You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
rocksdb/db/table_properties_collector.h

176 lines
6.2 KiB

// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
//
// This file defines a collection of statistics collectors.
#pragma once
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include "db/dbformat.h"
#include "rocksdb/comparator.h"
#include "rocksdb/table_properties.h"
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
// Base class for internal table properties collector.
class IntTblPropCollector {
public:
virtual ~IntTblPropCollector() {}
virtual Status Finish(UserCollectedProperties* properties) = 0;
virtual const char* Name() const = 0;
// @params key the user key that is inserted into the table.
// @params value the value that is inserted into the table.
virtual Status InternalAdd(const Slice& key, const Slice& value,
uint64_t file_size) = 0;
Refactor to avoid confusing "raw block" (#10408) Summary: We have a lot of confusing code because of mixed, sometimes completely opposite uses of of the term "raw block" or "raw contents", sometimes within the same source file. For example, in `BlockBasedTableBuilder`, `raw_block_contents` and `raw_size` generally referred to uncompressed block contents and size, while `WriteRawBlock` referred to writing a block that is already compressed if it is going to be. Meanwhile, in `BlockBasedTable`, `raw_block_contents` either referred to a (maybe compressed) block with trailer, or a maybe compressed block maybe without trailer. (Note: left as follow-up work to use C++ typing to better sort out the various kinds of BlockContents.) This change primarily tries to apply some consistent terminology around the kinds of block representations, avoiding the unclear "raw". (Any meaning of "raw" assumes some bias toward the storage layer or toward the logical data layer.) Preferred terminology: * **Serialized block** - bytes that go into storage. For block-based table (usually the case) this includes the block trailer. WART: block `size` may or may not include the trailer; need to be clear about whether it does or not. * **Maybe compressed block** - like a serialized block, but without the trailer (or no promise of including a trailer). Must be accompanied by a CompressionType. * **Uncompressed block** - "payload" bytes that are either stored with no compression, used as input to compression function, or result of decompression function. * **Parsed block** - an in-memory form of a block in block cache, as it is used by the table reader. Different C++ types are used depending on the block type (see block_like_traits.h). Other refactorings: * Misc corrections/improvements of internal API comments * Remove a few misleading / unhelpful / redundant comments. * Use move semantics in some places to simplify contracts * Use better parameter names to indicate which parameters are used for outputs * Remove some extraneous `extern` * Various clean-ups to `CacheDumperImpl` (mostly unnecessary code) Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10408 Test Plan: existing tests Reviewed By: akankshamahajan15 Differential Revision: D38172617 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: ccb99299f324ac5ca46996d34c5089621a4f260c
2 years ago
virtual void BlockAdd(uint64_t block_uncomp_bytes,
uint64_t block_compressed_bytes_fast,
uint64_t block_compressed_bytes_slow) = 0;
virtual UserCollectedProperties GetReadableProperties() const = 0;
virtual bool NeedCompact() const { return false; }
};
// Factory for internal table properties collector.
class IntTblPropCollectorFactory {
public:
virtual ~IntTblPropCollectorFactory() {}
// has to be thread-safe
virtual IntTblPropCollector* CreateIntTblPropCollector(
Support "level_at_creation" in TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context (#8919) Summary: Context: Exposing the level of the sst file (i.e, table) where it is created in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context` allows users of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` to customize some implementation details of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` and `TablePropertiesCollector` based on the level of creation. For example, `TablePropertiesCollector::NeedCompact()` can return different values based on level of creation. - Declared an extra field `level_at_creation` in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context` - Allowed `level_at_creation` to be passed in as an argument in `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` and `UserKeyTablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()`, the latter of which is an internal wrapper of user's passed-in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateTablePropertiesCollector()` used in table-building process - Called `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` with `level_at_creation` passed into both `BlockBasedTableBuilder` and `PlainTableBuilder` - `PlainTableBuilder` previously did not capture `level_at_creation` from `TableBuilderOptions` in `PlainTableFactory`. In order for it to call the method with this parameter, this PR also made `PlainTableBuilder` capture `level_at_creation` as a required parameter - Called `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` with `level_at_creation` its overridden functions in its derived classes, including `RegularKeysStartWithAFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` in `table_properties_collector_test.cc`, `SstFileWriterPropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` in `sst_file_writer_collectors.h` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8919 Test Plan: - Passed the added assertion for `context.level_at_creation` - Passed existing tests - Run `Make` to make sure adding a required parameter to `PlainTableBuilder`'s constructor does not break anything Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D30951729 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: c4a0173b0d9344a4cf47e1b987d759c1c73cb474
3 years ago
uint32_t column_family_id, int level_at_creation) = 0;
// The name of the properties collector can be used for debugging purpose.
virtual const char* Name() const = 0;
};
using IntTblPropCollectorFactories =
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<IntTblPropCollectorFactory>>;
// When rocksdb creates a new table, it will encode all "user keys" into
// "internal keys", which contains meta information of a given entry.
//
// This class extracts user key from the encoded internal key when Add() is
// invoked.
class UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector : public IntTblPropCollector {
public:
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
10 years ago
// transfer of ownership
explicit UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector(TablePropertiesCollector* collector)
: collector_(collector) {}
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
10 years ago
virtual ~UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector() {}
virtual Status InternalAdd(const Slice& key, const Slice& value,
uint64_t file_size) override;
Refactor to avoid confusing "raw block" (#10408) Summary: We have a lot of confusing code because of mixed, sometimes completely opposite uses of of the term "raw block" or "raw contents", sometimes within the same source file. For example, in `BlockBasedTableBuilder`, `raw_block_contents` and `raw_size` generally referred to uncompressed block contents and size, while `WriteRawBlock` referred to writing a block that is already compressed if it is going to be. Meanwhile, in `BlockBasedTable`, `raw_block_contents` either referred to a (maybe compressed) block with trailer, or a maybe compressed block maybe without trailer. (Note: left as follow-up work to use C++ typing to better sort out the various kinds of BlockContents.) This change primarily tries to apply some consistent terminology around the kinds of block representations, avoiding the unclear "raw". (Any meaning of "raw" assumes some bias toward the storage layer or toward the logical data layer.) Preferred terminology: * **Serialized block** - bytes that go into storage. For block-based table (usually the case) this includes the block trailer. WART: block `size` may or may not include the trailer; need to be clear about whether it does or not. * **Maybe compressed block** - like a serialized block, but without the trailer (or no promise of including a trailer). Must be accompanied by a CompressionType. * **Uncompressed block** - "payload" bytes that are either stored with no compression, used as input to compression function, or result of decompression function. * **Parsed block** - an in-memory form of a block in block cache, as it is used by the table reader. Different C++ types are used depending on the block type (see block_like_traits.h). Other refactorings: * Misc corrections/improvements of internal API comments * Remove a few misleading / unhelpful / redundant comments. * Use move semantics in some places to simplify contracts * Use better parameter names to indicate which parameters are used for outputs * Remove some extraneous `extern` * Various clean-ups to `CacheDumperImpl` (mostly unnecessary code) Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10408 Test Plan: existing tests Reviewed By: akankshamahajan15 Differential Revision: D38172617 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: ccb99299f324ac5ca46996d34c5089621a4f260c
2 years ago
virtual void BlockAdd(uint64_t block_uncomp_bytes,
uint64_t block_compressed_bytes_fast,
uint64_t block_compressed_bytes_slow) override;
virtual Status Finish(UserCollectedProperties* properties) override;
virtual const char* Name() const override { return collector_->Name(); }
UserCollectedProperties GetReadableProperties() const override;
virtual bool NeedCompact() const override {
return collector_->NeedCompact();
}
protected:
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
10 years ago
std::unique_ptr<TablePropertiesCollector> collector_;
};
class UserKeyTablePropertiesCollectorFactory
: public IntTblPropCollectorFactory {
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
10 years ago
public:
explicit UserKeyTablePropertiesCollectorFactory(
std::shared_ptr<TablePropertiesCollectorFactory> user_collector_factory)
: user_collector_factory_(user_collector_factory) {}
virtual IntTblPropCollector* CreateIntTblPropCollector(
Support "level_at_creation" in TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context (#8919) Summary: Context: Exposing the level of the sst file (i.e, table) where it is created in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context` allows users of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` to customize some implementation details of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` and `TablePropertiesCollector` based on the level of creation. For example, `TablePropertiesCollector::NeedCompact()` can return different values based on level of creation. - Declared an extra field `level_at_creation` in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context` - Allowed `level_at_creation` to be passed in as an argument in `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` and `UserKeyTablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()`, the latter of which is an internal wrapper of user's passed-in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateTablePropertiesCollector()` used in table-building process - Called `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` with `level_at_creation` passed into both `BlockBasedTableBuilder` and `PlainTableBuilder` - `PlainTableBuilder` previously did not capture `level_at_creation` from `TableBuilderOptions` in `PlainTableFactory`. In order for it to call the method with this parameter, this PR also made `PlainTableBuilder` capture `level_at_creation` as a required parameter - Called `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` with `level_at_creation` its overridden functions in its derived classes, including `RegularKeysStartWithAFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` in `table_properties_collector_test.cc`, `SstFileWriterPropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` in `sst_file_writer_collectors.h` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8919 Test Plan: - Passed the added assertion for `context.level_at_creation` - Passed existing tests - Run `Make` to make sure adding a required parameter to `PlainTableBuilder`'s constructor does not break anything Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D30951729 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: c4a0173b0d9344a4cf47e1b987d759c1c73cb474
3 years ago
uint32_t column_family_id, int level_at_creation) override {
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context context;
context.column_family_id = column_family_id;
Support "level_at_creation" in TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context (#8919) Summary: Context: Exposing the level of the sst file (i.e, table) where it is created in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context` allows users of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` to customize some implementation details of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` and `TablePropertiesCollector` based on the level of creation. For example, `TablePropertiesCollector::NeedCompact()` can return different values based on level of creation. - Declared an extra field `level_at_creation` in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context` - Allowed `level_at_creation` to be passed in as an argument in `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` and `UserKeyTablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()`, the latter of which is an internal wrapper of user's passed-in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateTablePropertiesCollector()` used in table-building process - Called `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` with `level_at_creation` passed into both `BlockBasedTableBuilder` and `PlainTableBuilder` - `PlainTableBuilder` previously did not capture `level_at_creation` from `TableBuilderOptions` in `PlainTableFactory`. In order for it to call the method with this parameter, this PR also made `PlainTableBuilder` capture `level_at_creation` as a required parameter - Called `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` with `level_at_creation` its overridden functions in its derived classes, including `RegularKeysStartWithAFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` in `table_properties_collector_test.cc`, `SstFileWriterPropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` in `sst_file_writer_collectors.h` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8919 Test Plan: - Passed the added assertion for `context.level_at_creation` - Passed existing tests - Run `Make` to make sure adding a required parameter to `PlainTableBuilder`'s constructor does not break anything Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D30951729 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: c4a0173b0d9344a4cf47e1b987d759c1c73cb474
3 years ago
context.level_at_creation = level_at_creation;
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
10 years ago
return new UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector(
user_collector_factory_->CreateTablePropertiesCollector(context));
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
10 years ago
}
virtual const char* Name() const override {
return user_collector_factory_->Name();
}
private:
std::shared_ptr<TablePropertiesCollectorFactory> user_collector_factory_;
};
// When rocksdb creates a newtable, it will encode all "user keys" into
// "internal keys". This class collects min/max timestamp from the encoded
// internal key when Add() is invoked.
//
// @param cmp the user comparator to compare the timestamps in internal key.
class TimestampTablePropertiesCollector : public IntTblPropCollector {
public:
explicit TimestampTablePropertiesCollector(const Comparator* cmp)
: cmp_(cmp),
timestamp_min_(kDisableUserTimestamp),
timestamp_max_(kDisableUserTimestamp) {}
Status InternalAdd(const Slice& key, const Slice& /* value */,
uint64_t /* file_size */) override {
auto user_key = ExtractUserKey(key);
assert(cmp_ && cmp_->timestamp_size() > 0);
if (user_key.size() < cmp_->timestamp_size()) {
return Status::Corruption(
"User key size mismatch when comparing to timestamp size.");
}
auto timestamp_in_key =
ExtractTimestampFromUserKey(user_key, cmp_->timestamp_size());
if (timestamp_max_ == kDisableUserTimestamp ||
cmp_->CompareTimestamp(timestamp_in_key, timestamp_max_) > 0) {
timestamp_max_.assign(timestamp_in_key.data(), timestamp_in_key.size());
}
if (timestamp_min_ == kDisableUserTimestamp ||
cmp_->CompareTimestamp(timestamp_min_, timestamp_in_key) > 0) {
timestamp_min_.assign(timestamp_in_key.data(), timestamp_in_key.size());
}
return Status::OK();
}
Refactor to avoid confusing "raw block" (#10408) Summary: We have a lot of confusing code because of mixed, sometimes completely opposite uses of of the term "raw block" or "raw contents", sometimes within the same source file. For example, in `BlockBasedTableBuilder`, `raw_block_contents` and `raw_size` generally referred to uncompressed block contents and size, while `WriteRawBlock` referred to writing a block that is already compressed if it is going to be. Meanwhile, in `BlockBasedTable`, `raw_block_contents` either referred to a (maybe compressed) block with trailer, or a maybe compressed block maybe without trailer. (Note: left as follow-up work to use C++ typing to better sort out the various kinds of BlockContents.) This change primarily tries to apply some consistent terminology around the kinds of block representations, avoiding the unclear "raw". (Any meaning of "raw" assumes some bias toward the storage layer or toward the logical data layer.) Preferred terminology: * **Serialized block** - bytes that go into storage. For block-based table (usually the case) this includes the block trailer. WART: block `size` may or may not include the trailer; need to be clear about whether it does or not. * **Maybe compressed block** - like a serialized block, but without the trailer (or no promise of including a trailer). Must be accompanied by a CompressionType. * **Uncompressed block** - "payload" bytes that are either stored with no compression, used as input to compression function, or result of decompression function. * **Parsed block** - an in-memory form of a block in block cache, as it is used by the table reader. Different C++ types are used depending on the block type (see block_like_traits.h). Other refactorings: * Misc corrections/improvements of internal API comments * Remove a few misleading / unhelpful / redundant comments. * Use move semantics in some places to simplify contracts * Use better parameter names to indicate which parameters are used for outputs * Remove some extraneous `extern` * Various clean-ups to `CacheDumperImpl` (mostly unnecessary code) Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10408 Test Plan: existing tests Reviewed By: akankshamahajan15 Differential Revision: D38172617 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: ccb99299f324ac5ca46996d34c5089621a4f260c
2 years ago
void BlockAdd(uint64_t /* block_uncomp_bytes */,
uint64_t /* block_compressed_bytes_fast */,
uint64_t /* block_compressed_bytes_slow */) override {
return;
}
Status Finish(UserCollectedProperties* properties) override {
assert(timestamp_min_.size() == timestamp_max_.size() &&
timestamp_max_.size() == cmp_->timestamp_size());
properties->insert({"rocksdb.timestamp_min", timestamp_min_});
properties->insert({"rocksdb.timestamp_max", timestamp_max_});
return Status::OK();
}
const char* Name() const override {
return "TimestampTablePropertiesCollector";
}
UserCollectedProperties GetReadableProperties() const override {
return {{"rocksdb.timestamp_min", Slice(timestamp_min_).ToString(true)},
{"rocksdb.timestamp_max", Slice(timestamp_max_).ToString(true)}};
}
protected:
const Comparator* const cmp_;
std::string timestamp_min_;
std::string timestamp_max_;
};
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE