Some platforms, particularly Windows, do not have a single method that can
release both a held reader lock and a held writer lock; instead, a
separate method (ReleaseSRWLockShared or ReleaseSRWLockExclusive) must be
called in each case.
This may also be necessary to back MutexRW with a shared_mutex in C++14;
the current language proposal includes both an unlock() and a
shared_unlock() method.
Summary:
Using ThreadLocalPtr as a flag to determine if a mutex is locked or not enables us to implement AssertNotHeld(). It also makes AssertHeld() actually correct.
I had to remove port::Mutex as a dependency for util/thread_local.h, but that's fine since we can just use std::mutex :)
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: ljin, dhruba, haobo, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18171
Summary:
AssertHeld() was a no-op before. Now it does things.
Also, this change caught a bad bug in SuperVersion::Init(). The method is calling db->mutex.AssertHeld(), but db variable is not initialized yet! I also fixed that issue.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17193
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary:
This diff adds an option to specify whether PTHREAD_MUTEX_ADAPTIVE_NP will be enabled for the rocksdb single big kernel lock. db_bench also have this option now.
Quickly tested 8 thread cpu bound 100 byte random read.
No fast mutex: ~750k/s ops
With fast mutex: ~880k/s ops
Test Plan: make check; db_bench; db_stress
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: MarkCallaghan, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11031
Summary:
Implement ReadWrite locks for leveldb. These will be helpful
to implement a read-modify-write operation (e.g. atomic increments).
Test Plan: does not modify any existing code
Reviewers: heyongqiang
Reviewed By: heyongqiang
CC: MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D5787
- Replace raw slice comparison with a call to user comparator.
Added test for custom comparators.
- Fix end of namespace comments.
- Fixed bug in picking inputs for a level-0 compaction.
When finding overlapping files, the covered range may expand
as files are added to the input set. We now correctly expand
the range when this happens instead of continuing to use the
old range. For example, suppose L0 contains files with the
following ranges:
F1: a .. d
F2: c .. g
F3: f .. j
and the initial compaction target is F3. We used to search
for range f..j which yielded {F2,F3}. However we now expand
the range as soon as another file is added. In this case,
when F2 is added, we expand the range to c..j and restart the
search. That picks up file F1 as well.
This change fixes a bug related to deleted keys showing up
incorrectly after a compaction as described in Issue 44.
(Sync with upstream @25072954)
Bradley Grainger