Summary: Converted db_stress, db_repl_stress and db_bench to use gflags
Test Plan: I tested by printing out all the flags from old and new versions. Tried defaults, + various combinations with "interesting flags". Also, tested by running db_crashtest.py and db_crashtest2.py.
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13581
Summary:
Create a new type of file on startup if it doesn't already exist called DBID.
This will store a unique number generated from boost library's uuid header file.
The use-case is to identify the case of a db losing all its data and coming back up either empty or from an image(backup/live replica's recovery)
the key point to note is that DBID is not stored in a backup or db snapshot
It's preferable to use Boost for uuid because:
1) A non-standard way of generating uuid is not good
2) /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid generates a uuid but only on linux environments and the solution would not be clean
3) c++ doesn't have any direct way to get a uuid
4) Boost is a very good library that was already having linkage in rocksdb from third-party
Note: I had to update the TOOLCHAIN_REV in build files to get latest verison of boost from third-party as the older version had a bug.
I had to put Wno-uninitialized in Makefile because boost-1.51 has an unitialized variable and rocksdb would not comiple otherwise. Latet open-source for boost is 1.54 but is not there in third-party. I have notified the concerned people in fbcode about it.
@kailiu : While releasing to third-party, an additional dependency will need to be created for boost in TARGETS file. I can help identify.
Test Plan:
Expand db_test to test 2 cases
1) Restarting db with Id file present - verify that no change to Id
2)Restarting db with Id file deleted - verify that a different Id is there after reopen
Also run make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13587
Summary: The pupose of this diff is to expose per user-call level precise timing of block read, so that we can answer questions like: a Get() costs me 100ms, is that somehow related to loading blocks from file system, or sth else? We will answer that with EXACTLY how many blocks have been read, how much time was spent on transfering the bytes from os, how much time was spent on checksum verification and how much time was spent on block decompression, just for that one Get. A nano second stopwatch was introduced to track time with higher precision. The cost/precision of the stopwatch is also measured in unit-test. On my dev box, retrieving one time instance costs about 30ns, on average. The deviation of timing results is good enough to track 100ns-1us level events. And the overhead could be safely ignored for 100us level events (10000 instances/s), for example, a viewstate thrift call.
Test Plan: perf_context_test, also testing with viewstate shadow traffic.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12351
Summary: Previously, RocksDB's build scripts used relative pathnames like ./build_detect_platform. This can cause problems if the user uses CDPATH. Also, it just doesn't seem right to me.
Test Plan:
make clean
make -j32 check
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12459
Summary:
* Added LIBNAME to enable configurable library name.
* remove/check fPIC in linux platform from build_detect_platform
Test Plan: make
Reviewers: emayanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12321
Summary:
Previously I changed the line `source ./fbcode.gcc471.sh` to `source fbcode.gcc471.sh`. It works in my devbox but failed in some jenkin servers. I revert the previous code to make sure it works well under all circumstances.
Test Plan:
Test in the jenkin server as well as dev box.
Reviewers:
CC:
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Summary: As Aaron suggested, there are quite some problems with our Makefile and scripts. So in this diff I did some cleanup for them and revise some part of the scripts/makefile to help people better understand some mysterious parts.
Test Plan:
Ran make in several modes;
Ran the updated scripts.
Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke, akushner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12285
Kai Liu