|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// This source code is licensed under the BSD-style license found in the
|
|
|
|
// LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. An additional grant
|
|
|
|
// of patent rights can be found in the PATENTS file in the same directory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "table/get_context.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "rocksdb/env.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "rocksdb/merge_operator.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "rocksdb/statistics.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "util/perf_context_imp.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "util/statistics.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace rocksdb {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void appendToReplayLog(std::string* replay_log, ValueType type, Slice value) {
|
|
|
|
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
|
|
|
|
if (replay_log) {
|
|
|
|
if (replay_log->empty()) {
|
|
|
|
// Optimization: in the common case of only one operation in the
|
|
|
|
// log, we allocate the exact amount of space needed.
|
|
|
|
replay_log->reserve(1 + VarintLength(value.size()) + value.size());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
replay_log->push_back(type);
|
|
|
|
PutLengthPrefixedSlice(replay_log, value);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif // ROCKSDB_LITE
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GetContext::GetContext(const Comparator* ucmp,
|
|
|
|
const MergeOperator* merge_operator, Logger* logger,
|
|
|
|
Statistics* statistics, GetState init_state,
|
|
|
|
const Slice& user_key, std::string* ret_value,
|
Use SST files for Transaction conflict detection
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict. This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts. Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.
With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts. This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot. Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).
Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread. Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.
Test Plan: unit tests, db bench
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
9 years ago
|
|
|
bool* value_found, MergeContext* merge_context, Env* env,
|
|
|
|
SequenceNumber* seq)
|
|
|
|
: ucmp_(ucmp),
|
|
|
|
merge_operator_(merge_operator),
|
|
|
|
logger_(logger),
|
|
|
|
statistics_(statistics),
|
|
|
|
state_(init_state),
|
|
|
|
user_key_(user_key),
|
|
|
|
value_(ret_value),
|
|
|
|
value_found_(value_found),
|
|
|
|
merge_context_(merge_context),
|
|
|
|
env_(env),
|
Use SST files for Transaction conflict detection
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict. This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts. Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.
With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts. This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot. Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).
Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread. Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.
Test Plan: unit tests, db bench
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
9 years ago
|
|
|
seq_(seq),
|
|
|
|
replay_log_(nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
if (seq_) {
|
|
|
|
*seq_ = kMaxSequenceNumber;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Called from TableCache::Get and Table::Get when file/block in which
|
|
|
|
// key may exist are not there in TableCache/BlockCache respectively. In this
|
|
|
|
// case we can't guarantee that key does not exist and are not permitted to do
|
|
|
|
// IO to be certain.Set the status=kFound and value_found=false to let the
|
|
|
|
// caller know that key may exist but is not there in memory
|
|
|
|
void GetContext::MarkKeyMayExist() {
|
|
|
|
state_ = kFound;
|
|
|
|
if (value_found_ != nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
*value_found_ = false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Use SST files for Transaction conflict detection
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict. This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts. Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.
With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts. This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot. Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).
Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread. Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.
Test Plan: unit tests, db bench
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
9 years ago
|
|
|
void GetContext::SaveValue(const Slice& value, SequenceNumber seq) {
|
|
|
|
assert(state_ == kNotFound);
|
|
|
|
appendToReplayLog(replay_log_, kTypeValue, value);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state_ = kFound;
|
|
|
|
if (value_ != nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
value_->assign(value.data(), value.size());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool GetContext::SaveValue(const ParsedInternalKey& parsed_key,
|
|
|
|
const Slice& value) {
|
|
|
|
assert((state_ != kMerge && parsed_key.type != kTypeMerge) ||
|
|
|
|
merge_context_ != nullptr);
|
|
|
|
if (ucmp_->Equal(parsed_key.user_key, user_key_)) {
|
|
|
|
appendToReplayLog(replay_log_, parsed_key.type, value);
|
|
|
|
|
Use SST files for Transaction conflict detection
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict. This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts. Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.
With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts. This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot. Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).
Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread. Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.
Test Plan: unit tests, db bench
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
9 years ago
|
|
|
if (seq_ != nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
// Set the sequence number if it is uninitialized
|
|
|
|
if (*seq_ == kMaxSequenceNumber) {
|
|
|
|
*seq_ = parsed_key.sequence;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Key matches. Process it
|
|
|
|
switch (parsed_key.type) {
|
|
|
|
case kTypeValue:
|
|
|
|
assert(state_ == kNotFound || state_ == kMerge);
|
|
|
|
if (kNotFound == state_) {
|
|
|
|
state_ = kFound;
|
|
|
|
if (value_ != nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
value_->assign(value.data(), value.size());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else if (kMerge == state_) {
|
|
|
|
assert(merge_operator_ != nullptr);
|
|
|
|
state_ = kFound;
|
|
|
|
if (value_ != nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
bool merge_success = false;
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
StopWatchNano timer(env_, statistics_ != nullptr);
|
|
|
|
PERF_TIMER_GUARD(merge_operator_time_nanos);
|
|
|
|
merge_success = merge_operator_->FullMerge(
|
|
|
|
user_key_, &value, merge_context_->GetOperands(), value_,
|
|
|
|
logger_);
|
|
|
|
RecordTick(statistics_, MERGE_OPERATION_TOTAL_TIME,
|
|
|
|
timer.ElapsedNanosSafe());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!merge_success) {
|
|
|
|
RecordTick(statistics_, NUMBER_MERGE_FAILURES);
|
|
|
|
state_ = kCorrupt;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case kTypeDeletion:
|
Support for SingleDelete()
Summary:
This patch fixes #7460559. It introduces SingleDelete as a new database
operation. This operation can be used to delete keys that were never
overwritten (no put following another put of the same key). If an overwritten
key is single deleted the behavior is undefined. Single deletion of a
non-existent key has no effect but multiple consecutive single deletions are
not allowed (see limitations).
In contrast to the conventional Delete() operation, the deletion entry is
removed along with the value when the two are lined up in a compaction. Note:
The semantics are similar to @igor's prototype that allowed to have this
behavior on the granularity of a column family (
https://reviews.facebook.net/D42093 ). This new patch, however, is more
aggressive when it comes to removing tombstones: It removes the SingleDelete
together with the value whenever there is no snapshot between them while the
older patch only did this when the sequence number of the deletion was older
than the earliest snapshot.
Most of the complex additions are in the Compaction Iterator, all other changes
should be relatively straightforward. The patch also includes basic support for
single deletions in db_stress and db_bench.
Limitations:
- Not compatible with cuckoo hash tables
- Single deletions cannot be used in combination with merges and normal
deletions on the same key (other keys are not affected by this)
- Consecutive single deletions are currently not allowed (and older version of
this patch supported this so it could be resurrected if needed)
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, rven, anthony, yoshinorim, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43179
9 years ago
|
|
|
case kTypeSingleDeletion:
|
|
|
|
// TODO(noetzli): Verify correctness once merge of single-deletes
|
|
|
|
// is supported
|
|
|
|
assert(state_ == kNotFound || state_ == kMerge);
|
|
|
|
if (kNotFound == state_) {
|
|
|
|
state_ = kDeleted;
|
|
|
|
} else if (kMerge == state_) {
|
|
|
|
state_ = kFound;
|
|
|
|
if (value_ != nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
bool merge_success = false;
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
StopWatchNano timer(env_, statistics_ != nullptr);
|
|
|
|
PERF_TIMER_GUARD(merge_operator_time_nanos);
|
|
|
|
merge_success = merge_operator_->FullMerge(
|
|
|
|
user_key_, nullptr, merge_context_->GetOperands(), value_,
|
|
|
|
logger_);
|
|
|
|
RecordTick(statistics_, MERGE_OPERATION_TOTAL_TIME,
|
|
|
|
timer.ElapsedNanosSafe());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!merge_success) {
|
|
|
|
RecordTick(statistics_, NUMBER_MERGE_FAILURES);
|
|
|
|
state_ = kCorrupt;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case kTypeMerge:
|
|
|
|
assert(state_ == kNotFound || state_ == kMerge);
|
|
|
|
state_ = kMerge;
|
|
|
|
merge_context_->PushOperand(value);
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
assert(false);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// state_ could be Corrupt, merge or notfound
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void replayGetContextLog(const Slice& replay_log, const Slice& user_key,
|
|
|
|
GetContext* get_context) {
|
|
|
|
#ifndef ROCKSDB_LITE
|
|
|
|
Slice s = replay_log;
|
|
|
|
while (s.size()) {
|
|
|
|
auto type = static_cast<ValueType>(*s.data());
|
|
|
|
s.remove_prefix(1);
|
|
|
|
Slice value;
|
|
|
|
bool ret = GetLengthPrefixedSlice(&s, &value);
|
|
|
|
assert(ret);
|
|
|
|
(void)ret;
|
Use SST files for Transaction conflict detection
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict. This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts. Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.
With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts. This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot. Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).
Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread. Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.
Test Plan: unit tests, db bench
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
9 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Since SequenceNumber is not stored and unknown, we will use
|
|
|
|
// kMaxSequenceNumber.
|
|
|
|
get_context->SaveValue(
|
|
|
|
ParsedInternalKey(user_key, kMaxSequenceNumber, type), value);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#else // ROCKSDB_LITE
|
|
|
|
assert(false);
|
|
|
|
#endif // ROCKSDB_LITE
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace rocksdb
|