You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
rocksdb/utilities/ttl/db_ttl.h

363 lines
10 KiB

// Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file. See the AUTHORS file for names of contributors.
#pragma once
#include "rocksdb/db.h"
#include "rocksdb/env.h"
#include "rocksdb/compaction_filter.h"
#include "rocksdb/merge_operator.h"
#include "utilities/utility_db.h"
#include "db/db_impl.h"
namespace rocksdb {
class DBWithTTL : public StackableDB {
public:
DBWithTTL(const int32_t ttl,
const Options& options,
const std::string& dbname,
Status& st,
bool read_only);
virtual ~DBWithTTL();
virtual Status Put(const WriteOptions& o,
const Slice& key,
const Slice& val);
virtual Status Get(const ReadOptions& options,
const Slice& key,
std::string* value);
virtual std::vector<Status> MultiGet(const ReadOptions& options,
const std::vector<Slice>& keys,
std::vector<std::string>* values);
virtual bool KeyMayExist(const ReadOptions& options,
const Slice& key,
std::string* value,
bool* value_found = nullptr) override;
virtual Status Delete(const WriteOptions& wopts, const Slice& key);
virtual Status Merge(const WriteOptions& options,
const Slice& key,
const Slice& value);
virtual Status Write(const WriteOptions& opts, WriteBatch* updates);
virtual Iterator* NewIterator(const ReadOptions& opts);
virtual const Snapshot* GetSnapshot();
virtual void ReleaseSnapshot(const Snapshot* snapshot);
virtual bool GetProperty(const Slice& property, std::string* value);
virtual void GetApproximateSizes(const Range* r, int n, uint64_t* sizes);
virtual void CompactRange(const Slice* begin, const Slice* end,
bool reduce_level = false, int target_level = -1);
virtual int NumberLevels();
virtual int MaxMemCompactionLevel();
virtual int Level0StopWriteTrigger();
virtual Status Flush(const FlushOptions& fopts);
virtual Status DisableFileDeletions();
virtual Status EnableFileDeletions();
virtual Status GetLiveFiles(std::vector<std::string>& vec, uint64_t* mfs,
bool flush_memtable = true);
virtual Status GetSortedWalFiles(VectorLogPtr& files);
virtual Status DeleteFile(std::string name);
virtual SequenceNumber GetLatestSequenceNumber() const;
virtual Status GetUpdatesSince(SequenceNumber seq_number,
unique_ptr<TransactionLogIterator>* iter);
// Simulate a db crash, no elegant closing of database.
void TEST_Destroy_DBWithTtl();
virtual DB* GetRawDB() {
return db_;
}
static bool IsStale(const Slice& value, int32_t ttl);
static Status AppendTS(const Slice& val, std::string& val_with_ts);
static Status SanityCheckTimestamp(const Slice& str);
static Status StripTS(std::string* str);
static Status GetCurrentTime(int32_t& curtime);
static const uint32_t kTSLength = sizeof(int32_t); // size of timestamp
static const int32_t kMinTimestamp = 1368146402; // 05/09/2013:5:40PM GMT-8
static const int32_t kMaxTimestamp = 2147483647; // 01/18/2038:7:14PM GMT-8
private:
DB* db_;
unique_ptr<CompactionFilter> ttl_comp_filter_;
};
class TtlIterator : public Iterator {
public:
explicit TtlIterator(Iterator* iter)
: iter_(iter) {
assert(iter_);
}
~TtlIterator() {
delete iter_;
}
bool Valid() const {
return iter_->Valid();
}
void SeekToFirst() {
iter_->SeekToFirst();
}
void SeekToLast() {
iter_->SeekToLast();
}
void Seek(const Slice& target) {
iter_->Seek(target);
}
void Next() {
iter_->Next();
}
void Prev() {
iter_->Prev();
}
Slice key() const {
return iter_->key();
}
int32_t timestamp() const {
return DecodeFixed32(
iter_->value().data() + iter_->value().size() - DBWithTTL::kTSLength);
}
Slice value() const {
//TODO: handle timestamp corruption like in general iterator semantics
assert(DBWithTTL::SanityCheckTimestamp(iter_->value()).ok());
Slice trimmed_value = iter_->value();
trimmed_value.size_ -= DBWithTTL::kTSLength;
return trimmed_value;
}
Status status() const {
return iter_->status();
}
private:
Iterator* iter_;
};
class TtlCompactionFilter : public CompactionFilter {
public:
TtlCompactionFilter(
int32_t ttl,
const CompactionFilter* user_comp_filter,
std::unique_ptr<const CompactionFilter>
user_comp_filter_from_factory = nullptr)
: ttl_(ttl),
user_comp_filter_(user_comp_filter),
user_comp_filter_from_factory_(std::move(user_comp_filter_from_factory)) {
// Unlike the merge operator, compaction filter is necessary for TTL, hence
// this would be called even if user doesn't specify any compaction-filter
if (!user_comp_filter_) {
user_comp_filter_ = user_comp_filter_from_factory_.get();
}
}
virtual bool Filter(int level,
const Slice& key,
const Slice& old_val,
std::string* new_val,
bool* value_changed) const override {
if (DBWithTTL::IsStale(old_val, ttl_)) {
return true;
}
if (user_comp_filter_ == nullptr) {
return false;
}
assert(old_val.size() >= DBWithTTL::kTSLength);
Slice old_val_without_ts(old_val.data(),
old_val.size() - DBWithTTL::kTSLength);
if (user_comp_filter_->Filter(level, key, old_val_without_ts, new_val,
value_changed)) {
return true;
}
if (*value_changed) {
new_val->append(old_val.data() + old_val.size() - DBWithTTL::kTSLength,
DBWithTTL::kTSLength);
}
return false;
}
virtual const char* Name() const override {
return "Delete By TTL";
}
private:
int32_t ttl_;
const CompactionFilter* user_comp_filter_;
std::unique_ptr<const CompactionFilter> user_comp_filter_from_factory_;
};
class TtlCompactionFilterFactory : public CompactionFilterFactory {
public:
TtlCompactionFilterFactory(
int32_t ttl,
std::shared_ptr<CompactionFilterFactory> comp_filter_factory)
: ttl_(ttl),
user_comp_filter_factory_(comp_filter_factory) { }
virtual std::unique_ptr<CompactionFilter> CreateCompactionFilter(
const CompactionFilter::Context& context) {
return std::unique_ptr<TtlCompactionFilter>(
new TtlCompactionFilter(
ttl_,
nullptr,
std::move(user_comp_filter_factory_->CreateCompactionFilter(context))
)
);
}
virtual const char* Name() const override {
return "TtlCompactionFilterFactory";
}
private:
int32_t ttl_;
std::shared_ptr<CompactionFilterFactory> user_comp_filter_factory_;
};
class TtlMergeOperator : public MergeOperator {
public:
explicit TtlMergeOperator(const std::shared_ptr<MergeOperator> merge_op)
: user_merge_op_(merge_op) {
assert(merge_op);
}
virtual bool FullMerge(const Slice& key,
const Slice* existing_value,
const std::deque<std::string>& operands,
std::string* new_value,
Logger* logger) const override {
const uint32_t ts_len = DBWithTTL::kTSLength;
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
if (existing_value && existing_value->size() < ts_len) {
Log(logger, "Error: Could not remove timestamp from existing value.");
return false;
}
// Extract time-stamp from each operand to be passed to user_merge_op_
std::deque<std::string> operands_without_ts;
for (const auto &operand : operands) {
if (operand.size() < ts_len) {
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
Log(logger, "Error: Could not remove timestamp from operand value.");
return false;
}
operands_without_ts.push_back(operand.substr(0, operand.size() - ts_len));
}
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
// Apply the user merge operator (store result in *new_value)
bool good = true;
if (existing_value) {
Slice existing_value_without_ts(existing_value->data(),
existing_value->size() - ts_len);
good = user_merge_op_->FullMerge(key, &existing_value_without_ts,
operands_without_ts, new_value, logger);
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
} else {
good = user_merge_op_->FullMerge(key, nullptr, operands_without_ts,
new_value, logger);
}
// Return false if the user merge operator returned false
if (!good) {
return false;
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
}
// Augment the *new_value with the ttl time-stamp
int32_t curtime;
if (!DBWithTTL::GetCurrentTime(curtime).ok()) {
Log(logger, "Error: Could not get current time to be attached internally "
"to the new value.");
return false;
} else {
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
char ts_string[ts_len];
EncodeFixed32(ts_string, curtime);
new_value->append(ts_string, ts_len);
return true;
}
}
virtual bool PartialMerge(const Slice& key,
const Slice& left_operand,
const Slice& right_operand,
std::string* new_value,
Logger* logger) const override {
const uint32_t ts_len = DBWithTTL::kTSLength;
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
if (left_operand.size() < ts_len || right_operand.size() < ts_len) {
Log(logger, "Error: Could not remove timestamp from value.");
return false;
}
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
// Apply the user partial-merge operator (store result in *new_value)
assert(new_value);
Slice left_without_ts(left_operand.data(), left_operand.size() - ts_len);
Slice right_without_ts(right_operand.data(), right_operand.size() - ts_len);
if (!user_merge_op_->PartialMerge(key, left_without_ts, right_without_ts,
new_value, logger)) {
return false;
}
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
// Augment the *new_value with the ttl time-stamp
int32_t curtime;
if (!DBWithTTL::GetCurrentTime(curtime).ok()) {
Log(logger, "Error: Could not get current time to be attached internally "
"to the new value.");
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
return false;
} else {
char ts_string[ts_len];
EncodeFixed32(ts_string, curtime);
new_value->append(ts_string, ts_len);
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
return true;
}
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences. Summary: Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the base/sentinel value. I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters). The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if and only if the "associative-merge" fails. This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure. NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review, revision, and testing. Feedback welcome! Test Plan: -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it. -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests (counters, string-append, and redis-lists) -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb. -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress. -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable, Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0, Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found, end-of-history, end-of-file, etc. -A lot of feedback from the reviewers. Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
11 years ago
}
virtual const char* Name() const override {
return "Merge By TTL";
}
private:
std::shared_ptr<MergeOperator> user_merge_op_;
};
}