You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
rocksdb/utilities/transactions/lock/point/point_lock_tracker.cc

267 lines
8.2 KiB

Replace tracked_keys with a new LockTracker interface in TransactionDB (#7013) Summary: We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction. However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol. The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are: 1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback. 2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit. 3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`. Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation. In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components. After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`. Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D22163706 Pulled By: cheng-chang fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
4 years ago
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
#include "utilities/transactions/lock/point/point_lock_tracker.h"
Replace tracked_keys with a new LockTracker interface in TransactionDB (#7013) Summary: We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction. However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol. The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are: 1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback. 2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit. 3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`. Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation. In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components. After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`. Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D22163706 Pulled By: cheng-chang fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
4 years ago
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
namespace {
class TrackedKeysColumnFamilyIterator
: public LockTracker::ColumnFamilyIterator {
public:
explicit TrackedKeysColumnFamilyIterator(const TrackedKeys& keys)
: tracked_keys_(keys), it_(keys.begin()) {}
bool HasNext() const override { return it_ != tracked_keys_.end(); }
ColumnFamilyId Next() override { return (it_++)->first; }
private:
const TrackedKeys& tracked_keys_;
TrackedKeys::const_iterator it_;
};
class TrackedKeysIterator : public LockTracker::KeyIterator {
public:
TrackedKeysIterator(const TrackedKeys& keys, ColumnFamilyId id)
: key_infos_(keys.at(id)), it_(key_infos_.begin()) {}
bool HasNext() const override { return it_ != key_infos_.end(); }
const std::string& Next() override { return (it_++)->first; }
private:
const TrackedKeyInfos& key_infos_;
TrackedKeyInfos::const_iterator it_;
};
} // namespace
void PointLockTracker::Track(const PointLockRequest& r) {
auto& keys = tracked_keys_[r.column_family_id];
#ifdef __cpp_lib_unordered_map_try_emplace
// use c++17's try_emplace if available, to avoid rehashing the key
// in case it is not already in the map
auto result = keys.try_emplace(r.key, r.seq);
auto it = result.first;
if (!result.second && r.seq < it->second.seq) {
// Now tracking this key with an earlier sequence number
it->second.seq = r.seq;
}
#else
auto it = keys.find(r.key);
if (it == keys.end()) {
auto result = keys.emplace(r.key, TrackedKeyInfo(r.seq));
it = result.first;
} else if (r.seq < it->second.seq) {
// Now tracking this key with an earlier sequence number
it->second.seq = r.seq;
}
#endif
// else we do not update the seq. The smaller the tracked seq, the stronger it
// the guarantee since it implies from the seq onward there has not been a
// concurrent update to the key. So we update the seq if it implies stronger
// guarantees, i.e., if it is smaller than the existing tracked seq.
if (r.read_only) {
it->second.num_reads++;
} else {
it->second.num_writes++;
}
it->second.exclusive = it->second.exclusive || r.exclusive;
}
UntrackStatus PointLockTracker::Untrack(const PointLockRequest& r) {
auto cf_keys = tracked_keys_.find(r.column_family_id);
if (cf_keys == tracked_keys_.end()) {
return UntrackStatus::NOT_TRACKED;
}
auto& keys = cf_keys->second;
auto it = keys.find(r.key);
if (it == keys.end()) {
return UntrackStatus::NOT_TRACKED;
}
bool untracked = false;
auto& info = it->second;
if (r.read_only) {
if (info.num_reads > 0) {
info.num_reads--;
untracked = true;
}
} else {
if (info.num_writes > 0) {
info.num_writes--;
untracked = true;
}
}
bool removed = false;
if (info.num_reads == 0 && info.num_writes == 0) {
keys.erase(it);
if (keys.empty()) {
tracked_keys_.erase(cf_keys);
}
removed = true;
}
if (removed) {
return UntrackStatus::REMOVED;
}
if (untracked) {
return UntrackStatus::UNTRACKED;
}
return UntrackStatus::NOT_TRACKED;
}
void PointLockTracker::Merge(const LockTracker& tracker) {
const PointLockTracker& t = static_cast<const PointLockTracker&>(tracker);
for (const auto& cf_keys : t.tracked_keys_) {
ColumnFamilyId cf = cf_keys.first;
const auto& keys = cf_keys.second;
auto current_cf_keys = tracked_keys_.find(cf);
if (current_cf_keys == tracked_keys_.end()) {
tracked_keys_.emplace(cf_keys);
} else {
auto& current_keys = current_cf_keys->second;
for (const auto& key_info : keys) {
const std::string& key = key_info.first;
const TrackedKeyInfo& info = key_info.second;
// If key was not previously tracked, just copy the whole struct over.
// Otherwise, some merging needs to occur.
auto current_info = current_keys.find(key);
if (current_info == current_keys.end()) {
current_keys.emplace(key_info);
} else {
current_info->second.Merge(info);
}
}
}
}
}
void PointLockTracker::Subtract(const LockTracker& tracker) {
const PointLockTracker& t = static_cast<const PointLockTracker&>(tracker);
for (const auto& cf_keys : t.tracked_keys_) {
ColumnFamilyId cf = cf_keys.first;
const auto& keys = cf_keys.second;
auto& current_keys = tracked_keys_.at(cf);
for (const auto& key_info : keys) {
const std::string& key = key_info.first;
const TrackedKeyInfo& info = key_info.second;
uint32_t num_reads = info.num_reads;
uint32_t num_writes = info.num_writes;
auto current_key_info = current_keys.find(key);
assert(current_key_info != current_keys.end());
// Decrement the total reads/writes of this key by the number of
// reads/writes done since the last SavePoint.
if (num_reads > 0) {
assert(current_key_info->second.num_reads >= num_reads);
current_key_info->second.num_reads -= num_reads;
}
if (num_writes > 0) {
assert(current_key_info->second.num_writes >= num_writes);
current_key_info->second.num_writes -= num_writes;
}
if (current_key_info->second.num_reads == 0 &&
current_key_info->second.num_writes == 0) {
current_keys.erase(current_key_info);
}
}
}
}
LockTracker* PointLockTracker::GetTrackedLocksSinceSavePoint(
const LockTracker& save_point_tracker) const {
// Examine the number of reads/writes performed on all keys written
// since the last SavePoint and compare to the total number of reads/writes
// for each key.
LockTracker* t = new PointLockTracker();
const PointLockTracker& save_point_t =
static_cast<const PointLockTracker&>(save_point_tracker);
for (const auto& cf_keys : save_point_t.tracked_keys_) {
ColumnFamilyId cf = cf_keys.first;
const auto& keys = cf_keys.second;
auto& current_keys = tracked_keys_.at(cf);
for (const auto& key_info : keys) {
const std::string& key = key_info.first;
const TrackedKeyInfo& info = key_info.second;
uint32_t num_reads = info.num_reads;
uint32_t num_writes = info.num_writes;
auto current_key_info = current_keys.find(key);
assert(current_key_info != current_keys.end());
assert(current_key_info->second.num_reads >= num_reads);
assert(current_key_info->second.num_writes >= num_writes);
if (current_key_info->second.num_reads == num_reads &&
current_key_info->second.num_writes == num_writes) {
// All the reads/writes to this key were done in the last savepoint.
PointLockRequest r;
r.column_family_id = cf;
r.key = key;
r.seq = info.seq;
r.read_only = (num_writes == 0);
r.exclusive = info.exclusive;
t->Track(r);
}
}
}
return t;
}
PointLockStatus PointLockTracker::GetPointLockStatus(
ColumnFamilyId column_family_id, const std::string& key) const {
assert(IsPointLockSupported());
PointLockStatus status;
auto it = tracked_keys_.find(column_family_id);
if (it == tracked_keys_.end()) {
return status;
}
const auto& keys = it->second;
auto key_it = keys.find(key);
if (key_it == keys.end()) {
return status;
}
const TrackedKeyInfo& key_info = key_it->second;
status.locked = true;
status.exclusive = key_info.exclusive;
status.seq = key_info.seq;
return status;
}
uint64_t PointLockTracker::GetNumPointLocks() const {
uint64_t num_keys = 0;
for (const auto& cf_keys : tracked_keys_) {
num_keys += cf_keys.second.size();
}
return num_keys;
}
LockTracker::ColumnFamilyIterator* PointLockTracker::GetColumnFamilyIterator()
const {
return new TrackedKeysColumnFamilyIterator(tracked_keys_);
}
LockTracker::KeyIterator* PointLockTracker::GetKeyIterator(
ColumnFamilyId column_family_id) const {
assert(tracked_keys_.find(column_family_id) != tracked_keys_.end());
return new TrackedKeysIterator(tracked_keys_, column_family_id);
}
void PointLockTracker::Clear() { tracked_keys_.clear(); }
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE