Summary:
For prefix mem tables, encoding mem table key may be unnecessary if the prefix doesn't have any key. This patch is a little bit hacky but I want to try out the performance gain of removing this lazy initialization.
In longer term, we might want to revisit the way we abstract mem tables implementations.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14265
Summary:
A Simple plain table format. No block structure. When creating the table reader, scanning the full table to create indexes.
Test Plan:Add unit test
Reviewers:haobo,dhruba,kailiu
CC:
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Summary:
Previously we introduce a `flush_block_policy_factory` in Options, however, that options is strongly releated to Table based tables.
It will make more sense to move it to block based table's own factory class.
Test Plan: make check to pass existing tests
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14211
Summary:
The primary motivation of the changes is to make it easier to figure out the inside of the tables.
* rename "table stats" to "table properties" since now we have more than "integers" to store in the property block.
* Add filter block size to the basic table properties.
* Whenever a table is built, we'll log the table properties (the sample output is in Test Plan).
* Make an api to expose deleted keys.
Test Plan:
Passed all existing test. and the sample output of table stats:
==================================================================
Basic Properties
------------------------------------------------------------------
# data blocks: 1
# entries: 1
raw key size: 9
raw average key size: 9
raw value size: 9
raw average value size: 0
data block size: 25
index block size: 27
filter block size: 18
(estimated) table size: 70
filter policy: rocksdb.BuiltinBloomFilter
==================================================================
User collected properties: InternalKeyPropertiesCollector
------------------------------------------------------------------
kDeletedKeys: 1
==================================================================
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14187
Summary:
1. Moved the compiler back to 4.8.1 and uses Centos 5.2 binaries if OS is Centos 5.2.
2. Fixes this issue: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7
3. We use lot of c++11 features, so we can't pretend we can compile without them. Makes it a first class dependency.
4. Fix blob_store_test, which failes on Ubuntu with "too many files opened" error
5. Removed dependency on port/port_chromium.h, which does not even exist on our system
Test Plan: make clean; make check
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14145
Summary: This diff invoves some more complicated issues in the posix environment.
Test Plan: works under mac os. will need to verify dev box.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14061
Summary:
mac and our dev server has totally differnt definition of uint64_t, therefore fixing the warning in mac has actually made code in linux uncompileable.
Test Plan:
make clean && make -j32
Summary: The work to make sure mac os compiles rocksdb is not completed yet. But at least we can start cleaning some warnings captured only by g++ from mac os..
Test Plan: ran make in mac os
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14049
Summary:
@haobo's suggestions from https://reviews.facebook.net/D13827
Renaming some variables, deprecating purge_log_after_flush, changing for loop into auto for loop.
I have not implemented deleting objects outside of mutex yet because it would require a big code change - we would delete object in db_impl, which currently does not know anything about object because it's defined in version_edit.h (FileMetaData). We should do it at some point, though.
Test Plan: Ran deletefile_test
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14025
Summary: In our project, when writing to the database, we want to form the value as the concatenation of a small header and a larger payload. It's a shame to have to copy the payload just so we can give RocksDB API a linear view of the value. Since RocksDB makes a copy internally, it's easy to support gather writes.
Test Plan: write_batch_test, new test case
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13947
Summary:
Here's one solution we discussed on speeding up FindObsoleteFiles. Keep a set of all files in DBImpl and update the set every time we create a file. I probably missed few other spots where we create a file.
It might speed things up a bit, but makes code uglier. I don't really like it.
Much better approach would be to abstract all file handling to a separate class. Think of it as layer between DBImpl and Env. Having a separate class deal with file namings and deletion would benefit both code cleanliness (especially with huge DBImpl) and speed things up. It will take a huge effort to do this, though.
Let's discuss offline today.
Test Plan: Ran ./db_stress, verified that files are getting deleted
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13827
Summary: What @haobo done with TransformRep, now in TransformRepNoLock. Similar implementation, except that I made DynamicIterator a subclass of Iterator which makes me have less iterator initializations.
Test Plan: ./prefix_test. Seeing huge savings vs. TransformRep again!
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13953
Summary: Allow block based table to configure the way flushing the blocks. This feature will allow us to add support for prefix-aligned block.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13875
Summary:
Added a new call LogFlush() that flushes the log contents to the OS buffers. We never call it with lock held.
We call it once for every Read/Write and often in compaction/flush process so the frequency should not be a problem.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13935
Summary: Added a prefix_seek flag in ReadOptions to indicate that Seek is prefix aware(might not return data with different prefix), and also not bound to a specific prefix. Multiple Seeks and range scans can be invoked on the same iterator. If a specific prefix is specified, this flag will be ignored. Just a quick prototype that works for PrefixHashRep, the new lockless memtable could be easily extended with this support too.
Test Plan: test it on Leaf
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13929
Summary:
Archive cleaning will still happen every WAL_ttl seconds
but archived logs will be deleted only if archive size
is greater then a WAL_size_limit value.
Empty archived logs will be deleted evety WAL_ttl.
Test Plan:
1. Unit tests pass.
2. Benchmark.
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13869
Summary: We have to be able to catch last few log outputs before a crash
Test Plan: no
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13917
Summary:
I'm sending this diff together with https://reviews.facebook.net/D13881 because it didn't allow me to send only the array one.
Here I also replaced unordered_map with just an array of shared_ptrs. This elminated all the locks.
I will run the new benchmark and post the results here.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13893
Summary:
Rocksdb can now support a uncompressed block cache, or a compressed
block cache or both. Lookups first look for a block in the
uncompressed cache, if it is not found only then it is looked up
in the compressed cache. If it is found in the compressed cache,
then it is uncompressed and inserted into the uncompressed cache.
It is possible that the same block resides in the compressed cache
as well as the uncompressed cache at the same time. Both caches
have their own individual LRU policy.
Test Plan: Unit test case attached.
Reviewers: kailiu, sdong, haobo, leveldb
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: xjin, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12675
Summary: Added an option --count_delim=<char> which takes the given character as delimiter ('.' by default) and reports count of each row type found in the db
Test Plan:
1. Created test in file (for DBDumperCommand) rocksdb/tools/ldb_test.py which puts various key value pair in db and checks the output using dump --count_delim ,--count_delim="." and --count_delim=",".
2. Created test in file (for InternalDumperCommand) rocksdb/tools/ldb_test.py which puts various key value pair in db and checks the output using dump --count_delim ,--count_delim="." and --count_delim=",".
3. Manually created a database with several keys of several type and verified by running the command
./ldb db=<path> dump --count_delim="<char>"
./ldb db=<path> idump --count_delim="<char>"
Reviewers: vamsi, dhruba, emayanke, kailiu
Reviewed By: vamsi
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13815
Summary: This might help with p99 performance, but does not solve the real problem. More discussion on #2947135
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13809
Summary:
Currently for each put, a fresh memory is allocated, and a new entry is added to the memtable with a new sequence number irrespective of whether the key already exists in the memtable. This diff is an attempt to update the value inplace for existing keys. It currently handles a very simple case:
1. Key already exists in the current memtable. Does not inplace update values in immutable memtable or snapshot
2. Latest value type is a 'put' ie kTypeValue
3. New value size is less than existing value, to avoid reallocating memory
TODO: For a put of an existing key, deallocate memory take by values, for other value types till a kTypeValue is found, ie. remove kTypeMerge.
TODO: Update the transaction log, to allow consistent reload of the memtable.
Test Plan: Added a unit test verifying the inplace update. But some other unit tests broken due to invalid sequence number checks. WIll fix them next.
Reviewers: xinyaohu, sumeet, haobo, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12423
Automatic commit by arc
Summary: This patch makes Table and TableBuilder a abstract class and make all the implementation of the current table into BlockedBasedTable and BlockedBasedTable Builder.
Test Plan: Make db_test.cc to work with block based table. Add a new test simple_table_db_test.cc where a different simple table format is implemented.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke, vamsi
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13521
Summary:
1. Added a new option that support user-defined table stats collection.
2. Added a deleted key stats collector in `utilities`
Test Plan:
Added a unit test for newly added code.
Also ran make check to make sure other tests are not broken.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13491
Summary:
I added max_size option in blobstore. Since we now know the maximum number of buckets we'll ever use, we can allocate an array of buckets and access its elements without use of any locks! Common case Get doesn't lock anything now.
Benchmarks on 16KB block size show no impact on speed, though.
Test Plan: unittests + benchmark
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13641
Summary: as title
Test Plan: make check; ./perf_context_test
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13629
Summary:
I have implemented a FreeList version that supports fragmented blob chunks. Each block gets allocated and freed in FIFO order. Since the idea for the blocks to be big, we will not take a big hit of non-sequential IO. Free list is also faster, taking only O(k) size in both free and allocate instead of O(N) as before.
See more info on the task: https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/tasks/?t=2990558
Also, I'm taking Slice instead of const char * and size in Put function.
Test Plan: unittests
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13569
Summary:
Create a new type of file on startup if it doesn't already exist called DBID.
This will store a unique number generated from boost library's uuid header file.
The use-case is to identify the case of a db losing all its data and coming back up either empty or from an image(backup/live replica's recovery)
the key point to note is that DBID is not stored in a backup or db snapshot
It's preferable to use Boost for uuid because:
1) A non-standard way of generating uuid is not good
2) /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid generates a uuid but only on linux environments and the solution would not be clean
3) c++ doesn't have any direct way to get a uuid
4) Boost is a very good library that was already having linkage in rocksdb from third-party
Note: I had to update the TOOLCHAIN_REV in build files to get latest verison of boost from third-party as the older version had a bug.
I had to put Wno-uninitialized in Makefile because boost-1.51 has an unitialized variable and rocksdb would not comiple otherwise. Latet open-source for boost is 1.54 but is not there in third-party. I have notified the concerned people in fbcode about it.
@kailiu : While releasing to third-party, an additional dependency will need to be created for boost in TARGETS file. I can help identify.
Test Plan:
Expand db_test to test 2 cases
1) Restarting db with Id file present - verify that no change to Id
2)Restarting db with Id file deleted - verify that a different Id is there after reopen
Also run make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13587
Summary: Per @haobo's request, rephrasing the comment for allocate
Test Plan: It's a comment!
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13575
Summary: This caused Siying's unit test to fail.
Test Plan: Unittest
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13539
Summary: Allow ttl flag
Test Plan:
tested on my database that has merge operations and ttl
Revert Plan: OK
Task ID: #3038186
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13503
Summary:
Developing a capability for storing values on external backing file(s).
This is just a highly unoptimized first pass - supports:
1) Allocating some portion of external file to be used to store value
2) Freeing the range, enabling it to be reused by other values
As next steps, I plan to:
1) Create some kind of stress testing. Once I can measure stuff, I can focus on optimizing.
2) Optimize locking.
3) Optimize freelist data structure. Currently we have O(n) for both freeing and allocation.
4) Figure out how to do recovery.
Test Plan: Created a unit test.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13389
Summary:
tmpfs might not support fallocate(). Fix unit test so that this
does not cause a unit test to fail.
Test Plan: ./env_test
Reviewers: emayanke, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13455
Summary:
This is needed to make existing dbs be able to open and also because BytewiseComparator was not changed since leveldb.
The inverted order in the error message caused confusion prebiously
Test Plan: make; open existing db
Reviewers: leveldb, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13449
Summary:
With this patch, when LRUCache.Insert() is called and the cache is full, it will first try to free up entries whose reference counter is 1 (would become 0 after remo\
ving from the cache). We do it in two passes, in the first pass, we only try to release those unreferenced entries. If we cannot free enough space after traversing t\
he first remove_scan_cnt_ entries, we start from the beginning again and remove those entries being used.
Test Plan: add two unit tests to cover the codes
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb, emayanke, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13377
Summary:
As title. Fix an lint error:
Lint: CppLint Error
Single-argument constructor 'Value(int v)' may inadvertently be used as a type conversion constructor. Prefix the function with the 'explicit' keyword to avoid this, or add an /* implicit */ comment to suppress this warning.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: emayanke, haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13401
Summary: virtual NewRandomRWFile is not implemented on EnvHdfs, causing build failure.
Test Plan: make clean; make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13383
Summary: I have implemented basic simple use case that I need for External Value Store I'm working on. There is a potential for making this prettier by refactoring/combining WritableFile and RandomAccessFile, avoiding some copypasta. However, I decided to implement just the basic functionality, so I can continue working on the other diff.
Test Plan: Added a unittest
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13365
Summary: In some cases, you might not want to store the data log (write ahead log) files in the same dir as the sst files. An example use case is leaf, which stores sst files in tmpfs. And would like to save the log files in a separate dir (disk) to save memory.
Test Plan: make all. Ran db_test test. A few test failing. P2785018. If you guys don't see an obvious problem with the code, maybe somebody from the rocksdb team could help me debug the issue here. Running this on leaf worked well. I could see logs stored on disk, and deleted appropriately after compactions. Obviously this is only one set of options. The unit tests cover different options. Seems like I'm missing some edge cases.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, leveldb
CC: xinyaohu, sumeet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13239
Summary: Split Unref into two parts -> cheap and expensive. Try to call expensive Unref outside of critical section to decrease lock contention.
Test Plan: unittests
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, kailiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13299
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: As title. This is just a quick hack and not ready for commit. fails a lot of unit test. I will test/debug it directly in ViewState shadow .
Test Plan: Try it in shadow test.
Reviewers: dhruba, xjin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12933
Summary: as title. unit test not polished. this is for a quick live test
Test Plan: live
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13221
Summary: as title
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13179
Siying Dong