Summary:
locktree is a module providing Range Locking. It has a counter for
the number of times a lock acquisition request was blocked by an
existing conflicting lock and had to wait for it to be released.
Expose this counter in RangeLockManagerHandle::Counters::lock_wait_count.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9289
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D33079182
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 25b1a362d9da247536ab5007bd15900b319f139e
Summary:
Context:
[Rapid thread creation and deletion](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/utilities/transactions/write_prepared_transaction_test.cc#L439-L444) in `SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAcces` inside a [potentially big loop](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/utilities/transactions/write_prepared_transaction_test.cc#L1238-L1248) can lead to heavy-loading the system with many threads due to delay in actually cleaning up thread's resource in the kernel sometime. We ran into some [flaky failure](https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/facebook/rocksdb/10383/workflows/136f1005-80a9-4515-aee9-fe36ac6462a1/jobs/253289) in CI and reproduced it by below:
- Command
```
Added `ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::port::InstallStackTraceHandler();` like https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9276
DEBUG_LEVEL=2 make -j56 write_prepared_transaction_test
GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS=0 ~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel -r 200 -w 200 ./write_prepared_transaction_test --gtest_filter=TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
```
- Stack, where `write_prepared_transaction_test.cc:442` in `https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9` points to thread creation
```
[ RUN ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
....terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
what(): Resource temporarily unavailable
Received signal 6 (Aborted)
#0 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x38) [0x7fc114f39438]
...
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(+0xb8e73) [0x7fc1158a5e73] ?? ??:0
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8 ./write_prepared_transaction_test() [0x4ca86c] std:🧵:thread<rocksdb::WritePreparedTransactionTestBase::SnapshotConcurrentAccessTestInternal(rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB*, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> const&, rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB::CommitEntry&, unsigned long&, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long)::{lambda()https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/1}>(rocksdb::WritePreparedTransactionTestBase::SnapshotConcurrentAccessTestInternal(rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB*, s d::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB::CommitEntry&, unsigned long&, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long)::{l mbda()https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/1}&&) /usr/include/c++/5/thread:137 (discriminator 4)
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9 ./write_prepared_transaction_test() [0x4bb80c] rocksdb::WritePreparedTransactionTestBase::SnapshotConcurrentAccessTestInternal(rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB*, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, rocksdb::W itePreparedTxnDB::CommitEntry&, unsigned long&, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long) /home/circleci/project/utilities/transactions/write_prepared_transaction_test.cc:442
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10 ./write_prepared_transaction_test() [0x4407b6] rocksdb::SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest_SnapshotConcurrentAccess_Test::TestBody() /home/circleci/project/utilities/transactions/write_prepared_transaction_test.cc:1244
...
[109/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 returned/aborted with exit code -6 (34462 ms)
```
- Move thread 2's work into current thread to avoid half of the thread creation cuz there is no difference in doing so. We expect this can make the thread-creation error less often, even though we can't gurantee it from happening again. Considering this is a trivial change with positive impact, it's still worth landing and monitor if it's enough to solve the problem in reality.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9281
Test Plan:
Before the change, repeating the test 200 times with 200 workers failed
`~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel -r 200 -w 200 ./write_prepared_transaction_test --gtest_filter=TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1`
```
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest
[ RUN ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
..unknown file: Failure
C++ exception with description "Resource temporarily unavailable" thrown in the test body.
[ FAILED ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1, where GetParam() = (false, true, 1, 0, 1, 20) (11882 ms)
[----------] 1 test from TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest (11882 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (11882 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 0 tests.
[ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below:
[ FAILED ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1, where GetParam() = (false, true, 1, 0, 1, 20)
```
After the change: repeating the test 200 times with 200 workers didn't fail, even with repeating the "repeating" for 10 times like below
`for i in {1..10}; do ~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel -r 200 -w 200 ./write_prepared_transaction_test --gtest_filter=TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1; done`
```
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
```
It does failed when repeating the test 400 times with 400 workers
`~/project$ ~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel -r 400 -w 400 ./write_prepared_transaction_test --gtest_filter=TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1`
```
[1/400] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 (2928 ms)
Note: Google Test filter = TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest
[ RUN ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1
unknown file: Failure
C++ exception with description "std::bad_alloc" thrown in the test body.
[ FAILED ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1, where GetParam() = (false, true, 1, 0, 1, 20) (2597 ms)
[----------] 1 test from TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest (2597 ms total)
```
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D33026776
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 509f57126392821e835e48396e5bf224f4f5dcac
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9266
This diff adds a new tag `CommitWithTimestamp`. Currently, there is no API to trigger writing
this tag to WAL, thus it is unavailable to users.
This is an ongoing effort to add user-defined timestamp support to write-committed transactions.
This diff also indicates all column families that may potentially participate in the same
transaction must either disable timestamp or have the same timestamp format, since
`CommitWithTimestamp` tag is followed by a single byte-array denoting the commit
timestamp of the transaction. We will enforce this checking in a future diff. We keep this
diff small.
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D31721350
fbshipit-source-id: e1450811443647feb6ca01adec4c8aaae270ffc6
Summary:
This changes write_prepared_transaction_test under CircleCI to
print a stack trace on unhandled exception, so that we can debug rare
exceptions seen in CircleCI:
[ RUN ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/24
.......unknown file: Failure
C++ exception with description "Resource temporarily unavailable" thrown in the test body.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9276
Test Plan:
manual run test with seeded 'throw', with and without
CIRCLECI=true environment variable
Reviewed By: ajkr, hx235
Differential Revision: D32996993
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: e790408ce204b676d3d84a290e41be511b203bfa
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9162
Existing TransactionUtil::CheckKeyForConflict() performs only seq-based
conflict checking. If user-defined timestamp is enabled, it should perform
conflict checking based on timestamps too.
Update TransactionUtil::CheckKey-related methods to verify the timestamp of the
latest version of a key is smaller than the read timestamp. Note that
CheckKeysForConflict() is not updated since it's used only by optimistic
transaction, and we do not plan to update it in this upcoming batch of diffs.
Existing GetLatestSequenceForKey() returns the sequence of the latest
version of a specific user key. Since we support user-defined timestamp, we
need to update this method to also return the timestamp (if enabled) of the
latest version of the key. This will be needed for snapshot validation.
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D31567960
fbshipit-source-id: 2e4a14aed267435a9aa91bc632d2411c01946d44
Summary:
The individual commits in this PR should be self-explanatory.
All small and _very_ low-priority changes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5896
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D18065108
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: 236b1a1d9d21f982cc08aa67027108dde5eaf280
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9105
The user contract of SingleDelete is that: a SingleDelete can only be issued to
a key that exists and has NOT been updated. For example, application can insert
one key `key`, and uses a SingleDelete to delete it in the future. The `key`
cannot be updated or removed using Delete.
In reality, especially when write-prepared transaction is being used, things
can get tricky. For example, a prepared transaction already writes `key` to the
memtable after a successful Prepare(). Afterwards, should the transaction
rollback, it will insert a Delete into the memtable to cancel out the prior
Put. Consider the following sequence of operations.
```
// operation sequence 1
Begin txn
Put(key)
Prepare()
Flush()
Rollback txn
Flush()
```
There will be two SSTs resulting from above. One of the contains a PUT, while
the second one contains a Delete. It is also known that releasing a snapshot
can lead to an L0 containing only a SD for a particular key. Consider the
following operations following the above block.
```
// operation sequence 2
db->Put(key)
db->SingleDelete(key)
Flush()
```
The operation sequence 2 can result in an L0 with only the SD.
Should there be a snapshot for conflict checking created before operation
sequence 1, then an attempt to compact the db may hit the assertion failure
below, because ikey_.type is Delete (from a rollback).
```
else if (clear_and_output_next_key_) {
assert(ikey_.type == kTypeValue || ikey_.type == kTypeBlobIndex);
}
```
To fix the assertion failure, we can skip the SingleDelete if we detect an
earlier Delete in the same snapshot interval.
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D32056848
fbshipit-source-id: 23620a91e28562d91c45cf7e95f414b54b729748
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9060
RocksDB bottommost level compaction may zero out an internal key's sequence if
the key's sequence is in the earliest_snapshot.
In write-prepared transaction, checking the visibility of a certain sequence in
a specific released snapshot may return a "snapshot released" result.
Therefore, it is possible, after a certain sequence of events, a PUT has its
sequence zeroed out, but a subsequent SingleDelete of the same key will still
be output with its original sequence. This violates the ascending order of
keys and leads to incorrect result.
The solution is to use an extra variable `last_key_seq_zeroed_` to track the
information about visibility in earliest snapshot. With this variable, we can
know for sure that a SingleDelete is in the earliest snapshot even if the said
snapshot is released during compaction before processing the SD.
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D31813016
fbshipit-source-id: d8cff59d6f34e0bdf282614034aaea99be9174e1
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9061
In write-prepared txn, checking a sequence's visibility in a released (old)
snapshot may return "Snapshot released". Suppose we have two snapshots:
```
earliest_snap < earliest_write_conflict_snap
```
If we release `earliest_write_conflict_snap` but keep `earliest_snap` during
bottommost level compaction, then it is possible that certain sequence of
events can lead to a PUT being seq-zeroed followed by a SingleDelete of the
same key. This violates the ascending order of keys, and will cause data
inconsistency.
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D31813017
fbshipit-source-id: dc68ba2541d1228489b93cf3edda5f37ed06f285
Summary:
This PR adds support for building on s390x including updating travis CI. It uses the previous work in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6168 and adds some more changes to get all current tests (make check and jni tests) to pass. The tests were run with snappy, lz4, bzip2 and zstd all compiled in.
There are a few pieces still needed to get the travis build working that I don't think I can do. adamretter is this something you could help with?
1. A prebuilt https://rocksdb-deps.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/cmake/cmake-3.14.5-Linux-s390x.deb package
2. A https://hub.docker.com/r/evolvedbinary/rocksjava s390x image
Not sure if there is more required for travis. Happy to help in any way I can.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8962
Reviewed By: mrambacher
Differential Revision: D31802198
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 683511466fa6b505f85ba5a9964a268c6151f0c2
Summary:
This header file was including everything and the kitchen sink when it did not need to. This resulted in many places including this header when they needed other pieces instead.
Cleaned up this header to only include what was needed and fixed up the remaining code to include what was now missing.
Hopefully, this sort of code hygiene cleanup will speed up the builds...
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8930
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D31142788
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: 6b45de3f300750c79f751f6227dece9cfd44085d
Summary:
There is a corner case when using WriteUnprepared transactions when
`WriteUnpreparedTxn::Get` returns `Status::TryAgain` instead of
propagating the result of `GetFromBatchAndDB`. The patch adds
`PermitUncheckedError` to make the `ASSERT_STATUS_CHECKED` build pass in
this case as well.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8947
Test Plan: `make check`
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D31125422
Pulled By: ltamasi
fbshipit-source-id: 42de51dcfa9384e032244c2b4d3f40e9a4111194
Summary:
Old typedef syntax is confusing
Most but not all changes with
perl -pi -e 's/typedef (.*) ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+);/using $2 = $1;/g' list_of_files
make format
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8751
Test Plan: existing
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D30745277
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 6f65f0631c3563382d43347896020413cc2366d9
Summary:
In debug mode, we are seeing assertion failure as follows
```
db/compaction/compaction_iterator.cc:980: void rocksdb::CompactionIterator::PrepareOutput(): \
Assertion `ikey_.type != kTypeDeletion && ikey_.type != kTypeSingleDeletion' failed.
```
It is caused by releasing earliest snapshot during compaction between the execution of
`NextFromInput()` and `PrepareOutput()`.
In one case, as demonstrated in unit test `WritePreparedTransaction.ReleaseEarliestSnapshotDuringCompaction_WithSD2`,
incorrect result may be returned by a following range scan if we disable assertion, as in opt compilation
level: the SingleDelete marker's sequence number is zeroed out, but the preceding PUT is also
outputted to the SST file after compaction. Due to the logic of DBIter, the PUT will not be
skipped and will be returned by iterator in range scan. https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8661 illustrates what happened.
Fix by taking a more conservative approach: make compaction zero out sequence number only
if key is in the earliest snapshot when the compaction starts.
Another assertion failure is
```
Assertion `current_user_key_snapshot_ == last_snapshot' failed.
```
It's caused by releasing the snapshot between the PUT and SingleDelete during compaction.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8608
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D30145645
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 699f58e66faf70732ad53810ccef43935d3bbe81
Summary:
This PR tries to remove some unnecessary checks as well as unreachable code blocks to
improve readability. An obvious non-public API method naming typo is also corrected.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8565
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: lth
Differential Revision: D29963984
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: cc96e8f09890e5cfe9b20eadb63bdca5484c150a
Summary:
- Added Type/CreateFromString
- Added ability to load EventListeners to DBOptions
- Since EventListeners did not previously have a Name(), defaulted to "". If there is no name, the listener cannot be loaded from the ObjectRegistry.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8473
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D29901488
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: 2d3a4aa6db1562ac03e7ad41b360e3521d486254
Summary:
Various tests had disabled valgrind due to it slowing down and timing
out (as is the case right now) the CI runs. Where a test was disabled with no comment,
I assumed slowness was the cause. For these tests that were slow under
valgrind, as well as the ones identified in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8352, this PR moves them
behind the compiler flag `-DROCKSDB_FULL_VALGRIND_RUN`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8475
Test Plan: running `make full_valgrind_test`, `make valgrind_test`, `make check`; will verify they appear working correctly
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D29504843
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 2aac90749cfbd30d5ce11cb29a07a1b9314eeea7
Summary:
This reverts commit 25be1ed66a.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8438
Test Plan: Run the impacted mysql test 40 times
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D29286247
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: d3bd056971a19a8b012d5d0295fa045c012b3c04
Summary:
This reverts commit 9167ece586.
It was found to reliably trip a compaction picking conflict assertion in a MyRocks unit test. We don't understand why yet so reverting in the meantime.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8410
Test Plan: `make check -j48`
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D29150300
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 2de8664f355d6da015e84e5fec2e3f90f49741c8
Summary:
This is a duplicate of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/4948 by mzhaom to fix tests after rebase.
This change is a follow-up to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/4927, which made this possible by allowing tombstone dropping/seqnum zeroing optimizations on the last key in the compaction. Now the `largest_seqno != 0` condition suffices to prevent snapshot release triggered compaction from entering an infinite loop.
The issues caused by the extraneous condition `level_and_file.second->num_deletions > 1` are:
- files could have `largest_seqno > 0` forever making it impossible to tell they cannot contain any covering keys
- it doesn't trigger compaction when there are many overwritten keys. Some MyRocks use case actually doesn't use Delete but instead calls Put with empty value to "delete" keys, so we'd like to be able to trigger compaction in this case too.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8357
Test Plan: - make check
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D28855340
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: a261b51eecafec492499e6d01e8e43112f801798
Summary:
We saw the `Commit()` fail with "Operation expired" so apparently the
expiration time is too short. Increased the magnitude of the times in
this test to make flakiness less likely.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8258
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D28177033
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 0357acee6cc14c104b6ccd39231a683a606ab130
Summary:
The WBWI has two differing modes of operation dependent on the value
of the constructor parameter `overwrite_key`.
Currently, regardless of the parameter, neither mode performs as
expected when using Merge. This PR remedies this by correctly invoking
the appropriate Merge Operator before returning results from the WBWI.
Examples of issues that exist which are solved by this PR:
## Example 1 with `overwrite_key=false`
Currently, from an empty database, the following sequence:
```
Put('k1', 'v1')
Merge('k1', 'v2')
Get('k1')
```
Incorrectly yields `v2`, that is to say that the Merge behaves like a Put.
## Example 2 with o`verwrite_key=true`
Currently, from an empty database, the following sequence:
```
Put('k1', 'v1')
Merge('k1', 'v2')
Get('k1')
```
Incorrectly yields `ERROR: kMergeInProgress`.
## Example 3 with `overwrite_key=false`
Currently, with a database containing `('k1' -> 'v1')`, the following sequence:
```
Merge('k1', 'v2')
GetFromBatchAndDB('k1')
```
Incorrectly yields `v1,v2`
## Example 4 with `overwrite_key=true`
Currently, with a database containing `('k1' -> 'v1')`, the following sequence:
```
Merge('k1', 'v1')
GetFromBatchAndDB('k1')
```
Incorrectly yields `ERROR: kMergeInProgress`.
## Example 5 with `overwrite_key=false`
Currently, from an empty database, the following sequence:
```
Put('k1', 'v1')
Merge('k1', 'v2')
GetFromBatchAndDB('k1')
```
Incorrectly yields `v1,v2`
## Example 6 with `overwrite_key=true`
Currently, from an empty database, `('k1' -> 'v1')`, the following sequence:
```
Put('k1', 'v1')
Merge('k1', 'v2')
GetFromBatchAndDB('k1')
```
Incorrectly yields `ERROR: kMergeInProgress`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8135
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D27657938
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: 0fbda6bbc66bedeba96a84786d90141d776297df
Summary:
The implementation of TransactionDB::WrapDB() and
TransactionDB::WrapStackableDB() are almost identical, except for the
type of the first argument `db`. This PR adds a new template function in
anonymous namespace, and calls it in the above two functions.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8079
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: lth
Differential Revision: D27184575
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: f2855a6db3a7e897d0d611f7050ca4b696c56a7a
Summary:
For performance purposes, the lower level routines were changed to use a SystemClock* instead of a std::shared_ptr<SystemClock>. The shared ptr has some performance degradation on certain hardware classes.
For most of the system, there is no risk of the pointer being deleted/invalid because the shared_ptr will be stored elsewhere. For example, the ImmutableDBOptions stores the Env which has a std::shared_ptr<SystemClock> in it. The SystemClock* within the ImmutableDBOptions is essentially a "short cut" to gain access to this constant resource.
There were a few classes (PeriodicWorkScheduler?) where the "short cut" property did not hold. In those cases, the shared pointer was preserved.
Using db_bench readrandom perf_level=3 on my EC2 box, this change performed as well or better than 6.17:
6.17: readrandom : 28.046 micros/op 854902 ops/sec; 61.3 MB/s (355999 of 355999 found)
6.18: readrandom : 32.615 micros/op 735306 ops/sec; 52.7 MB/s (290999 of 290999 found)
PR: readrandom : 27.500 micros/op 871909 ops/sec; 62.5 MB/s (367999 of 367999 found)
(Note that the times for 6.18 are prior to revert of the SystemClock).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8033
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D27014563
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: ad0459eba03182e454391b5926bf5cdd45657b67
Summary:
Fix this scenario:
trx1> acquire shared lock on $key
trx2> acquire shared lock on the same $key
trx1> attempt to acquire a unique lock on $key.
Lock acquisition will fail, and deadlock detection will start.
It will call iterate_and_get_overlapping_row_locks() which will
produce a list with two locks (shared locks by trx1 and trx2).
However the code in lock_request::build_wait_graph() was not prepared
to find the lock by the same transaction in the list of conflicting
locks. Fix it to ignore it.
(One may suggest to fix iterate_and_get_overlapping_row_locks() to not
include locks by trx1. This is not a good idea, because that function
is also used to report all locks currently held)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7938
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D26529374
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: d89cbed008db1a97a8f2351b9bfb75310750d16a
Summary:
TransactionDB uses read callback to filter out un-committed data before
a snapshot. But `MultiGet()` API doesn't use that at all, which causes
returning unwanted data.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7963
Test Plan: Added unittest to reproduce
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D26455851
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: 265276698cf9d8c4cd79e3250ef10d14375bac55
Summary:
Explicitly reject all range deletions on `TransactionDB` or `OptimisticTransactionDB`, except when the user provides sufficient promises that allow us to proceed safely. The necessary promises are described in the API doc for `TransactionDB::DeleteRange()`. There is currently no way to provide enough promises to make it safe in `OptimisticTransactionDB`.
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7913.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7929
Test Plan: unit tests covering the cases it's permitted/rejected
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D26240254
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 2834a0ce64cc3e4c3799e35b885a5e79c2f4f6d9
Summary:
Memtable bloom filter is useful in many use cases. A default value on with conservative 1.5% memory can benefit more use cases than use cases impacted.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6584
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D20626739
fbshipit-source-id: 1dd45532b932139552519b8c2682bd954550c2f9
Summary:
BasicLockEscalation will cause false-positive warnings under TSAN (this is a known issue in TSAN, see details in https://gist.github.com/spetrunia/77274cf2d5848e0a7e090d622695ed4e), skip this test if TSAN is enabled, or if we are not sure whether TSAN is enabled.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7814
Test Plan: watch the tsan contrun test to pass.
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D25708094
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 4fc813ff373301d033d086154cc7bb60a5e95889
Summary:
Range Locking - an implementation based on the locktree library
- Add a RangeTreeLockManager and RangeTreeLockTracker which implement
range locking using the locktree library.
- Point locks are handled as locks on single-point ranges.
- Add a unit test: range_locking_test
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7506
Reviewed By: akankshamahajan15
Differential Revision: D25320703
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: f86347384b42ba2b0257d67eca0f45f806b69da7
Summary:
This disables Linux/amd64 builds in Travis for PRs, and adds a
gcc-10+c++20 build in CircleCI, which should fill out sufficient coverage
vs. what we had in Travis
Fixed a use of std::is_pod, which is deprecated in c++20
Fixed ++ on a volatile in db_repl_stress.cc, with bigger refactoring.
Although ++ on this volatile was probably ok with one thread writer and
one thread reader, the code was still overly complex. There was a
deadcode check for error
`if (replThread.no_read < dataPump.no_records)` which can be proven
never to happen based on the structure of the code. It infinite loops
instead for the case intended to be checked. I just simplified the code
for what should be the same checking power.
Also most configurations seem to be using make parallelism = 2 * vcores,
so fixing / using that.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7791
Test Plan:
CI
and `while ./db_repl_stress; do echo again; done` for a while
Reviewed By: siying
Differential Revision: D25669834
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: b2c688053d0b1d52c989903449d3cd27a04130d6
Summary:
Some clients do not close their iterators until after the transaction finishes. To handle this case, we will invalidate any iterators on transaction clear.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7733
Reviewed By: cheng-chang
Differential Revision: D25261158
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: b91320f00c54cbe0e6882b794b34f3bb5640dbc0
Summary:
To be used for implementing Range Locking.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7753
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D25378980
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 801a9c5cd92a84654ca2586b73e8f69001e89320
Summary:
This PR has two commits:
1. Modify the code to allow different Lock Managers (of any kind) to be used. It is implied that a LockManager uses its own custom LockTracker.
2. Add definitions for Range Locking (class Endpoint and GetRangeLock() function.
cheng-chang, is this what you've had in mind (should the PR have both item 1 and item 2?)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7443
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D24123172
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: c6548ad6d4cc3c25f68d13b29147bc6fdf357185
Summary:
The patch adds iterator support to the integrated BlobDB implementation.
Whenever a blob reference is encountered during iteration, the corresponding
blob is retrieved by calling `Version::GetBlob`, assuming the `expose_blob_index`
(formerly `allow_blob`) flag is *not* set. (Note: the flag is set by the old stacked
BlobDB implementation, which has its own blob file handling/blob retrieval logic.)
In addition, `DBIter` now uniformly returns `Status::NotSupported` with the error
message `"BlobDB does not support merge operator."` when encountering a
blob reference while performing a merge (instead of potentially returning a
message that implies the database should be opened using the stacked BlobDB's
`Open`.)
TODO: We can implement support for lazily retrieving the blob value (or in other
words, bypassing the retrieval of blob values based on key) by extending the `Iterator`
API with a new `PrepareValue` method (similarly to `InternalIterator`, which already
supports lazy values).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7731
Test Plan: `make check`
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D25256293
Pulled By: ltamasi
fbshipit-source-id: c39cd782011495a526cdff99c16f5fca400c4811
Summary:
An application may accidentally write merge operands without properly configuring `merge_operator`. We should alert them as early as possible that there's an API misuse. Previously RocksDB only notified them when a query or background operation needed to merge but couldn't. With this PR, RocksDB notifies them of the problem before applying the merge operand to the memtable (although it may already be in WAL, which seems it'd cause a crash loop until they enable `merge_operator`).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7667
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D24933360
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 3a4a2ceb0b7aed184113dd03b8efd735a8332f7f
Summary:
The tests often times out in internal infra, skipping fsync should reduce test time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7641
Test Plan: watch existing tests to pass
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D24765098
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: c62bf8110361aee901918d632cf4772435d05e8d
Summary:
This is a PR generated **semi-automatically** by an internal tool to remove unused includes and `using` statements.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7604
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D24579392
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: c4bfa6c6b08da1de186690d37eb73d8fff45aecd
Summary:
When `ASSERT_STATUS_CHECKED` is enabled, `transaction_test` does not pass without this PR.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7572
Test Plan: `ASSERT_STATUS_CHECKED=1 make -j32 transaction_test && ./transaction_test`
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D24404319
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 13689035995366ab06d8eada3ea404e45fef8bc5
Summary:
In order to be able to introduce more locking protocols, we need to abstract out the locking subsystem in TransactionDB into a set of interfaces.
PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 introduces interface `LockTracker`. This PR is a follow up to take the first step to abstract out a `LockManager` interface.
Further modifications to the interface may be needed when introducing the first implementation of range lock. But the idea here is to put the range lock implementation based on range tree under the `utilities/transactions/lock/range/range_tree`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7532
Test Plan: point_lock_manager_test
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D24238731
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 2a9458cd8b3fb008d9529dbc4d3b28c24631f463
Summary:
A generic algorithm in progress depends on a templatized
version of fastrange, so this change generalizes it and renames
it to fit our style guidelines, FastRange32, FastRange64, and now
FastRangeGeneric.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7436
Test Plan: added a few more test cases
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D23958153
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 8c3b76101653417804997e5f076623a25586f3e8
Sergei Petrunia