Summary:
Given that we have cut 5.15, we should bump the version number to the next
version, i.e. 5.16.
Also update HISTORY.md
cc sagar0
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4176
Differential Revision: D8977965
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 481d75d2f446946f0eb2afb7e94ef894c8c87e1e
Summary:
We missed updating version.h on master when cutting 5.11.fb and 5.12.fb branches. It should be the same as the version in the latest release branch (or should it be one more?).
I noticed this when trying to run some upgrade/downgrade tests from 5.11 to some new code on master.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3611
Differential Revision: D7282917
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 205ee75b77c5b6bbcea95a272760b427025a4aba
Summary:
This fixes the existing logic for pinning l0 index partitions. The patch preloads the partitions into block cache and pin them if they belong to level 0 and pin_l0 is set.
The drawback is that it does many small IOs when preloading all the partitions into the cache is direct io is enabled. Working for a solution for that.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2661
Differential Revision: D5554010
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 1e6f32a3524d71355c77d4138516dcfb601ca7b2
Summary: RocksDB 4.11 has been branched out. Now need to move to 4.12.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: kradhakrishnan, andrewkr, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61845
Summary: Bump master version to the next potential release version of 4.11
Test Plan: Compile
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60993
Summary: 4.5 is already cut, we can now increase the version in 4.6.
Test Plan: Not needed.
Reviewers: anthony, kradhakrishnan, andrewkr, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54963
Summary: Time to cut branch for release 4.5. Change the versions.
Test Plan: Not needed
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, andrewkr, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D53883
Summary: Bump the version to 4.2 ( the unreleased version ), so that when fbcode_unittests run it can differentiate between old and new APIs
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D49041
Summary: Change RocksDB version to 4.1
Test Plan: no code change.
Reviewers: sdong, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48387
Summary: Release RocksDB 4.0.0
Test Plan: no test
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, anthony, rven, kradhakrishnan, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46515
Summary: Change master version to 3.14
Test Plan: simple change
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, rven, anthony, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44187
Summary: master is now 3.13-to-be. I'm testing some internal stuff that has #ifdef based on RocksDB version.
Test Plan: none
Reviewers: sdong, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42249
Summary: About to cut release
Test Plan: none
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41061
Summary:
This diff adds BlockBasedTable format_version = 2. New format version brings better compressed block format for these compressions:
1) Zlib -- encode decompressed size in compressed block header
2) BZip2 -- encode decompressed size in compressed block header
3) LZ4 and LZ4HC -- instead of doing memcpy of size_t encode size as varint32. memcpy is very bad because the DB is not portable accross big/little endian machines or even platforms where size_t might be 8 or 4 bytes.
It does not affect format for snappy.
If you write a new database with format_version = 2, it will not be readable by RocksDB versions before 3.10. DB::Open() will return corruption in that case.
Test Plan:
Added a new test in db_test.
I will also run db_bench and verify VSIZE when block_cache == 1GB
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, MarkCallaghan, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31461
Summary: As tittle
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28299
Summary:
Before this diff, there are two places with rocksdb versions. After the diff:
1. we only have one source of truth for rocksdb version
2. we have a script that we can use to get the version that we can use in other compilations (java, go, etc).
Test Plan: make
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24333
Summary: Bump up version after we've cut 3.4
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22047
Summary:
This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options.
Here's description of task #4296714:
I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB.
For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys.
The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for.
Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API.
In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe.
Test Plan:
Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one).
Also, all other tests
Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
Yanqin Jin