|
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
|
|
|
|
|
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
|
|
|
|
|
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
|
|
|
|
// found in the LICENSE file. See the AUTHORS file for names of contributors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "db/version_edit.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "db/blob/blob_index.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "rocksdb/advanced_options.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "table/unique_id_impl.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "test_util/sync_point.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "test_util/testharness.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "test_util/testutil.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "util/coding.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "util/string_util.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void TestEncodeDecode(const VersionEdit& edit) {
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded, encoded2;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.EncodeTo(&encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit parsed;
|
|
|
|
|
Status s = parsed.DecodeFrom(encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ok()) << s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
parsed.EncodeTo(&encoded2);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(encoded, encoded2);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class VersionEditTest : public testing::Test {};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, EncodeDecode) {
|
|
|
|
|
static const uint64_t kBig = 1ull << 50;
|
|
|
|
|
static const uint32_t kBig32Bit = 1ull << 30;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(3, kBig + 300 + i, kBig32Bit + 400 + i, 0,
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("foo", kBig + 500 + i, kTypeValue),
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("zoo", kBig + 600 + i, kTypeDeletion),
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 500 + i, kBig + 600 + i, false, Temperature::kUnknown,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
kInvalidBlobFileNumber, 888, 678,
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 300 + i /* epoch_number */, "234", "crc32c",
|
|
|
|
|
kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.DeleteFile(4, kBig + 700 + i);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetComparatorName("foo");
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLogNumber(kBig + 100);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetNextFile(kBig + 200);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLastSequence(kBig + 1000);
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, EncodeDecodeNewFile4) {
|
|
|
|
|
static const uint64_t kBig = 1ull << 50;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(3, 300, 3, 100, InternalKey("foo", kBig + 500, kTypeValue),
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("zoo", kBig + 600, kTypeDeletion), kBig + 500,
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 600, true, Temperature::kUnknown, kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownOldestAncesterTime, kUnknownFileCreationTime,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
300 /* epoch_number */, kUnknownFileChecksum,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownFileChecksumFuncName, kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(4, 301, 3, 100, InternalKey("foo", kBig + 501, kTypeValue),
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("zoo", kBig + 601, kTypeDeletion), kBig + 501,
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 601, false, Temperature::kUnknown, kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownOldestAncesterTime, kUnknownFileCreationTime,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
301 /* epoch_number */, kUnknownFileChecksum,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownFileChecksumFuncName, kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(5, 302, 0, 100, InternalKey("foo", kBig + 502, kTypeValue),
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("zoo", kBig + 602, kTypeDeletion), kBig + 502,
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 602, true, Temperature::kUnknown, kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
666, 888, 302 /* epoch_number */, kUnknownFileChecksum,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownFileChecksumFuncName, kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(5, 303, 0, 100, InternalKey("foo", kBig + 503, kTypeBlobIndex),
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("zoo", kBig + 603, kTypeBlobIndex), kBig + 503,
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 603, true, Temperature::kUnknown, 1001,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownOldestAncesterTime, kUnknownFileCreationTime,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
303 /* epoch_number */, kUnknownFileChecksum,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownFileChecksumFuncName, kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.DeleteFile(4, 700);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetComparatorName("foo");
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLogNumber(kBig + 100);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetNextFile(kBig + 200);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLastSequence(kBig + 1000);
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded, encoded2;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.EncodeTo(&encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit parsed;
|
|
|
|
|
Status s = parsed.DecodeFrom(encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ok()) << s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
auto& new_files = parsed.GetNewFiles();
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(new_files[0].second.marked_for_compaction);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(!new_files[1].second.marked_for_compaction);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(new_files[2].second.marked_for_compaction);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(new_files[3].second.marked_for_compaction);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(3u, new_files[0].second.fd.GetPathId());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(3u, new_files[1].second.fd.GetPathId());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(0u, new_files[2].second.fd.GetPathId());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(0u, new_files[3].second.fd.GetPathId());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
|
|
|
|
new_files[0].second.oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
|
|
|
|
new_files[1].second.oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
|
|
|
|
new_files[2].second.oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(1001, new_files[3].second.oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, ForwardCompatibleNewFile4) {
|
|
|
|
|
static const uint64_t kBig = 1ull << 50;
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(3, 300, 3, 100, InternalKey("foo", kBig + 500, kTypeValue),
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("zoo", kBig + 600, kTypeDeletion), kBig + 500,
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 600, true, Temperature::kUnknown, kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownOldestAncesterTime, kUnknownFileCreationTime,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
300 /* epoch_number */, kUnknownFileChecksum,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownFileChecksumFuncName, kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(4, 301, 3, 100, InternalKey("foo", kBig + 501, kTypeValue),
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("zoo", kBig + 601, kTypeDeletion), kBig + 501,
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 601, false, Temperature::kUnknown, kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
686, 868, 301 /* epoch_number */, "234", "crc32c",
|
|
|
|
|
kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.DeleteFile(4, 700);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetComparatorName("foo");
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLogNumber(kBig + 100);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetNextFile(kBig + 200);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLastSequence(kBig + 1000);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Call back function to add extra customized builds.
|
|
|
|
|
bool first = true;
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->SetCallBack(
|
|
|
|
|
"VersionEdit::EncodeTo:NewFile4:CustomizeFields", [&](void* arg) {
|
|
|
|
|
std::string* str = reinterpret_cast<std::string*>(arg);
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32(str, 33);
|
|
|
|
|
const std::string str1 = "random_string";
|
|
|
|
|
PutLengthPrefixedSlice(str, str1);
|
|
|
|
|
if (first) {
|
|
|
|
|
first = false;
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32(str, 22);
|
|
|
|
|
const std::string str2 = "s";
|
|
|
|
|
PutLengthPrefixedSlice(str, str2);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->EnableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
|
edit.EncodeTo(&encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->DisableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit parsed;
|
|
|
|
|
Status s = parsed.DecodeFrom(encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ok()) << s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(!first);
|
|
|
|
|
auto& new_files = parsed.GetNewFiles();
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(new_files[0].second.marked_for_compaction);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(!new_files[1].second.marked_for_compaction);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(3u, new_files[0].second.fd.GetPathId());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(3u, new_files[1].second.fd.GetPathId());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(1u, parsed.GetDeletedFiles().size());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, NewFile4NotSupportedField) {
|
|
|
|
|
static const uint64_t kBig = 1ull << 50;
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(3, 300, 3, 100, InternalKey("foo", kBig + 500, kTypeValue),
|
|
|
|
|
InternalKey("zoo", kBig + 600, kTypeDeletion), kBig + 500,
|
|
|
|
|
kBig + 600, true, Temperature::kUnknown, kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownOldestAncesterTime, kUnknownFileCreationTime,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
300 /* epoch_number */, kUnknownFileChecksum,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownFileChecksumFuncName, kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetComparatorName("foo");
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLogNumber(kBig + 100);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetNextFile(kBig + 200);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLastSequence(kBig + 1000);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Call back function to add extra customized builds.
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->SetCallBack(
|
|
|
|
|
"VersionEdit::EncodeTo:NewFile4:CustomizeFields", [&](void* arg) {
|
|
|
|
|
std::string* str = reinterpret_cast<std::string*>(arg);
|
|
|
|
|
const std::string str1 = "s";
|
|
|
|
|
PutLengthPrefixedSlice(str, str1);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->EnableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
|
edit.EncodeTo(&encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::SyncPoint::GetInstance()->DisableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit parsed;
|
|
|
|
|
Status s = parsed.DecodeFrom(encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, EncodeEmptyFile) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddFile(0, 0, 0, 0, InternalKey(), InternalKey(), 0, 0, false,
|
|
|
|
|
Temperature::kUnknown, kInvalidBlobFileNumber,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownOldestAncesterTime, kUnknownFileCreationTime,
|
Sort L0 files by newly introduced epoch_num (#10922)
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930 tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958#issue-511150930
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run https://github.com/ajkr/rocksdb/commit/36a5686ec012f35a4371e409aa85c404ca1c210d (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
2 years ago
|
|
|
1 /*epoch_number*/, kUnknownFileChecksum,
|
|
|
|
|
kUnknownFileChecksumFuncName, kNullUniqueId64x2, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
std::string buffer;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(!edit.EncodeTo(&buffer));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, ColumnFamilyTest) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetColumnFamily(2);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddColumnFamily("column_family");
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetMaxColumnFamily(5);
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.Clear();
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetColumnFamily(3);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.DropColumnFamily();
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skip deleted WALs during recovery
Summary:
This patch record min log number to keep to the manifest while flushing SST files to ignore them and any WAL older than them during recovery. This is to avoid scenarios when we have a gap between the WAL files are fed to the recovery procedure. The gap could happen by for example out-of-order WAL deletion. Such gap could cause problems in 2PC recovery where the prepared and commit entry are placed into two separate WAL and gap in the WALs could result into not processing the WAL with the commit entry and hence breaking the 2PC recovery logic.
Before the commit, for 2PC case, we determined which log number to keep in FindObsoleteFiles(). We looked at the earliest logs with outstanding prepare entries, or prepare entries whose respective commit or abort are in memtable. With the commit, the same calculation is done while we apply the SST flush. Just before installing the flush file, we precompute the earliest log file to keep after the flush finishes using the same logic (but skipping the memtables just flushed), record this information to the manifest entry for this new flushed SST file. This pre-computed value is also remembered in memory, and will later be used to determine whether a log file can be deleted. This value is unlikely to change until next flush because the commit entry will stay in memtable. (In WritePrepared, we could have removed the older log files as soon as all prepared entries are committed. It's not yet done anyway. Even if we do it, the only thing we loss with this new approach is earlier log deletion between two flushes, which does not guarantee to happen anyway because the obsolete file clean-up function is only executed after flush or compaction)
This min log number to keep is stored in the manifest using the safely-ignore customized field of AddFile entry, in order to guarantee that the DB generated using newer release can be opened by previous releases no older than 4.2.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3765
Differential Revision: D7747618
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: d00c92105b4f83852e9754a1b70d6b64cb590729
7 years ago
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, MinLogNumberToKeep) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetMinLogNumberToKeep(13);
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.Clear();
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetMinLogNumberToKeep(23);
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, AtomicGroupTest) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.MarkAtomicGroup(1);
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, IgnorableField) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit ve;
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Size of ignorable field is too large
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32Varint64(&encoded, 2 /* kLogNumber */, 66);
|
|
|
|
|
// This is a customized ignorable tag
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32Varint64(&encoded,
|
|
|
|
|
0x2710 /* A field with kTagSafeIgnoreMask set */,
|
|
|
|
|
5 /* fieldlength 5 */);
|
|
|
|
|
encoded += "abc"; // Only fills 3 bytes,
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(ve.DecodeFrom(encoded));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
encoded.clear();
|
|
|
|
|
// Error when seeing unidentified tag that is not ignorable
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32Varint64(&encoded, 2 /* kLogNumber */, 66);
|
|
|
|
|
// This is a customized ignorable tag
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32Varint64(&encoded, 666 /* A field with kTagSafeIgnoreMask unset */,
|
|
|
|
|
3 /* fieldlength 3 */);
|
|
|
|
|
encoded += "abc"; // Fill 3 bytes
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32Varint64(&encoded, 3 /* next file number */, 88);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(ve.DecodeFrom(encoded));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Safely ignore an identified but safely ignorable entry
|
|
|
|
|
encoded.clear();
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32Varint64(&encoded, 2 /* kLogNumber */, 66);
|
|
|
|
|
// This is a customized ignorable tag
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32Varint64(&encoded,
|
|
|
|
|
0x2710 /* A field with kTagSafeIgnoreMask set */,
|
|
|
|
|
3 /* fieldlength 3 */);
|
|
|
|
|
encoded += "abc"; // Fill 3 bytes
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32Varint64(&encoded, 3 /* kNextFileNumber */, 88);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(ve.DecodeFrom(encoded));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(ve.HasLogNumber());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(ve.HasNextFile());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(66, ve.GetLogNumber());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(88, ve.GetNextFile());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, DbId) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetDBId("ab34-cd12-435f-er00");
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.Clear();
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetDBId("34ba-cd12-435f-er01");
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, BlobFileAdditionAndGarbage) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const std::string checksum_method_prefix = "Hash";
|
|
|
|
|
const std::string checksum_value_prefix = "Value";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (uint64_t blob_file_number = 1; blob_file_number <= 10;
|
|
|
|
|
++blob_file_number) {
|
|
|
|
|
const uint64_t total_blob_count = blob_file_number << 10;
|
|
|
|
|
const uint64_t total_blob_bytes = blob_file_number << 20;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string checksum_method(checksum_method_prefix);
|
|
|
|
|
AppendNumberTo(&checksum_method, blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string checksum_value(checksum_value_prefix);
|
|
|
|
|
AppendNumberTo(&checksum_value, blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddBlobFile(blob_file_number, total_blob_count, total_blob_bytes,
|
|
|
|
|
checksum_method, checksum_value);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint64_t garbage_blob_count = total_blob_count >> 2;
|
|
|
|
|
const uint64_t garbage_blob_bytes = total_blob_bytes >> 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddBlobFileGarbage(blob_file_number, garbage_blob_count,
|
|
|
|
|
garbage_blob_bytes);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, AddWalEncodeDecode) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
for (uint64_t log_number = 1; log_number <= 20; log_number++) {
|
Track WAL in MANIFEST: update WalMetadata for WAL syncing (#7414)
Summary:
There are some tricky behaviors related to WAL sync:
- When creating a WAL, the WAL might not be synced, if the WAL directory is not synced, the WAL file's metadata may not even be synced to disk, so during recovery, when listing the WAL directory, the WAL may not even show up.
- During each DB::Write, the WriteOption can control whether the WAL should be synced, so a WAL previously not synced on creation can be synced during Write.
For each `SyncWAL`, we'll track the synced status and the current WAL size. Previously, we only track the WAL size on closing.
During recovery, we check that the on-disk WAL size is >= the last synced size.
So this PR introduces `synced_size` and `closed` to `WalMetadata` for the above design update.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7414
Test Plan:
- updated wal_edit_test
- updated version_edit_test
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D23796127
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5498ab80f537c48a10157e71a4745716aef5cf30
4 years ago
|
|
|
WalMetadata meta;
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
bool has_size = rand() % 2 == 0;
|
|
|
|
|
if (has_size) {
|
Track WAL in MANIFEST: update WalMetadata for WAL syncing (#7414)
Summary:
There are some tricky behaviors related to WAL sync:
- When creating a WAL, the WAL might not be synced, if the WAL directory is not synced, the WAL file's metadata may not even be synced to disk, so during recovery, when listing the WAL directory, the WAL may not even show up.
- During each DB::Write, the WriteOption can control whether the WAL should be synced, so a WAL previously not synced on creation can be synced during Write.
For each `SyncWAL`, we'll track the synced status and the current WAL size. Previously, we only track the WAL size on closing.
During recovery, we check that the on-disk WAL size is >= the last synced size.
So this PR introduces `synced_size` and `closed` to `WalMetadata` for the above design update.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7414
Test Plan:
- updated wal_edit_test
- updated version_edit_test
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D23796127
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5498ab80f537c48a10157e71a4745716aef5cf30
4 years ago
|
|
|
meta.SetSyncedSizeInBytes(rand() % 1000);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
edit.AddWal(log_number, meta);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
static std::string PrefixEncodedWalAdditionWithLength(
|
|
|
|
|
const std::string& encoded) {
|
|
|
|
|
std::string ret;
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32(&ret, Tag::kWalAddition2);
|
|
|
|
|
PutLengthPrefixedSlice(&ret, encoded);
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, AddWalDecodeBadLogNumber) {
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// No log number.
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
std::string encoded_edit = PrefixEncodedWalAdditionWithLength(encoded);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
Status s = edit.DecodeFrom(encoded_edit);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsCorruption());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ToString().find("Error decoding WAL log number") !=
|
|
|
|
|
std::string::npos)
|
|
|
|
|
<< s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// log number should be varint64,
|
|
|
|
|
// but we only encode 128 which is not a valid representation of varint64.
|
|
|
|
|
char c = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned char* ptr = reinterpret_cast<unsigned char*>(&c);
|
|
|
|
|
*ptr = 128;
|
|
|
|
|
encoded.append(1, c);
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded_edit = PrefixEncodedWalAdditionWithLength(encoded);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
Status s = edit.DecodeFrom(encoded_edit);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsCorruption());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ToString().find("Error decoding WAL log number") !=
|
|
|
|
|
std::string::npos)
|
|
|
|
|
<< s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, AddWalDecodeBadTag) {
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr WalNumber kLogNumber = 100;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t kSizeInBytes = 100;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
std::string encoded;
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint64(&encoded, kLogNumber);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// No tag.
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
std::string encoded_edit = PrefixEncodedWalAdditionWithLength(encoded);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
Status s = edit.DecodeFrom(encoded_edit);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsCorruption());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ToString().find("Error decoding tag") != std::string::npos)
|
|
|
|
|
<< s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// Only has size tag, no terminate tag.
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
std::string encoded_with_size = encoded;
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
PutVarint32(&encoded_with_size,
|
Track WAL in MANIFEST: update WalMetadata for WAL syncing (#7414)
Summary:
There are some tricky behaviors related to WAL sync:
- When creating a WAL, the WAL might not be synced, if the WAL directory is not synced, the WAL file's metadata may not even be synced to disk, so during recovery, when listing the WAL directory, the WAL may not even show up.
- During each DB::Write, the WriteOption can control whether the WAL should be synced, so a WAL previously not synced on creation can be synced during Write.
For each `SyncWAL`, we'll track the synced status and the current WAL size. Previously, we only track the WAL size on closing.
During recovery, we check that the on-disk WAL size is >= the last synced size.
So this PR introduces `synced_size` and `closed` to `WalMetadata` for the above design update.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7414
Test Plan:
- updated wal_edit_test
- updated version_edit_test
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D23796127
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5498ab80f537c48a10157e71a4745716aef5cf30
4 years ago
|
|
|
static_cast<uint32_t>(WalAdditionTag::kSyncedSize));
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
PutVarint64(&encoded_with_size, kSizeInBytes);
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded_edit =
|
|
|
|
|
PrefixEncodedWalAdditionWithLength(encoded_with_size);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
Status s = edit.DecodeFrom(encoded_edit);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsCorruption());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ToString().find("Error decoding tag") != std::string::npos)
|
|
|
|
|
<< s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// Only has terminate tag.
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
std::string encoded_with_terminate = encoded;
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
PutVarint32(&encoded_with_terminate,
|
|
|
|
|
static_cast<uint32_t>(WalAdditionTag::kTerminate));
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded_edit =
|
|
|
|
|
PrefixEncodedWalAdditionWithLength(encoded_with_terminate);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(edit.DecodeFrom(encoded_edit));
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
auto& wal_addition = edit.GetWalAdditions()[0];
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(wal_addition.GetLogNumber(), kLogNumber);
|
Track WAL in MANIFEST: update WalMetadata for WAL syncing (#7414)
Summary:
There are some tricky behaviors related to WAL sync:
- When creating a WAL, the WAL might not be synced, if the WAL directory is not synced, the WAL file's metadata may not even be synced to disk, so during recovery, when listing the WAL directory, the WAL may not even show up.
- During each DB::Write, the WriteOption can control whether the WAL should be synced, so a WAL previously not synced on creation can be synced during Write.
For each `SyncWAL`, we'll track the synced status and the current WAL size. Previously, we only track the WAL size on closing.
During recovery, we check that the on-disk WAL size is >= the last synced size.
So this PR introduces `synced_size` and `closed` to `WalMetadata` for the above design update.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7414
Test Plan:
- updated wal_edit_test
- updated version_edit_test
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D23796127
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5498ab80f537c48a10157e71a4745716aef5cf30
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wal_addition.GetMetadata().HasSyncedSize());
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, AddWalDecodeNoSize) {
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr WalNumber kLogNumber = 100;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded;
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint64(&encoded, kLogNumber);
|
Track WAL in MANIFEST: update WalMetadata for WAL syncing (#7414)
Summary:
There are some tricky behaviors related to WAL sync:
- When creating a WAL, the WAL might not be synced, if the WAL directory is not synced, the WAL file's metadata may not even be synced to disk, so during recovery, when listing the WAL directory, the WAL may not even show up.
- During each DB::Write, the WriteOption can control whether the WAL should be synced, so a WAL previously not synced on creation can be synced during Write.
For each `SyncWAL`, we'll track the synced status and the current WAL size. Previously, we only track the WAL size on closing.
During recovery, we check that the on-disk WAL size is >= the last synced size.
So this PR introduces `synced_size` and `closed` to `WalMetadata` for the above design update.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7414
Test Plan:
- updated wal_edit_test
- updated version_edit_test
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D23796127
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5498ab80f537c48a10157e71a4745716aef5cf30
4 years ago
|
|
|
PutVarint32(&encoded, static_cast<uint32_t>(WalAdditionTag::kSyncedSize));
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
// No real size after the size tag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// Without terminate tag.
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
std::string encoded_edit = PrefixEncodedWalAdditionWithLength(encoded);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
Status s = edit.DecodeFrom(encoded_edit);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsCorruption());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ToString().find("Error decoding WAL file size") !=
|
|
|
|
|
std::string::npos)
|
|
|
|
|
<< s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// With terminate tag.
|
|
|
|
|
PutVarint32(&encoded, static_cast<uint32_t>(WalAdditionTag::kTerminate));
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded_edit = PrefixEncodedWalAdditionWithLength(encoded);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
Status s = edit.DecodeFrom(encoded_edit);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsCorruption());
|
|
|
|
|
// The terminate tag is misunderstood as the size.
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.ToString().find("Error decoding tag") != std::string::npos)
|
|
|
|
|
<< s.ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, AddWalDebug) {
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr int n = 2;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr std::array<uint64_t, n> kLogNumbers{{10, 20}};
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr std::array<uint64_t, n> kSizeInBytes{{100, 200}};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddWal(kLogNumbers[i], WalMetadata(kSizeInBytes[i]));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const WalAdditions& wals = edit.GetWalAdditions();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(edit.IsWalAddition());
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(wals.size(), n);
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
const WalAddition& wal = wals[i];
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(wal.GetLogNumber(), kLogNumbers[i]);
|
Track WAL in MANIFEST: update WalMetadata for WAL syncing (#7414)
Summary:
There are some tricky behaviors related to WAL sync:
- When creating a WAL, the WAL might not be synced, if the WAL directory is not synced, the WAL file's metadata may not even be synced to disk, so during recovery, when listing the WAL directory, the WAL may not even show up.
- During each DB::Write, the WriteOption can control whether the WAL should be synced, so a WAL previously not synced on creation can be synced during Write.
For each `SyncWAL`, we'll track the synced status and the current WAL size. Previously, we only track the WAL size on closing.
During recovery, we check that the on-disk WAL size is >= the last synced size.
So this PR introduces `synced_size` and `closed` to `WalMetadata` for the above design update.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7414
Test Plan:
- updated wal_edit_test
- updated version_edit_test
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D23796127
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5498ab80f537c48a10157e71a4745716aef5cf30
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(wal.GetMetadata().GetSyncedSizeInBytes(), kSizeInBytes[i]);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string expected_str = "VersionEdit {\n";
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
std::stringstream ss;
|
|
|
|
|
ss << " WalAddition: log_number: " << kLogNumbers[i]
|
|
|
|
|
<< " synced_size_in_bytes: " << kSizeInBytes[i] << "\n";
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
expected_str += ss.str();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
expected_str += " ColumnFamily: 0\n}\n";
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(edit.DebugString(true), expected_str);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string expected_json = "{\"EditNumber\": 4, \"WalAdditions\": [";
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
std::stringstream ss;
|
|
|
|
|
ss << "{\"LogNumber\": " << kLogNumbers[i] << ", "
|
|
|
|
|
<< "\"SyncedSizeInBytes\": " << kSizeInBytes[i] << "}";
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
if (i < n - 1) ss << ", ";
|
|
|
|
|
expected_json += ss.str();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
expected_json += "], \"ColumnFamily\": 0}";
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(edit.DebugJSON(4, true), expected_json);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, DeleteWalEncodeDecode) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.DeleteWalsBefore(rand() % 100);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, DeleteWalDebug) {
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr int n = 2;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr std::array<uint64_t, n> kLogNumbers{{10, 20}};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
edit.DeleteWalsBefore(kLogNumbers[n - 1]);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const WalDeletion& wal = edit.GetWalDeletion();
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(edit.IsWalDeletion());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(wal.GetLogNumber(), kLogNumbers[n - 1]);
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string expected_str = "VersionEdit {\n";
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
std::stringstream ss;
|
|
|
|
|
ss << " WalDeletion: log_number: " << kLogNumbers[n - 1] << "\n";
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
expected_str += ss.str();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
expected_str += " ColumnFamily: 0\n}\n";
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(edit.DebugString(true), expected_str);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string expected_json = "{\"EditNumber\": 4, \"WalDeletion\": ";
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
std::stringstream ss;
|
|
|
|
|
ss << "{\"LogNumber\": " << kLogNumbers[n - 1] << "}";
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
expected_json += ss.str();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
expected_json += ", \"ColumnFamily\": 0}";
|
Define WAL related classes to be used in VersionEdit and VersionSet (#7164)
Summary:
`WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are defined in `wal_version.h` and used in `VersionEdit`.
`WalAddition` is used to represent events of creating a new WAL (no size, just log number), or closing a WAL (with size).
`WalDeletion` is used to represent events of deleting or archiving a WAL, it means the WAL is no longer alive (won't be replayed during recovery).
`WalSet` is the set of alive WALs kept in `VersionSet`.
1. Why use `WalDeletion` instead of relying on `MinLogNumber` to identify outdated WALs
On recovery, we can compute `MinLogNumber()` based on the log numbers kept in MANIFEST, any log with number < MinLogNumber can be ignored. So it seems that we don't need to persist `WalDeletion` to MANIFEST, since we can ignore the WALs based on MinLogNumber.
But the `MinLogNumber()` is actually a lower bound, it does not exactly mean that logs starting from MinLogNumber must exist. This is because in a corner case, when a column family is empty and never flushed, its log number is set to the largest log number, but not persisted in MANIFEST. So let's say there are 2 column families, when creating the DB, the first WAL has log number 1, so it's persisted to MANIFEST for both column families. Then CF 0 is empty and never flushed, CF 1 is updated and flushed, so a new WAL with log number 2 is created and persisted to MANIFEST for CF 1. But CF 0's log number in MANIFEST is still 1. So on recovery, MinLogNumber is 1, but since log 1 only contains data for CF 1, and CF 1 is flushed, log 1 might have already been deleted from disk.
We can make `MinLogNumber()` be the exactly minimum log number that must exist, by persisting the most recent log number for empty column families that are not flushed. But if there are N such column families, then every time a new WAL is created, we need to add N records to MANIFEST.
In current design, a record is persisted to MANIFEST only when WAL is created, closed, or deleted/archived, so the number of WAL related records are bounded to 3x number of WALs.
2. Why keep `WalSet` in `VersionSet` instead of applying the `VersionEdit`s to `VersionStorageInfo`
`VersionEdit`s are originally designed to track the addition and deletion of SST files. The SST files are related to column families, each column family has a list of `Version`s, and each `Version` keeps the set of active SST files in `VersionStorageInfo`.
But WALs are a concept of DB, they are not bounded to specific column families. So logically it does not make sense to store WALs in a column family's `Version`s.
Also, `Version`'s purpose is to keep reference to SST / blob files, so that they are not deleted until there is no version referencing them. But a WAL is deleted regardless of version references.
So we keep the WALs in `VersionSet` for the purpose of writing out the DB state's snapshot when creating new MANIFESTs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7164
Test Plan:
make version_edit_test && ./version_edit_test
make wal_edit_test && ./wal_edit_test
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D22677936
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 5a3b6890140e572ffd79eb37e6e4c3c32361a859
4 years ago
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(edit.DebugJSON(4, true), expected_json);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, FullHistoryTsLow) {
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(edit.HasFullHistoryTsLow());
|
|
|
|
|
std::string ts = test::EncodeInt(0);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetFullHistoryTsLow(ts);
|
|
|
|
|
TestEncodeDecode(edit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make it able to ignore WAL related VersionEdits in older versions (#7873)
Summary:
Although the tags for `WalAddition`, `WalDeletion` are after `kTagSafeIgnoreMask`, to actually be able to skip these entries in older versions of RocksDB, we require that they are encoded with their encoded size as the prefix. This requirement is not met in the current codebase, so a downgraded DB may fail to open if these entries exist in the MANIFEST.
If a DB wants to downgrade, and its MANIFEST contains `WalAddition` or `WalDeletion`, it can set `track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest` to `false`, then restart twice, then downgrade. On the first restart, a new MANIFEST will be created with a `WalDeletion` indicating that all previously tracked WALs are removed from MANIFEST. On the second restart, since there is no tracked WALs in MANIFEST now, a new MANIFEST will be created with neither `WalAddition` nor `WalDeletion`. Then the DB can downgrade.
Tags for `BlobFileAddition`, `BlobFileGarbage` also have the same problem, but this PR focuses on solving the problem for WAL edits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7873
Test Plan: Added a `VersionEditTest::IgnorableTags` unit test to verify all entries with tags larger than `kTagSafeIgnoreMask` can actually be skipped and won't affect parsing of other entries.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D25935930
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 7a02fdba4311d6084328c14aed110a26d08c3efb
4 years ago
|
|
|
// Tests that if RocksDB is downgraded, the new types of VersionEdits
|
|
|
|
|
// that have a tag larger than kTagSafeIgnoreMask can be safely ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(VersionEditTest, IgnorableTags) {
|
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->SetCallBack(
|
|
|
|
|
"VersionEdit::EncodeTo:IgnoreIgnorableTags", [&](void* arg) {
|
|
|
|
|
bool* ignore = static_cast<bool*>(arg);
|
|
|
|
|
*ignore = true;
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->EnableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t kPrevLogNumber = 100;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t kLogNumber = 200;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t kNextFileNumber = 300;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t kColumnFamilyId = 400;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit;
|
|
|
|
|
// Add some ignorable entries.
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
edit.AddWal(i + 1, WalMetadata(i + 2));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetDBId("db_id");
|
|
|
|
|
// Add unignorable entries.
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetPrevLogNumber(kPrevLogNumber);
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetLogNumber(kLogNumber);
|
|
|
|
|
// Add more ignorable entries.
|
|
|
|
|
edit.DeleteWalsBefore(100);
|
|
|
|
|
// Add unignorable entry.
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetNextFile(kNextFileNumber);
|
|
|
|
|
// Add more ignorable entries.
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetFullHistoryTsLow("ts");
|
|
|
|
|
// Add unignorable entry.
|
|
|
|
|
edit.SetColumnFamily(kColumnFamilyId);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string encoded;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(edit.EncodeTo(&encoded));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit decoded;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(decoded.DecodeFrom(encoded));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that all ignorable entries are ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(decoded.HasDbId());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(decoded.HasFullHistoryTsLow());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(decoded.IsWalAddition());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(decoded.IsWalDeletion());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(decoded.GetWalAdditions().empty());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(decoded.GetWalDeletion().IsEmpty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that unignorable entries are still present.
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(edit.GetPrevLogNumber(), kPrevLogNumber);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(edit.GetLogNumber(), kLogNumber);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(edit.GetNextFile(), kNextFileNumber);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(edit.GetColumnFamily(), kColumnFamilyId);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SyncPoint::GetInstance()->DisableProcessing();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(FileMetaDataTest, UpdateBoundariesBlobIndex) {
|
|
|
|
|
FileMetaData meta;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t file_number = 10;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint32_t path_id = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t file_size = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
meta.fd = FileDescriptor(file_number, path_id, file_size);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr char key[] = "foo";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t expected_oldest_blob_file_number = 20;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Plain old value (does not affect oldest_blob_file_number)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr char value[] = "value";
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr SequenceNumber seq = 200;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(meta.UpdateBoundaries(key, value, seq, kTypeValue));
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(meta.oldest_blob_file_number, kInvalidBlobFileNumber);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Non-inlined, non-TTL blob index (sets oldest_blob_file_number)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t blob_file_number = 25;
|
|
|
|
|
static_assert(blob_file_number > expected_oldest_blob_file_number,
|
|
|
|
|
"unexpected");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t offset = 1000;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t size = 100;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string blob_index;
|
|
|
|
|
BlobIndex::EncodeBlob(&blob_index, blob_file_number, offset, size,
|
|
|
|
|
kNoCompression);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr SequenceNumber seq = 201;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(meta.UpdateBoundaries(key, blob_index, seq, kTypeBlobIndex));
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(meta.oldest_blob_file_number, blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Another one, with the oldest blob file number (updates
|
|
|
|
|
// oldest_blob_file_number)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t offset = 2000;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t size = 300;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string blob_index;
|
|
|
|
|
BlobIndex::EncodeBlob(&blob_index, expected_oldest_blob_file_number, offset,
|
|
|
|
|
size, kNoCompression);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr SequenceNumber seq = 202;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(meta.UpdateBoundaries(key, blob_index, seq, kTypeBlobIndex));
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(meta.oldest_blob_file_number, expected_oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Inlined TTL blob index (does not affect oldest_blob_file_number)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t expiration = 9876543210;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr char value[] = "value";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string blob_index;
|
|
|
|
|
BlobIndex::EncodeInlinedTTL(&blob_index, expiration, value);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr SequenceNumber seq = 203;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(meta.UpdateBoundaries(key, blob_index, seq, kTypeBlobIndex));
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(meta.oldest_blob_file_number, expected_oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Non-inlined TTL blob index (does not affect oldest_blob_file_number, even
|
|
|
|
|
// though file number is smaller)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t expiration = 9876543210;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t blob_file_number = 15;
|
|
|
|
|
static_assert(blob_file_number < expected_oldest_blob_file_number,
|
|
|
|
|
"unexpected");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t offset = 2000;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t size = 500;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string blob_index;
|
|
|
|
|
BlobIndex::EncodeBlobTTL(&blob_index, expiration, blob_file_number, offset,
|
|
|
|
|
size, kNoCompression);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr SequenceNumber seq = 204;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(meta.UpdateBoundaries(key, blob_index, seq, kTypeBlobIndex));
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(meta.oldest_blob_file_number, expected_oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Corrupt blob index
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr char corrupt_blob_index[] = "!corrupt!";
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr SequenceNumber seq = 205;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(
|
|
|
|
|
meta.UpdateBoundaries(key, corrupt_blob_index, seq, kTypeBlobIndex)
|
|
|
|
|
.IsCorruption());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(meta.oldest_blob_file_number, expected_oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Invalid blob file number
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t offset = 10000;
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr uint64_t size = 1000;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string blob_index;
|
|
|
|
|
BlobIndex::EncodeBlob(&blob_index, kInvalidBlobFileNumber, offset, size,
|
|
|
|
|
kNoCompression);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constexpr SequenceNumber seq = 206;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(meta.UpdateBoundaries(key, blob_index, seq, kTypeBlobIndex)
|
|
|
|
|
.IsCorruption());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(meta.oldest_blob_file_number, expected_oldest_blob_file_number);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::port::InstallStackTraceHandler();
|
|
|
|
|
::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
|
|
|
|
|
return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
