You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
rocksdb/utilities/transactions/transaction_test.h

496 lines
16 KiB

// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
#pragma once
#ifndef __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#define __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#endif
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>
#include <string>
#include <thread>
#include "db/db_impl.h"
#include "rocksdb/db.h"
#include "rocksdb/options.h"
#include "rocksdb/utilities/transaction.h"
#include "rocksdb/utilities/transaction_db.h"
#include "table/mock_table.h"
#include "test_util/fault_injection_test_env.h"
#include "test_util/sync_point.h"
#include "test_util/testharness.h"
#include "test_util/testutil.h"
#include "test_util/transaction_test_util.h"
#include "util/random.h"
#include "util/string_util.h"
#include "utilities/merge_operators.h"
#include "utilities/merge_operators/string_append/stringappend.h"
#include "utilities/transactions/pessimistic_transaction_db.h"
#include "port/port.h"
namespace rocksdb {
// Return true if the ith bit is set in combination represented by comb
bool IsInCombination(size_t i, size_t comb) { return comb & (size_t(1) << i); }
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
enum WriteOrdering : bool { kOrderedWrite, kUnorderedWrite };
class TransactionTestBase : public ::testing::Test {
public:
TransactionDB* db;
FaultInjectionTestEnv* env;
std::string dbname;
Options options;
TransactionDBOptions txn_db_options;
bool use_stackable_db_;
TransactionTestBase(bool use_stackable_db, bool two_write_queue,
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
TxnDBWritePolicy write_policy,
WriteOrdering write_ordering)
: db(nullptr), env(nullptr), use_stackable_db_(use_stackable_db) {
options.create_if_missing = true;
options.max_write_buffer_number = 2;
options.write_buffer_size = 4 * 1024;
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
options.unordered_write = write_ordering == kUnorderedWrite;
options.level0_file_num_compaction_trigger = 2;
options.merge_operator = MergeOperators::CreateFromStringId("stringappend");
env = new FaultInjectionTestEnv(Env::Default());
options.env = env;
options.two_write_queues = two_write_queue;
dbname = test::PerThreadDBPath("transaction_testdb");
DestroyDB(dbname, options);
txn_db_options.transaction_lock_timeout = 0;
txn_db_options.default_lock_timeout = 0;
txn_db_options.write_policy = write_policy;
txn_db_options.rollback_merge_operands = true;
Status s;
if (use_stackable_db == false) {
s = TransactionDB::Open(options, txn_db_options, dbname, &db);
} else {
s = OpenWithStackableDB();
}
assert(s.ok());
}
~TransactionTestBase() {
delete db;
db = nullptr;
// This is to skip the assert statement in FaultInjectionTestEnv. There
// seems to be a bug in btrfs that the makes readdir return recently
// unlink-ed files. By using the default fs we simply ignore errors resulted
// from attempting to delete such files in DestroyDB.
options.env = Env::Default();
DestroyDB(dbname, options);
delete env;
}
Status ReOpenNoDelete() {
delete db;
db = nullptr;
env->AssertNoOpenFile();
env->DropUnsyncedFileData();
env->ResetState();
Status s;
if (use_stackable_db_ == false) {
s = TransactionDB::Open(options, txn_db_options, dbname, &db);
} else {
s = OpenWithStackableDB();
}
assert(!s.ok() || db != nullptr);
return s;
}
Status ReOpenNoDelete(std::vector<ColumnFamilyDescriptor>& cfs,
std::vector<ColumnFamilyHandle*>* handles) {
for (auto h : *handles) {
delete h;
}
handles->clear();
delete db;
db = nullptr;
env->AssertNoOpenFile();
env->DropUnsyncedFileData();
env->ResetState();
Status s;
if (use_stackable_db_ == false) {
s = TransactionDB::Open(options, txn_db_options, dbname, cfs, handles,
&db);
} else {
s = OpenWithStackableDB(cfs, handles);
}
assert(db != nullptr);
return s;
}
Status ReOpen() {
delete db;
db = nullptr;
DestroyDB(dbname, options);
Status s;
if (use_stackable_db_ == false) {
s = TransactionDB::Open(options, txn_db_options, dbname, &db);
} else {
s = OpenWithStackableDB();
}
assert(db != nullptr);
return s;
}
Status OpenWithStackableDB(std::vector<ColumnFamilyDescriptor>& cfs,
std::vector<ColumnFamilyHandle*>* handles) {
std::vector<size_t> compaction_enabled_cf_indices;
TransactionDB::PrepareWrap(&options, &cfs, &compaction_enabled_cf_indices);
DB* root_db = nullptr;
Options options_copy(options);
const bool use_seq_per_batch =
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_PREPARED ||
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_UNPREPARED;
const bool use_batch_per_txn =
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_COMMITTED ||
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_PREPARED;
Status s = DBImpl::Open(options_copy, dbname, cfs, handles, &root_db,
use_seq_per_batch, use_batch_per_txn);
StackableDB* stackable_db = new StackableDB(root_db);
if (s.ok()) {
assert(root_db != nullptr);
s = TransactionDB::WrapStackableDB(stackable_db, txn_db_options,
compaction_enabled_cf_indices,
*handles, &db);
}
if (!s.ok()) {
delete stackable_db;
// just in case it was not deleted (and not set to nullptr).
delete root_db;
}
return s;
}
Status OpenWithStackableDB() {
std::vector<size_t> compaction_enabled_cf_indices;
std::vector<ColumnFamilyDescriptor> column_families{ColumnFamilyDescriptor(
kDefaultColumnFamilyName, ColumnFamilyOptions(options))};
TransactionDB::PrepareWrap(&options, &column_families,
&compaction_enabled_cf_indices);
std::vector<ColumnFamilyHandle*> handles;
DB* root_db = nullptr;
Options options_copy(options);
const bool use_seq_per_batch =
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_PREPARED ||
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_UNPREPARED;
const bool use_batch_per_txn =
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_COMMITTED ||
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_PREPARED;
Status s = DBImpl::Open(options_copy, dbname, column_families, &handles,
&root_db, use_seq_per_batch, use_batch_per_txn);
if (!s.ok()) {
delete root_db;
return s;
}
StackableDB* stackable_db = new StackableDB(root_db);
assert(root_db != nullptr);
assert(handles.size() == 1);
s = TransactionDB::WrapStackableDB(stackable_db, txn_db_options,
compaction_enabled_cf_indices, handles,
&db);
delete handles[0];
if (!s.ok()) {
delete stackable_db;
// just in case it was not deleted (and not set to nullptr).
delete root_db;
}
return s;
}
std::atomic<size_t> linked = {0};
std::atomic<size_t> exp_seq = {0};
std::atomic<size_t> commit_writes = {0};
std::atomic<size_t> expected_commits = {0};
// Without Prepare, the commit does not write to WAL
std::atomic<size_t> with_empty_commits = {0};
std::function<void(size_t, Status)> txn_t0_with_status = [&](size_t index,
Status exp_s) {
// Test DB's internal txn. It involves no prepare phase nor a commit marker.
WriteOptions wopts;
auto s = db->Put(wopts, "key" + std::to_string(index), "value");
ASSERT_EQ(exp_s, s);
if (txn_db_options.write_policy == TxnDBWritePolicy::WRITE_COMMITTED) {
// Consume one seq per key
exp_seq++;
} else {
// Consume one seq per batch
exp_seq++;
if (options.two_write_queues) {
// Consume one seq for commit
exp_seq++;
}
}
with_empty_commits++;
};
std::function<void(size_t)> txn_t0 = [&](size_t index) {
return txn_t0_with_status(index, Status::OK());
};
std::function<void(size_t)> txn_t1 = [&](size_t index) {
// Testing directly writing a write batch. Functionality-wise it is
// equivalent to commit without prepare.
WriteBatch wb;
auto istr = std::to_string(index);
ASSERT_OK(wb.Put("k1" + istr, "v1"));
ASSERT_OK(wb.Put("k2" + istr, "v2"));
ASSERT_OK(wb.Put("k3" + istr, "v3"));
WriteOptions wopts;
auto s = db->Write(wopts, &wb);
if (txn_db_options.write_policy == TxnDBWritePolicy::WRITE_COMMITTED) {
// Consume one seq per key
exp_seq += 3;
} else {
// Consume one seq per batch
exp_seq++;
if (options.two_write_queues) {
// Consume one seq for commit
exp_seq++;
}
}
ASSERT_OK(s);
with_empty_commits++;
};
std::function<void(size_t)> txn_t2 = [&](size_t index) {
// Commit without prepare. It should write to DB without a commit marker.
TransactionOptions txn_options;
WriteOptions write_options;
Transaction* txn = db->BeginTransaction(write_options, txn_options);
auto istr = std::to_string(index);
ASSERT_OK(txn->SetName("xid" + istr));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo" + istr), Slice("bar")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo2" + istr), Slice("bar2")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo3" + istr), Slice("bar3")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo4" + istr), Slice("bar4")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Commit());
if (txn_db_options.write_policy == TxnDBWritePolicy::WRITE_COMMITTED) {
// Consume one seq per key
exp_seq += 4;
} else {
// Consume one seq per batch
exp_seq++;
if (options.two_write_queues) {
// Consume one seq for commit
exp_seq++;
}
}
delete txn;
with_empty_commits++;
};
std::function<void(size_t)> txn_t3 = [&](size_t index) {
// A full 2pc txn that also involves a commit marker.
TransactionOptions txn_options;
WriteOptions write_options;
Transaction* txn = db->BeginTransaction(write_options, txn_options);
auto istr = std::to_string(index);
ASSERT_OK(txn->SetName("xid" + istr));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo" + istr), Slice("bar")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo2" + istr), Slice("bar2")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo3" + istr), Slice("bar3")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo4" + istr), Slice("bar4")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo5" + istr), Slice("bar5")));
expected_commits++;
ASSERT_OK(txn->Prepare());
commit_writes++;
ASSERT_OK(txn->Commit());
if (txn_db_options.write_policy == TxnDBWritePolicy::WRITE_COMMITTED) {
// Consume one seq per key
exp_seq += 5;
} else {
// Consume one seq per batch
exp_seq++;
// Consume one seq per commit marker
exp_seq++;
}
delete txn;
};
std::function<void(size_t)> txn_t4 = [&](size_t index) {
// A full 2pc txn that also involves a commit marker.
TransactionOptions txn_options;
WriteOptions write_options;
Transaction* txn = db->BeginTransaction(write_options, txn_options);
auto istr = std::to_string(index);
ASSERT_OK(txn->SetName("xid" + istr));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo" + istr), Slice("bar")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo2" + istr), Slice("bar2")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo3" + istr), Slice("bar3")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo4" + istr), Slice("bar4")));
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(Slice("foo5" + istr), Slice("bar5")));
expected_commits++;
ASSERT_OK(txn->Prepare());
commit_writes++;
ASSERT_OK(txn->Rollback());
if (txn_db_options.write_policy == TxnDBWritePolicy::WRITE_COMMITTED) {
// No seq is consumed for deleting the txn buffer
exp_seq += 0;
} else {
// Consume one seq per batch
exp_seq++;
// Consume one seq per rollback batch
exp_seq++;
if (options.two_write_queues) {
// Consume one seq for rollback commit
exp_seq++;
}
}
delete txn;
};
// Test that we can change write policy after a clean shutdown (which would
// empty the WAL)
void CrossCompatibilityTest(TxnDBWritePolicy from_policy,
TxnDBWritePolicy to_policy, bool empty_wal) {
TransactionOptions txn_options;
ReadOptions read_options;
WriteOptions write_options;
uint32_t index = 0;
Random rnd(1103);
options.write_buffer_size = 1024; // To create more sst files
std::unordered_map<std::string, std::string> committed_kvs;
Transaction* txn;
txn_db_options.write_policy = from_policy;
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
if (txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_COMMITTED) {
options.unordered_write = false;
}
ReOpen();
for (int i = 0; i < 1024; i++) {
auto istr = std::to_string(index);
auto k = Slice("foo-" + istr).ToString();
auto v = Slice("bar-" + istr).ToString();
// For test the duplicate keys
auto v2 = Slice("bar2-" + istr).ToString();
auto type = rnd.Uniform(4);
switch (type) {
case 0:
committed_kvs[k] = v;
ASSERT_OK(db->Put(write_options, k, v));
committed_kvs[k] = v2;
ASSERT_OK(db->Put(write_options, k, v2));
break;
case 1: {
WriteBatch wb;
committed_kvs[k] = v;
wb.Put(k, v);
committed_kvs[k] = v2;
wb.Put(k, v2);
ASSERT_OK(db->Write(write_options, &wb));
} break;
case 2:
case 3:
txn = db->BeginTransaction(write_options, txn_options);
ASSERT_OK(txn->SetName("xid" + istr));
committed_kvs[k] = v;
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(k, v));
committed_kvs[k] = v2;
ASSERT_OK(txn->Put(k, v2));
if (type == 3) {
ASSERT_OK(txn->Prepare());
}
ASSERT_OK(txn->Commit());
delete txn;
break;
default:
assert(0);
}
index++;
} // for i
txn_db_options.write_policy = to_policy;
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
if (txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_COMMITTED) {
options.unordered_write = false;
}
auto db_impl = reinterpret_cast<DBImpl*>(db->GetRootDB());
// Before upgrade/downgrade the WAL must be emptied
if (empty_wal) {
db_impl->TEST_FlushMemTable();
} else {
db_impl->FlushWAL(true);
}
auto s = ReOpenNoDelete();
if (empty_wal) {
ASSERT_OK(s);
} else {
// Test that we can detect the WAL that is produced by an incompatible
// WritePolicy and fail fast before mis-interpreting the WAL.
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsNotSupported());
return;
}
db_impl = reinterpret_cast<DBImpl*>(db->GetRootDB());
// Check that WAL is empty
VectorLogPtr log_files;
db_impl->GetSortedWalFiles(log_files);
ASSERT_EQ(0, log_files.size());
for (auto& kv : committed_kvs) {
std::string value;
s = db->Get(read_options, kv.first, &value);
if (s.IsNotFound()) {
printf("key = %s\n", kv.first.c_str());
}
ASSERT_OK(s);
if (kv.second != value) {
printf("key = %s\n", kv.first.c_str());
}
ASSERT_EQ(kv.second, value);
}
}
};
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
class TransactionTest
: public TransactionTestBase,
virtual public ::testing::WithParamInterface<
std::tuple<bool, bool, TxnDBWritePolicy, WriteOrdering>> {
public:
TransactionTest()
: TransactionTestBase(std::get<0>(GetParam()), std::get<1>(GetParam()),
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
std::get<2>(GetParam()), std::get<3>(GetParam())){};
};
class TransactionStressTest : public TransactionTest {};
class MySQLStyleTransactionTest
: public TransactionTestBase,
virtual public ::testing::WithParamInterface<
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
std::tuple<bool, bool, TxnDBWritePolicy, WriteOrdering, bool>> {
public:
MySQLStyleTransactionTest()
: TransactionTestBase(std::get<0>(GetParam()), std::get<1>(GetParam()),
Unordered Writes (#5218) Summary: Performing unordered writes in rocksdb when unordered_write option is set to true. When enabled the writes to memtable are done without joining any write thread. This offers much higher write throughput since the upcoming writes would not have to wait for the slowest memtable write to finish. The tradeoff is that the writes visible to a snapshot might change over time. If the application cannot tolerate that, it should implement its own mechanisms to work around that. Using TransactionDB with WRITE_PREPARED write policy is one way to achieve that. Doing so increases the max throughput by 2.2x without however compromising the snapshot guarantees. The patch is prepared based on an original by siying Existing unit tests are extended to include unordered_write option. Benchmark Results: ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ ./db_bench_unordered --benchmarks=fillrandom --threads=32 --num=10000000 -max_write_buffer_number=16 --max_background_jobs=64 --batch_size=8 --writes=3000000 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=99999 --level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=99999 --level0_stop_writes_trigger=99999 -enable_pipelined_write=false -disable_auto_compactions --unordered_write=1 ``` With WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 78.6 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 177.8 MB/s (2.2x) - unordered_write: 368.9 MB/s (4.7x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) Without WAL - Vanilla RocksDB: 111.3 MB/s - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write: 259.3 MB/s MB/s (2.3x) - unordered_write: 645.6 MB/s (5.8x with relaxed snapshot guarantees) - WRITER_PREPARED with unordered_write disable concurrency control: 185.3 MB/s MB/s (2.35x) Limitations: - The feature is not yet extended to `max_successive_merges` > 0. The feature is also incompatible with `enable_pipelined_write` = true as well as with `allow_concurrent_memtable_write` = false. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5218 Differential Revision: D15219029 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 38f2abc4af8780148c6128acdba2b3227bc81759
6 years ago
std::get<2>(GetParam()), std::get<3>(GetParam())),
with_slow_threads_(std::get<4>(GetParam())) {
if (with_slow_threads_ &&
(txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_PREPARED ||
txn_db_options.write_policy == WRITE_UNPREPARED)) {
// The corner case with slow threads involves the caches filling
// over which would not happen even with artifial delays. To help
// such cases to show up we lower the size of the cache-related data
// structures.
txn_db_options.wp_snapshot_cache_bits = 1;
txn_db_options.wp_commit_cache_bits = 10;
options.write_buffer_size = 1024;
EXPECT_OK(ReOpen());
}
};
protected:
// Also emulate slow threads by addin artiftial delays
const bool with_slow_threads_;
};
} // namespace rocksdb