Summary:
The patch improves the bookkeeping around the memory usage of
cached blobs in two ways: 1) it uses `malloc_usable_size`, which accounts
for allocator bin sizes etc., and 2) it also considers the memory usage
of the `BlobContents` object in addition to the blob itself. Note: some unit
tests had been relying on the cache charge being equal to the size of the
cached blob; these were updated.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10583
Test Plan: `make check`
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D39060680
Pulled By: ltamasi
fbshipit-source-id: 3583adce2b4ce6e84861f3fadccbfd2e5a3cc482
Summary:
The patch introduces a new class called `BlobContents`, which represents
a single uncompressed blob value. We currently use `std::string` for this
purpose; `BlobContents` is somewhat smaller but the primary reason for a
dedicated class is that it enables certain improvements and optimizations
like eliding a copy when inserting a blob into the cache, using custom
allocators, or more control over and better accounting of the memory usage
of cached blobs (see https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10484).
(We plan to implement these in subsequent PRs.)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10571
Test Plan: `make check`
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D39000965
Pulled By: ltamasi
fbshipit-source-id: f296eddf9dec4fc3e11cad525b462bdf63c78f96
Summary:
RocksDB's `Cache` abstraction currently supports two priority levels for items: high (used for frequently accessed/highly valuable SST metablocks like index/filter blocks) and low (used for SST data blocks). Blobs are typically lower-value targets for caching than data blocks, since 1) with BlobDB, data blocks containing blob references conceptually form an index structure which has to be consulted before we can read the blob value, and 2) cached blobs represent only a single key-value, while cached data blocks generally contain multiple KVs. Since we would like to make it possible to use the same backing cache for the block cache and the blob cache, it would make sense to add a new, lower-than-low cache priority level (bottom level) for blobs so data blocks are prioritized over them.
This task is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10461
Reviewed By: siying
Differential Revision: D38672823
Pulled By: ltamasi
fbshipit-source-id: 90cf7362036563d79891f47be2cc24b827482743
Summary:
... so that cache keys can be derived from DB manifest data
before reading the file from storage--so that every part of the file
can potentially go in a persistent cache.
See updated comments in cache_key.cc for technical details. Importantly,
the new cache key encoding uses some fancy but efficient math to pack
data into the cache key without depending on the sizes of the various
pieces. This simplifies some existing code creating cache keys, like
cache warming before the file size is known.
This should provide us an essentially permanent mapping between SST
unique IDs and base cache keys, with the ability to "upgrade" SST
unique IDs (and thus cache keys) with new SST format_versions.
These cache keys are of similar, perhaps indistinguishable quality to
the previous generation. Before this change (see "corrected" days
between collision):
```
./cache_bench -stress_cache_key -sck_keep_bits=43
18 collisions after 2 x 90 days, est 10 days between (1.15292e+19 corrected)
```
After this change (keep 43 bits, up through 50, to validate "trajectory"
is ok on "corrected" days between collision):
```
19 collisions after 3 x 90 days, est 14.2105 days between (1.63836e+19 corrected)
16 collisions after 5 x 90 days, est 28.125 days between (1.6213e+19 corrected)
15 collisions after 7 x 90 days, est 42 days between (1.21057e+19 corrected)
15 collisions after 17 x 90 days, est 102 days between (1.46997e+19 corrected)
15 collisions after 49 x 90 days, est 294 days between (2.11849e+19 corrected)
15 collisions after 62 x 90 days, est 372 days between (1.34027e+19 corrected)
15 collisions after 53 x 90 days, est 318 days between (5.72858e+18 corrected)
15 collisions after 309 x 90 days, est 1854 days between (1.66994e+19 corrected)
```
However, the change does modify (probably weaken) the "guaranteed unique" promise from this
> SST files generated in a single process are guaranteed to have unique cache keys, unless/until number session ids * max file number = 2**86
to this (see https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10388)
> With the DB id limitation, we only have nice guaranteed unique cache keys for files generated in a single process until biggest session_id_counter and offset_in_file reach combined 64 bits
I don't think this is a practical concern, though.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10394
Test Plan: unit tests updated, see simulation results above
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D38667529
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 49af3fe7f47e5b61162809a78b76c769fd519fba
Summary:
RocksDB's `Cache` abstraction currently supports two priority levels for items: high (used for frequently accessed/highly valuable SST metablocks like index/filter blocks) and low (used for SST data blocks). Blobs are typically lower-value targets for caching than data blocks, since 1) with BlobDB, data blocks containing blob references conceptually form an index structure which has to be consulted before we can read the blob value, and 2) cached blobs represent only a single key-value, while cached data blocks generally contain multiple KVs. Since we would like to make it possible to use the same backing cache for the block cache and the blob cache, it would make sense to add a new, lower-than-low cache priority level (bottom level) for blobs so data blocks are prioritized over them.
This task is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10309
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D38211655
Pulled By: gangliao
fbshipit-source-id: 65ef33337db4d85277cc6f9782d67c421ad71dd5
Summary:
To help service owners to manage their memory budget effectively, we have been working towards counting all major memory users inside RocksDB towards a single global memory limit (see e.g. https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Write-Buffer-Manager#cost-memory-used-in-memtable-to-block-cache). The global limit is specified by the capacity of the block-based table's block cache, and is technically implemented by inserting dummy entries ("reservations") into the block cache. The goal of this task is to support charging the memory usage of the new blob cache against this global memory limit when the backing cache of the blob cache and the block cache are different.
This PR is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10321
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D37913590
Pulled By: gangliao
fbshipit-source-id: eaacf23907f82dc7d18964a3f24d7039a2937a72
Summary:
RocksDB supports a two-level cache hierarchy (see https://rocksdb.org/blog/2021/05/27/rocksdb-secondary-cache.html), where items evicted from the primary cache can be spilled over to the secondary cache, or items from the secondary cache can be promoted to the primary one. We have a CacheLib-based non-volatile secondary cache implementation that can be used to improve read latencies and reduce the amount of network bandwidth when using distributed file systems. In addition, we have recently implemented a compressed secondary cache that can be used as a replacement for the OS page cache when e.g. direct I/O is used. The goals of this task are to add support for using a secondary cache with the blob cache and to measure the potential performance gains using `db_bench`.
This task is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10349
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D37896773
Pulled By: gangliao
fbshipit-source-id: 7804619ce4a44b73d9e11ad606640f9385969c84
Summary:
- [x] Enabled blob caching for MultiGetBlob in RocksDB
- [x] Refactored MultiGetBlob logic and interface in RocksDB
- [x] Cleaned up Version::MultiGetBlob() and moved 'blob'-related code snippets into BlobSource
- [x] Add End-to-end test cases in db_blob_basic_test and also add unit tests in blob_source_test
This task is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10272
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D37558112
Pulled By: gangliao
fbshipit-source-id: a73a6a94ffdee0024d5b2a39e6d1c1a7d38664db
Summary:
The `bytes_read` returned by the current BlobSource interface is ambiguous. The uncompressed blob size is returned if the cache hits. The size of the blob read from disk, presumably the compressed version, is returned if the cache misses. Two differing semantics might cause ambiguity and consistency issues. For example, this inconsistency causes the assertion failure (T124246362 and its hot fix is https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10249).
This goal is to require that the value of `byte read` always be an on-disk blob record size.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10248
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D37470292
Pulled By: gangliao
fbshipit-source-id: fbca521b2791d3674dbf2484cea5fcae2fdd94d2
Summary:
There is currently no caching mechanism for blobs, which is not ideal especially when the database resides on remote storage (where we cannot rely on the OS page cache). As part of this task, we would like to make it possible for the application to configure a blob cache.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10225
Test Plan:
Add test cases for MultiGetBlob
In this task, we added the new API MultiGetBlob() for BlobSource.
This PR is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D37358364
Pulled By: gangliao
fbshipit-source-id: aff053a37615d96d768fb9aedde17da5618c7ae6
Summary:
There is currently no caching mechanism for blobs, which is not ideal especially when the database resides on remote storage (where we cannot rely on the OS page cache). As part of this task, we would like to make it possible for the application to configure a blob cache.
In this task, we added a new abstraction layer `BlobSource` to retrieve blobs from either blob cache or raw blob file. Note: For simplicity, the current PR only includes `GetBlob()`. `MultiGetBlob()` will be included in the next PR.
This PR is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10178
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D37250507
Pulled By: gangliao
fbshipit-source-id: 3fc4a55a0cea955a3147bdc7dba06430e377259b
Levi Tamasi