dont skip IO for filter blocks

Summary:
Based on my experience with linkbench, We should not skip loading bloom filter blocks when they are not available in block cache when using Iterator::Seek

Actually I am not sure why this behavior existed in the first place
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2255

Differential Revision: D5010721

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: 0af545a06ac4baeecb248706ec34d009c2480ca4
main
Islam AbdelRahman 8 years ago committed by Facebook Github Bot
parent 3f73d54bbd
commit 4897eb250b
  1. 27
      db/db_bloom_filter_test.cc
  2. 5
      table/block_based_table_reader.cc

@ -798,36 +798,19 @@ TEST_P(BloomStatsTestWithParam, BloomStatsTestWithIter) {
ASSERT_OK(iter->status());
ASSERT_TRUE(iter->Valid());
ASSERT_EQ(value1, iter->value().ToString());
if (partition_filters_) {
ASSERT_EQ(0, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count); // no_io
ASSERT_EQ(0, perf_context.bloom_sst_miss_count); // no_io
} else {
ASSERT_EQ(1, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count);
}
ASSERT_EQ(1, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count);
iter->Seek(key3);
ASSERT_OK(iter->status());
ASSERT_TRUE(iter->Valid());
ASSERT_EQ(value3, iter->value().ToString());
if (partition_filters_) {
ASSERT_EQ(0, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count); // no_io
ASSERT_EQ(0, perf_context.bloom_sst_miss_count); // no_io
} else {
ASSERT_EQ(2, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count);
}
ASSERT_EQ(2, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count);
iter->Seek(key2);
ASSERT_OK(iter->status());
if (partition_filters_) {
// iter is still valid since filter did not reject the key2
ASSERT_TRUE(iter->Valid());
ASSERT_EQ(0, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count); // no_io
ASSERT_EQ(0, perf_context.bloom_sst_miss_count); // no_io
} else {
ASSERT_TRUE(!iter->Valid());
ASSERT_EQ(1, perf_context.bloom_sst_miss_count);
ASSERT_EQ(2, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count);
}
ASSERT_TRUE(!iter->Valid());
ASSERT_EQ(1, perf_context.bloom_sst_miss_count);
ASSERT_EQ(2, perf_context.bloom_sst_hit_count);
}
INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(BloomStatsTestWithParam, BloomStatsTestWithParam,

@ -1477,14 +1477,13 @@ bool BlockBasedTable::PrefixMayMatch(const Slice& internal_key) {
Status s;
// First, try check with full filter
const bool no_io = true;
auto filter_entry = GetFilter(no_io);
auto filter_entry = GetFilter();
FilterBlockReader* filter = filter_entry.value;
if (filter != nullptr) {
if (!filter->IsBlockBased()) {
const Slice* const const_ikey_ptr = &internal_key;
may_match =
filter->PrefixMayMatch(prefix, kNotValid, no_io, const_ikey_ptr);
filter->PrefixMayMatch(prefix, kNotValid, false, const_ikey_ptr);
} else {
InternalKey internal_key_prefix(prefix, kMaxSequenceNumber, kTypeValue);
auto internal_prefix = internal_key_prefix.Encode();

Loading…
Cancel
Save