Summary:
Uses a newer build toolchain but the same old GLIBC when building releases of RocksJava for Linux x64 in the Docker Container.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4756
Differential Revision: D13383575
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 27c58814876e434d5fa61395e6664cfc5f6830b1
Summary:
This enables us to crossbuild pcc64le RocksJava binaries with a suitably old version of glibc (2.17) on CentOS 7.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2491
Differential Revision: D5955301
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 69ef9746f1dc30ffde4063dc764583d8c7ae937e
Summary:
Problem:
During RocksJava performance testing we found that the rocksdb jni library is not built with jemalloc; instead it was getting built with the default glibc malloc. We saw quite a bit of memory bloat due to this.
Addressed this by installing jemalloc-devel package in the vm that we use to build release jars.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2916
Differential Revision: D5887018
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: ace0b5d60234b3a30dcd5d39633e7827a5982a50
Summary:
As an alternative to Vagrant, we can now also use Docker to cross-build RocksDB. The advantages are:
1. The Docker images are fixed; they include all the latest updates and build tools.
2. The Vagrant image, required scripts that ran for every build that would update CentOS and install the buildtools. This lead to slow repeatable builds, we don't need to do this with Docker as they are already in the provided images.
The Docker images I have used have their Docker build files here: https://github.com/evolvedbinary/docker-rocksjava and the images themselves are available from Docker hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/evolvedbinary/rocksjava/
I have added the following targets to the `Makefile`:
1. `rocksdbjavastaticreleasedocker` this uses Docker to perform the cross-builds. It is basically the Docker version of the existing Vagrant `rocksdbjavastaticrelease` target.
2. `rocksdbjavastaticpublishdocker` delegates to `rocksdbjavastaticreleasedocker` and then `rocksdbjavastaticpublishcentral` to upload the artiacts to Maven Central. Equivalent to the existing Vagrant target: `rocksdbjavastaticpublish`
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2278
Differential Revision: D5048206
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 78fa96ef9d966fe09638ed01de282cd4e31961a9
Summary:
Updates to CentOS 5 have been archived as CentOS 5 is EOL. We now pull the updates from the vault. This is a stop gap solution, I will send a PR in a couple days which uses fixed Docker containers (with the updates pre-installed) instead.
sagar0 Here you go :-)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2270
Differential Revision: D5033637
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: a9312dd1bc18bfb8653f06ffa0a1512b4415720d
1) There is no need to download and install the compression libraries twice
just to get access to their header files during the compile phase.
2) Ensure that the compression library headers files used during the
compile phase are the same ones used to build the static library that
is linked into the library.
1) There is no need to download and install the compression libraries twice
just to get access to their header files during the compile phase.
2) Ensure that the compression library headers files used during the
compile phase are the same ones used to build the static library that
is linked into the library.
in the Java jar. Also build the linux libraries using the portable flag to fix a problem with
the linux32 build and improve the general portability of the RocksDB dynamic libraries.
==> linux32: util/crc32c.cc:318:39: error: ‘_mm_crc32_u64’ was not declared in this scope
Summary: This patch fixed couple build issues of rocksdbjavastaticrelease.
Test Plan: make rocksdbjavastaticrelease
Reviewers: sdong, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45915
Adam Retter