Summary:
Add and implement Iterator::Refresh(). When this function is called, if the super version doesn't change, update the sequence number of the iterator to the latest one and invalidate the iterator. If the super version changed, recreated the whole iterator. This can help users reuse the iterator more easily.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2621
Differential Revision: D5464500
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: f548bd35e85c1efca2ea69273802f6704eba6ba9
Summary:
This reverts the previous commit 1d7048c598, which broke the build.
Did a `git revert 1d7048c`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2627
Differential Revision: D5476473
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 4756ff5c0dfc88c17eceb00e02c36176de728d06
Summary: This uses `clang-tidy` to comment out unused parameters (in functions, methods and lambdas) in fbcode. Cases that the tool failed to handle are fixed manually.
Reviewed By: igorsugak
Differential Revision: D5454343
fbshipit-source-id: 5dee339b4334e25e963891b519a5aa81fbf627b2
Summary:
… headers
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2199 should not reference RocksDB-specific macros (like ROCKSDB_SUPPORT_THREAD_LOCAL in this case) to public headers, `iostats_context.h` and `perf_context.h`. We shouldn't do that because users have to provide these compiler flags when building their binary with RocksDB.
We should hide the thread local global variable inside our implementation and just expose a function api to retrieve these variables. It may break some users for now but good for long term.
make check -j64
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2380
Differential Revision: D5177896
Pulled By: lightmark
fbshipit-source-id: 6fcdfac57f2e2dcfe60992b7385c5403f6dcb390
Summary:
DBIter, and in-turn NewDBIterator and NewArenaWrappedDBIterator, take a bunch of params. They can be reduced by passing in ReadOptions directly instead of passing in every new param separately. It also seems much cleaner as a bunch of the params towards the end seem to be optional.
(Recently I introduced max_skippable_internal_keys, which added one more to the already huge count).
Idea courtesy IslamAbdelRahman
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2116
Differential Revision: D4857128
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 7d239df094b94bd9ea79d145cdf825478ac037a8
Summary:
Operations like Seek/Next/Prev sometimes take too long to complete when there are many internal keys to be skipped. Adding an option, max_skippable_internal_keys -- which could be used to set a threshold for the maximum number of keys that can be skipped, will help to address these cases where it is much better to fail a request (as incomplete) than to wait for a considerable time for the request to complete.
This feature -- to fail an iterator seek request as incomplete, is disabled by default when max_skippable_internal_keys = 0. It is enabled only when max_skippable_internal_keys > 0.
This feature is based on the discussion mentioned in the PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1084.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2000
Differential Revision: D4753223
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 1c973f7
Summary:
merger.h was always a confusing name for me, simply give the file a better name
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1836
Differential Revision: D4505357
Pulled By: IslamAbdelRahman
fbshipit-source-id: 07b28d8
Summary: in rocksdb::DBIter::FindValueForCurrentKey(), last_not_merge_type could also be SingleDelete() which is omitted
Test Plan: db_iter_test
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D65187
Summary:
1) The previous solution for Prev() prefix support is not clean.
Since I add api SeekForPrev(), now the Prev() can be symmetric to Next().
and we do not need SeekToLast() to be called in Prev() any more.
Also, Next() will Seek(prefix_seek_key_) to solve the problem of possible inconsistency between db_iter and merge_iter when
there is merge_operator. And prefix_seek_key is only refreshed when change direction to forward.
2) This diff also solves the bug of Iterator::SeekToLast() with iterate_upper_bound_ with prefix extractor.
add test cases for the above two cases.
There are some tests for the SeekToLast() in Prev(), I will clean them later.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, andrewkr, yiwu, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D63933
Summary:
Add new Iterator API, `SeekForPrev`: find the last key that <= target key
support prefix_extractor
support prefix_same_as_start
support upper_bound
not supported in iterators without Prev()
Also add tests in db_iter_test and db_iterator_test
Pass all tests
Cheers!
Test Plan: make all check -j64
Reviewers: andrewkr, yiwu, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64149
Summary: add prefix_seek_mode to db_iter_test to enable data race test for iterator when prefix_extractor != nullptr
Test Plan: make all check -j64
Reviewers: andrewkr, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D63027
Summary: We want to provide a way to detect whether an iterator is stale and needs to be recreated. Add a iterator property to return version number.
Test Plan: Add two unit tests for it.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54921
Summary:
Separate a new class InternalIterator from class Iterator, when the look-up is done internally, which also means they operate on key with sequence ID and type.
This change will enable potential future optimizations but for now InternalIterator's functions are still the same as Iterator's.
At the same time, separate the cleanup function to a separate class and let both of InternalIterator and Iterator inherit from it.
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48549
Summary:
This patch fixes#7460559. It introduces SingleDelete as a new database
operation. This operation can be used to delete keys that were never
overwritten (no put following another put of the same key). If an overwritten
key is single deleted the behavior is undefined. Single deletion of a
non-existent key has no effect but multiple consecutive single deletions are
not allowed (see limitations).
In contrast to the conventional Delete() operation, the deletion entry is
removed along with the value when the two are lined up in a compaction. Note:
The semantics are similar to @igor's prototype that allowed to have this
behavior on the granularity of a column family (
https://reviews.facebook.net/D42093 ). This new patch, however, is more
aggressive when it comes to removing tombstones: It removes the SingleDelete
together with the value whenever there is no snapshot between them while the
older patch only did this when the sequence number of the deletion was older
than the earliest snapshot.
Most of the complex additions are in the Compaction Iterator, all other changes
should be relatively straightforward. The patch also includes basic support for
single deletions in db_stress and db_bench.
Limitations:
- Not compatible with cuckoo hash tables
- Single deletions cannot be used in combination with merges and normal
deletions on the same key (other keys are not affected by this)
- Consecutive single deletions are currently not allowed (and older version of
this patch supported this so it could be resurrected if needed)
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, rven, anthony, yoshinorim, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43179
Summary:
When DBIter changes iterating direction from forward to backward, it might see some much larger keys with higher sequence ID. With this commit, these rows will be actively filtered out. It should fix existing disabled tests in db_iter_test.
This may not be a perfect fix, but it introduces least impact on existing codes, in order to be safe.
Test Plan:
Enable existing tests and make sure they pass. Add a new test DBIterWithMergeIterTest.InnerMergeIteratorDataRace8.
Also run all existing tests.
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45567
Summary: Add more test cases of data race causing wrong iterating results. Tag tests not passing as DISABLED_
Test Plan: Run the tests
Reviewers: igor, rven, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: tnovak, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44907
Summary: Iterator has a bug: if a child iterator reaches its end, and user issues a Prev(), and just before SeekToLast() of the child iterator is called, some extra rows is added in the end, the position of iterator can be misplaced.
Test Plan: Run the tests with or without valgrind
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: tnovak, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43671
Summary:
When seeking to the last occurrence of a key with sequence number 0, db_iter
ends up in an endless loop because it seeks to type kValueTypeForSeek
which is larger than kTypeDeletion/kTypeValue. Added test case that triggers
the behavior.
Test Plan: make clean all check
Reviewers: igor, rven, anthony, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43653
Summary:
While doing forward iterating, if current key is merge, internal iterator position is placed to the next key. If Prev() is called now, needs to do extra Prev() to recover the location.
This is second attempt of fixing after reverting ec70fea4c4. This time shrink the fix to only merge key is the current key and avoid the reseeking logic for max_iterating skipping
Test Plan: enable the two disabled tests and make sure they pass
Reviewers: rven, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, tnovak, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43557
Summary:
This diff reverts the following two previous diffs related to
DBIter::FindPrevUserKey(), which makes db_stress unstable.
We should bake a better fix for this.
* "Fix a comparison in DBIter::FindPrevUserKey()"
ec70fea4c4.
* "Fixed endless loop in DBIter::FindPrevUserKey()"
acee2b08a2.
Test Plan: db_stress
Reviewers: anthony, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41301
Summary:
When seek target is a merge key (`kTypeMerge`), `DBIter::FindNextUserEntry()`
advances the underlying iterator _past_ the current key (`saved_key_`); see
`MergeValuesNewToOld()`. However, `FindPrevUserKey()` assumes that `iter_`
points to an entry with the same user key as `saved_key_`. As a result,
`it->Seek(key) && it->Prev()` can cause the iterator to be positioned at the
_next_, instead of the previous, entry (new test, written by @lovro, reproduces
the bug).
This diff changes `FindPrevUserKey()` to also skip keys that are _greater_ than
`saved_key_`.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, lovro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40791
Summary: #7124486: RocksDB's Iterator.SeekToLast should seek to the last key before iterate_upper_bound if presents
Test Plan: ./db_iter_test run successfully with the new testcase
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, igor, anthony, kradhakrishnan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40425
Summary:
Our existing test notation is very similar to what is used in gtest. It makes it easy to adopt what is different.
In this diff I modify existing [[ https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/Primer#Test_Fixtures:_Using_the_Same_Data_Configuration_for_Multiple_Te | test fixture ]] classes to inherit from `testing::Test`. Also for unit tests that use fixture class, `TEST` is replaced with `TEST_F` as required in gtest.
There are several custom `main` functions in our existing tests. To make this transition easier, I modify all `main` functions to fallow gtest notation. But eventually we can remove them and use implementation of `main` that gtest provides.
```lang=bash
% cat ~/transform
#!/bin/sh
files=$(git ls-files '*test\.cc')
for file in $files
do
if grep -q "rocksdb::test::RunAllTests()" $file
then
if grep -Eq '^class \w+Test {' $file
then
perl -pi -e 's/^(class \w+Test) {/${1}: public testing::Test {/g' $file
perl -pi -e 's/^(TEST)/${1}_F/g' $file
fi
perl -pi -e 's/(int main.*\{)/${1}::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);/g' $file
perl -pi -e 's/rocksdb::test::RunAllTests/RUN_ALL_TESTS/g' $file
fi
done
% sh ~/transform
% make format
```
Second iteration of this diff contains only scripted changes.
Third iteration contains manual changes to fix last errors and make it compilable.
Test Plan:
Build and notice no errors.
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make check -j55
```
Tests are still testing.
Reviewers: meyering, sdong, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35157
Summary:
When building on my host, I saw warning:
In file included from db/db_iter_test.cc:17:0:
db/db_iter_test.cc: In member function ‘void rocksdb::_Test_DBIterator::_Run()’:
./util/testharness.h:147:14: note: variable tracking size limit exceeded with -fvar-tracking-assignments, retrying without
void TCONCAT(_Test_,name)::_Run()
^
./util/testharness.h:134:23: note: in definition of macro ‘TCONCAT1’
#define TCONCAT1(a,b) a##b
^
./util/testharness.h:147:6: note: in expansion of macro ‘TCONCAT’
void TCONCAT(_Test_,name)::_Run()
^
db/db_iter_test.cc:589:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘TEST’
TEST(DBIteratorTest, DBIterator) {
^
By dividing the test into small tests, it should fix the problem
Test Plan: Run the test
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32679
Summary:
In some environment such as android, the c++ library does not have
std::to_string. This path adds rocksdb::ToString(), which wraps std::to_string
when std::to_string is not available, and implements std::to_string
in the other case.
Test Plan:
make dbg -j32
./db_test
make clean
make dbg OPT=-DOS_ANDROID -j32
./db_test
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29181
Summary:
We need to turn on -Wshorten-64-to-32 for mobile. See D1671432 (internal phabricator) for details.
This diff turns on the warning flag and fixes all the errors. There were also some interesting errors that I might call bugs, especially in plain table. Going forward, I think it makes sense to have this flag turned on and be very very careful when converting 64-bit to 32-bit variables.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: bobbaldwin, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28689
Summary: It turns out that -Wshadow has different rules for gcc than clang. Previous commit fixed clang. This commits fixes the rest of the warnings for gcc.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28131
Summary:
...and fix all the errors :)
Jim suggested turning on -Wshadow because it helped him fix number of critical bugs in fbcode. I think it's a good idea to be -Wshadow clean.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27711
Summary:
I found it is almost impossible to get rid of this function in a single
batch. I will take a step by step approach
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22995
Siying Dong