Summary:
Changes to support sharing block cache using the Java API.
Previously DB instances could share the block cache only when the same Options instance is passed to all the DB instances. But now, with this change, it is possible to explicitly create a cache and pass it to multiple options instances, to share the block cache.
Implementing this for [Rocksandra](https://github.com/instagram/cassandra/tree/rocks_3.0), but this feature has been requested by many java api users over the years.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3623
Differential Revision: D7305794
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 03e4e8ed7aeee6f88bada4a8365d4279ede2ad71
Summary:
When a block based table file is opened, if prefetch_index_and_filter is true, it will prefetch the index and filter blocks, putting them into the block cache.
What this feature adds: when a L0 block based table file is opened, if pin_l0_filter_and_index_blocks_in_cache is true in the options (and prefetch_index_and_filter is true), then the filter and index blocks aren't released back to the block cache at the end of BlockBasedTableReader::Open(). Instead the table reader takes ownership of them, hence pinning them, ie. the LRU cache will never push them out. Meanwhile in the table reader, further accesses will not hit the block cache, thus avoiding lock contention.
Test Plan:
'export TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ && DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 OPT=-g make all valgrind_check -j32' is OK.
I didn't run the Java tests, I don't have Java set up on my devserver.
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D56133
Summary:
When a block based table file is opened, if prefetch_index_and_filter is true, it will prefetch the index and filter blocks, putting them into the block cache.
What this feature adds: when a L0 block based table file is opened, if pin_l0_filter_and_index_blocks_in_cache is true in the options (and prefetch_index_and_filter is true), then the filter and index blocks aren't released back to the block cache at the end of BlockBasedTableReader::Open(). Instead the table reader takes ownership of them, hence pinning them, ie. the LRU cache will never push them out. Meanwhile in the table reader, further accesses will not hit the block cache, thus avoiding lock contention.
When the table reader is destroyed, it releases the pinned blocks (if there were any). This has to happen before the cache is destroyed, so I had to introduce a TableReader::Close(), to guarantee the order of destruction.
Test Plan:
Added two unit tests for this. Existing unit tests run fine (default is pin_l0_filter_and_index_blocks_in_cache=false).
DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 OPT=-g make all valgrind_check -j32
Mac: OK.
Linux: with D55287 patched in it's OK.
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54801
Previous to this commit Filters passed as parameters to the
BlockTableConfig are disposed before they should be disposed.
Further Smart pointer usage was corrected.
Java holds now the smart pointer to the FilterPolicy correctly
and cares about freeing underlying c++ structures.
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
tested on my mac
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21963
Summary: Fixed the Java compilation error caused by PlainTableFactory API change.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jdb_bench
cd java;./jdb_bench.sh
Reviewers: sdong, ljin, ankgup87, swapnilghike, zzbennett, rsumbaly, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20295
Summary:
Add Java bindings for memtables and sst format. Specifically,
add two abstract Java classses --- MemTableConfig and SstFormatConfig.
Each MemTable / SST implementation should has its own config class
extends MemTableConfig / SstFormatConfig respectively and pass it
to Options via setMemTableConfig / setSstConfig.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jdb_test
make jdb_bench
java/jdb_bench.sh \
--benchmarks=fillseq,readrandom,readwhilewriting \
--memtablerep=hash_skiplist \
--use_plain_table=1 \
--key_size=20 \
--prefix_size=12 \
--value_size=100 \
--cache_size=17179869184 \
--disable_wal=0 \
--sync=0 \
Reviewers: haobo, ankgup87, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17997
Sagar Vemuri