Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
oxigraph-main
main
oxigraph-8.1.1
oxigraph-8.3.2
oxigraph-main
${ noResults }
8 Commits (oxigraph-main)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Changyu Bi
|
62fc15f009 |
Block per key-value checksum (#11287)
Summary: add option `block_protection_bytes_per_key` and implementation for block per key-value checksum. The main changes are 1. checksum construction and verification in block.cc/h 2. pass the option `block_protection_bytes_per_key` around (mainly for methods defined in table_cache.h) 3. unit tests/crash test updates Tests: * Added unit tests * Crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --simple --block_protection_bytes_per_key=1 --write_buffer_size=1048576` Follow up (maybe as a separate PR): make sure corruption status returned from BlockIters are correctly handled. Performance: Turning on block per KV protection has a non-trivial negative impact on read performance and costs additional memory. For memory, each block includes additional 24 bytes for checksum-related states beside checksum itself. For CPU, I set up a DB of size ~1.2GB with 5M keys (32 bytes key and 200 bytes value) which compacts to ~5 SST files (target file size 256 MB) in L6 without compression. I tested readrandom performance with various block cache size (to mimic various cache hit rates): ``` SETUP make OPTIMIZE_LEVEL="-O3" USE_LTO=1 DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -j32 db_bench ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq,compact0,waitforcompaction,compact,waitforcompaction -write_buffer_size=33554432 -level_compaction_dynamic_level_bytes=true -max_background_jobs=8 -target_file_size_base=268435456 --num=5000000 --key_size=32 --value_size=200 --compression_type=none BENCHMARK ./db_bench --use_existing_db -benchmarks=readtocache,readrandom[-X10] --num=5000000 --key_size=32 --disable_auto_compactions --reads=1000000 --block_protection_bytes_per_key=[0|1] --cache_size=$CACHESIZE The readrandom ops/sec looks like the following: Block cache size: 2GB 1.2GB * 0.9 1.2GB * 0.8 1.2GB * 0.5 8MB Main 240805 223604 198176 161653 139040 PR prot_bytes=0 238691 226693 200127 161082 141153 PR prot_bytes=1 214983 193199 178532 137013 108211 prot_bytes=1 vs -10% -15% -10.8% -15% -23% prot_bytes=0 ``` The benchmark has a lot of variance, but there was a 5% to 25% regression in this benchmark with different cache hit rates. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11287 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D43970708 Pulled By: cbi42 fbshipit-source-id: ef98d898b71779846fa74212b9ec9e08b7183940 |
2 years ago |
|
Changyu Bi
|
fd165c869d |
Add memtable per key-value checksum (#10281)
Summary: Append per key-value checksum to internal key. These checksums are verified on read paths including Get, Iterator and during Flush. Get and Iterator will return `Corruption` status if there is a checksum verification failure. Flush will make DB become read-only upon memtable entry checksum verification failure. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10281 Test Plan: - Added new unit test cases: `make check` - Benchmark on memtable insert ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/memtable_write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -disable_wal=true -max_write_buffer_number=100 -num=10000000 -min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 # avg over 10 runs Baseline: 1166936 ops/sec memtable 2 bytes kv checksum : 1.11674e+06 ops/sec (-4%) memtable 2 bytes kv checksum + write batch 8 bytes kv checksum: 1.08579e+06 ops/sec (-6.95%) write batch 8 bytes kv checksum: 1.17979e+06 ops/sec (+1.1%) ``` - Benchmark on only memtable read: ops/sec dropped 31% for `readseq` due to time spend on verifying checksum. ops/sec for `readrandom` dropped ~6.8%. ``` # Readseq sudo TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/memtable_read ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq,readseq"[-X20]" -disable_wal=true -max_write_buffer_number=100 -num=10000000 -min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 readseq [AVG 20 runs] : 7432840 (± 212005) ops/sec; 822.3 (± 23.5) MB/sec readseq [MEDIAN 20 runs] : 7573878 ops/sec; 837.9 MB/sec With -memtable_protection_bytes_per_key=2: readseq [AVG 20 runs] : 5134607 (± 119596) ops/sec; 568.0 (± 13.2) MB/sec readseq [MEDIAN 20 runs] : 5232946 ops/sec; 578.9 MB/sec # Readrandom sudo TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/memtable_read ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom,readrandom"[-X10]" -disable_wal=true -max_write_buffer_number=100 -num=1000000 -min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 readrandom [AVG 10 runs] : 140236 (± 3938) ops/sec; 9.8 (± 0.3) MB/sec readrandom [MEDIAN 10 runs] : 140545 ops/sec; 9.8 MB/sec With -memtable_protection_bytes_per_key=2: readrandom [AVG 10 runs] : 130632 (± 2738) ops/sec; 9.1 (± 0.2) MB/sec readrandom [MEDIAN 10 runs] : 130341 ops/sec; 9.1 MB/sec ``` - Stress test: `python3 -u tools/db_crashtest.py whitebox --duration=1800` Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D37607896 Pulled By: cbi42 fbshipit-source-id: fdaefb475629d2471780d4a5f5bf81b44ee56113 |
3 years ago |
|
Adam Simpkins
|
28f54e71f3 |
fix compile errors in db/kv_checksum.h (#9173)
Summary: When defining a template class, the constructor should be specified simply using the class name; it does not take template arguments.a Apparently older versions of gcc and clang did not complain about this syntax, but gcc 11.x and recent versions of clang both complain about this file. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9173 Test Plan: When building with platform010 I got compile errors in this file both in `mode/dev` (clang) and in `mode/opt-gcc`. This diff fixes the compile failures. Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D32455881 Pulled By: simpkins fbshipit-source-id: 0682910d9e2cdade94ce1e77973d47ac04d9f7e2 |
4 years ago |
|
Peter Dillinger
|
0774d640c0 |
Fix some lint warnings reported on 6.25 (#8945)
Summary: Fix some lint warnings Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8945 Test Plan: existing tests, linters Reviewed By: zhichao-cao Differential Revision: D31103824 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 4dd9b0c30fa50e588107ac6ed392b2dfb507a5d4 |
4 years ago |
|
Andrew Kryczka
|
d648cb47b9 |
Adapt key-value checksum for timestamp-suffixed keys (#8914)
Summary: After https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8725, keys added to `WriteBatch` may be timestamp-suffixed, while `WriteBatch` has no awareness of the timestamp size. Therefore, `WriteBatch` can no longer calculate timestamp checksum separately from the rest of the key's checksum in all cases. This PR changes the definition of key in KV checksum to include the timestamp suffix. That way we do not need to worry about where the timestamp begins within the key. I believe the only practical effect of this change is now `AssignTimestamp()` requires recomputing the whole key checksum (`UpdateK()`) rather than just the timestamp portion (`UpdateT()`). Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8914 Test Plan: run stress command that used to fail ``` $ ./db_stress --batch_protection_bytes_per_key=8 -clear_column_family_one_in=0 -test_batches_snapshots=1 ``` Reviewed By: riversand963 Differential Revision: D30925715 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: c143f7ccb46c0efb390ad57ef415c250d754deff |
4 years ago |
|
Yanqin Jin
|
2a2b3e03a5 |
Allow WriteBatch to have keys with different timestamp sizes (#8725)
Summary: In the past, we unnecessarily requires all keys in the same write batch to be from column families whose timestamps' formats are the same for simplicity. Specifically, we cannot use the same write batch to write to two column families, one of which enables timestamp while the other disables it. The limitation is due to the member `timestamp_size_` that used to exist in each `WriteBatch` object. We pass a timestamp_size to the constructor of `WriteBatch`. Therefore, users can simply use the old `WriteBatch::Put()`, `WriteBatch::Delete()`, etc APIs for write, while the internal implementation of `WriteBatch` will take care of memory allocation for timestamps. The above is not necessary. One the one hand, users can set up a memory buffer to store user key and then contiguously append the timestamp to the user key. Then the user can pass this buffer to the `WriteBatch::Put(Slice&)` API. On the other hand, users can set up a SliceParts object which is an array of Slices and let the last Slice to point to the memory buffer storing timestamp. Then the user can pass the SliceParts object to the `WriteBatch::Put(SliceParts&)` API. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8725 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: ltamasi Differential Revision: D30654499 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: 9d848c77ad3c9dd629aa5fc4e2bc16fb0687b4a2 |
4 years ago |
|
Peter Dillinger
|
4750421ece |
Replace most typedef with using= (#8751)
Summary:
Old typedef syntax is confusing
Most but not all changes with
perl -pi -e 's/typedef (.*) ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+);/using $2 = $1;/g' list_of_files
make format
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8751
Test Plan: existing
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D30745277
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 6f65f0631c3563382d43347896020413cc2366d9
|
4 years ago |
|
Andrew Kryczka
|
78ee8564ad |
Integrity protection for live updates to WriteBatch (#7748)
Summary: This PR adds the foundation classes for key-value integrity protection and the first use case: protecting live updates from the source buffers added to `WriteBatch` through the destination buffer in `MemTable`. The width of the protection info is not yet configurable -- only eight bytes per key is supported. This PR allows users to enable protection by constructing `WriteBatch` with `protection_bytes_per_key == 8`. It does not yet expose a way for users to get integrity protection via other write APIs (e.g., `Put()`, `Merge()`, `Delete()`, etc.). The foundation classes (`ProtectionInfo.*`) embed the coverage info in their type, and provide `Protect.*()` and `Strip.*()` functions to navigate between types with different coverage. For making bytes per key configurable (for powers of two up to eight) in the future, these classes are templated on the unsigned integer type used to store the protection info. That integer contains the XOR'd result of hashes with independent seeds for all covered fields. For integer fields, the hash is computed on the raw unadjusted bytes, so the result is endian-dependent. The most significant bytes are truncated when the hash value (8 bytes) is wider than the protection integer. When `WriteBatch` is constructed with `protection_bytes_per_key == 8`, we hold a `ProtectionInfoKVOTC` (i.e., one that covers key, value, optype aka `ValueType`, timestamp, and CF ID) for each entry added to the batch. The protection info is generated from the original buffers passed by the user, as well as the original metadata generated internally. When writing to memtable, each entry is transformed to a `ProtectionInfoKVOTS` (i.e., dropping coverage of CF ID and adding coverage of sequence number), since at that point we know the sequence number, and have already selected a memtable corresponding to a particular CF. This protection info is verified once the entry is encoded in the `MemTable` buffer. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7748 Test Plan: - an integration test to verify a wide variety of single-byte changes to the encoded `MemTable` buffer are caught - add to stress/crash test to verify it works in variety of configs/operations without intentional corruption - [deferred] unit tests for `ProtectionInfo.*` classes for edge cases like KV swap, `SliceParts` and `Slice` APIs are interchangeable, etc. Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D25754492 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: e481bac6c03c2ab268be41359730f1ceb9964866 |
4 years ago |