Summary:
This is useful when we put the entries in the block cache for accounting
purposes and do not expect it to be used after it is released. If the cache does not
erase the item in such cases not only the performance of cache is
negatively affected but the item's destructor not being called at the
time of release might violate the assumptions about the lifetime of the
object.
The new change adds a force_erase option to the Release method and
returns a boolean to indicate whehter the item is successfully deleted.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2180
Differential Revision: D4916032
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 94409a346069923cac9de8e57adc313b4ed46f28
Summary:
Move some files under util/ to new directories env/, monitoring/ options/ and cache/
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2090
Differential Revision: D4833681
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 2fd8bef
Summary:
If the users use the NewLRUCache() without passing in the number of shard bits, instead of using hard-coded 6, we'll determine it based on capacity.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1584
Differential Revision: D4242517
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 86b0f18
Summary:
Previously the only way to increment a handle's refcount was to invoke Lookup(), which (1) did hash table lookup to get cache handle, (2) incremented that handle's refcount. For a future DeleteRange optimization, I added a function, Ref(), for when the caller already has a cache handle and only needs to do (2).
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1761
Differential Revision: D4397114
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 9addbe5
Summary:
Fix ClockCache memory leak found by valgrind:
# Add destructor to cleanup cached values.
# Delete key with cache handle immediately after handle is recycled, and erase table entry immediately if duplicated cache entry is inserted.
Test Plan:
make DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 valgrind_check
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62973
Summary:
We used to allow insert into full block cache as long as `strict_capacity_limit=false`. This diff further restrict insert to full cache if caller don't intent to hold handle to the cache entry after insert.
Hope this diff fix the assertion failure with db_stress: https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/sandcastle/log/?instance_id=211853102&step_id=2475070014
db_stress: util/lru_cache.cc:278: virtual void rocksdb::LRUCacheShard::Release(rocksdb::Cache::Handle*): Assertion `lru_.next == &lru_' failed.
The assertion at lru_cache.cc:278 can fail when an entry is inserted into full cache and stay in LRU list.
Test Plan:
make all check
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, lightmark, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62325
Summary:
Add mid-point insertion functionality to LRU cache. Caller of `Cache::Insert()` can set an additional parameter to make a cache entry have higher priority. The LRU cache will reserve at most `capacity * high_pri_pool_pct` bytes for high-pri cache entries. If `high_pri_pool_pct` is zero, the cache degenerates to normal LRU cache.
Context: If we are to put index and filter blocks into RocksDB block cache, index/filter block can be swap out too early. We want to add an option to RocksDB to reserve some capacity in block cache just for index/filter blocks, to mitigate the issue.
In later diffs I'll update block based table reader to use the interface to cache index/filter blocks at high priority, and expose the option to `DBOptions` and make it dynamic changeable.
Test Plan: unit test.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong, lightmark
Reviewed By: lightmark
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, march, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61977
Summary:
Clock-based cache implemenetation aim to have better concurreny than
default LRU cache. See inline comments for implementation details.
Test Plan:
Update cache_test to run on both LRUCache and ClockCache. Adding some
new tests to catch some of the bugs that I fixed while implementing the
cache.
Reviewers: kradhakrishnan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61647
Siying Dong