Summary:
Sometimes, I got a test failure. After fixing that, I want to resume
db_test from that test. ROCKSDB_TESTS_FROM is for this purpose.
Test Plan: as title
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27807
Summary: RocksDB already depends on C++11, so we might as well all the goodness that C++11 provides. This means that we don't need AtomicPointer anymore. The less things in port/, the easier it will be to port to other platforms.
Test Plan: make check + careful visual review verifying that NoBarried got memory_order_relaxed, while Acquire/Release methods got memory_order_acquire and memory_order_release
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27543
Summary:
Make inplace_update_support and inplace_update_num_locks dynamic.
inplace_callback becomes immutable
We are almost free of references to cfd->options() in db_impl
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D25293
Summary: Since we depend on C++11, we might as well use it for timing, instead of this platform-depended code.
Test Plan: Ran autovector_test, which reports time and confirmed that output is similar to master
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, yhchiang, rven, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D25587
Summary: as title
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D25347
Summary:
This is not a critical options. Making it dynamic so that we can remove
more reference to cfd->options()
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24957
Summary: as title
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24903
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
unit test
I am only able to build the test case for hard_rate_limit.
soft_rate_limit is essentially the same thing as hard_rate_limit
Reviewers: igor, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24759
Summary: Add more tests as well
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: igor, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24747
Summary: as title
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24729
Summary:
ldb to support --fix_prefix_len to allow us to verify more cases.
Also fix a small issue that --bloom_bits might not be applied if --block_size is not given.
Test Plan: run ldb tool against an example DB.
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24819
Summary:
Fixed the following error in Mac:
./util/testharness.h:93:19: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const unsigned long' and 'const int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
BINARY_OP(IsEq, ==)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
./util/testharness.h:86:14: note: expanded from macro 'BINARY_OP'
if (! (x op y)) { \
^
util/options_test.cc:269:3: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'rocksdb::test::Tester::IsEq<unsigned long, int>' requested here
ASSERT_EQ(new_cf_opt.write_buffer_size, 5);
^
Test Plan:
options_test
Summary: Allow accepting Options as a string of key/value pairs
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24597
Summary:
This diff introduces the `lookahead` argument to `SkipListFactory()`. This is an
optimization for the tailing use case which includes many seeks. E.g. consider
the following operations on a skip list iterator:
Seek(x), Next(), Next(), Seek(x+2), Next(), Seek(x+3), Next(), Next(), ...
If `lookahead` is positive, `SkipListRep` will return an iterator which also
keeps track of the previously visited node. Seek() then first does a linear
search starting from that node (up to `lookahead` steps). As in the tailing
example above, this may require fewer than ~log(n) comparisons as with regular
skip list search.
Test Plan:
Added a new benchmark (`fillseekseq`) which simulates the usage pattern. It
first writes N records (with consecutive keys), then measures how much time it
takes to read them by calling `Seek()` and `Next()`.
$ time ./db_bench -num 10000000 -benchmarks fillseekseq -prefix_size 1 \
-key_size 8 -write_buffer_size $[1024*1024*1024] -value_size 50 \
-seekseq_next 2 -skip_list_lookahead=0
[...]
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdbtest/dbbench]
fillseekseq : 0.389 micros/op 2569047 ops/sec;
real 0m21.806s
user 0m12.106s
sys 0m9.672s
$ time ./db_bench [...] -skip_list_lookahead=2
[...]
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdbtest/dbbench]
fillseekseq : 0.153 micros/op 6540684 ops/sec;
real 0m19.469s
user 0m10.192s
sys 0m9.252s
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, march, lovro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23997
Summary:
make compaction related options changeable. Most of changes are tedious,
following the same convention: grabs MutableCFOptions at the beginning
of compaction under mutex, then pass it throughout the job and register
it in SuperVersion at the end.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23349
Prefer prefix ++operator for non-primitive types like iterators for
performance reasons. Prefix ++/-- operators avoid creating a temporary
copy.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Add comment to enabele cppcheck suppression of intentional null
pointer deref via --inline-suppr option.
Signed-off-by: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Extended Built-in comparators with ReverseBytewiseComparator.
Reverse key handling is under certain conditions essential. E.g. while
using timestamp versioned data.
As native-comparators were not available using JAVA-API. Both built-in comparators
were exposed via JNI to be set upon database creation time.
Summary:
Now the file summary is too small for printing. Enlarge it.
To enable it, allow to pass a size to log buffer.
Test Plan:
Add a unit test.
make all check
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21723
Summary:
It was commented out in D22545 by accident. Keep the option in
ImmutableOptions for now. I can make it dynamic in
https://reviews.facebook.net/D23349
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23865
Summary: It contrains the file size to be 4G max with int
Test Plan:
tried to grep instance and made sure other related variables are also
uint64
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23697
Summary:
compression_size_percent is an int but was printed as
an unsigned int. So the default of -1 is displayed as a big number.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23679
Summary: To avoid false positive test failures when the file system doesn't support fallocate. In EnvTest.AllocateTest, we first make a simple fallocate call and check the error codes to rule out the possibility that it is not supported. Skip the test if the error code indicates it is not supported.
Test Plan: Run the test and make sure it passes on file systems supporting and not supporting fallocate
Reviewers: yhchiang, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23667
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
make all check
I will think a way to set up stress test for this
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23055
Summary: as title
Test Plan: options_test
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23283
Summary: This work on my compiler, but it turns out some compilers don't implicitly add constness, see: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/284. This diff adds constness explicitly.
Test Plan: still compiles
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23409
Summary:
The compilers we use treat char as signed. However, this is not guarantee of C standard and some compilers (for ARM platform for example), treat char as unsigned. Code that assumes that char is either signed or unsigned is wrong.
This change explicitly casts the char to signed version. This will not break any of our use cases on x86, which, I believe are all of them. In case somebody out there is using RocksDB on ARM AND using bloom filters, they're going to have a bad time. However, it is very unlikely that this is the case.
Test Plan: sanity test with previous commit (with new sanity test)
Reviewers: yhchiang, ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22767
Summary: removed reference to options in WriteBatch and DBImpl::Get()
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23049
Summary:
all shared_ptrs are in immutable_options now. This will also make
options assignment a little cheaper
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23001
Summary:
I found it is almost impossible to get rid of this function in a single
batch. I will take a step by step approach
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22995
Lei Jin