {
|
|
|
|
port::Mutex* request_mutex = (port::Mutex*)arg;
|
|
|
|
// We temporarily unlock the mutex so that the following
|
|
|
|
// GetTotalPendingRequests() can acquire it
|
|
|
|
request_mutex->Unlock();
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i <= Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_OK(limiter->GetTotalPendingRequests(
|
|
|
|
&total_pending_requests, static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i)))
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to return total pending requests for priority level = "
|
|
|
|
<< static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i);
|
|
|
|
if (i == Env::IO_USER || i == Env::IO_TOTAL) {
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(total_pending_requests, 1)
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to correctly return total pending requests for "
|
|
|
|
"priority level = "
|
|
|
|
<< static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(total_pending_requests, 0)
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to correctly return total pending requests for "
|
|
|
|
"priority level = "
|
|
|
|
<< static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We lock the mutex again so that the request thread can resume running
|
|
|
|
// with the mutex locked
|
|
|
|
request_mutex->Lock();
|
|
|
|
nonzero_pending_requests_verified = true;
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->EnableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
limiter->Request(200, Env::IO_USER, nullptr /* stats */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(nonzero_pending_requests_verified, true);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = Env::IO_LOW; i <= Env::IO_TOTAL; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_OK(limiter->GetTotalPendingRequests(&total_pending_requests,
|
|
|
|
static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i)))
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to return total pending requests for priority level = "
|
|
|
|
<< static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(total_pending_requests, 0)
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to correctly return total pending requests for priority "
|
|
|
|
"level = "
|
|
|
|
<< static_cast<Env::IOPriority>(i);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->DisableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->ClearCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::Request:PostEnqueueRequest");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, Modes) {
|
|
|
|
for (auto mode : {RateLimiter::Mode::kWritesOnly,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::Mode::kReadsOnly, RateLimiter::Mode::kAllIo}) {
|
|
|
|
GenericRateLimiter limiter(2000 /* rate_bytes_per_sec */,
|
|
|
|
1000 * 1000 /* refill_period_us */,
|
|
|
|
10 /* fairness */, mode, SystemClock::Default(),
|
|
|
|
false /* auto_tuned */);
|
|
|
|
limiter.Request(1000 /* bytes */, Env::IO_HIGH, nullptr /* stats */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kRead);
|
|
|
|
if (mode == RateLimiter::Mode::kWritesOnly) {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(0, limiter.GetTotalBytesThrough(Env::IO_HIGH));
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(1000, limiter.GetTotalBytesThrough(Env::IO_HIGH));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
limiter.Request(1000 /* bytes */, Env::IO_HIGH, nullptr /* stats */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
if (mode == RateLimiter::Mode::kAllIo) {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(2000, limiter.GetTotalBytesThrough(Env::IO_HIGH));
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(1000, limiter.GetTotalBytesThrough(Env::IO_HIGH));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, GeneratePriorityIterationOrder) {
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<RateLimiter> limiter(NewGenericRateLimiter(
|
|
|
|
200 /* rate_bytes_per_sec */, 1000 * 1000 /* refill_period_us */,
|
|
|
|
10 /* fairness */));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool possible_random_one_in_fairness_results_for_high_mid_pri[4][2] = {
|
|
|
|
{false, false}, {false, true}, {true, false}, {true, true}};
|
|
|
|
std::vector<Env::IOPriority> possible_priority_iteration_orders[4] = {
|
|
|
|
{Env::IO_USER, Env::IO_HIGH, Env::IO_MID, Env::IO_LOW},
|
|
|
|
{Env::IO_USER, Env::IO_HIGH, Env::IO_LOW, Env::IO_MID},
|
|
|
|
{Env::IO_USER, Env::IO_MID, Env::IO_LOW, Env::IO_HIGH},
|
|
|
|
{Env::IO_USER, Env::IO_LOW, Env::IO_MID, Env::IO_HIGH}};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
// These are variables for making sure the following callbacks are called
|
|
|
|
// and the assertion in the last callback is indeed excuted
|
|
|
|
bool high_pri_iterated_after_mid_low_pri_set = false;
|
|
|
|
bool mid_pri_itereated_after_low_pri_set = false;
|
|
|
|
bool pri_iteration_order_verified = false;
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->SetCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::GeneratePriorityIterationOrderLocked::"
|
|
|
|
"PostRandomOneInFairnessForHighPri",
|
|
|
|
[&](void* arg) {
|
|
|
|
bool* high_pri_iterated_after_mid_low_pri = (bool*)arg;
|
|
|
|
*high_pri_iterated_after_mid_low_pri =
|
|
|
|
possible_random_one_in_fairness_results_for_high_mid_pri[i][0];
|
|
|
|
high_pri_iterated_after_mid_low_pri_set = true;
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->SetCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::GeneratePriorityIterationOrderLocked::"
|
|
|
|
"PostRandomOneInFairnessForMidPri",
|
|
|
|
[&](void* arg) {
|
|
|
|
bool* mid_pri_itereated_after_low_pri = (bool*)arg;
|
|
|
|
*mid_pri_itereated_after_low_pri =
|
|
|
|
possible_random_one_in_fairness_results_for_high_mid_pri[i][1];
|
|
|
|
mid_pri_itereated_after_low_pri_set = true;
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->SetCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::GeneratePriorityIterationOrderLocked::"
|
|
|
|
"PreReturnPriIterationOrder",
|
|
|
|
[&](void* arg) {
|
|
|
|
std::vector<Env::IOPriority>* pri_iteration_order =
|
|
|
|
(std::vector<Env::IOPriority>*)arg;
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(*pri_iteration_order, possible_priority_iteration_orders[i])
|
|
|
|
<< "Failed to generate priority iteration order correctly when "
|
|
|
|
"high_pri_iterated_after_mid_low_pri = "
|
|
|
|
<< possible_random_one_in_fairness_results_for_high_mid_pri[i][0]
|
|
|
|
<< ", mid_pri_itereated_after_low_pri = "
|
|
|
|
<< possible_random_one_in_fairness_results_for_high_mid_pri[i][1]
|
|
|
|
<< std::endl;
|
|
|
|
pri_iteration_order_verified = true;
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->EnableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
limiter->Request(200 /* request max bytes to drain so that refill and order
|
|
|
|
generation will be triggered every time
|
|
|
|
GenericRateLimiter::Request() is called */
|
|
|
|
,
|
|
|
|
Env::IO_USER, nullptr /* stats */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(high_pri_iterated_after_mid_low_pri_set, true);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(mid_pri_itereated_after_low_pri_set, true);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(pri_iteration_order_verified, true);
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->DisableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->ClearCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::GeneratePriorityIterationOrderLocked::"
|
|
|
|
"PreReturnPriIterationOrder");
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->ClearCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::GeneratePriorityIterationOrderLocked::"
|
|
|
|
"PostRandomOneInFairnessForMidPri");
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->ClearCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::GeneratePriorityIterationOrderLocked::"
|
|
|
|
"PostRandomOneInFairnessForHighPri");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, Rate) {
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
auto* env = Env::Default();
|
|
|
|
struct Arg {
|
|
|
|
Arg(int32_t _target_rate, int _burst)
|
|
|
|
: limiter(NewGenericRateLimiter(_target_rate /* rate_bytes_per_sec */,
|
|
|
|
100 * 1000 /* refill_period_us */,
|
|
|
|
10 /* fairness */)),
|
|
|
|
request_size(_target_rate /
|
|
|
|
10 /* refill period here is 1/10 second */),
|
|
|
|
burst(_burst) {}
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<RateLimiter> limiter;
|
|
|
|
int32_t request_size;
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
int burst;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto writer = [](void* p) {
|
|
|
|
const auto& thread_clock = SystemClock::Default();
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
auto* arg = static_cast<Arg*>(p);
|
|
|
|
// Test for 2 seconds
|
|
|
|
auto until = thread_clock->NowMicros() + 2 * 1000000;
|
|
|
|
Random r((uint32_t)(thread_clock->NowNanos() %
|
|
|
|
std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()));
|
|
|
|
while (thread_clock->NowMicros() < until) {
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(r.Skewed(arg->burst * 2) + 1); ++i) {
|
|
|
|
arg->limiter->Request(r.Uniform(arg->request_size - 1) + 1,
|
|
|
|
Env::IO_USER, nullptr /* stats */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(r.Skewed(arg->burst) + 1); ++i) {
|
|
|
|
arg->limiter->Request(r.Uniform(arg->request_size - 1) + 1,
|
|
|
|
Env::IO_HIGH, nullptr /* stats */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(r.Skewed(arg->burst / 2 + 1) + 1);
|
|
|
|
++i) {
|
|
|
|
arg->limiter->Request(r.Uniform(arg->request_size - 1) + 1, Env::IO_MID,
|
|
|
|
nullptr /* stats */, RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arg->limiter->Request(r.Uniform(arg->request_size - 1) + 1, Env::IO_LOW,
|
|
|
|
nullptr /* stats */, RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int samples = 0;
|
|
|
|
int samples_at_minimum = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 1; i <= 16; i *= 2) {
|
|
|
|
int32_t target = i * 1024 * 10;
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
Arg arg(target, i / 4 + 1);
|
|
|
|
int64_t old_total_bytes_through = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int iter = 1; iter <= 2; ++iter) {
|
|
|
|
// second iteration changes the target dynamically
|
|
|
|
if (iter == 2) {
|
|
|
|
target *= 2;
|
|
|
|
arg.limiter->SetBytesPerSecond(target);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto start = env->NowMicros();
|
|
|
|
for (int t = 0; t < i; ++t) {
|
|
|
|
env->StartThread(writer, &arg);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
env->WaitForJoin();
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto elapsed = env->NowMicros() - start;
|
|
|
|
double rate =
|
|
|
|
(arg.limiter->GetTotalBytesThrough() - old_total_bytes_through) *
|
|
|
|
1000000.0 / elapsed;
|
|
|
|
old_total_bytes_through = arg.limiter->GetTotalBytesThrough();
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr,
|
|
|
|
"request size [1 - %" PRIi32 "], limit %" PRIi32
|
|
|
|
" KB/sec, actual rate: %lf KB/sec, elapsed %.2lf seconds\n",
|
|
|
|
arg.request_size - 1, target / 1024, rate / 1024,
|
|
|
|
elapsed / 1000000.0);
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
++samples;
|
|
|
|
if (rate / target >= 0.80) {
|
|
|
|
++samples_at_minimum;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_LE(rate / target, 1.25);
|
|
|
|
}
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This can fail due to slow execution speed, like when using valgrind or in
|
|
|
|
// heavily loaded CI environments
|
|
|
|
bool skip_minimum_rate_check =
|
|
|
|
#if (defined(CIRCLECI) && defined(OS_MACOSX)) || defined(ROCKSDB_VALGRIND_RUN)
|
|
|
|
true;
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
getenv("SANDCASTLE");
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
if (skip_minimum_rate_check) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "Skipped minimum rate check (%d / %d passed)\n",
|
|
|
|
samples_at_minimum, samples);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(samples_at_minimum, samples);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
|
fix rate limiter to avoid starvation
Summary:
The current implementation of rate limiter has the possibility to introduce resource starvation when change its limit.
This diff aims to fix this problem by consuming request bytes partially.
Test Plan:
```
./rate_limiter_test
[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.355712 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 1023], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 19.136564 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.783976 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 39.308144 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 40.318349 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 79.667396 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.807158 KB/sec, elapsed 2.30 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.659761 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.700990 KB/sec, elapsed 3.00 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 320 KB/sec, actual rate: 317.639481 KB/sec, elapsed 2.50 seconds
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.Rate (22618 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 5KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 10KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 160KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 320KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest (5002 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest (27620 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (27621 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 4 tests.
```
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, yiwu, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60207
9 years ago
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, LimitChangeTest) {
|
|
|
|
// starvation test when limit changes to a smaller value
|
|
|
|
int64_t refill_period = 1000 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
auto* env = Env::Default();
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->EnableProcessing();
|
fix rate limiter to avoid starvation
Summary:
The current implementation of rate limiter has the possibility to introduce resource starvation when change its limit.
This diff aims to fix this problem by consuming request bytes partially.
Test Plan:
```
./rate_limiter_test
[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.355712 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 1023], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 19.136564 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.783976 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 39.308144 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 40.318349 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 79.667396 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.807158 KB/sec, elapsed 2.30 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.659761 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.700990 KB/sec, elapsed 3.00 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 320 KB/sec, actual rate: 317.639481 KB/sec, elapsed 2.50 seconds
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.Rate (22618 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 5KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 10KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 160KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 320KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest (5002 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest (27620 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (27621 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 4 tests.
```
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, yiwu, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60207
9 years ago
|
|
|
struct Arg {
|
|
|
|
Arg(int32_t _request_size, Env::IOPriority _pri,
|
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<RateLimiter> _limiter)
|
|
|
|
: request_size(_request_size), pri(_pri), limiter(_limiter) {}
|
|
|
|
int32_t request_size;
|
|
|
|
Env::IOPriority pri;
|
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<RateLimiter> limiter;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto writer = [](void* p) {
|
|
|
|
auto* arg = static_cast<Arg*>(p);
|
|
|
|
arg->limiter->Request(arg->request_size, arg->pri, nullptr /* stats */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
fix rate limiter to avoid starvation
Summary:
The current implementation of rate limiter has the possibility to introduce resource starvation when change its limit.
This diff aims to fix this problem by consuming request bytes partially.
Test Plan:
```
./rate_limiter_test
[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.355712 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 1023], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 19.136564 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.783976 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 39.308144 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 40.318349 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 79.667396 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.807158 KB/sec, elapsed 2.30 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.659761 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.700990 KB/sec, elapsed 3.00 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 320 KB/sec, actual rate: 317.639481 KB/sec, elapsed 2.50 seconds
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.Rate (22618 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 5KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 10KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 160KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 320KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest (5002 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest (27620 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (27621 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 4 tests.
```
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, yiwu, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60207
9 years ago
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (uint32_t i = 1; i <= 16; i <<= 1) {
|
|
|
|
int32_t target = i * 1024 * 10;
|
|
|
|
// refill per second
|
|
|
|
for (int iter = 0; iter < 2; iter++) {
|
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<RateLimiter> limiter =
|
|
|
|
std::make_shared<GenericRateLimiter>(
|
|
|
|
target, refill_period, 10, RateLimiter::Mode::kWritesOnly,
|
|
|
|
SystemClock::Default(), false /* auto_tuned */);
|
|
|
|
// After "GenericRateLimiter::Request:1" the mutex is held until the bytes
|
|
|
|
// are refilled. This test could be improved to change the limit when lock
|
|
|
|
// is released in `TimedWait()`.
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->LoadDependency(
|
fix rate limiter to avoid starvation
Summary:
The current implementation of rate limiter has the possibility to introduce resource starvation when change its limit.
This diff aims to fix this problem by consuming request bytes partially.
Test Plan:
```
./rate_limiter_test
[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.355712 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 1023], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 19.136564 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.783976 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 39.308144 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 40.318349 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 79.667396 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.807158 KB/sec, elapsed 2.30 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.659761 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.700990 KB/sec, elapsed 3.00 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 320 KB/sec, actual rate: 317.639481 KB/sec, elapsed 2.50 seconds
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.Rate (22618 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 5KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 10KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 160KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 320KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest (5002 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest (27620 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (27621 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 4 tests.
```
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, yiwu, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60207
9 years ago
|
|
|
{{"GenericRateLimiter::Request",
|
|
|
|
"RateLimiterTest::LimitChangeTest:changeLimitStart"},
|
|
|
|
{"RateLimiterTest::LimitChangeTest:changeLimitEnd",
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::Request:1"}});
|
fix rate limiter to avoid starvation
Summary:
The current implementation of rate limiter has the possibility to introduce resource starvation when change its limit.
This diff aims to fix this problem by consuming request bytes partially.
Test Plan:
```
./rate_limiter_test
[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.355712 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 1023], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 19.136564 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.783976 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 39.308144 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 40.318349 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 79.667396 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.807158 KB/sec, elapsed 2.30 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.659761 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.700990 KB/sec, elapsed 3.00 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 320 KB/sec, actual rate: 317.639481 KB/sec, elapsed 2.50 seconds
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.Rate (22618 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 5KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 10KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 160KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 320KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest (5002 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest (27620 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (27621 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 4 tests.
```
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, yiwu, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60207
9 years ago
|
|
|
Arg arg(target, Env::IO_HIGH, limiter);
|
|
|
|
// The idea behind is to start a request first, then before it refills,
|
|
|
|
// update limit to a different value (2X/0.5X). No starvation should
|
|
|
|
// be guaranteed under any situation
|
|
|
|
// TODO(lightmark): more test cases are welcome.
|
|
|
|
env->StartThread(writer, &arg);
|
|
|
|
int32_t new_limit = (target << 1) >> (iter << 1);
|
|
|
|
TEST_SYNC_POINT("RateLimiterTest::LimitChangeTest:changeLimitStart");
|
|
|
|
arg.limiter->SetBytesPerSecond(new_limit);
|
|
|
|
TEST_SYNC_POINT("RateLimiterTest::LimitChangeTest:changeLimitEnd");
|
|
|
|
env->WaitForJoin();
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr,
|
|
|
|
"[COMPLETE] request size %" PRIi32 " KB, new limit %" PRIi32
|
|
|
|
"KB/sec, refill period %" PRIi64 " ms\n",
|
|
|
|
target / 1024, new_limit / 1024, refill_period / 1000);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->DisableProcessing();
|
fix rate limiter to avoid starvation
Summary:
The current implementation of rate limiter has the possibility to introduce resource starvation when change its limit.
This diff aims to fix this problem by consuming request bytes partially.
Test Plan:
```
./rate_limiter_test
[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.OverflowRate (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.StartStop (0 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.355712 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 1023], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 19.136564 KB/sec, elapsed 2.00 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.783976 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 2047], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 39.308144 KB/sec, elapsed 2.10 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 40.318349 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 4095], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 79.667396 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.807158 KB/sec, elapsed 2.30 seconds
request size [1 - 8191], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.659761 KB/sec, elapsed 2.20 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 160.700990 KB/sec, elapsed 3.00 seconds
request size [1 - 16383], limit 320 KB/sec, actual rate: 317.639481 KB/sec, elapsed 2.50 seconds
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.Rate (22618 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 10 KB, new limit 5KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 20 KB, new limit 10KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 40 KB, new limit 20KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 160KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 80 KB, new limit 40KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 320KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[COMPLETE] request size 160 KB, new limit 80KB/sec, refill period 1000 ms
[ OK ] RateLimiterTest.LimitChangeTest (5002 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from RateLimiterTest (27620 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (27621 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 4 tests.
```
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, yiwu, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60207
9 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(RateLimiterTest, AutoTuneIncreaseWhenFull) {
|
|
|
|
const std::chrono::seconds kTimePerRefill(1);
|
|
|
|
const int kRefillsPerTune = 100; // needs to match util/rate_limiter.cc
|
|
|
|
|
Fix+clean up handling of mock sleeps (#7101)
Summary:
We have a number of tests hanging on MacOS and windows due to
mishandling of code for mock sleeps. In addition, the code was in
terrible shape because the same variable (addon_time_) would sometimes
refer to microseconds and sometimes to seconds. One test even assumed it
was nanoseconds but was written to pass anyway.
This has been cleaned up so that DB tests generally use a SpecialEnv
function to mock sleep, for either some number of microseconds or seconds
depending on the function called. But to call one of these, the test must first
call SetMockSleep (precondition enforced with assertion), which also turns
sleeps in RocksDB into mock sleeps. To also removes accounting for actual
clock time, call SetTimeElapseOnlySleepOnReopen, which implies
SetMockSleep (on DB re-open). This latter setting only works by applying
on DB re-open, otherwise havoc can ensue if Env goes back in time with
DB open.
More specifics:
Removed some unused test classes, and updated comments on the general
problem.
Fixed DBSSTTest.GetTotalSstFilesSize using a sync point callback instead
of mock time. For this we have the only modification to production code,
inserting a sync point callback in flush_job.cc, which is not a change to
production behavior.
Removed unnecessary resetting of mock times to 0 in many tests. RocksDB
deals in relative time. Any behaviors relying on absolute date/time are likely
a bug. (The above test DBSSTTest.GetTotalSstFilesSize was the only one
clearly injecting a specific absolute time for actual testing convenience.) Just
in case I misunderstood some test, I put this note in each replacement:
// NOTE: Presumed unnecessary and removed: resetting mock time in env
Strengthened some tests like MergeTestTime, MergeCompactionTimeTest, and
FilterCompactionTimeTest in db_test.cc
stats_history_test and blob_db_test are each their own beast, rather deeply
dependent on MockTimeEnv. Each gets its own variant of a work-around for
TimedWait in a mock time environment. (Reduces redundancy and
inconsistency in stats_history_test.)
Intended follow-up:
Remove TimedWait from the public API of InstrumentedCondVar, and only
make that accessible through Env by passing in an InstrumentedCondVar and
a deadline. Then the Env implementations mocking time can fix this problem
without using sync points. (Test infrastructure using sync points interferes
with individual tests' control over sync points.)
With that change, we can simplify/consolidate the scattered work-arounds.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7101
Test Plan: make check on Linux and MacOS
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D23032815
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 7f33967ada8b83011fb54e8279365c008bd6610b
4 years ago
|
|
|
SpecialEnv special_env(Env::Default(), /*time_elapse_only_sleep*/ true);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto stats = CreateDBStatistics();
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<RateLimiter> rate_limiter(new GenericRateLimiter(
|
|
|
|
1000 /* rate_bytes_per_sec */,
|
|
|
|
std::chrono::microseconds(kTimePerRefill).count(), 10 /* fairness */,
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::Mode::kWritesOnly, special_env.GetSystemClock(),
|
|
|
|
true /* auto_tuned */));
|
|
|
|
|
Simplify GenericRateLimiter algorithm (#8602)
Summary:
`GenericRateLimiter` slow path handles requests that cannot be satisfied
immediately. Such requests enter a queue, and their thread stays in `Request()`
until they are granted or the rate limiter is stopped. These threads are
responsible for unblocking themselves. The work to do so is split into two main
duties.
(1) Waiting for the next refill time.
(2) Refilling the bytes and granting requests.
Prior to this PR, the slow path logic involved a leader election algorithm to
pick one thread to perform (1) followed by (2). It elected the thread whose
request was at the front of the highest priority non-empty queue since that
request was most likely to be granted. This algorithm was efficient in terms of
reducing intermediate wakeups, which is a thread waking up only to resume
waiting after finding its request is not granted. However, the conceptual
complexity of this algorithm was too high. It took me a long time to draw a
timeline to understand how it works for just one edge case yet there were so
many.
This PR drops the leader election to reduce conceptual complexity. Now, the two
duties can be performed by whichever thread acquires the lock first. The risk
of this change is increasing the number of intermediate wakeups, however, we
took steps to mitigate that.
- `wait_until_refill_pending_` flag ensures only one thread performs (1). This\
prevents the thundering herd problem at the next refill time. The remaining\
threads wait on their condition variable with an unbounded duration -- thus we\
must remember to notify them to ensure forward progress.
- (1) is typically done by a thread at the front of a queue. This is trivial\
when the queues are initially empty as the first choice that arrives must be\
the only entry in its queue. When queues are initially non-empty, we achieve\
this by having (2) notify a thread at the front of a queue (preferring higher\
priority) to perform the next duty.
- We do not require any additional wakeup for (2). Typically it will just be\
done by the thread that finished (1).
Combined, the second and third bullet points above suggest the refill/granting
will typically be done by a request at the front of its queue. This is
important because one wakeup is saved when a granted request happens to be in an
already running thread.
Note there are a few cases that still lead to intermediate wakeup, however. The
first two are existing issues that also apply to the old algorithm, however, the
third (including both subpoints) is new.
- No request may be granted (only possible when rate limit dynamically\
decreases).
- Requests from a different queue may be granted.
- (2) may be run by a non-front request thread causing it to not be granted even\
if some requests in that same queue are granted. It can happen for a couple\
(unlikely) reasons.
- A new request may sneak in and grab the lock at the refill time, before the\
thread finishing (1) can wake up and grab it.
- A new request may sneak in and grab the lock and execute (1) before (2)'s\
chosen candidate can wake up and grab the lock. Then that non-front request\
thread performing (1) can carry over to perform (2).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8602
Test Plan:
- Use existing tests. The edge cases listed in the comment are all performance\
related; I could not really think of any related to correctness. The logic\
looks the same whether a thread wakes up/finishes its work early/on-time/late,\
or whether the thread is chosen vs. "steals" the work.
- Verified write throughput and CPU overhead are basically the same with and\
without this change, even in a rate limiter heavy workload:
Test command:
```
$ rm -rf /dev/shm/dbbench/ && TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm /usr/bin/time ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -num_multi_db=64 -num_low_pri_threads=64 -num_high_pri_threads=64 -write_buffer_size=262144 -target_file_size_base=262144 -max_bytes_for_level_base=1048576 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=16777216 -key_size=24 -value_size=1000 -num=10000 -compression_type=none -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000
```
Results before this PR:
```
fillrandom : 108.463 micros/op 9219 ops/sec; 9.0 MB/s
7.40user 8.84system 1:26.20elapsed 18%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 256140maxresident)k
```
Results after this PR:
```
fillrandom : 108.108 micros/op 9250 ops/sec; 9.0 MB/s
7.45user 8.23system 1:26.68elapsed 18%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 255688maxresident)k
```
Reviewed By: hx235
Differential Revision: D30048013
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 6741bba9d9dfbccab359806d725105817fef818b
3 years ago
|
|
|
// Rate limiter uses `CondVar::TimedWait()`, which does not have access to the
|
|
|
|
// `Env` to advance its time according to the fake wait duration. The
|
|
|
|
// workaround is to install a callback that advance the `Env`'s mock time.
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->SetCallBack(
|
Simplify GenericRateLimiter algorithm (#8602)
Summary:
`GenericRateLimiter` slow path handles requests that cannot be satisfied
immediately. Such requests enter a queue, and their thread stays in `Request()`
until they are granted or the rate limiter is stopped. These threads are
responsible for unblocking themselves. The work to do so is split into two main
duties.
(1) Waiting for the next refill time.
(2) Refilling the bytes and granting requests.
Prior to this PR, the slow path logic involved a leader election algorithm to
pick one thread to perform (1) followed by (2). It elected the thread whose
request was at the front of the highest priority non-empty queue since that
request was most likely to be granted. This algorithm was efficient in terms of
reducing intermediate wakeups, which is a thread waking up only to resume
waiting after finding its request is not granted. However, the conceptual
complexity of this algorithm was too high. It took me a long time to draw a
timeline to understand how it works for just one edge case yet there were so
many.
This PR drops the leader election to reduce conceptual complexity. Now, the two
duties can be performed by whichever thread acquires the lock first. The risk
of this change is increasing the number of intermediate wakeups, however, we
took steps to mitigate that.
- `wait_until_refill_pending_` flag ensures only one thread performs (1). This\
prevents the thundering herd problem at the next refill time. The remaining\
threads wait on their condition variable with an unbounded duration -- thus we\
must remember to notify them to ensure forward progress.
- (1) is typically done by a thread at the front of a queue. This is trivial\
when the queues are initially empty as the first choice that arrives must be\
the only entry in its queue. When queues are initially non-empty, we achieve\
this by having (2) notify a thread at the front of a queue (preferring higher\
priority) to perform the next duty.
- We do not require any additional wakeup for (2). Typically it will just be\
done by the thread that finished (1).
Combined, the second and third bullet points above suggest the refill/granting
will typically be done by a request at the front of its queue. This is
important because one wakeup is saved when a granted request happens to be in an
already running thread.
Note there are a few cases that still lead to intermediate wakeup, however. The
first two are existing issues that also apply to the old algorithm, however, the
third (including both subpoints) is new.
- No request may be granted (only possible when rate limit dynamically\
decreases).
- Requests from a different queue may be granted.
- (2) may be run by a non-front request thread causing it to not be granted even\
if some requests in that same queue are granted. It can happen for a couple\
(unlikely) reasons.
- A new request may sneak in and grab the lock at the refill time, before the\
thread finishing (1) can wake up and grab it.
- A new request may sneak in and grab the lock and execute (1) before (2)'s\
chosen candidate can wake up and grab the lock. Then that non-front request\
thread performing (1) can carry over to perform (2).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8602
Test Plan:
- Use existing tests. The edge cases listed in the comment are all performance\
related; I could not really think of any related to correctness. The logic\
looks the same whether a thread wakes up/finishes its work early/on-time/late,\
or whether the thread is chosen vs. "steals" the work.
- Verified write throughput and CPU overhead are basically the same with and\
without this change, even in a rate limiter heavy workload:
Test command:
```
$ rm -rf /dev/shm/dbbench/ && TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm /usr/bin/time ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -num_multi_db=64 -num_low_pri_threads=64 -num_high_pri_threads=64 -write_buffer_size=262144 -target_file_size_base=262144 -max_bytes_for_level_base=1048576 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=16777216 -key_size=24 -value_size=1000 -num=10000 -compression_type=none -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000
```
Results before this PR:
```
fillrandom : 108.463 micros/op 9219 ops/sec; 9.0 MB/s
7.40user 8.84system 1:26.20elapsed 18%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 256140maxresident)k
```
Results after this PR:
```
fillrandom : 108.108 micros/op 9250 ops/sec; 9.0 MB/s
7.45user 8.23system 1:26.68elapsed 18%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 255688maxresident)k
```
Reviewed By: hx235
Differential Revision: D30048013
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 6741bba9d9dfbccab359806d725105817fef818b
3 years ago
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::Request:PostTimedWait", [&](void* arg) {
|
|
|
|
int64_t time_waited_us = *static_cast<int64_t*>(arg);
|
|
|
|
special_env.SleepForMicroseconds(static_cast<int>(time_waited_us));
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->EnableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// verify rate limit increases after a sequence of periods where rate limiter
|
|
|
|
// is always drained
|
|
|
|
int64_t orig_bytes_per_sec = rate_limiter->GetSingleBurstBytes();
|
|
|
|
rate_limiter->Request(orig_bytes_per_sec, Env::IO_HIGH, stats.get(),
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
while (std::chrono::microseconds(special_env.NowMicros()) <=
|
|
|
|
kRefillsPerTune * kTimePerRefill) {
|
|
|
|
rate_limiter->Request(orig_bytes_per_sec, Env::IO_HIGH, stats.get(),
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int64_t new_bytes_per_sec = rate_limiter->GetSingleBurstBytes();
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_GT(new_bytes_per_sec, orig_bytes_per_sec);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->DisableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->ClearCallBack(
|
|
|
|
"GenericRateLimiter::Request:PostTimedWait");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// decreases after a sequence of periods where rate limiter is not drained
|
|
|
|
orig_bytes_per_sec = new_bytes_per_sec;
|
|
|
|
special_env.SleepForMicroseconds(static_cast<int>(
|
|
|
|
kRefillsPerTune * std::chrono::microseconds(kTimePerRefill).count()));
|
|
|
|
// make a request so tuner can be triggered
|
|
|
|
rate_limiter->Request(1 /* bytes */, Env::IO_HIGH, stats.get(),
|
|
|
|
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
|
|
|
|
new_bytes_per_sec = rate_limiter->GetSingleBurstBytes();
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_LT(new_bytes_per_sec, orig_bytes_per_sec);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
|
|
|
|
::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
|
|
|
|
return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
generic rate limiter
Summary:
A generic rate limiter that can be shared by threads and rocksdb
instances. Will use this to smooth out write traffic generated by
compaction and flush. This will help us get better p99 behavior on flash
storage.
Test Plan:
unit test output
==== Test RateLimiterTest.Rate
request size [1 - 1023], limit 10 KB/sec, actual rate: 10.374969 KB/sec, elapsed 2002265
request size [1 - 2047], limit 20 KB/sec, actual rate: 20.771242 KB/sec, elapsed 2002139
request size [1 - 4095], limit 40 KB/sec, actual rate: 41.285299 KB/sec, elapsed 2202424
request size [1 - 8191], limit 80 KB/sec, actual rate: 81.371605 KB/sec, elapsed 2402558
request size [1 - 16383], limit 160 KB/sec, actual rate: 162.541268 KB/sec, elapsed 3303500
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19359
11 years ago
|
|
|
}
|