Summary:
... instead of race-condition-laden FaultInjectionTestEnv. See https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/facebook/rocksdb/27912/workflows/4c63e5a8-597e-439d-8c7e-82308056af02/jobs/609648 and similar PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/11271
Had to fix the semantics of FaultInjectionTestFS Close() operations to allow a non-OK Close() to fulfill the obligation to close before destruction. To me, this is the obvious choice of Close contract, because what is the caller supposed to do if Close() fails and they still have an obligation to successfully close before object destruction? Call Close() in an infinite loop? Leak the object? I have added API comments to the Env and Filesystem Close() functions to clarify the contracts.
Note that `DB::Close()` has one exception to this kind of Close contract, but it is clearly described in API comments and it is really only for catching programming mistakes, not for dealing with exogenous errors.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11499
Test Plan: watch CI
Reviewed By: jowlyzhang
Differential Revision: D46375708
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 03d4d8251e5df50a82ecd139f7e83f613015fe40
oxigraph-main
Peter Dillinger2 years agocommitted byFacebook GitHub Bot