Summary:
We have alot of code duplication whenever we call FullMerge we keep duplicating the instrumentation and statistics code
This is a simple diff to refactor the code to use TimedFullMerge instead of FullMerge
Test Plan: COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make check -j64
Reviewers: andrewkr, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59577
Summary: DBImpl::GetLatestSequenceForKey() can do memcpy's to load a value that will never be used. This can be optimized by changing all the Get() functions called to optionally not fetch the value (and only fetch the sequencenumber).
Test Plan: optimistic_transaction_test and transaction_test
Reviewers: anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, hermanlee4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D52227
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict. This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts. Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.
With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts. This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot. Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).
Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread. Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.
Test Plan: unit tests, db bench
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
Summary:
Since Andres' internship is over, I took over https://reviews.facebook.net/D42555 and rebased and simplified it a bit.
The behavior in this diff is a bit simpler than in D42555:
* only merge operators are passed through FilterMergeValue(). If fitler function returns true, the merge operator is ignored
* compaction filter is *not* called on: 1) results of merge operations and 2) base values that are getting merged with merge operands (the second case was also true in previous diff)
Do we also need a compaction filter to get called on merge results?
Test Plan: make && make check
Reviewers: lovro, tnovak, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: noetzli, kolmike, leveldb, dhruba, sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47847
Summary:
This patch fixes#7460559. It introduces SingleDelete as a new database
operation. This operation can be used to delete keys that were never
overwritten (no put following another put of the same key). If an overwritten
key is single deleted the behavior is undefined. Single deletion of a
non-existent key has no effect but multiple consecutive single deletions are
not allowed (see limitations).
In contrast to the conventional Delete() operation, the deletion entry is
removed along with the value when the two are lined up in a compaction. Note:
The semantics are similar to @igor's prototype that allowed to have this
behavior on the granularity of a column family (
https://reviews.facebook.net/D42093 ). This new patch, however, is more
aggressive when it comes to removing tombstones: It removes the SingleDelete
together with the value whenever there is no snapshot between them while the
older patch only did this when the sequence number of the deletion was older
than the earliest snapshot.
Most of the complex additions are in the Compaction Iterator, all other changes
should be relatively straightforward. The patch also includes basic support for
single deletions in db_stress and db_bench.
Limitations:
- Not compatible with cuckoo hash tables
- Single deletions cannot be used in combination with merges and normal
deletions on the same key (other keys are not affected by this)
- Consecutive single deletions are currently not allowed (and older version of
this patch supported this so it could be resurrected if needed)
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, rven, anthony, yoshinorim, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43179
Summary:
In some cases, equality comparisons can be done more efficiently than three-way
comparisons. There are quite a few places in the code where we only care about
equality. This patch adds an Equal() method that defaults to using the
Compare() method.
Test Plan: make clean all check
Reviewers: rven, anthony, yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46233
Summary:
Implementation of a table-level row cache.
It only caches point queries done through the `DB::Get` interface, queries done through the `Iterator` interface will completely skip the cache.
Supports snapshots and merge operations.
Test Plan: Ran `make valgrind_check commit-prereq`
Reviewers: igor, philipp, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39849
Summary: Fixing issues with get context function.
Test Plan: Run make commit-prereq
Reviewers: sdong, meyering, yhchiang
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35853
Summary:
We have addded new stats and perf_context for measuring the merge and filter operation time consumption.
We have bounded all the merge operations within the GUARD statment and collected the total time for these operations in the DB.
Test Plan: WIP
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34377
Summary:
Intead of passing callback function pointer and its arg on Table::Get()
interface, passing GetContext. This makes the interface cleaner and
possible better perf. Also adding a fast pass for SaveValue()
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24057
Islam AbdelRahman