De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
|
|
|
|
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
|
|
|
|
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
|
|
|
// found in the LICENSE file. See the AUTHORS file for names of contributors.
|
|
|
|
#pragma once
|
|
|
|
#include "table/block_based/block_based_table_reader.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "table/block_based/block_based_table_reader_impl.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "table/block_based/block_prefetcher.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "table/block_based/reader_common.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
|
|
|
|
// Iterator that iterates over partitioned index.
|
|
|
|
// Some upper and lower bound tricks played in block based table iterators
|
|
|
|
// could be played here, but it's too complicated to reason about index
|
|
|
|
// keys with upper or lower bound, so we skip it for simplicity.
|
|
|
|
class PartitionedIndexIterator : public InternalIteratorBase<IndexValue> {
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
// compaction_readahead_size: its value will only be used if for_compaction =
|
|
|
|
// true
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
PartitionedIndexIterator(
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
const BlockBasedTable* table, const ReadOptions& read_options,
|
|
|
|
const InternalKeyComparator& icomp,
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<InternalIteratorBase<IndexValue>>&& index_iter,
|
|
|
|
TableReaderCaller caller, size_t compaction_readahead_size = 0)
|
|
|
|
: index_iter_(std::move(index_iter)),
|
|
|
|
table_(table),
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
read_options_(read_options),
|
|
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
icomp_(icomp),
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
user_comparator_(icomp.user_comparator()),
|
|
|
|
block_iter_points_to_real_block_(false),
|
|
|
|
lookup_context_(caller),
|
|
|
|
block_prefetcher_(compaction_readahead_size) {
|
|
|
|
}
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~PartitionedIndexIterator() override {}
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void Seek(const Slice& target) override;
|
|
|
|
void SeekForPrev(const Slice&) override {
|
|
|
|
// Shouldn't be called.
|
|
|
|
assert(false);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void SeekToFirst() override;
|
|
|
|
void SeekToLast() override;
|
|
|
|
void Next() final override;
|
|
|
|
bool NextAndGetResult(IterateResult*) override {
|
|
|
|
assert(false);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void Prev() override;
|
|
|
|
bool Valid() const override {
|
|
|
|
return block_iter_points_to_real_block_ && block_iter_.Valid();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Slice key() const override {
|
|
|
|
assert(Valid());
|
|
|
|
return block_iter_.key();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Slice user_key() const override {
|
|
|
|
assert(Valid());
|
|
|
|
return block_iter_.user_key();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
IndexValue value() const override {
|
|
|
|
assert(Valid());
|
|
|
|
return block_iter_.value();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Status status() const override {
|
|
|
|
// Prefix index set status to NotFound when the prefix does not exist
|
|
|
|
if (!index_iter_->status().ok() && !index_iter_->status().IsNotFound()) {
|
|
|
|
return index_iter_->status();
|
|
|
|
} else if (block_iter_points_to_real_block_) {
|
|
|
|
return block_iter_.status();
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
return Status::OK();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
inline IterBoundCheck UpperBoundCheckResult() override {
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
// Shouldn't be called.
|
|
|
|
assert(false);
|
|
|
|
return IterBoundCheck::kUnknown;
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void SetPinnedItersMgr(PinnedIteratorsManager*) override {
|
|
|
|
// Shouldn't be called.
|
|
|
|
assert(false);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool IsKeyPinned() const override {
|
|
|
|
// Shouldn't be called.
|
|
|
|
assert(false);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool IsValuePinned() const override {
|
|
|
|
// Shouldn't be called.
|
|
|
|
assert(false);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ResetPartitionedIndexIter() {
|
|
|
|
if (block_iter_points_to_real_block_) {
|
|
|
|
block_iter_.Invalidate(Status::OK());
|
|
|
|
block_iter_points_to_real_block_ = false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void SavePrevIndexValue() {
|
|
|
|
if (block_iter_points_to_real_block_) {
|
|
|
|
// Reseek. If they end up with the same data block, we shouldn't re-fetch
|
|
|
|
// the same data block.
|
|
|
|
prev_block_offset_ = index_iter_->value().handle.offset();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void GetReadaheadState(ReadaheadFileInfo* readahead_file_info) override {
|
|
|
|
if (block_prefetcher_.prefetch_buffer() != nullptr &&
|
|
|
|
read_options_.adaptive_readahead) {
|
|
|
|
block_prefetcher_.prefetch_buffer()->GetReadaheadState(
|
|
|
|
&(readahead_file_info->index_block_readahead_info));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void SetReadaheadState(ReadaheadFileInfo* readahead_file_info) override {
|
|
|
|
if (read_options_.adaptive_readahead) {
|
|
|
|
block_prefetcher_.SetReadaheadState(
|
|
|
|
&(readahead_file_info->index_block_readahead_info));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<InternalIteratorBase<IndexValue>> index_iter_;
|
|
|
|
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
friend class BlockBasedTableReaderTestVerifyChecksum_ChecksumMismatch_Test;
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
const BlockBasedTable* table_;
|
|
|
|
const ReadOptions read_options_;
|
|
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
const InternalKeyComparator& icomp_;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
De-template block based table iterator (#6531)
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
5 years ago
|
|
|
UserComparatorWrapper user_comparator_;
|
|
|
|
IndexBlockIter block_iter_;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// True if block_iter_ is initialized and points to the same block
|
|
|
|
// as index iterator.
|
|
|
|
bool block_iter_points_to_real_block_;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t prev_block_offset_ = std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max();
|
|
|
|
BlockCacheLookupContext lookup_context_;
|
|
|
|
BlockPrefetcher block_prefetcher_;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If `target` is null, seek to first.
|
|
|
|
void SeekImpl(const Slice* target);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void InitPartitionedIndexBlock();
|
|
|
|
void FindKeyForward();
|
|
|
|
void FindBlockForward();
|
|
|
|
void FindKeyBackward();
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE
|