Summary:
Fix IO error on read not being handle and crashing the DB. With the fix we properly return the error.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4410
Differential Revision: D9979246
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 111a85675067a29c03cb60e9a34103f4ff636694
Summary:
This commit implements automatic recovery from a Status::NoSpace() error
during background operations such as write callback, flush and
compaction. The broad design is as follows -
1. Compaction errors are treated as soft errors and don't put the
database in read-only mode. A compaction is delayed until enough free
disk space is available to accomodate the compaction outputs, which is
estimated based on the input size. This means that users can continue to
write, and we rely on the WriteController to delay or stop writes if the
compaction debt becomes too high due to persistent low disk space
condition
2. Errors during write callback and flush are treated as hard errors,
i.e the database is put in read-only mode and goes back to read-write
only fater certain recovery actions are taken.
3. Both types of recovery rely on the SstFileManagerImpl to poll for
sufficient disk space. We assume that there is a 1-1 mapping between an
SFM and the underlying OS storage container. For cases where multiple
DBs are hosted on a single storage container, the user is expected to
allocate a single SFM instance and use the same one for all the DBs. If
no SFM is specified by the user, DBImpl::Open() will allocate one, but
this will be one per DB and each DB will recover independently. The
recovery implemented by SFM is as follows -
a) On the first occurance of an out of space error during compaction,
subsequent
compactions will be delayed until the disk free space check indicates
enough available space. The required space is computed as the sum of
input sizes.
b) The free space check requirement will be removed once the amount of
free space is greater than the size reserved by in progress
compactions when the first error occured
c) If the out of space error is a hard error, a background thread in
SFM will poll for sufficient headroom before triggering the recovery
of the database and putting it in write-only mode. The headroom is
calculated as the sum of the write_buffer_size of all the DB instances
associated with the SFM
4. EventListener callbacks will be called at the start and completion of
automatic recovery. Users can disable the auto recov ery in the start
callback, and later initiate it manually by calling DB::Resume()
Todo:
1. More extensive testing
2. Add disk full condition to db_stress (follow-on PR)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4164
Differential Revision: D9846378
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: 80ea875dbd7f00205e19c82215ff6e37da10da4a
Summary:
As you know, almost all compilers support "pragma once" keyword instead of using include guards. To be keep consistency between header files, all header files are edited.
Besides this, try to fix some warnings about loss of data.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4339
Differential Revision: D9654990
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: c2cf3d2d03a599847684bed81378c401920ca848
Summary:
Currently, if RocksDB encounters errors during a write operation (user requested or BG operations), it sets DBImpl::bg_error_ and fails subsequent writes. This PR allows the DB to be resumed for certain classes of errors. It consists of 3 parts -
1. Introduce Status::Severity in rocksdb::Status to indicate whether a given error can be recovered from or not
2. Refactor the error handling code so that setting bg_error_ and deciding on severity is in one place
3. Provide an API for the user to clear the error and resume the DB instance
This whole change is broken up into multiple PRs. Initially, we only allow clearing the error for Status::NoSpace() errors during background flush/compaction. Subsequent PRs will expand this to include more errors and foreground operations such as Put(), and implement a polling mechanism for out-of-space errors.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3997
Differential Revision: D8653831
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: 6dc835c76122443a7668497c0226b4f072bc6afd
Summary:
Implemented PositionedAppend() and use_direct_io() for TestWritableFile.
With these changes, FaultInjectionTestEnv can be used with DirectIO enabled.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3586
Differential Revision: D7244305
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: f6b7aece53daa0f9977bc684164a0693693e514c
Summary:
Move some files under util/ to new directories env/, monitoring/ options/ and cache/
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2090
Differential Revision: D4833681
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 2fd8bef
Summary:
It is confusing to have auto_roll_logger to stay under db/, which has nothing to do with database. Move filename together as it is a dependency.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2080
Differential Revision: D4821141
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: ca7d768
Summary:
Consider the following WAL with 4 batch entries prefixed with their sequence at time of memtable insert.
[1: BEGIN_PREPARE, PUT, PUT, PUT, PUT, END_PREPARE(a)]
[1: BEGIN_PREPARE, PUT, PUT, PUT, PUT, END_PREPARE(b)]
[4: COMMIT(a)]
[7: COMMIT(b)]
The first two batches do not consume any sequence numbers so are both prefixed with seq=1.
For 2pc commit, memtable insertion takes place before COMMIT batch is written to WAL.
We can see that sequence number consumption takes place between WAL entries giving us the seemingly sparse sequence prefix for WAL entries.
This is a valid WAL.
Because with 2PC markers one WriteBatch points to another batch containing its inserts a writebatch can consume more or less sequence numbers than the number of sequence consuming entries that it contains.
We can see that, given the entries in the WAL, 6 sequence ids were consumed. Yet on recovery the maximum sequence consumed would be 7 + 3 (the number of sequence numbers consumed by COMMIT(b))
So, now upon recovery we must track the actual consumption of sequence numbers.
In the provided scenario there will be no sequence gaps, but it is possible to produce a sequence gap. This should not be a problem though. correct?
Test Plan: provided test.
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, leveldb, dhruba, hermanlee4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57645
Yi Wu