Summary: The t/DBTest.DropWrites test still fails under certain gcc version in release unit test.
I unfortunately cannot repro the failure (since the compilers have mapped library which I am not able to map to correctly). I am suspecting the clock skew.
Test Plan: Run make check
Reviewers:
CC: sdong igore
Task ID: #7312624
Blame Rev:
Summary: Change the naming style of getter and setters according to Google C++ style in compaction.h file
Test Plan: Compilation success
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41265
Summary: Currently there is no test in the suite to test the case where
there are multiple WAL files and there is a corruption in one of them. We have
tests for single WAL file corruption scenarios. Added tests to mock
the scenarios for all combinations of recovery modes and corruption in
specified file locations.
Test Plan: Run make check
Reviewers: sdong igor
CC: leveldb@
Task ID: #7501229
Blame Rev:
Summary: This change enables trivial move if all the input files are non onverlapping while doing Universal Compaction.
Test Plan: ./compaction_picker_test and db_test ran successfully with the new testcases.
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40875
Summary:
Fixed a bug in test ThreadStatusSingleCompaction where
SyncPoint traces are not cleared before the test begins
its second iteration.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: sdong, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41337
Summary:
This diff reverts the following two previous diffs related to
DBIter::FindPrevUserKey(), which makes db_stress unstable.
We should bake a better fix for this.
* "Fix a comparison in DBIter::FindPrevUserKey()"
ec70fea4c4.
* "Fixed endless loop in DBIter::FindPrevUserKey()"
acee2b08a2.
Test Plan: db_stress
Reviewers: anthony, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41301
Summary:
This fixes the following scenario we've hit:
- we reached max_total_wal_size, created a new wal and scheduled flushing all memtables corresponding to the old one,
- before the last of these flushes started its column family was dropped; the last background flush call was a no-op; no one removed the old wal from alive_logs_,
- hours have passed and no flushes happened even though lots of data was written; data is written to different column families, compactions are disabled; old column families are dropped before memtable grows big enough to trigger a flush; the old wal still sits in alive_logs_ preventing max_total_wal_size limit from kicking in,
- a few more hours pass and we run out disk space because of one huge .log file.
Test Plan: `make check`; backported the new test, checked that it fails without this diff
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40893
Summary: We have a race in the way test works. We avoided the race by adding the
wait to the counter. I thought 1s was eternity, but that is not true in some
scenarios. Increasing the timeout to 10s and adding warnings.
Also, adding nosleep to avoid the case where the wakeup thread is waiting behind
the sleeping thread for scheduling.
Test Plan: Run make check
Reviewers: siying igorcanadi
CC: leveldb@
Task ID: #7312624
Blame Rev:
Summary:
When seek target is a merge key (`kTypeMerge`), `DBIter::FindNextUserEntry()`
advances the underlying iterator _past_ the current key (`saved_key_`); see
`MergeValuesNewToOld()`. However, `FindPrevUserKey()` assumes that `iter_`
points to an entry with the same user key as `saved_key_`. As a result,
`it->Seek(key) && it->Prev()` can cause the iterator to be positioned at the
_next_, instead of the previous, entry (new test, written by @lovro, reproduces
the bug).
This diff changes `FindPrevUserKey()` to also skip keys that are _greater_ than
`saved_key_`.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, lovro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40791
Summary:
Fixes task 7156865 where a compaction causes a hang in flush
memtable if CancelAllBackgroundWork was called prior to it.
Stack trace is in : https://phabricator.fb.com/P19848829
We end up waiting for a flush which will never happen because there are no background threads.
Test Plan: PreShutdownFlush
Reviewers: sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong, igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40617
Summary: #7124486: RocksDB's Iterator.SeekToLast should seek to the last key before iterate_upper_bound if presents
Test Plan: ./db_iter_test run successfully with the new testcase
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, igor, anthony, kradhakrishnan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40425
Summary: Replace force_bottommost_level_compaction in CompactRangeOption with an option that allow the user to (always skip, always compact, compact if compaction filter is present) the bottommost level for level based compaction.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40527
Summary:
Implementation of a table-level row cache.
It only caches point queries done through the `DB::Get` interface, queries done through the `Iterator` interface will completely skip the cache.
Supports snapshots and merge operations.
Test Plan: Ran `make valgrind_check commit-prereq`
Reviewers: igor, philipp, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39849
Summary:
The "one size fits all" approach with WAL recovery will only introduce inconvenience for our varied clients as we go forward. The current recovery is a bit heuristic. We introduce the following levels of consistency while replaying the WAL.
1. RecoverAfterRestart (kTolerateCorruptedTailRecords)
This mocks the current recovery mode.
2. RecoverAfterCleanShutdown (kAbsoluteConsistency)
This is ideal for unit test and cases where the store is shutdown cleanly. We tolerate no corruption or incomplete writes.
3. RecoverPointInTime (kPointInTimeRecovery)
This is ideal when using devices with controller cache or file systems which can loose data on restart. We recover upto the point were is no corruption or incomplete write.
4. RecoverAfterDisaster (kSkipAnyCorruptRecord)
This is ideal mode to recover data. We tolerate corruption and incomplete writes, and we hop over those sections that we cannot make sense of salvaging as many records as possible.
Test Plan:
(1) Run added unit test to cover all levels.
(2) Run make check.
Reviewers: leveldb, sdong, igor
Subscribers: yoshinorim, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38487
Summary:
When there are multiple column families, the flush in
GetLiveFiles is not atomic, so that there are entries in the wal files
which are needed to get a consisten RocksDB. We now add the log files to
the checkpoint.
Test Plan:
CheckpointCF - This test forces more data to be written to
the other column families after the flush of the first column family but
before the second.
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, kradhakrishnan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40323
Summary: CompressLevelCompaction() depends on Zlib. We should skip it when zlib is not present.
Test Plan: `make check` without zlib
Reviewers: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40401
Summary:
Currently RocksDB silently ignores this issue and doesn't compress the data. Based on discussion, we agree that this is pretty bad because it can cause confusion for our users.
This patch fails DB::Open() if we don't support the compression that is specified in the options.
Test Plan: make check with LZ4 not present. If Snappy is not present all tests will just fail because Snappy is our default library. We should make Snappy the requirement, since without it our default DB::Open() fails.
Reviewers: sdong, MarkCallaghan, rven, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39687
Summary:
This is https://reviews.facebook.net/D39999 but after introducing an option to force compaction the bottom most level
Changes in this patch
- Introduce force_bottommost_level_compaction to CompactRangeOptions that force compacting bottommost level during compaction
- Skip bottommost level compaction if we dont have a compaction filter and force_bottommost_level_compaction options is not set
Although tests pass on my machine but I suspect that there maybe some tests that I am not aware of that should use force_bottommost_level_compaction to pass in a deterministic way
Test Plan:
make check
adding new tests
Reviewers: igor, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40059
Summary:
This diff update DB::CompactRange to use RangeCompactionOptions instead of using multiple parameters
Old CompactRange is still available but deprecated
Test Plan:
make all check
make rocksdbjava
USE_CLANG=1 make all
OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make release
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40209
Summary:
Add an option in GetApproximateSize() so that the result will include estimated sizes in mem tables.
To implement it, implement an estimated count from the beginning to a key in skip list. The approach is to count to find the entry, how many Next() is issued from each level, and sum them with a weight that is <branching factor> ^ <level>.
Test Plan: Add a test case
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40119
Summary:
Reverting this diff https://reviews.facebook.net/D39999
Will add an option to force bottom most level compaction and then re submit it
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40041
Summary: If we don't have a compaction filter then we can skip compacting the bottom most level
Test Plan:
make check
added unit tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39999
Summary:
We slow down data into the database to the rate of options.delayed_write_rate (a new option) with this patch.
The thread synchronization approach I take is to still synchronize write controller by DB mutex and GetDelay() is inside DB mutex. Try to minimize the frequency of getting time in GetDelay(). I verified it through db_bench and it seems to work
hard_rate_limit is deprecated.
options.delayed_write_rate is still not dynamically changeable. Need to work on it as a follow-up.
Test Plan: Add new unit tests in db_test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, kradhakrishnan, anthony, MarkCallaghan, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: ikabiljo, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D36351
Summary: With experimental feature SuggestCompactRange() we don't restrict running two L0->L1 compactions in parallel. This diff fixes this.
Test Plan: added a unit test to reproduce the failure. fixed the unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39981
Summary:
Right now the level we pass to ReFitLevel is the maximum level with files (before compaction), there are multiple cases where this maximum level have changed after compaction
- all files where in L0 (now maximum level is L1)
- using kCompactionStyleUniversal (now maximum level in the last level)
- level_compaction_dynamic_level_bytes ??
We can handle each of these cases individually, but I felt it's safer to calculate max_level_with_files again if we want to do a ReFitLevel
Test Plan:
adding some tests
make -j64 check
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: ott, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39663
Summary: Some test and benchmark codes don't build for CYGWIN. Fix it.
Test Plan: Build "make all" with TARGET_OS=Cygwin on cygwin and make sure it passes.
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, anthony, igor, kradhakrishnan
Reviewed By: igor, kradhakrishnan
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39711
Summary:
There is a hang during DB close in the following scenario:
a) a load with WAL disabled was done,
b) CancelAllBackgroundWork was called,
c) DB Close was called
This was because in that we will wait for a flush but we cannot do a
background flush because we have called CancelAllBackgroundWork which
marks the DB as shutting downn.
Test Plan: Added DBTest FlushOnDestroy
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: yoshinorim, hermanlee4, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39747
Summary:
It is experimental. Allow users to return from a call back function TablePropertiesCollector::NeedCompact(), based on the data in the file.
It can be used to allow users to suggest DB to clear up delete tombstones faster.
Test Plan: Add a unit test.
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: yoshinorim, MarkCallaghan, maykov, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39585
Summary:
The type of smallest_output_key_prefix and largest_output_key_prefix
have been changed to std::string in https://reviews.facebook.net/D39537.
As a result, we shouldn't do smallest_output_key_prefix[0] = 0 in the
initialization.
Test Plan: compile db_test with tsan enabled and repeat DBTest.CompactionDeletionTrigger test to verify the tsan issue has been gone.
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39645
Summary:
This diff updates the logic of how we do trivial move, now trivial move can run on any number of files in input level as long as they are not overlapping
The conditions for trivial move have been updated
Introduced conditions:
- Trivial move cannot happen if we have a compaction filter (except if the compaction is not manual)
- Input level files cannot be overlapping
Removed conditions:
- Trivial move only run when the compaction is not manual
- Input level should can contain only 1 file
More context on what tests failed because of Trivial move
```
DBTest.CompactionsGenerateMultipleFiles
This test is expecting compaction on a file in L0 to generate multiple files in L1, this test will fail with trivial move because we end up with one file in L1
```
```
DBTest.NoSpaceCompactRange
This test expect compaction to fail when we force environment to report running out of space, of course this is not valid in trivial move situation
because trivial move does not need any extra space, and did not check for that
```
```
DBTest.DropWrites
Similar to DBTest.NoSpaceCompactRange
```
```
DBTest.DeleteObsoleteFilesPendingOutputs
This test expect that a file in L2 is deleted after it's moved to L3, this is not valid with trivial move because although the file was moved it is now used by L3
```
```
CuckooTableDBTest.CompactionIntoMultipleFiles
Same as DBTest.CompactionsGenerateMultipleFiles
```
This diff is based on a work by @sdonghttps://reviews.facebook.net/D34149
Test Plan: make -j64 check
Reviewers: rven, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: yhchiang, ott, march, dhruba, sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34797
Summary:
Add EventListener::OnTableFileDeletion(), which will be
called when a table file is deleted.
Test Plan: Extend three existing tests in db_test to verify the deleted files.
Reviewers: rven, anthony, kradhakrishnan, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38931
Summary:
DBTest.MigrateToDynamicLevelMaxBytesBase with valgrind test is
extremely slow. Work it around by not having both threads running
everything non-stop.
Test Plan: Run the test with valgrind which used to take too long to finish and see it finish in reasonable time.
Reviewers: yhchiang, anthony, rven, kradhakrishnan, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39477
Summary: Add a stats counter for DB_WRITE back which was mistakenly removed.
Test Plan: augment GroupCommitTest
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39399
Summary: In DB::CompactRange(), change parameter "reduce_level" to "change_level". Users can compact all data to the last level if needed. By doing it, users can migrate the DB to options.level_compaction_dynamic_level_bytes=true.
Test Plan: Add a unit test for it.
Reviewers: yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, igor, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39099
Summary: Optimistic transactions supporting begin/commit/rollback semantics. Currently relies on checking the memtable to determine if there are any collisions at commit time. Not yet implemented would be a way of enuring the memtable has some minimum amount of history so that we won't fail to commit when the memtable is empty. You should probably start with transaction.h to get an overview of what is currently supported.
Test Plan: Added a new test, but still need to look into stress testing.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: adamretter, MarkCallaghan, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33435
Summary:
For transactions, we are using the memtables to validate that there are no write conflicts. But after flushing, we don't have any memtables, and transactions could fail to commit. So we want to someone keep around some extra history to use for conflict checking. In addition, we want to provide a way to increase the size of this history if too many transactions fail to commit.
After chatting with people, it seems like everyone prefers just using Memtables to store this history (instead of a separate history structure). It seems like the best place for this is abstracted inside the memtable_list. I decide to create a separate list in MemtableListVersion as using the same list complicated the flush/installalflushresults logic too much.
This diff adds a new parameter to control how much memtable history to keep around after flushing. However, it sounds like people aren't too fond of adding new parameters. So I am making the default size of flushed+not-flushed memtables be set to max_write_buffers. This should not change the maximum amount of memory used, but make it more likely we're using closer the the limit. (We are now postponing deleting flushed memtables until the max_write_buffer limit is reached). So while we might use more memory on average, we are still obeying the limit set (and you could argue it's better to go ahead and use up memory now instead of waiting for a write stall to happen to test this limit).
However, if people are opposed to this default behavior, we can easily set it to 0 and require this parameter be set in order to use transactions.
Test Plan: Added a xfunc test to play around with setting different values of this parameter in all tests. Added testing in memtablelist_test and planning on adding more testing here.
Reviewers: sdong, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37443
Summary: As title. I spent some time thinking about it and I don't think there should be any issue with running manual compaction and flushes in parallel
Test Plan: make check works
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: yhchiang, sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38355
Summary: DBTest.DynamicLevelMaxBytesCompactRange needs to make sure L0 is not empty to properly cover the code paths we want to cover. However, current codes have a bug that might leave the condition not held. Improve the test to ensure it.
Test Plan: Run the test in an environment that is used to fail. Also run it many times.
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38631
Summary: CompactRange() now is much more expensive for dynamic level base size as it goes through all the levels. Skip those not used levels between level 0 an base level.
Test Plan: Run all unit tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, anthony, kradhakrishnan, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37125
Summary: DBTest.DynamicLevelMaxBytesBase2 has a check that is not necessary and may fail. Remove it, and add two unrelated check.
Test Plan: Run the test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, kradhakrishnan, anthony, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38457
Summary: Universal compactions with multiple levels should use file preallocation size based on file size if output level is not level 0
Test Plan: Run all tests.
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38439
Summary:
Added a couple functions to WriteBatchWithIndex to make it easier to query the value of a key including reading pending writes from a batch. (This is needed for transactions).
I created write_batch_with_index_internal.h to use to store an internal-only helper function since there wasn't a good place in the existing class hierarchy to store this function (and it didn't seem right to stick this function inside WriteBatchInternal::Rep).
Since I needed to access the WriteBatchEntryComparator, I moved some helper classes from write_batch_with_index.cc into write_batch_with_index_internal.h/.cc. WriteBatchIndexEntry, ReadableWriteBatch, and WriteBatchEntryComparator are all unchanged (just moved to a different file(s)).
Test Plan: Added new unit tests.
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38037
Summary: In new clang we need to add override to every overriden function
Test Plan: none
Reviewers: rven
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38259
Summary: When reporting compaction that was started because of SuggestCompactRange() we should treat it as manual compaction.
Test Plan: none
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38139
krad