Summary:
CreateLoggerFromOptions have some parameters like db_log_dir and env, these parameters are redundant since they already exist in DBOptions
this patch remove the redundant parameters and expose CreateLoggerFromOptions to users
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: igor, anthony, yhchiang, rven, kradhakrishnan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, hermanlee4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D49713
Summary:
MyRocks needs the ability to clear a snapshot for Read Committed support
Test Plan: transaction_test
Reviewers: anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48861
Summary: Support for Transaction::CreateSnapshotOnNextOperation(). This is to fix a write-conflict race-condition that Yoshinori was running into when testing MyRocks with LinkBench.
Test Plan: New tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, spetrunia, rven, igor, yoshinorim, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48099
Summary:
MyRocks reported some perfomance issues when inserting many keys into a transaction due to the cost of inserting new keys into WriteBatchWithIndex. Frequently, they don't even need the keys to be indexed as they don't need to read them back. DisableIndexing() can be used to avoid the cost of indexing.
I also plan on eventually investigating if we can improve WriteBatchWithIndex performance. But even if we improved the perf here, it is still beneficial to be able to disable the indexing all together for large transactions.
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: igor, rven, yoshinorim, spetrunia, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48471
Summary: Pass column family ID through TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateTablePropertiesCollector() so that users can identify which column family this file is for and handle it differently.
Test Plan: Add unit test scenarios in tests related to table properties collectors to verify the information passed in is correct.
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, igor, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: yoshinorim, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48411
Summary:
WriteBatchWithIndex::GetFromBatchAndDB only works correctly for overwrite_key=false. Transactions use overwrite_key=true (since WriteBatchWithIndex::GetIteratorWithBase only works when overwrite_key=true). So currently, Transactions could return incorrectly merged results when calling Get/GetForUpdate().
Until a permanent fix can be put in place, Transaction::Get[ForUpdate] and WriteBatchWithIndex::GetFromBatch[AndDB] will now return MergeInProgress if the most recent write to a key in the batch is a Merge.
Test Plan: more tests
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47817
Summary: Should have used auto& instead of auto. Also needed to change the code a bit due to const correctness.
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yoshinorim, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47787
Summary: Transactional SingleDelete is needed for MyRocks. Note: This diff requires D47529.
Test Plan: Added some new tests in this diff as well as more tests added in D47529
Reviewers: rven, sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: yoshinorim, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47535
Summary: Fixed some bugs in using SingleDelete on a WriteBatchWithIndex and added some tests.
Test Plan: new tests
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47529
Summary: FailOverwritingBackups has unexpected results when auto-compaction runs.
Test Plan: ran test a bunch of times
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47181
Summary:
This patch fixes#7460559. It introduces SingleDelete as a new database
operation. This operation can be used to delete keys that were never
overwritten (no put following another put of the same key). If an overwritten
key is single deleted the behavior is undefined. Single deletion of a
non-existent key has no effect but multiple consecutive single deletions are
not allowed (see limitations).
In contrast to the conventional Delete() operation, the deletion entry is
removed along with the value when the two are lined up in a compaction. Note:
The semantics are similar to @igor's prototype that allowed to have this
behavior on the granularity of a column family (
https://reviews.facebook.net/D42093 ). This new patch, however, is more
aggressive when it comes to removing tombstones: It removes the SingleDelete
together with the value whenever there is no snapshot between them while the
older patch only did this when the sequence number of the deletion was older
than the earliest snapshot.
Most of the complex additions are in the Compaction Iterator, all other changes
should be relatively straightforward. The patch also includes basic support for
single deletions in db_stress and db_bench.
Limitations:
- Not compatible with cuckoo hash tables
- Single deletions cannot be used in combination with merges and normal
deletions on the same key (other keys are not affected by this)
- Consecutive single deletions are currently not allowed (and older version of
this patch supported this so it could be resurrected if needed)
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, rven, anthony, yoshinorim, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43179
Summary:
In case of huge db backup infromation about progress of downloading would help.
New callback parameter in CreateNewBackup() function will trigger whenever a some amount of data downloaded.
Task: 8057631
Test Plan:
ProgressCallbackDuringBackup test that cover new functionality added to BackupableDBTest tests.
other test succeed as well.
Reviewers: Guenena, benj, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46575
Summary: Transaction::RollbackToSavePoint() will now release any locks that were taken since the previous SavePoint. To do this cleanly, I moved tracked_keys_ management into TransactionBase.
Test Plan: New Transaction test.
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, spetrunia, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46761
Summary: Added funtions to fetch the number of locked keys in a transaction, the number of pending puts/merge/deletes, and the elapsed time
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: yoshinorim, jkedgar, rven, sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45417
Summary:
Prototype of API to allow MyRocks to override default Mutex/CondVar used by transactions with their own implementations. They would simply need to pass their own implementations of Mutex/CondVar to the templated TransactionDB::Open().
Default implementation of TransactionDBMutex/TransactionDBCondVar provided (but the code is not currently changed to use this).
Let me know if this API makes sense or if it should be changed
Test Plan: n/a
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor, sdong, spetrunia
Reviewed By: spetrunia
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43761
Summary:
In some cases, equality comparisons can be done more efficiently than three-way
comparisons. There are quite a few places in the code where we only care about
equality. This patch adds an Equal() method that defaults to using the
Compare() method.
Test Plan: make clean all check
Reviewers: rven, anthony, yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46233
Summary: This diff adds a verifyBackup method to BackupEngine. The method verifies the name and size of each file in the backup.
Test Plan: Unit test cases created and passing.
Reviewers: igor, benj
Subscribers: zelaine.fong, yhchiang, sdong, lgalanis, dhruba, AaronFeldman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46029
Summary: BackupRateLimiter removed and uses replaced with the existing GenericRateLimiter
Test Plan:
make all check
make clean
USE_CLANG=1 make all
make clean
OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make release
Reviewers: leveldb, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: igor, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46095
Summary: MyRocks wants to be able to change the lock timeout of a transaction that has already started. Expose existing SetLockTimeout function to users.
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: spetrunia, rven, sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45987
Summary:
This diff is a collection of cleanups that were initially part of D43179.
Additionally it adds a unified way of defining key-value maps that use a
Comparator for sorting (this was previously implemented in four different
places).
Test Plan: make clean check all
Reviewers: rven, anthony, yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45993
Summary:
In the first implementation of BackupEngine, LATEST_BACKUP was the commit point. The backup became committed after the write to LATEST_BACKUP completed.
However, we can avoid the need for LATEST_BACKUP. Instead of write to LATEST_BACKUP, the commit point can be the rename from `meta/<backup_id>.tmp` to `meta/<backup_id>`. Once we see that there exists a file `meta/<backup_id>` (without tmp), we can assume that backup is valid.
In this diff, we still write out the file LATEST_BACKUP. We need to do this so that we can maintain backward compatibility. However, the new version doesn't depend on this file anymore. We get the latest backup by `ls`-ing `meta` directory.
This diff depends on D41925
Test Plan: Adjusted backupable_db_test to this new behavior
Reviewers: benj, yhchiang, sdong, AaronFeldman
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42069
Summary: Provide a way to specify a detailed static error message for a Status without incurring a memcpy. Let me know what people think of this approach.
Test Plan: added simple test
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44259
Summary:
As I keep adding new features to transactions, I keep creating more duplicate code. This diff cleans this up by creating a base implementation class for Transaction and OptimisticTransaction to inherit from.
The code in TransactionBase.h/.cc is all just copied from elsewhere. The only entertaining part of this class worth looking at is the virtual TryLock method which allows OptimisticTransactions and Transactions to share the same common code for Put/Get/etc.
The rest of this diff is mostly red and easy on the eyes.
Test Plan: No functionality change. existing tests pass.
Reviewers: sdong, jkedgar, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45135
Summary:
While working on supporting mixing merge operators with
single deletes ( https://reviews.facebook.net/D43179 ),
I realized that returning and dealing with merge results
can be made simpler. Submitting this as a separate diff
because it is not directly related to single deletes.
Before, callers of merge helper had to retrieve the merge
result in one of two ways depending on whether the merge
was successful or not (success = result of merge was single
kTypeValue). For successful merges, the caller could query
the resulting key/value pair and for unsuccessful merges,
the result could be retrieved in the form of two deques of
keys and values. However, with single deletes, a successful merge
does not return a single key/value pair (if merge
operands are merged with a single delete, we have to generate
a value and keep the original single delete around to make
sure that we are not accidentially producing a key overwrite).
In addition, the two existing call sites of the merge
helper were taking the same actions independently from whether
the merge was successful or not, so this patch simplifies that.
Test Plan: make clean all check
Reviewers: rven, sdong, yhchiang, anthony, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43353
Summary: RandomRWFile is not used anywhere in out code base, this patch remove RandomRWFile
Test Plan:
make check -j64
USE_CLANG=1 make all -j64
OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make release -j64
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44091
Summary:
Clean up transactions to use the new RollbackToSavePoint api in WriteBatchWithIndex.
Note, this diff depends on Pessimistic Transactions diff and ManagedSnapshot diff (D40869 and D43293).
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, spetrunia, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43371
Summary:
Initial implementation of Pessimistic Transactions. This diff contains the api changes discussed in D38913. This diff is pretty large, so let me know if people would prefer to meet up to discuss it.
MyRocks folks: please take a look at the API in include/rocksdb/utilities/transaction[_db].h and let me know if you have any issues.
Also, you'll notice a couple of TODOs in the implementation of RollbackToSavePoint(). After chatting with Siying, I'm going to send out a separate diff for an alternate implementation of this feature that implements the rollback inside of WriteBatch/WriteBatchWithIndex. We can then decide which route is preferable.
Next, I'm planning on doing some perf testing and then integrating this diff into MongoRocks for further testing.
Test Plan: Unit tests, db_bench parallel testing.
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong, yhchiang, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: hermanlee4, maykov, spetrunia, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40869
Summary: The list of info log files of a db can be obtained using the new function.
Test Plan: New test in db_test.cc passed.
Reviewers: yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: IslamAbdelRahman, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41715
Summary:
This diff adds CompactOnDeletionCollector in utilities/table_properties_collectors,
which applies a sliding window to a sst file and mark this file as need-compaction
when it observe enough deletion entries within the consecutive keys covered by
the sliding window.
Test Plan: compact_on_deletion_collector_test
Reviewers: igor, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, yoshinorim, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41175
Summary:
Support RollbackToSavePoint() in WriteBatch and WriteBatchWithIndex. Support for partial transaction rollback is needed for MyRocks.
An alternate implementation of Transaction::RollbackToSavePoint() exists in D40869. However, the other implementation is messier because it is implemented outside of WriteBatch. This implementation is much cleaner and also exposes a potentially useful feature to WriteBatch.
Test Plan: Added unit tests
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, maykov, yoshinorim, hermanlee4, spetrunia, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42723
Summary: Directly using TMPDIR can cause problems when running tests using parallel option. Fix them.
Test Plan: Run all tests in parallel
Reviewers: kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42807
Summary: Add new CheckFileExists method. Considered changing the FileExists api but didn't want to break anyone's builds.
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42003
Summary:
Skipping these tests in ROCKSDB_LITE since they are not supported
json_document_test
wal_manager_test
ttl_test
sst_dump_test
deletefile_test
compact_files_test
prefix_test
checkpoint_test
Test Plan:
json_document_test
wal_manager_test
ttl_test
sst_dump_test
deletefile_test
compact_files_test
prefix_test
checkpoint_test
Reviewers: igor, sdong, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42573
Summary: We want to keep Env a think layer for better portability. Less platform dependent codes should be moved out of Env. In this patch, I create a wrapper of file readers and writers, and put rate limiting, write buffering, as well as most perf context instrumentation and random kill out of Env. It will make it easier to maintain multiple Env in the future.
Test Plan: Run all existing unit tests.
Reviewers: anthony, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42321
Summary: DocumentDB is not supported in ROCKSDB_LITE
Test Plan: document_db_test
Reviewers: yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42177
Summary:
When we first started, max_background_flushes was 0 by default and compaction thread was executing flushes (since there was no flush thread). Then, we switched the default max_background_flushes to 1. However, we still support the case where there is no flush thread and flushes are done in compaction. This is making our code a bit more complicated. By not supporting this use-case we can make our code simpler.
We have a special case that when you set max_background_flushes to 0, we
schedule the flush to execute on the compaction thread.
Test Plan: make check (there might be some unit tests that depend on this behavior)
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41931
Summary:
MergeUntil was not reporting a success when merging an operand with
a Value/Deletion despite the comments in MergeHelper and CompactionJob
indicating otherwise. This lead to operands being written to the compaction
output unnecessarily:
M1 M2 M3 P M4 M5 --> (P+M1+M2+M3) M2 M3 M4 M5 (before the diff)
M1 M2 M3 P M4 M5 --> (P+M1+M2+M3) M4 M5 (after the diff)
In addition, the code handling Values/Deletion was basically identical.
This patch unifies the code. Finally, this patch also adds testing for
merge_helper.
Test Plan: make && make check
Reviewers: sdong, rven, yhchiang, tnovak, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: tnovak, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42351
Islam AbdelRahman