Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
49a10feb21
main
oxigraph-8.1.1
oxigraph-8.3.2
oxigraph-main
${ noResults }
2 Commits (49a10feb21dc5c766bb272406136667e1d8a969e)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Hui Xiao
|
ca0ef54f16 |
Rate-limit automatic WAL flush after each user write (#9607)
Summary: **Context:** WAL flush is currently not rate-limited by `Options::rate_limiter`. This PR is to provide rate-limiting to auto WAL flush, the one that automatically happen after each user write operation (i.e, `Options::manual_wal_flush == false`), by adding `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options`. Note that we are NOT rate-limiting WAL flush that do NOT automatically happen after each user write, such as `Options::manual_wal_flush == true + manual FlushWAL()` (rate-limiting multiple WAL flushes), for the benefits of: - being consistent with [ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.0.fb/include/rocksdb/options.h#L515) - being able to turn off some WAL flush's rate-limiting but not all (e.g, turn off specific the WAL flush of a critical user write like a service's heartbeat) `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` only accept `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` currently due to an implementation constraint. - The constraint is that we currently queue parallel writes (including WAL writes) based on FIFO policy which does not factor rate limiter priority into this layer's scheduling. If we allow lower priorities such as `Env::IO_HIGH/MID/LOW` and such writes specified with lower priorities occurs before ones specified with higher priorities (even just by a tiny bit in arrival time), the former would have blocked the latter, leading to a "priority inversion" issue and contradictory to what we promise for rate-limiting priority. Therefore we only allow `Env::IO_USER` and `Env::IO_TOTAL` right now before improving that scheduling. A pre-requisite to this feature is to support operation-level rate limiting in `WritableFileWriter`, which is also included in this PR. **Summary:** - Renamed test suite `DBRateLimiterTest to DBRateLimiterOnReadTest` for adding a new test suite - Accept `rate_limiter_priority` in `WritableFileWriter`'s private and public write functions - Passed `WriteOptions::rate_limiter_options` to `WritableFileWriter` in the path of automatic WAL flush. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9607 Test Plan: - Added new unit test to verify existing flush/compaction rate-limiting does not break, since `DBTest, RateLimitingTest` is disabled and current db-level rate-limiting tests focus on read only (e.g, `db_rate_limiter_test`, `DBTest2, RateLimitedCompactionReads`). - Added new unit test `DBRateLimiterOnWriteWALTest, AutoWalFlush` - `strace -ftt -e trace=write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=15 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -write_buffer_size=100000000 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -num=100` - verified that WAL flush(i.e, system-call _write_) were chunked into 15 bytes and each _write_ was roughly 1 second apart - verified the chunking disappeared when `-rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=0` - crash test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --disable_wal=0 --rate_limit_auto_wal_flush=1 --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` killed as normal **Benchmarked on flush/compaction to ensure no performance regression:** - compaction with rate-limiting (see table 1, avg over 1280-run): pre-change: **915635 micros/op**; post-change: **907350 micros/op (improved by 0.106%)** ``` #!/bin/bash TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/testdb START=1 NUM_DATA_ENTRY=8 N=10 rm -f compact_bmk_output.txt compact_bmk_output_2.txt dont_care_output.txt for i in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_DATA_ENTRY}") do NUM_RUN=$(($N*(2**($i-1)))) for j in $(eval echo "{$START..$NUM_RUN}") do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=6710886 > dont_care_output.txt && ./db_bench --benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=1 -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=1 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=100000000 | egrep 'compact' done > compact_bmk_output.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' compact_bmk_output.txt >> compact_bmk_output_2.txt done ``` - compaction w/o rate-limiting (see table 2, avg over 640-run): pre-change: **822197 micros/op**; post-change: **823148 micros/op (regressed by 0.12%)** ``` Same as above script, except that -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=0 ``` - flush with rate-limiting (see table 3, avg over 320-run, run on the [patch]( |
3 years ago |
|
Andrew Kryczka
|
babe56ddba |
Add rate limiter priority to ReadOptions (#9424)
Summary: Users can set the priority for file reads associated with their operation by setting `ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority` to something other than `Env::IO_TOTAL`. Rate limiting `VerifyChecksum()` and `VerifyFileChecksums()` is the motivation for this PR, so it also includes benchmarks and minor bug fixes to get that working. `RandomAccessFileReader::Read()` already had support for rate limiting compaction reads. I changed that rate limiting to be non-specific to compaction, but rather performed according to the passed in `Env::IOPriority`. Now the compaction read rate limiting is supported by setting `rate_limiter_priority = Env::IO_LOW` on its `ReadOptions`. There is no default value for the new `Env::IOPriority` parameter to `RandomAccessFileReader::Read()`. That means this PR goes through all callers (in some cases multiple layers up the call stack) to find a `ReadOptions` to provide the priority. There are TODOs for cases I believe it would be good to let user control the priority some day (e.g., file footer reads), and no TODO in cases I believe it doesn't matter (e.g., trace file reads). The API doc only lists the missing cases where a file read associated with a provided `ReadOptions` cannot be rate limited. For cases like file ingestion checksum calculation, there is no API to provide `ReadOptions` or `Env::IOPriority`, so I didn't count that as missing. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9424 Test Plan: - new unit tests - new benchmarks on ~50MB database with 1MB/s read rate limit and 100ms refill interval; verified with strace reads are chunked (at 0.1MB per chunk) and spaced roughly 100ms apart. - setup command: `./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom,compact -db=/tmp/testdb -target_file_size_base=1048576 -disable_auto_compactions=true -file_checksum=true` - benchmarks command: `strace -ttfe pread64 ./db_bench -benchmarks=verifychecksum,verifyfilechecksums -use_existing_db=true -db=/tmp/testdb -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=1048576 -rate_limit_bg_reads=1 -rate_limit_user_ops=true -file_checksum=true` - crash test using IO_USER priority on non-validation reads with https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9567 reverted: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --max_key=1000000 --write_buffer_size=524288 --target_file_size_base=524288 --level_compaction_dynamic_level_bytes=true --duration=3600 --rate_limit_bg_reads=true --rate_limit_user_ops=true --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10` Reviewed By: hx235 Differential Revision: D33747386 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: a2d985e97912fba8c54763798e04f006ccc56e0c |
3 years ago |