Summary:
Now if we have iterate_upper_bound set, we continue read until get a key >= upper_bound. For a lot of cases that neighboring data blocks have a user key gap between them, our index key will be a user key in the middle to get a shorter size. For example, if we have blocks:
[a b c d][f g h]
Then the index key for the first block will be 'e'.
then if upper bound is any key between 'd' and 'e', for example, d1, d2, ..., d99999999999, we don't have to read the second block and also know that we have done our iteration by reaching the last key that smaller the upper bound already.
This diff can reduce RA in most cases.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2239
Differential Revision: D4990693
Pulled By: lightmark
fbshipit-source-id: ab30ea2e3c6edf3fddd5efed3c34fcf7739827ff
Summary:
to void future bug that caused by the mix of userkey/internalkey
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2084
Differential Revision: D4825889
Pulled By: lightmark
fbshipit-source-id: 28411db
Summary:
merger.h was always a confusing name for me, simply give the file a better name
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1836
Differential Revision: D4505357
Pulled By: IslamAbdelRahman
fbshipit-source-id: 07b28d8
Summary:
change the iterator status to NotSupported as soon as a range tombstone
is encountered by a ForwardIterator.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1593
Differential Revision: D4246294
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: aef9f49
Summary:
Previously we used TableCache::NewIterator() for multiple purposes (data
block iterator and range deletion iterator), and returned non-ok status in
the data block iterator. In one case where the caller only used the range
deletion block iterator (9e7cf3469b/db/version_set.cc (L965-L973)),
we didn't check/free the data block iterator containing non-ok status, which
caused a valgrind error.
So, this diff decouples creation of data block and range deletion block iterators,
and updates the callers accordingly. Both functions can return non-ok status
in an InternalIterator. Since the non-ok status is returned in an iterator that the
callers will definitely use, it should be more usable/less error-prone.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1513
Differential Revision: D4181423
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 835b8f5
Summary:
In ForwardIterator::SeekInternal(), we may end up passing empty Slice representing an internal key to InternalKeyComparator::Compare.
and when we try to extract the user key from this empty Slice, we will create a slice with size = 0 - 8 ( which will overflow and cause us to read invalid memory as well )
Scenarios to reproduce these issues are in the unit tests
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1467
Differential Revision: D4136660
Pulled By: lightmark
fbshipit-source-id: 151e128
Summary: As offline discussion with Siying, revert this since it has bug with seek.
Test Plan: make check -j64
Reviewers: yiwu, andrewkr, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D65559
Summary:
Add new Iterator API, `SeekForPrev`: find the last key that <= target key
support prefix_extractor
support prefix_same_as_start
support upper_bound
not supported in iterators without Prev()
Also add tests in db_iter_test and db_iterator_test
Pass all tests
Cheers!
Test Plan: make all check -j64
Reviewers: andrewkr, yiwu, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64149
Summary:
This diff update ForwardIterator to support pinning keys and values, which will allow DBIter to take advantage of that and eliminate memcpy when executing merge operators
This diff is stacked on D61305
Test Plan:
existing tests (updated them to test tailing iterator)
new test
Reviewers: andrewkr, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60009
Summary: With read_options.background_purge_on_iterator_cleanup=true, File deletion and closing can still happen in forward iterator, or WAL file closing. Cover those cases too.
Test Plan: I am adding unit tests.
Reviewers: andrewkr, IslamAbdelRahman, yiwu
Reviewed By: yiwu
Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61503
Summary: I realized I again is wrong about the naming convention. Let me change it to the correct one.
Test Plan: Run unit tests.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D55041
Summary: We want to provide a way to detect whether an iterator is stale and needs to be recreated. Add a iterator property to return version number.
Test Plan: Add two unit tests for it.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54921
Summary:
List of changes:
1) Fix the snprintf() usage in cases where wrong variable was used to determine the output buffer size.
2) Remove unnecessary checks before calling delete operator.
3) Increase code correctness by using size_t type when getting vector's size.
4) Unify the coding style by removing namespace::std usage at the top of the file to confirm to the majority usage.
5) Fix various lint errors pointed out by 'arc lint'.
Test Plan:
Code review and build:
git diff
make clean
make -j 32 commit-prereq
arc lint
Reviewers: kradhakrishnan, sdong, rven, anthony, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51849
Summary:
db_tailing_iter_test was failing on some platforms because of
an incorrect allocation and use. This diff fixes the issue.
Test Plan:
db_tailing_iter_test
Run valgrind for db_tailing_iter_test
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50835
Summary:
Under a tailing workload, there were increased block cache
misses when a memtable was flushed because we were rebuilding iterators
in that case since the version set changed. This was exacerbated in the
case of iterate_upper_bound, since file iterators which were over the
iterate_upper_bound would have been deleted and are now brought back as
part of the Rebuild, only to be deleted again. We now renew the iterators
and only build iterators for files which are added and delete file
iterators for files which are deleted.
Refer to https://reviews.facebook.net/D50463 for previous version
Test Plan: DBTestTailingIterator.TailingIteratorTrimSeekToNext
Reviewers: anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, igor, tnovak, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: yhchiang, march, dhruba, leveldb, lovro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50679
Summary:
Separate a new class InternalIterator from class Iterator, when the look-up is done internally, which also means they operate on key with sequence ID and type.
This change will enable potential future optimizations but for now InternalIterator's functions are still the same as Iterator's.
At the same time, separate the cleanup function to a separate class and let both of InternalIterator and Iterator inherit from it.
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48549
Summary:
It looks like in some cases an assert in SeekInternal failed when computing the
hints for the next level because user_key was the same as the largest key and
not strictly smaller. Relaxing the assert to expect smaller or equal keys.
Test Plan: make clean all check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46443
Summary: When computing the hint for GetNextLevelIndex(), ForwardIterator was doing a redundant comparison. This patch fixes the comparison (using https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/master/db/version_set.cc#L158 as a reference) and moves it inside an assert because we expect `level_files[f_idx]` to contain the next key after Seek(), so user_key should always be smaller than the largest key.
Test Plan: make clean all check
Reviewers: rven, anthony, yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: tnovak, sdong, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46227
Summary:
This diff fixes a case when the forward iterator misses a new
insert when the mutable iterator is not current. The test is also
improved and the check for deleted iterators is made more informative.
Test Plan: DBTailingIteratorTest.*Trim
Reviewers: tnovak, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46167
Summary:
I noticed that memtable iterator usually crosses the `iterate_upper_bound`
threshold when tailing. Changes introduced in D43833 made `NeedToSeekImmutable`
always return true in such case, even when `Seek()` only needs to rewind the
memtable iterator. In a test I ran, this caused the "tailing efficiency"
(ratio of calls to `Seek()` that only affect the memtable versus all seeks)
to drop almost to zero.
This diff attempts to fix the regression by using a different flag to indicate
that `current_` is over the limit instead of resetting `valid_` in
`UpdateCurrent()`.
Test Plan: `DBTestTailingIterator.TailingIteratorUpperBound`
Reviewers: sdong, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: dhruba, march
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45909
Summary:
The immutable memtable iterators are allocated from an arena and there
is no benefit from deleting these. Also the immutable memtables
themselves will continue to be in memory until the version set
containing it is alive. We will not remove immutable memtable iterators
over the upper bound. We now add immutable iterators to the test.
Test Plan: db_tailing_iter_test.TailingIteratorTrimSeekToNext
Reviewers: tnovak, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45597
Summary:
We have earlier added a feature to delete file iterators when the
current key is over the iterate upper bound. We now add a whitebox test
to check if the file iterators were actually deleted.
Test Plan: Add check for a range which has deleted iterators.
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45321
Summary:
After deleting file iterators which are over the iterate upper
bound, we also need to check for null pointers in
ResetIncompletIterators.
Test Plan: db_tailing_iter_test.TailingIteratorTrimSeekToNext
Reviewers: tnovak, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45525
Summary: Removing two unused variables that prevented compilation.
Test Plan: make all
Reviewers: rven, sdong, yhchiang, anthony, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44991
Summary:
This diff improves the memory utilization for tailing iterators RocksDB,
by freeing file iterators which are over the upper bound.
It is an updating on Siying's original diff for improving the memory usage for
tailing iterators. The changes for the seek and next path are now complete
and a test has been added to exercise these paths while deleting file iterators
which are above the upper bound.
Test Plan: db_tailing_iter_test.TailingIteratorTrimSeekToNext
Reviewers: march, tnovak, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43833
Summary:
Reseek mutable_iter if it is invalid in Next and immutable_iter
is invalid.
Test Plan: DBTestTailingIterator.TailingIteratorSeekToNext
Reviewers: tnovak, march, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44865
Summary: In internal stats, remember read latency histogram, if statistics is enabled. It can be retrieved from DB::GetProperty() with "rocksdb.dbstats" property, if it is enabled.
Test Plan: Manually run db_bench and prints out "rocksdb.dbstats" by hand and make sure it prints out as expected
Reviewers: igor, IslamAbdelRahman, rven, kradhakrishnan, anthony, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44193
Summary:
When using latest clang (3.6 or 3.7/trunck) rocksdb is failing with many errors. Almost all of them are missing override errors. This diff adds missing override keyword. No manual changes.
Prerequisites: bear and clang 3.5 build with extra tools
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 bear make all # generate a compilation database http://clang.llvm.org/docs/JSONCompilationDatabase.html
% clang-modernize -p . -include . -add-override
% make format
```
Test Plan:
Make sure all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% #Use default fb code clang.
% make check
```
Verify less error and no missing override errors.
```lang=bash
% # Have trunk clang present in path.
% ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 CC=clang CXX=clang++ make
```
Reviewers: igor, kradhakrishnan, rven, meyering, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34077
Summary:
It would be good to assing background job their IDs. Two benefits:
1) makes LOGs more readable
2) I might use it in my EventLogger, which will try to make our LOG easier to read/query/visualize
Test Plan: ran rocksdb, read the LOG
Reviewers: sdong, rven, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31617
Summary:
The very last reference happens in DBImpl::GetOptions()
I built with both DBImpl::GetOptions() and ColumnFamilyData::options() commented out
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29073
Summary:
We need to turn on -Wshorten-64-to-32 for mobile. See D1671432 (internal phabricator) for details.
This diff turns on the warning flag and fixes all the errors. There were also some interesting errors that I might call bugs, especially in plain table. Going forward, I think it makes sense to have this flag turned on and be very very careful when converting 64-bit to 32-bit variables.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: bobbaldwin, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28689
Summary:
In D19581 I made `ForwardIterator::status()` check all child iterators,
including immutable ones. It's, however, not necessary to do it every
time -- it'll suffice to check only when they're used and their status
could change.
This diff:
* introduces `immutable_status_` which is updated by `Seek()` and `Next()`
* removes special handling of `kIncomplete` status in those methods
Test Plan:
* `db_test`
* hacked ReadSequential in db_bench.cc to check `status()` in addition to
validity:
```
$ ./db_bench -use_existing_db -benchmarks readseq -disable_auto_compactions \
-use_tailing_iterator # without this patch
Keys: 16 bytes each
Values: 100 bytes each (50 bytes after compression)
Entries: 1000000
[...]
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdbtest/dbbench]
readseq : 0.562 micros/op 1778103 ops/sec; 98.4 MB/s
$ ./db_bench -use_existing_db -benchmarks readseq -disable_auto_compactions \
-use_tailing_iterator # with the patch
readseq : 0.433 micros/op 2311363 ops/sec; 127.8 MB/s
```
Reviewers: igor, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, march, lovro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24063
Summary: Enforce the accessier naming convention in functions in version_set.h
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28143
Summary:
Rename Version::Builder to VersionBuilder and expose its definition to a header.
Make VerisonBuilder not reference Version or ColumnFamilyData, only working with VersionStorageInfo.
Add version_builder_test which has a simple test.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27969
Summary:
Make compaction picker easier to test.
The basic idea is to separate a minimum subcomponent of Version to VersionStorageInfo, which just responsible to LSM tree. A stub VersionStorageInfo can then be easily created and passed into compaction picker so that we can check the outputs.
It now passes most tests. Still two things need to be done:
(1) deal with the FIFO compaction's file size.
(2) write an example test to make sure the interface can do the job.
Add a compaction_picker_test to make sure compaction picker codes can be easily unit tested.
Test Plan:
Pass all unit tests and compaction_picker_test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27639
Summary:
Abstract out FlushProcess and take it out of DBImpl.
This also includes taking DeletionState outside of DBImpl.
Currently this diff is only doing the refactoring. Future work includes:
1. Decoupling flush_process.cc, make it depend on less state
2. Write flush_process_test, which will mock out everything that FlushProcess depends on and test it in isolation
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27561
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
make release
will run full test on all stacked diffs
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27597
Summary:
This is not a critical options. Making it dynamic so that we can remove
more reference to cfd->options()
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24957
Summary:
Since ForwardIterator is on a level below DBIter, the latter may call Next() on
it (e.g. in order to skip deletion markers). Since this also updates
`prev_key_`, it may prevent the Seek() optimization.
For example, assume that there's only one SST file and it contains the following
entries: 0101, 0201 (`ValueType::kTypeDeletion`, i.e. a tombstone record), 0201
(`kTypeValue`), 0202. Memtable is empty. `Seek(0102)` will result in `prev_key_`
being set to `0201` instead of `0102`, since `DBIter::Seek()` will call
`ForwardIterator::Next()` to skip record 0201. Therefore, when `Seek(0102)` is
called again, `NeedToSeekImmutable()` will return true.
This fix relies on `prefix_extractor_` to detect prefix changes. `prev_key_` is
only set to `current_->key()` as long as they have the same prefix.
I also made a small change to `NeedToSeekImmutable()` so it no longer returns
true when the db is empty (i.e. there's nothing but a memtable).
Test Plan:
$ TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdbtest ROCKSDB_TESTS=TailingIterator ./db_test
Reviewers: sdong, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23823
Summary:
Simply code by removing code path which does not use Arena
from NewInternalIterator
Test Plan:
make all check
make valgrind_check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22395
Summary:
When reading from kBlockCacheTier, ForwardIterator's internal child iterators
may end up in the incomplete state (read was unable to complete without doing
disk I/O). `ForwardIterator::status()` will correctly report that; however, the
iterator may be stuck in that state until all sub-iterators are rebuilt:
* `NeedToSeekImmutable()` may return false even if some sub-iterators are
incomplete
* one of the child iterators may be an empty iterator without any state other
that the kIncomplete status (created using `NewErrorIterator()`); seeking on
any such iterator has no effect -- we need to construct it again
Akin to rebuilding iterators after a superversion bump, this diff makes forward
iterator reset all incomplete child iterators when `Seek()` or `Next()` are
called.
Test Plan: TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdbtest ROCKSDB_TESTS=TailingIterator ./db_test
Reviewers: igor, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: lovro, march, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22575
Summary:
If `NeedToSeekImmutable()` returns false, `SeekInternal()` won't reset the
contents of `immutable_min_heap_`. However, since it calls `UpdateCurrent()`
unconditionally, if `current_` is one of immutable iterators (previously popped
from `immutable_min_heap_`), `UpdateCurrent()` will overwrite it. As a result,
if old `current_` in fact pointed to the smallest entry, forward iterator will
skip some records.
Fix implemented in this diff pushes `current_` back to `immutable_min_heap_`
before calling `UpdateCurrent()`.
Test Plan:
New unit test (courtesy of @lovro):
$ ROCKSDB_TESTS=TailingIteratorSeekToSame ./db_test
Reviewers: igor, dhruba, haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: lovro, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19653
Summary:
Forward iterator only checked `status_` and `mutable_iter_->status()`, which is
not sufficient. For example, when reading exclusively from cache
(kBlockCacheTier), `mutable_iter_->status()` may return kOk (e.g. there's
nothing in the memtable), but one of immutable iterators could be in
kIncomplete. In this case, `ForwardIterator::status()` ought to return that
status instead of kOk.
This diff changes `status()` to also check `imm_iters_`, `l0_iters_`, and
`level_iters_`.
Test Plan:
ROCKSDB_TESTS=TailingIteratorIncomplete ./db_test
Reviewers: ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19581
Summary:
Use search hint to reduce FindFile range thus avoid comparison
For a small DB with 50M keys, perf_context counter shows it reduces
comparison from 2B to 1.3B for a 15-minute run. No perf change was
observed for 1 seek thread, but quite good improvement was seen for 32
seek threads, when CPU was busy.
will post detail results when ready
Test Plan: db_bench and db_test
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18879
Siying Dong