4 Commits (0db4cde6e2f79f7e5af91dd5fed26d5201e0ec93)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
sdong	fdf882ded2	Replace namespace name "rocksdb" with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE (#6433) ... Summary: When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433 Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag. Differential Revision: D19977691 fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e	5 years ago
Levi Tamasi	29ccf2075c	Store the filter bits reader alongside the filter block contents (#5936) ... Summary: Amongst other things, PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5504 refactored the filter block readers so that only the filter block contents are stored in the block cache (as opposed to the earlier design where the cache stored the filter block reader itself, leading to potentially dangling pointers and concurrency bugs). However, this change introduced a performance hit since with the new code, the metadata fields are re-parsed upon every access. This patch reunites the block contents with the filter bits reader to eliminate this overhead; since this is still a self-contained pure data object, it is safe to store it in the cache. (Note: this is similar to how the zstd digest is handled.) Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5936 Test Plan: make asan_check filter_bench results for the old code: ``` $ ./filter_bench -quick WARNING: Assertions are enabled; benchmarks unnecessarily slow Building... Build avg ns/key: 26.7153 Number of filters: 16669 Total memory (MB): 200.009 Bits/key actual: 10.0647 ---------------------------- Inside queries... Dry run (46b) ns/op: 33.4258 Single filter ns/op: 42.5974 Random filter ns/op: 217.861 ---------------------------- Outside queries... Dry run (25d) ns/op: 32.4217 Single filter ns/op: 50.9855 Random filter ns/op: 219.167 Average FP rate %: 1.13993 ---------------------------- Done. (For more info, run with -legend or -help.) $ ./filter_bench -quick -use_full_block_reader WARNING: Assertions are enabled; benchmarks unnecessarily slow Building... Build avg ns/key: 26.5172 Number of filters: 16669 Total memory (MB): 200.009 Bits/key actual: 10.0647 ---------------------------- Inside queries... Dry run (46b) ns/op: 32.3556 Single filter ns/op: 83.2239 Random filter ns/op: 370.676 ---------------------------- Outside queries... Dry run (25d) ns/op: 32.2265 Single filter ns/op: 93.5651 Random filter ns/op: 408.393 Average FP rate %: 1.13993 ---------------------------- Done. (For more info, run with -legend or -help.) ``` With the new code: ``` $ ./filter_bench -quick WARNING: Assertions are enabled; benchmarks unnecessarily slow Building... Build avg ns/key: 25.4285 Number of filters: 16669 Total memory (MB): 200.009 Bits/key actual: 10.0647 ---------------------------- Inside queries... Dry run (46b) ns/op: 31.0594 Single filter ns/op: 43.8974 Random filter ns/op: 226.075 ---------------------------- Outside queries... Dry run (25d) ns/op: 31.0295 Single filter ns/op: 50.3824 Random filter ns/op: 226.805 Average FP rate %: 1.13993 ---------------------------- Done. (For more info, run with -legend or -help.) $ ./filter_bench -quick -use_full_block_reader WARNING: Assertions are enabled; benchmarks unnecessarily slow Building... Build avg ns/key: 26.5308 Number of filters: 16669 Total memory (MB): 200.009 Bits/key actual: 10.0647 ---------------------------- Inside queries... Dry run (46b) ns/op: 33.2968 Single filter ns/op: 58.6163 Random filter ns/op: 291.434 ---------------------------- Outside queries... Dry run (25d) ns/op: 32.1839 Single filter ns/op: 66.9039 Random filter ns/op: 292.828 Average FP rate %: 1.13993 ---------------------------- Done. (For more info, run with -legend or -help.) ``` Differential Revision: D17991712 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: 7ea205550217bfaaa1d5158ebd658e5832e60f29	5 years ago
Levi Tamasi	d92a59b6f2	Fix regression affecting partitioned indexes/filters when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false (#5705) ... Summary: PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5298 (and subsequent related patches) unintentionally changed the semantics of cache_index_and_filter_blocks: historically, this option only affected the main index/filter block; with the changes, it affects index/filter partitions as well. This can cause performance issues when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false since in this case, partitions are neither cached nor preloaded (i.e. they are loaded on demand upon each access). The patch reverts to the earlier behavior, that is, partitions are cached similarly to data blocks regardless of the value of the above option. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5705 Test Plan: make check ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=30 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false ./db_bench -benchmarks=readrandom --use_existing_db --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=10 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false --cache_size=8000000000 Relevant statistics from the readrandom benchmark with the old code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 With the new code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 42696 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 4050048 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 4550493 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 10331040 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 Differential Revision: D16817382 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: 28a516b0da1f041a03313e0b70b28cf5cf205d00	5 years ago
Levi Tamasi	3bde41b5a3	Move the filter readers out of the block cache (#5504) ... Summary: Currently, when the block cache is used for the filter block, it is not really the block itself that is stored in the cache but a FilterBlockReader object. Since this object is not pure data (it has, for instance, pointers that might dangle, including in one case a back pointer to the TableReader), it's not really sharable. To avoid the issues around this, the current code erases the cache entries when the TableReader is closed (which, BTW, is not sufficient since a concurrent TableReader might have picked up the object in the meantime). Instead of doing this, the patch moves the FilterBlockReader out of the cache altogether, and decouples the filter reader object from the filter block. In particular, instead of the TableReader owning, or caching/pinning the FilterBlockReader (based on the customer's settings), with the change the TableReader unconditionally owns the FilterBlockReader, which in turn owns/caches/pins the filter block. This change also enables us to reuse the code paths historically used for data blocks for filters as well. Note: Eviction statistics for filter blocks are temporarily broken. We plan to fix this in a separate phase. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5504 Test Plan: make asan_check Differential Revision: D16036974 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: 770f543c5fb4ed126fd1e04bfd3809cf4ff9c091	5 years ago