You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
rocksdb/file/writable_file_writer.cc

922 lines
32 KiB

// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
//
// Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file. See the AUTHORS file for names of contributors.
#include "file/writable_file_writer.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <mutex>
#include "db/version_edit.h"
#include "monitoring/histogram.h"
#include "monitoring/iostats_context_imp.h"
#include "port/port.h"
#include "rocksdb/system_clock.h"
#include "test_util/sync_point.h"
#include "util/crc32c.h"
#include "util/random.h"
#include "util/rate_limiter.h"
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::Create(const std::shared_ptr<FileSystem>& fs,
const std::string& fname,
const FileOptions& file_opts,
std::unique_ptr<WritableFileWriter>* writer,
IODebugContext* dbg) {
if (file_opts.use_direct_writes &&
0 == file_opts.writable_file_max_buffer_size) {
return IOStatus::InvalidArgument(
"Direct write requires writable_file_max_buffer_size > 0");
}
std::unique_ptr<FSWritableFile> file;
IOStatus io_s = fs->NewWritableFile(fname, file_opts, &file, dbg);
if (io_s.ok()) {
writer->reset(new WritableFileWriter(std::move(file), fname, file_opts));
}
return io_s;
}
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::Append(const Slice& data, uint32_t crc32c_checksum,
Env::IOPriority op_rate_limiter_priority) {
const char* src = data.data();
size_t left = data.size();
IOStatus s;
pending_sync_ = true;
TEST_KILL_RANDOM_WITH_WEIGHT("WritableFileWriter::Append:0", REDUCE_ODDS2);
// Calculate the checksum of appended data
UpdateFileChecksum(data);
{
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority(
writable_file_->GetIOPriority(), op_rate_limiter_priority,
io_options.rate_limiter_priority);
IOSTATS_TIMER_GUARD(prepare_write_nanos);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::Append:BeforePrepareWrite");
Introduce a new storage specific Env API (#5761) Summary: The current Env API encompasses both storage/file operations, as well as OS related operations. Most of the APIs return a Status, which does not have enough metadata about an error, such as whether its retry-able or not, scope (i.e fault domain) of the error etc., that may be required in order to properly handle a storage error. The file APIs also do not provide enough control over the IO SLA, such as timeout, prioritization, hinting about placement and redundancy etc. This PR separates out the file/storage APIs from Env into a new FileSystem class. The APIs are updated to return an IOStatus with metadata about the error, as well as to take an IOOptions structure as input in order to allow more control over the IO. The user can set both ```options.env``` and ```options.file_system``` to specify that RocksDB should use the former for OS related operations and the latter for storage operations. Internally, a ```CompositeEnvWrapper``` has been introduced that inherits from ```Env``` and redirects individual methods to either an ```Env``` implementation or the ```FileSystem``` as appropriate. When options are sanitized during ```DB::Open```, ```options.env``` is replaced with a newly allocated ```CompositeEnvWrapper``` instance if both env and file_system have been specified. This way, the rest of the RocksDB code can continue to function as before. This PR also ports PosixEnv to the new API by splitting it into two - PosixEnv and PosixFileSystem. PosixEnv is defined as a sub-class of CompositeEnvWrapper, and threading/time functions are overridden with Posix specific implementations in order to avoid an extra level of indirection. The ```CompositeEnvWrapper``` translates ```IOStatus``` return code to ```Status```, and sets the severity to ```kSoftError``` if the io_status is retryable. The error handling code in RocksDB can then recover the DB automatically. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5761 Differential Revision: D18868376 Pulled By: anand1976 fbshipit-source-id: 39efe18a162ea746fabac6360ff529baba48486f
5 years ago
writable_file_->PrepareWrite(static_cast<size_t>(GetFileSize()), left,
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
io_options, nullptr);
}
// See whether we need to enlarge the buffer to avoid the flush
if (buf_.Capacity() - buf_.CurrentSize() < left) {
for (size_t cap = buf_.Capacity();
cap < max_buffer_size_; // There is still room to increase
cap *= 2) {
// See whether the next available size is large enough.
// Buffer will never be increased to more than max_buffer_size_.
size_t desired_capacity = std::min(cap * 2, max_buffer_size_);
if (desired_capacity - buf_.CurrentSize() >= left ||
(use_direct_io() && desired_capacity == max_buffer_size_)) {
buf_.AllocateNewBuffer(desired_capacity, true);
break;
}
}
}
// Flush only when buffered I/O
if (!use_direct_io() && (buf_.Capacity() - buf_.CurrentSize()) < left) {
if (buf_.CurrentSize() > 0) {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = Flush(op_rate_limiter_priority);
if (!s.ok()) {
return s;
}
}
assert(buf_.CurrentSize() == 0);
}
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
if (perform_data_verification_ && buffered_data_with_checksum_ &&
crc32c_checksum != 0) {
// Since we want to use the checksum of the input data, we cannot break it
// into several pieces. We will only write them in the buffer when buffer
// size is enough. Otherwise, we will directly write it down.
if (use_direct_io() || (buf_.Capacity() - buf_.CurrentSize()) >= left) {
if ((buf_.Capacity() - buf_.CurrentSize()) >= left) {
size_t appended = buf_.Append(src, left);
if (appended != left) {
s = IOStatus::Corruption("Write buffer append failure");
}
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ = crc32c::Crc32cCombine(
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_, crc32c_checksum, appended);
} else {
while (left > 0) {
size_t appended = buf_.Append(src, left);
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ =
crc32c::Extend(buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_, src, appended);
left -= appended;
src += appended;
if (left > 0) {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = Flush(op_rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
if (!s.ok()) {
break;
}
}
}
}
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
} else {
assert(buf_.CurrentSize() == 0);
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ = crc32c_checksum;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = WriteBufferedWithChecksum(src, left, op_rate_limiter_priority);
}
} else {
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
// In this case, either we do not need to do the data verification or
// caller does not provide the checksum of the data (crc32c_checksum = 0).
//
// We never write directly to disk with direct I/O on.
// or we simply use it for its original purpose to accumulate many small
// chunks
if (use_direct_io() || (buf_.Capacity() >= left)) {
while (left > 0) {
size_t appended = buf_.Append(src, left);
if (perform_data_verification_ && buffered_data_with_checksum_) {
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ =
crc32c::Extend(buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_, src, appended);
}
left -= appended;
src += appended;
if (left > 0) {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = Flush(op_rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
if (!s.ok()) {
break;
}
}
}
} else {
// Writing directly to file bypassing the buffer
assert(buf_.CurrentSize() == 0);
if (perform_data_verification_ && buffered_data_with_checksum_) {
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ = crc32c::Value(src, left);
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = WriteBufferedWithChecksum(src, left, op_rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
} else {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = WriteBuffered(src, left, op_rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
}
}
}
TEST_KILL_RANDOM("WritableFileWriter::Append:1");
if (s.ok()) {
filesize_ += data.size();
}
return s;
}
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::Pad(const size_t pad_bytes,
Env::IOPriority op_rate_limiter_priority) {
assert(pad_bytes < kDefaultPageSize);
size_t left = pad_bytes;
size_t cap = buf_.Capacity() - buf_.CurrentSize();
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
size_t pad_start = buf_.CurrentSize();
// Assume pad_bytes is small compared to buf_ capacity. So we always
// use buf_ rather than write directly to file in certain cases like
// Append() does.
while (left) {
size_t append_bytes = std::min(cap, left);
buf_.PadWith(append_bytes, 0);
left -= append_bytes;
if (left > 0) {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
IOStatus s = Flush(op_rate_limiter_priority);
if (!s.ok()) {
return s;
}
}
cap = buf_.Capacity() - buf_.CurrentSize();
}
pending_sync_ = true;
filesize_ += pad_bytes;
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
if (perform_data_verification_) {
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ =
crc32c::Extend(buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_,
buf_.BufferStart() + pad_start, pad_bytes);
}
return IOStatus::OK();
}
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::Close() {
// Do not quit immediately on failure the file MUST be closed
IOStatus s;
// Possible to close it twice now as we MUST close
// in __dtor, simply flushing is not enough
// Windows when pre-allocating does not fill with zeros
// also with unbuffered access we also set the end of data.
if (writable_file_.get() == nullptr) {
return s;
}
s = Flush(); // flush cache to OS
IOStatus interim;
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
io_options.rate_limiter_priority = writable_file_->GetIOPriority();
// In direct I/O mode we write whole pages so
// we need to let the file know where data ends.
if (use_direct_io()) {
{
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
}
#endif
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
interim = writable_file_->Truncate(filesize_, io_options, nullptr);
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = FileOperationInfo::FinishNow();
NotifyOnFileTruncateFinish(start_ts, finish_ts, s);
if (!interim.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(interim, FileOperationType::kTruncate, file_name(),
filesize_);
}
}
#endif
}
if (interim.ok()) {
{
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
}
#endif
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
interim = writable_file_->Fsync(io_options, nullptr);
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = FileOperationInfo::FinishNow();
NotifyOnFileSyncFinish(start_ts, finish_ts, s,
FileOperationType::kFsync);
if (!interim.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(interim, FileOperationType::kFsync, file_name());
}
}
#endif
}
}
if (!interim.ok() && s.ok()) {
s = interim;
}
}
TEST_KILL_RANDOM("WritableFileWriter::Close:0");
{
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
}
#endif
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
interim = writable_file_->Close(io_options, nullptr);
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = FileOperationInfo::FinishNow();
NotifyOnFileCloseFinish(start_ts, finish_ts, s);
if (!interim.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(interim, FileOperationType::kClose, file_name());
}
}
#endif
}
if (!interim.ok() && s.ok()) {
s = interim;
}
writable_file_.reset();
TEST_KILL_RANDOM("WritableFileWriter::Close:1");
if (s.ok() && checksum_generator_ != nullptr && !checksum_finalized_) {
checksum_generator_->Finalize();
checksum_finalized_ = true;
}
return s;
}
// write out the cached data to the OS cache or storage if direct I/O
// enabled
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::Flush(Env::IOPriority op_rate_limiter_priority) {
IOStatus s;
TEST_KILL_RANDOM_WITH_WEIGHT("WritableFileWriter::Flush:0", REDUCE_ODDS2);
if (buf_.CurrentSize() > 0) {
if (use_direct_io()) {
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (pending_sync_) {
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
if (perform_data_verification_ && buffered_data_with_checksum_) {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = WriteDirectWithChecksum(op_rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
} else {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = WriteDirect(op_rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
}
}
#endif // !ROCKSDB_LITE
} else {
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
if (perform_data_verification_ && buffered_data_with_checksum_) {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = WriteBufferedWithChecksum(buf_.BufferStart(), buf_.CurrentSize(),
op_rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
} else {
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
s = WriteBuffered(buf_.BufferStart(), buf_.CurrentSize(),
op_rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
}
}
if (!s.ok()) {
return s;
}
}
{
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
}
#endif
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority(
writable_file_->GetIOPriority(), op_rate_limiter_priority,
io_options.rate_limiter_priority);
s = writable_file_->Flush(io_options, nullptr);
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
NotifyOnFileFlushFinish(start_ts, finish_ts, s);
if (!s.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(s, FileOperationType::kFlush, file_name());
}
}
#endif
}
if (!s.ok()) {
return s;
}
// sync OS cache to disk for every bytes_per_sync_
// TODO: give log file and sst file different options (log
// files could be potentially cached in OS for their whole
// life time, thus we might not want to flush at all).
// We try to avoid sync to the last 1MB of data. For two reasons:
// (1) avoid rewrite the same page that is modified later.
// (2) for older version of OS, write can block while writing out
// the page.
// Xfs does neighbor page flushing outside of the specified ranges. We
// need to make sure sync range is far from the write offset.
if (!use_direct_io() && bytes_per_sync_) {
const uint64_t kBytesNotSyncRange =
1024 * 1024; // recent 1MB is not synced.
const uint64_t kBytesAlignWhenSync = 4 * 1024; // Align 4KB.
if (filesize_ > kBytesNotSyncRange) {
uint64_t offset_sync_to = filesize_ - kBytesNotSyncRange;
offset_sync_to -= offset_sync_to % kBytesAlignWhenSync;
assert(offset_sync_to >= last_sync_size_);
if (offset_sync_to > 0 &&
offset_sync_to - last_sync_size_ >= bytes_per_sync_) {
s = RangeSync(last_sync_size_, offset_sync_to - last_sync_size_);
last_sync_size_ = offset_sync_to;
}
}
}
return s;
}
std::string WritableFileWriter::GetFileChecksum() {
if (checksum_generator_ != nullptr) {
assert(checksum_finalized_);
return checksum_generator_->GetChecksum();
} else {
return kUnknownFileChecksum;
}
}
const char* WritableFileWriter::GetFileChecksumFuncName() const {
if (checksum_generator_ != nullptr) {
return checksum_generator_->Name();
} else {
return kUnknownFileChecksumFuncName;
}
}
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::Sync(bool use_fsync) {
IOStatus s = Flush();
if (!s.ok()) {
return s;
}
TEST_KILL_RANDOM("WritableFileWriter::Sync:0");
if (!use_direct_io() && pending_sync_) {
s = SyncInternal(use_fsync);
if (!s.ok()) {
return s;
}
}
TEST_KILL_RANDOM("WritableFileWriter::Sync:1");
pending_sync_ = false;
return IOStatus::OK();
}
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::SyncWithoutFlush(bool use_fsync) {
if (!writable_file_->IsSyncThreadSafe()) {
return IOStatus::NotSupported(
"Can't WritableFileWriter::SyncWithoutFlush() because "
"WritableFile::IsSyncThreadSafe() is false");
}
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::SyncWithoutFlush:1");
IOStatus s = SyncInternal(use_fsync);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::SyncWithoutFlush:2");
return s;
}
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::SyncInternal(bool use_fsync) {
IOStatus s;
IOSTATS_TIMER_GUARD(fsync_nanos);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::SyncInternal:0");
auto prev_perf_level = GetPerfLevel();
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOSTATS_CPU_TIMER_GUARD(cpu_write_nanos, clock_);
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
}
#endif
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
io_options.rate_limiter_priority = writable_file_->GetIOPriority();
if (use_fsync) {
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
s = writable_file_->Fsync(io_options, nullptr);
} else {
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
s = writable_file_->Sync(io_options, nullptr);
}
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
NotifyOnFileSyncFinish(
start_ts, finish_ts, s,
use_fsync ? FileOperationType::kFsync : FileOperationType::kSync);
if (!s.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(
s, (use_fsync ? FileOperationType::kFsync : FileOperationType::kSync),
file_name());
}
}
#endif
SetPerfLevel(prev_perf_level);
return s;
}
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::RangeSync(uint64_t offset, uint64_t nbytes) {
IOSTATS_TIMER_GUARD(range_sync_nanos);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::RangeSync:0");
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
}
#endif
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
io_options.rate_limiter_priority = writable_file_->GetIOPriority();
IOStatus s = writable_file_->RangeSync(offset, nbytes, io_options, nullptr);
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
NotifyOnFileRangeSyncFinish(offset, nbytes, start_ts, finish_ts, s);
if (!s.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(s, FileOperationType::kRangeSync, file_name(), nbytes,
offset);
}
}
#endif
return s;
}
// This method writes to disk the specified data and makes use of the rate
// limiter if available
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::WriteBuffered(
const char* data, size_t size, Env::IOPriority op_rate_limiter_priority) {
IOStatus s;
assert(!use_direct_io());
const char* src = data;
size_t left = size;
DataVerificationInfo v_info;
char checksum_buf[sizeof(uint32_t)];
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
Env::IOPriority rate_limiter_priority_used =
WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority(
writable_file_->GetIOPriority(), op_rate_limiter_priority,
io_options.rate_limiter_priority);
while (left > 0) {
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
size_t allowed = left;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
if (rate_limiter_ != nullptr &&
rate_limiter_priority_used != Env::IO_TOTAL) {
allowed = rate_limiter_->RequestToken(left, 0 /* alignment */,
rate_limiter_priority_used, stats_,
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
}
{
IOSTATS_TIMER_GUARD(write_nanos);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::Flush:BeforeAppend");
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
uint64_t old_size = writable_file_->GetFileSize(io_options, nullptr);
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
old_size = next_write_offset_;
}
#endif
{
auto prev_perf_level = GetPerfLevel();
IOSTATS_CPU_TIMER_GUARD(cpu_write_nanos, clock_);
if (perform_data_verification_) {
Crc32cHandoffChecksumCalculation(src, allowed, checksum_buf);
v_info.checksum = Slice(checksum_buf, sizeof(uint32_t));
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
s = writable_file_->Append(Slice(src, allowed), io_options, v_info,
nullptr);
} else {
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
s = writable_file_->Append(Slice(src, allowed), io_options, nullptr);
}
Fix a bug causing duplicate trailing entries in WritableFile (buffered IO) (#9236) Summary: `db_stress` is a user of `FaultInjectionTestFS`. After injecting a write error, `db_stress` probabilistically determins data drop (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/db_stress_tool/db_stress_test_base.cc#L2615:L2619). In some of our recent runs of `db_stress`, we found duplicate trailing entries corresponding to file trivial move in the MANIFEST, causing the recovery to fail, because the file move operation is not idempotent: you cannot delete a file from a given level twice. Investigation suggests that data buffering in both `WritableFileWriter` and `FaultInjectionTestFS` may be the root cause. WritableFileWriter buffers data to write in a memory buffer, `WritableFileWriter::buf_`. After each `WriteBuffered()`/`WriteBufferedWithChecksum()` succeeds, the `buf_` is cleared. If the underlying file `WritableFileWriter::writable_file_` is opened in buffered IO mode, then `FaultInjectionTestFS` buffers data written for each file until next file sync. After an injected error, user of `FaultInjectionFS` can choose to drop some or none of previously buffered data. If `db_stress` does not drop any unsynced data, then such data will still exist in the `FaultInjectionTestFS`'s buffer. Existing implementation of `WritableileWriter::WriteBuffered()` does not clear `buf_` if there is an error. This may lead to the data being buffered two copies: one in `WritableFileWriter`, and another in `FaultInjectionTestFS`. We also know that the `WritableFileWriter` of MANIFEST file will close upon an error. During `Close()`, it will flush the content in `buf_`. If no write error is injected to `FaultInjectionTestFS` this time, then we end up with two copies of the data appended to the file. To fix, we clear the `WritableFileWriter::buf_` upon failure as well. We focus this PR on files opened in non-direct mode. This PR includes a unit test to reproduce a case when write error injection to `WritableFile` can cause duplicate trailing entries. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9236 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: zhichao-cao Differential Revision: D33033984 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: ebfa5a0db8cbf1ed73100528b34fcba543c5db31
3 years ago
if (!s.ok()) {
// If writable_file_->Append() failed, then the data may or may not
// exist in the underlying memory buffer, OS page cache, remote file
// system's buffer, etc. If WritableFileWriter keeps the data in
// buf_, then a future Close() or write retry may send the data to
// the underlying file again. If the data does exist in the
// underlying buffer and gets written to the file eventually despite
// returning error, the file may end up with two duplicate pieces of
// data. Therefore, clear the buf_ at the WritableFileWriter layer
// and let caller determine error handling.
buf_.Size(0);
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ = 0;
}
SetPerfLevel(prev_perf_level);
}
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
NotifyOnFileWriteFinish(old_size, allowed, start_ts, finish_ts, s);
if (!s.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(s, FileOperationType::kAppend, file_name(), allowed,
old_size);
}
}
#endif
if (!s.ok()) {
return s;
}
}
IOSTATS_ADD(bytes_written, allowed);
TEST_KILL_RANDOM("WritableFileWriter::WriteBuffered:0");
left -= allowed;
src += allowed;
}
buf_.Size(0);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ = 0;
return s;
}
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::WriteBufferedWithChecksum(
const char* data, size_t size, Env::IOPriority op_rate_limiter_priority) {
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
IOStatus s;
assert(!use_direct_io());
assert(perform_data_verification_ && buffered_data_with_checksum_);
const char* src = data;
size_t left = size;
DataVerificationInfo v_info;
char checksum_buf[sizeof(uint32_t)];
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
Env::IOPriority rate_limiter_priority_used =
WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority(
writable_file_->GetIOPriority(), op_rate_limiter_priority,
io_options.rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
// Check how much is allowed. Here, we loop until the rate limiter allows to
// write the entire buffer.
// TODO: need to be improved since it sort of defeats the purpose of the rate
// limiter
size_t data_size = left;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
if (rate_limiter_ != nullptr && rate_limiter_priority_used != Env::IO_TOTAL) {
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
while (data_size > 0) {
size_t tmp_size;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
tmp_size = rate_limiter_->RequestToken(data_size, buf_.Alignment(),
rate_limiter_priority_used, stats_,
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
data_size -= tmp_size;
}
}
{
IOSTATS_TIMER_GUARD(write_nanos);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::Flush:BeforeAppend");
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
uint64_t old_size = writable_file_->GetFileSize(io_options, nullptr);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
old_size = next_write_offset_;
}
#endif
{
auto prev_perf_level = GetPerfLevel();
IOSTATS_CPU_TIMER_GUARD(cpu_write_nanos, clock_);
EncodeFixed32(checksum_buf, buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_);
v_info.checksum = Slice(checksum_buf, sizeof(uint32_t));
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
s = writable_file_->Append(Slice(src, left), io_options, v_info, nullptr);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
SetPerfLevel(prev_perf_level);
}
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
NotifyOnFileWriteFinish(old_size, left, start_ts, finish_ts, s);
if (!s.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(s, FileOperationType::kAppend, file_name(), left,
old_size);
}
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
}
#endif
if (!s.ok()) {
Fix a bug causing duplicate trailing entries in WritableFile (buffered IO) (#9236) Summary: `db_stress` is a user of `FaultInjectionTestFS`. After injecting a write error, `db_stress` probabilistically determins data drop (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/db_stress_tool/db_stress_test_base.cc#L2615:L2619). In some of our recent runs of `db_stress`, we found duplicate trailing entries corresponding to file trivial move in the MANIFEST, causing the recovery to fail, because the file move operation is not idempotent: you cannot delete a file from a given level twice. Investigation suggests that data buffering in both `WritableFileWriter` and `FaultInjectionTestFS` may be the root cause. WritableFileWriter buffers data to write in a memory buffer, `WritableFileWriter::buf_`. After each `WriteBuffered()`/`WriteBufferedWithChecksum()` succeeds, the `buf_` is cleared. If the underlying file `WritableFileWriter::writable_file_` is opened in buffered IO mode, then `FaultInjectionTestFS` buffers data written for each file until next file sync. After an injected error, user of `FaultInjectionFS` can choose to drop some or none of previously buffered data. If `db_stress` does not drop any unsynced data, then such data will still exist in the `FaultInjectionTestFS`'s buffer. Existing implementation of `WritableileWriter::WriteBuffered()` does not clear `buf_` if there is an error. This may lead to the data being buffered two copies: one in `WritableFileWriter`, and another in `FaultInjectionTestFS`. We also know that the `WritableFileWriter` of MANIFEST file will close upon an error. During `Close()`, it will flush the content in `buf_`. If no write error is injected to `FaultInjectionTestFS` this time, then we end up with two copies of the data appended to the file. To fix, we clear the `WritableFileWriter::buf_` upon failure as well. We focus this PR on files opened in non-direct mode. This PR includes a unit test to reproduce a case when write error injection to `WritableFile` can cause duplicate trailing entries. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9236 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: zhichao-cao Differential Revision: D33033984 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: ebfa5a0db8cbf1ed73100528b34fcba543c5db31
3 years ago
// If writable_file_->Append() failed, then the data may or may not
// exist in the underlying memory buffer, OS page cache, remote file
// system's buffer, etc. If WritableFileWriter keeps the data in
// buf_, then a future Close() or write retry may send the data to
// the underlying file again. If the data does exist in the
// underlying buffer and gets written to the file eventually despite
// returning error, the file may end up with two duplicate pieces of
// data. Therefore, clear the buf_ at the WritableFileWriter layer
// and let caller determine error handling.
buf_.Size(0);
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ = 0;
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
return s;
}
}
IOSTATS_ADD(bytes_written, left);
TEST_KILL_RANDOM("WritableFileWriter::WriteBuffered:0");
// Buffer write is successful, reset the buffer current size to 0 and reset
// the corresponding checksum value
buf_.Size(0);
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ = 0;
return s;
}
void WritableFileWriter::UpdateFileChecksum(const Slice& data) {
if (checksum_generator_ != nullptr) {
checksum_generator_->Update(data.data(), data.size());
}
}
// Currently, crc32c checksum is used to calculate the checksum value of the
// content in the input buffer for handoff. In the future, the checksum might be
// calculated from the existing crc32c checksums of the in WAl and Manifest
// records, or even SST file blocks.
// TODO: effectively use the existing checksum of the data being writing to
// generate the crc32c checksum instead of a raw calculation.
void WritableFileWriter::Crc32cHandoffChecksumCalculation(const char* data,
size_t size,
char* buf) {
uint32_t v_crc32c = crc32c::Extend(0, data, size);
EncodeFixed32(buf, v_crc32c);
}
// This flushes the accumulated data in the buffer. We pad data with zeros if
// necessary to the whole page.
// However, during automatic flushes padding would not be necessary.
// We always use RateLimiter if available. We move (Refit) any buffer bytes
// that are left over the
// whole number of pages to be written again on the next flush because we can
// only write on aligned
// offsets.
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::WriteDirect(
Env::IOPriority op_rate_limiter_priority) {
assert(use_direct_io());
IOStatus s;
const size_t alignment = buf_.Alignment();
assert((next_write_offset_ % alignment) == 0);
// Calculate whole page final file advance if all writes succeed
Fix a bug causing duplicate trailing entries in WritableFile (buffered IO) (#9236) Summary: `db_stress` is a user of `FaultInjectionTestFS`. After injecting a write error, `db_stress` probabilistically determins data drop (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/db_stress_tool/db_stress_test_base.cc#L2615:L2619). In some of our recent runs of `db_stress`, we found duplicate trailing entries corresponding to file trivial move in the MANIFEST, causing the recovery to fail, because the file move operation is not idempotent: you cannot delete a file from a given level twice. Investigation suggests that data buffering in both `WritableFileWriter` and `FaultInjectionTestFS` may be the root cause. WritableFileWriter buffers data to write in a memory buffer, `WritableFileWriter::buf_`. After each `WriteBuffered()`/`WriteBufferedWithChecksum()` succeeds, the `buf_` is cleared. If the underlying file `WritableFileWriter::writable_file_` is opened in buffered IO mode, then `FaultInjectionTestFS` buffers data written for each file until next file sync. After an injected error, user of `FaultInjectionFS` can choose to drop some or none of previously buffered data. If `db_stress` does not drop any unsynced data, then such data will still exist in the `FaultInjectionTestFS`'s buffer. Existing implementation of `WritableileWriter::WriteBuffered()` does not clear `buf_` if there is an error. This may lead to the data being buffered two copies: one in `WritableFileWriter`, and another in `FaultInjectionTestFS`. We also know that the `WritableFileWriter` of MANIFEST file will close upon an error. During `Close()`, it will flush the content in `buf_`. If no write error is injected to `FaultInjectionTestFS` this time, then we end up with two copies of the data appended to the file. To fix, we clear the `WritableFileWriter::buf_` upon failure as well. We focus this PR on files opened in non-direct mode. This PR includes a unit test to reproduce a case when write error injection to `WritableFile` can cause duplicate trailing entries. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9236 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: zhichao-cao Differential Revision: D33033984 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: ebfa5a0db8cbf1ed73100528b34fcba543c5db31
3 years ago
const size_t file_advance =
TruncateToPageBoundary(alignment, buf_.CurrentSize());
// Calculate the leftover tail, we write it here padded with zeros BUT we
Fix a bug causing duplicate trailing entries in WritableFile (buffered IO) (#9236) Summary: `db_stress` is a user of `FaultInjectionTestFS`. After injecting a write error, `db_stress` probabilistically determins data drop (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/db_stress_tool/db_stress_test_base.cc#L2615:L2619). In some of our recent runs of `db_stress`, we found duplicate trailing entries corresponding to file trivial move in the MANIFEST, causing the recovery to fail, because the file move operation is not idempotent: you cannot delete a file from a given level twice. Investigation suggests that data buffering in both `WritableFileWriter` and `FaultInjectionTestFS` may be the root cause. WritableFileWriter buffers data to write in a memory buffer, `WritableFileWriter::buf_`. After each `WriteBuffered()`/`WriteBufferedWithChecksum()` succeeds, the `buf_` is cleared. If the underlying file `WritableFileWriter::writable_file_` is opened in buffered IO mode, then `FaultInjectionTestFS` buffers data written for each file until next file sync. After an injected error, user of `FaultInjectionFS` can choose to drop some or none of previously buffered data. If `db_stress` does not drop any unsynced data, then such data will still exist in the `FaultInjectionTestFS`'s buffer. Existing implementation of `WritableileWriter::WriteBuffered()` does not clear `buf_` if there is an error. This may lead to the data being buffered two copies: one in `WritableFileWriter`, and another in `FaultInjectionTestFS`. We also know that the `WritableFileWriter` of MANIFEST file will close upon an error. During `Close()`, it will flush the content in `buf_`. If no write error is injected to `FaultInjectionTestFS` this time, then we end up with two copies of the data appended to the file. To fix, we clear the `WritableFileWriter::buf_` upon failure as well. We focus this PR on files opened in non-direct mode. This PR includes a unit test to reproduce a case when write error injection to `WritableFile` can cause duplicate trailing entries. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9236 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: zhichao-cao Differential Revision: D33033984 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: ebfa5a0db8cbf1ed73100528b34fcba543c5db31
3 years ago
// will write it again in the future either on Close() OR when the current
// whole page fills out.
const size_t leftover_tail = buf_.CurrentSize() - file_advance;
// Round up and pad
buf_.PadToAlignmentWith(0);
const char* src = buf_.BufferStart();
uint64_t write_offset = next_write_offset_;
size_t left = buf_.CurrentSize();
DataVerificationInfo v_info;
char checksum_buf[sizeof(uint32_t)];
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
Env::IOPriority rate_limiter_priority_used =
WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority(
writable_file_->GetIOPriority(), op_rate_limiter_priority,
io_options.rate_limiter_priority);
while (left > 0) {
// Check how much is allowed
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
size_t size = left;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
if (rate_limiter_ != nullptr &&
rate_limiter_priority_used != Env::IO_TOTAL) {
size = rate_limiter_->RequestToken(left, buf_.Alignment(),
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
rate_limiter_priority_used, stats_,
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
}
{
IOSTATS_TIMER_GUARD(write_nanos);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::Flush:BeforeAppend");
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
}
// direct writes must be positional
if (perform_data_verification_) {
Crc32cHandoffChecksumCalculation(src, size, checksum_buf);
v_info.checksum = Slice(checksum_buf, sizeof(uint32_t));
s = writable_file_->PositionedAppend(Slice(src, size), write_offset,
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
io_options, v_info, nullptr);
} else {
s = writable_file_->PositionedAppend(Slice(src, size), write_offset,
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
io_options, nullptr);
}
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
NotifyOnFileWriteFinish(write_offset, size, start_ts, finish_ts, s);
if (!s.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(s, FileOperationType::kPositionedAppend, file_name(),
size, write_offset);
}
}
if (!s.ok()) {
buf_.Size(file_advance + leftover_tail);
return s;
}
}
IOSTATS_ADD(bytes_written, size);
left -= size;
src += size;
write_offset += size;
assert((next_write_offset_ % alignment) == 0);
}
if (s.ok()) {
// Move the tail to the beginning of the buffer
// This never happens during normal Append but rather during
// explicit call to Flush()/Sync() or Close()
buf_.RefitTail(file_advance, leftover_tail);
// This is where we start writing next time which may or not be
// the actual file size on disk. They match if the buffer size
// is a multiple of whole pages otherwise filesize_ is leftover_tail
// behind
next_write_offset_ += file_advance;
}
return s;
}
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
IOStatus WritableFileWriter::WriteDirectWithChecksum(
Env::IOPriority op_rate_limiter_priority) {
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
assert(use_direct_io());
assert(perform_data_verification_ && buffered_data_with_checksum_);
IOStatus s;
const size_t alignment = buf_.Alignment();
assert((next_write_offset_ % alignment) == 0);
// Calculate whole page final file advance if all writes succeed
Fix a bug causing duplicate trailing entries in WritableFile (buffered IO) (#9236) Summary: `db_stress` is a user of `FaultInjectionTestFS`. After injecting a write error, `db_stress` probabilistically determins data drop (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/db_stress_tool/db_stress_test_base.cc#L2615:L2619). In some of our recent runs of `db_stress`, we found duplicate trailing entries corresponding to file trivial move in the MANIFEST, causing the recovery to fail, because the file move operation is not idempotent: you cannot delete a file from a given level twice. Investigation suggests that data buffering in both `WritableFileWriter` and `FaultInjectionTestFS` may be the root cause. WritableFileWriter buffers data to write in a memory buffer, `WritableFileWriter::buf_`. After each `WriteBuffered()`/`WriteBufferedWithChecksum()` succeeds, the `buf_` is cleared. If the underlying file `WritableFileWriter::writable_file_` is opened in buffered IO mode, then `FaultInjectionTestFS` buffers data written for each file until next file sync. After an injected error, user of `FaultInjectionFS` can choose to drop some or none of previously buffered data. If `db_stress` does not drop any unsynced data, then such data will still exist in the `FaultInjectionTestFS`'s buffer. Existing implementation of `WritableileWriter::WriteBuffered()` does not clear `buf_` if there is an error. This may lead to the data being buffered two copies: one in `WritableFileWriter`, and another in `FaultInjectionTestFS`. We also know that the `WritableFileWriter` of MANIFEST file will close upon an error. During `Close()`, it will flush the content in `buf_`. If no write error is injected to `FaultInjectionTestFS` this time, then we end up with two copies of the data appended to the file. To fix, we clear the `WritableFileWriter::buf_` upon failure as well. We focus this PR on files opened in non-direct mode. This PR includes a unit test to reproduce a case when write error injection to `WritableFile` can cause duplicate trailing entries. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9236 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: zhichao-cao Differential Revision: D33033984 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: ebfa5a0db8cbf1ed73100528b34fcba543c5db31
3 years ago
const size_t file_advance =
TruncateToPageBoundary(alignment, buf_.CurrentSize());
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
// Calculate the leftover tail, we write it here padded with zeros BUT we
Fix a bug causing duplicate trailing entries in WritableFile (buffered IO) (#9236) Summary: `db_stress` is a user of `FaultInjectionTestFS`. After injecting a write error, `db_stress` probabilistically determins data drop (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/db_stress_tool/db_stress_test_base.cc#L2615:L2619). In some of our recent runs of `db_stress`, we found duplicate trailing entries corresponding to file trivial move in the MANIFEST, causing the recovery to fail, because the file move operation is not idempotent: you cannot delete a file from a given level twice. Investigation suggests that data buffering in both `WritableFileWriter` and `FaultInjectionTestFS` may be the root cause. WritableFileWriter buffers data to write in a memory buffer, `WritableFileWriter::buf_`. After each `WriteBuffered()`/`WriteBufferedWithChecksum()` succeeds, the `buf_` is cleared. If the underlying file `WritableFileWriter::writable_file_` is opened in buffered IO mode, then `FaultInjectionTestFS` buffers data written for each file until next file sync. After an injected error, user of `FaultInjectionFS` can choose to drop some or none of previously buffered data. If `db_stress` does not drop any unsynced data, then such data will still exist in the `FaultInjectionTestFS`'s buffer. Existing implementation of `WritableileWriter::WriteBuffered()` does not clear `buf_` if there is an error. This may lead to the data being buffered two copies: one in `WritableFileWriter`, and another in `FaultInjectionTestFS`. We also know that the `WritableFileWriter` of MANIFEST file will close upon an error. During `Close()`, it will flush the content in `buf_`. If no write error is injected to `FaultInjectionTestFS` this time, then we end up with two copies of the data appended to the file. To fix, we clear the `WritableFileWriter::buf_` upon failure as well. We focus this PR on files opened in non-direct mode. This PR includes a unit test to reproduce a case when write error injection to `WritableFile` can cause duplicate trailing entries. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9236 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: zhichao-cao Differential Revision: D33033984 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: ebfa5a0db8cbf1ed73100528b34fcba543c5db31
3 years ago
// will write it again in the future either on Close() OR when the current
// whole page fills out.
const size_t leftover_tail = buf_.CurrentSize() - file_advance;
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
// Round up, pad, and combine the checksum.
size_t last_cur_size = buf_.CurrentSize();
buf_.PadToAlignmentWith(0);
size_t padded_size = buf_.CurrentSize() - last_cur_size;
const char* padded_start = buf_.BufferStart() + last_cur_size;
uint32_t padded_checksum = crc32c::Value(padded_start, padded_size);
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ = crc32c::Crc32cCombine(
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_, padded_checksum, padded_size);
const char* src = buf_.BufferStart();
uint64_t write_offset = next_write_offset_;
size_t left = buf_.CurrentSize();
DataVerificationInfo v_info;
char checksum_buf[sizeof(uint32_t)];
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
IOOptions io_options;
Env::IOPriority rate_limiter_priority_used =
WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority(
writable_file_->GetIOPriority(), op_rate_limiter_priority,
io_options.rate_limiter_priority);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
// Check how much is allowed. Here, we loop until the rate limiter allows to
// write the entire buffer.
// TODO: need to be improved since it sort of defeats the purpose of the rate
// limiter
size_t data_size = left;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
if (rate_limiter_ != nullptr && rate_limiter_priority_used != Env::IO_TOTAL) {
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
while (data_size > 0) {
size_t size;
size = rate_limiter_->RequestToken(data_size, buf_.Alignment(),
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
rate_limiter_priority_used, stats_,
RateLimiter::OpType::kWrite);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
data_size -= size;
}
}
{
IOSTATS_TIMER_GUARD(write_nanos);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("WritableFileWriter::Flush:BeforeAppend");
FileOperationInfo::StartTimePoint start_ts;
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
start_ts = FileOperationInfo::StartNow();
}
// direct writes must be positional
EncodeFixed32(checksum_buf, buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_);
v_info.checksum = Slice(checksum_buf, sizeof(uint32_t));
s = writable_file_->PositionedAppend(Slice(src, left), write_offset,
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
io_options, v_info, nullptr);
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
if (ShouldNotifyListeners()) {
auto finish_ts = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
NotifyOnFileWriteFinish(write_offset, left, start_ts, finish_ts, s);
if (!s.ok()) {
NotifyOnIOError(s, FileOperationType::kPositionedAppend, file_name(),
left, write_offset);
}
Using existing crc32c checksum in checksum handoff for Manifest and WAL (#8412) Summary: In PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7523 , checksum handoff is introduced in RocksDB for WAL, Manifest, and SST files. When user enable checksum handoff for a certain type of file, before the data is written to the lower layer storage system, we calculate the checksum (crc32c) of each piece of data and pass the checksum down with the data, such that data verification can be down by the lower layer storage system if it has the capability. However, it cannot cover the whole lifetime of the data in the memory and also it potentially introduces extra checksum calculation overhead. In this PR, we introduce a new interface in WritableFileWriter::Append, which allows the caller be able to pass the data and the checksum (crc32c) together. In this way, WritableFileWriter can directly use the pass-in checksum (crc32c) to generate the checksum of data being passed down to the storage system. It saves the calculation overhead and achieves higher protection coverage. When a new checksum is added with the data, we use Crc32cCombine https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8305 to combine the existing checksum and the new checksum. To avoid the segmenting of data by rate-limiter before it is stored, rate-limiter is called enough times to accumulate enough credits for a certain write. This design only support Manifest and WAL which use log_writer in the current stage. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8412 Test Plan: make check, add new testing cases. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D29151545 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 75e2278c5126cfd58393c67b1efd18dcc7a30772
3 years ago
}
if (!s.ok()) {
// In this case, we do not change buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ because
// it still aligns with the data in the buffer.
buf_.Size(file_advance + leftover_tail);
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ =
crc32c::Value(buf_.BufferStart(), buf_.CurrentSize());
return s;
}
}
IOSTATS_ADD(bytes_written, left);
assert((next_write_offset_ % alignment) == 0);
if (s.ok()) {
// Move the tail to the beginning of the buffer
// This never happens during normal Append but rather during
// explicit call to Flush()/Sync() or Close(). Also the buffer checksum will
// recalculated accordingly.
buf_.RefitTail(file_advance, leftover_tail);
// Adjust the checksum value to align with the data in the buffer
buffered_data_crc32c_checksum_ =
crc32c::Value(buf_.BufferStart(), buf_.CurrentSize());
// This is where we start writing next time which may or not be
// the actual file size on disk. They match if the buffer size
// is a multiple of whole pages otherwise filesize_ is leftover_tail
// behind
next_write_offset_ += file_advance;
}
return s;
}
#endif // !ROCKSDB_LITE
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
Env::IOPriority WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority(
Env::IOPriority writable_file_io_priority,
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
Env::IOPriority op_rate_limiter_priority,
Env::IOPriority& iooptions_io_priority) {
Env::IOPriority rate_limiter_priority{Env::IO_TOTAL};
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
if (writable_file_io_priority == Env::IO_TOTAL &&
op_rate_limiter_priority == Env::IO_TOTAL) {
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
rate_limiter_priority = Env::IO_TOTAL;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
} else if (writable_file_io_priority == Env::IO_TOTAL) {
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
rate_limiter_priority = op_rate_limiter_priority;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
} else if (op_rate_limiter_priority == Env::IO_TOTAL) {
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
rate_limiter_priority = writable_file_io_priority;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
} else {
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
rate_limiter_priority = op_rate_limiter_priority;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
}
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
iooptions_io_priority = rate_limiter_priority;
return rate_limiter_priority;
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607) Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench ): pre-change: **745752 micros/op**; post-change: **745331 micros/op (regressed by 0.06 %)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f flush_bmk_output.txt flush_bmk_output_2.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -num=1000000 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 -benchmarks=fillseq,flush | egrep 'flush' done > flush_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' flush_bmk_output.txt >> flush_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - flush w/o rate-limiting (see table 4, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch](https://github.com/hx235/rocksdb/commit/ee5c6023a9f6533fab9afdc681568daa21da4953) to augment current db_bench): pre-change: **487512 micros/op**, post-change: **485856 micors/ops (improved by 0.34%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` | table 1 - compact with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 896978 | 16046.9 | 901242 | 15670.9 | 0.475373978 20 | 893718 | 15813 | 886505 | 17544.7 | -0.8070778478 40 | 900426 | 23882.2 | 894958 | 15104.5 | -0.6072681153 80 | 906635 | 21761.5 | 903332 | 23948.3 | -0.3643141948 160 | 898632 | 21098.9 | 907583 | 21145 | 0.9960695813 3.20E+02 | 905252 | 22785.5 | 908106 | 25325.5 | 0.3152713278 6.40E+02 | 905213 | 23598.6 | 906741 | 21370.5 | 0.1688000504 **1.28E+03** | **908316** | **23533.1** | **907350** | **24626.8** | **-0.1063506533** average over #-run | 901896.25 | 21064.9625 | 901977.125 | 20592.025 | 0.008967217682 | table 2 - compact w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 811211 | 26996.7 | 807586 | 28456.4 | -0.4468627768 20 | 815465 | 14803.7 | 814608 | 28719.7 | -0.105093413 40 | 809203 | 26187.1 | 797835 | 25492.1 | -1.404839082 80 | 822088 | 28765.3 | 822192 | 32840.4 | 0.01265071379 160 | 821719 | 36344.7 | 821664 | 29544.9 | -0.006693285661 3.20E+02 | 820921 | 27756.4 | 821403 | 28347.7 | 0.05871454135 **6.40E+02** | **822197** | **28960.6** | **823148** | **30055.1** | **0.1156657103** average over #-run | 8.18E+05 | 2.71E+04 | 8.15E+05 | 2.91E+04 | -0.25 | table 3 - flush with rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 741721 | 11770.8 | 740345 | 5949.76 | -0.1855144994 20 | 735169 | 3561.83 | 743199 | 9755.77 | 1.09226586 40 | 743368 | 8891.03 | 742102 | 8683.22 | -0.1703059588 80 | 742129 | 8148.51 | 743417 | 9631.58| 0.1735547324 160 | 749045 | 9757.21 | 746256 | 9191.86 | -0.3723407806 **3.20E+02** | **745752** | **9819.65** | **745331** | **9840.62** | **-0.0564530836** 6.40E+02 | 749006 | 11080.5 | 748173 | 10578.7 | -0.1112140624 average over #-run | 743741.4286 | 9004.218571 | 744117.5714 | 9090.215714 | 0.05057441238 | table 4 - flush w/o rate-limiting| #-run | (pre-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-change) avg micros/op | std micros/op | change in avg micros/op (%) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 10 | 477283 | 24719.6 | 473864 | 12379 | -0.7163464863 20 | 486743 | 20175.2 | 502296 | 23931.3 | 3.195320734 40 | 482846 | 15309.2 | 489820 | 22259.5 | 1.444352858 80 | 491490 | 21883.1 | 490071 | 23085.7 | -0.2887139108 160 | 493347 | 28074.3 | 483609 | 21211.7 | -1.973864238 **3.20E+02** | **487512** | **21401.5** | **485856** | **22195.2** | **-0.3396839462** 6.40E+02 | 490307 | 25418.6 | 485435 | 22405.2 | -0.9936631539 average over #-run | 4.87E+05 | 2.24E+04 | 4.87E+05 | 2.11E+04 | 0.00E+00 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D34442441 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 4790f13e1e5c0a95ae1d1cc93ffcf69dc6e78bdd
3 years ago
}
Set Write rate limiter priority dynamically and pass it to FS (#9988) Summary: ### Context: Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users. From the RocksDB perspective, there can be two kinds of rate limiters, the internal (native) one and the external one. - The internal (native) rate limiter is introduced in [the wiki](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rate-Limiter). Currently, only IO_LOW and IO_HIGH are used and they are set statically. - For the external rate limiter, in FSWritableFile functions, IOOptions is open for end users to set and get rate_limiter_priority for their own rate limiter. Currently, RocksDB doesn’t pass the rate_limiter_priority through IOOptions to the file system. ### Solution During the User Read, Flush write, Compaction read/write, the WriteController is used to determine whether DB writes are stalled or slowed down. The rate limiter priority (Env::IOPriority) can be determined accordingly. We decided to always pass the priority in IOOptions. What the file system does with it should be a contract between the user and the file system. We would like to set the rate limiter priority at file level, since the Flush/Compaction job level may be too coarse with multiple files and block IO level is too granular. **This PR is for the Write path.** The **Write:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows: | State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled | | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | Flush | IO_HIGH | IO_USER | IO_USER | | Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER | Flush and Compaction writes share the same call path through BlockBaseTableWriter, WritableFileWriter, and FSWritableFile. When a new FSWritableFile object is created, its io_priority_ can be set dynamically based on the state of the WriteController. In WritableFileWriter, before the call sites of FSWritableFile functions, WritableFileWriter::DecideRateLimiterPriority() determines the rate_limiter_priority. The options (IOOptions) argument of FSWritableFile functions will be updated with the rate_limiter_priority. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 Test Plan: Add unit tests. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D36395159 Pulled By: gitbw95 fbshipit-source-id: a7c82fc29759139a1a07ec46c37dbf7e753474cf
2 years ago
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE