Summary:
In one of CPU profiles, we see some CPU costs of string::reserve() inside Batch.Put(). This patch should be able to reduce some of the costs by allocating sufficient buffer before hand.
Since it is a trivial percentage of CPU costs, I didn't find a way to show the improvement in one of the benchmarks. I'll deploy it to same application and do the same CPU profiling to make sure those CPU costs are reduced.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15135
Summary:
In one of CPU profiles, we see some CPU costs of string::reserve() inside Batch.Put(). This patch should be able to reduce some of the costs by allocating sufficient buffer before hand.
Since it is a trivial percentage of CPU costs, I didn't find a way to show the improvement in one of the benchmarks. I'll deploy it to same application and do the same CPU profiling to make sure those CPU costs are reduced.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15135
Summary:
WriteBatch::Data() now is easily to be misuse by users. Also, there is no cheap way for user of WriteBatch to know the data size accumulated. This patch fix the problem by:
(1) return a constant reference to Data() so it's obvious to caller what it means.
(2) add a function to return data size directly
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: zshao, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15123
Summary: The work to make sure mac os compiles rocksdb is not completed yet. But at least we can start cleaning some warnings captured only by g++ from mac os..
Test Plan: ran make in mac os
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14049
Summary: In our project, when writing to the database, we want to form the value as the concatenation of a small header and a larger payload. It's a shame to have to copy the payload just so we can give RocksDB API a linear view of the value. Since RocksDB makes a copy internally, it's easy to support gather writes.
Test Plan: write_batch_test, new test case
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13947
Summary:
The previous release 2.4 had a mapping to alias the older
namespace to rocksdb. This mapping is not needed in the new
release.
Test Plan:
make check
make release
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13359
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: LogData doesn't consume sequence numbers and doesn't increase the count of the write-batch. Also it was discussed that GetLiveFiles will have to be followed by GetSortedWalFiles to get a lossless backup
Test Plan: visual
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12753
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary:
Sometimes you don't need to iterate through the whole WriteBatch. This diff makes the Handler member functions return a bool that indicates whether to abort or not. If they return true, the iteration stops.
One thing I just thought of is that this will break backwards-compability. Maybe it would be better to add a virtual member function WriteBatch::Handler::ShouldAbort() that returns false by default. Comments requested.
I still have to add a new unit test for the abort code, but let's finalize the API first.
Test Plan: make -j32 check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, vamsi, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12339
Summary:
This patch adds the ability for the user to add sequences of arbitrary data (blobs) to write batches. These blobs are saved to the log along with everything else in the write batch. You can add multiple blobs per WriteBatch and the ordering of blobs, puts, merges, and deletes are preserved.
Blobs are not saves to SST files. RocksDB ignores blobs in every way except for writing them to the log.
Before committing this patch, I need to add some test code. But I'm submitting it now so people can comment on the API.
Test Plan: make -j32 check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, vamsi
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12195
Summary: As title. Exposed a Count function that returns the number of updates in a batch. Could be handy for replication sequence number check.
Test Plan: make check;
Reviewers: emayanke, sheki, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11523
Summary:
This diff introduces a new Merge operation into rocksdb.
The purpose of this review is mostly getting feedback from the team (everyone please) on the design.
Please focus on the four files under include/leveldb/, as they spell the client visible interface change.
include/leveldb/db.h
include/leveldb/merge_operator.h
include/leveldb/options.h
include/leveldb/write_batch.h
Please go over local/my_test.cc carefully, as it is a concerete use case.
Please also review the impelmentation files to see if the straw man implementation makes sense.
Note that, the diff does pass all make check and truly supports forward iterator over db and a version
of Get that's based on iterator.
Future work:
- Integration with compaction
- A raw Get implementation
I am working on a wiki that explains the design and implementation choices, but coding comes
just naturally and I think it might be a good idea to share the code earlier. The code is
heavily commented.
Test Plan: run all local tests
Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, zshao, sheki, emayanke, MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9651
Summary:
1. The OpenForReadOnly() call should not lock the db. This is useful
so that multiple processes can open the same database concurrently
for reading.
2. GetUpdatesSince should not error out if the archive directory
does not exist.
3. A new constructor for WriteBatch that can takes a serialized
string as a parameter of the constructor.
Test Plan: make clean check
Reviewers: sheki
Reviewed By: sheki
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7449
Summary:
Expose the serialized string that represents a WriteBatch. This
is helpful to replicate a writebatch operation from one machine
to another.
Test Plan: make clean check
Reviewers: sheki
Reviewed By: sheki
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7317
- Replace raw slice comparison with a call to user comparator.
Added test for custom comparators.
- Fix end of namespace comments.
- Fixed bug in picking inputs for a level-0 compaction.
When finding overlapping files, the covered range may expand
as files are added to the input set. We now correctly expand
the range when this happens instead of continuing to use the
old range. For example, suppose L0 contains files with the
following ranges:
F1: a .. d
F2: c .. g
F3: f .. j
and the initial compaction target is F3. We used to search
for range f..j which yielded {F2,F3}. However we now expand
the range as soon as another file is added. In this case,
when F2 is added, we expand the range to c..j and restart the
search. That picks up file F1 as well.
This change fixes a bug related to deleted keys showing up
incorrectly after a compaction as described in Issue 44.
(Sync with upstream @25072954)
kailiu