Summary: to make it less CPU intensive
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17403
Summary:
In total order mode, iterator's seek() shouldn't check total order.
Also some cleaning up about checking null for shared pointers. I don't know the behavior before it.
This bug was reported by @igor.
Test Plan: test plain_table_db_test
Reviewers: ljin, haobo, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: yhchiang, dhruba, igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17391
Summary:
Fixed a compile error which tries to check whether a size_t < 0 in env_posix.cc
util/env_posix.cc:180:16: error: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-compare]
} while (r < 0 && errno == EINTR);
~ ^ ~
1 error generated.
Test Plan: make check all
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17379
Summary:
* [java] RocksDB now does not implement Closeable.
* [java] RocksDB.close() is now synchronized.
* [c++] Fix a bug in rocksjni.cc that does not release a java reference before
throwing an exception.
Test Plan:
make jni
make jtest
Reviewers: haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17355
Summary:
If auto roll logger can't create a new LOG file on roll (if, for example, somebody deletes rocksdb directory while rocksdb is running, khm), we'll try to call Logv on invalid address and get a SIGSEGV. This diff will fix the issue
Here's the paste of the stack trace: https://phabricator.fb.com/P8276386 (fb-only)
Test Plan: make check is fine, although not really testing error condition
Reviewers: haobo, ljin, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17367
Summary: EINTR means 'please retry'. We don't do that currenty. We should.
Test Plan: make check, although it doesn't really test the new code. we'll just have to believe in the code!
Reviewers: haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17349
Summary: Talked to <insert internal project name> folks and they found it really scary that they won't be able to roll back once they upgrade to 2.8. We should fix this.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17343
Summary: Fix a bug in RocksDBSample.java and minor code improvement in rocksjni.cc.
Test Plan:
make jni
make jtest
Reviewers: haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17325
Summary: Fix some more CompactionFilterV2 valgrind issues. Maybe it would make sense for CompactionFilterV2 to delete its prefix_extractor?
Test Plan: ran CompactionFilterV2* tests with valgrind. issues before patch -> no issues after
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, ljin, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, danguo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17337
Summary: this causes overflow and asan failure
Test Plan: make asan_check
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17301
Summary: Since we are optimizing for server workloads, some default values are not optimized any more. We change some of those values that I feel it's less prone to regression bugs.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16995
Summary: In one of the perf, I shows 10%-25% CPU costs of MemTableIterator.Seek(), when doing dynamic prefix seek, are spent on checking whether we need to do bloom filter check or finding out the prefix extractor. Seems that more level of pointer checking makes CPU cache miss more likely. This patch makes things slightly simpler by copying pointer of bloom of prefix extractor into the iterator.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: igor, dhruba, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17247
Summary: int -> uint64_t
Test Plan:
it think it is pretty obvious
will run asan_check before committing
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17241
Summary:
This patch stores gps locations in rocksdb.
Each object is uniquely identified by an id. Each object has
a gps (latitude, longitude) associated with it. The geodb
supports looking up an object either by its gps location
or by its id. There is a method to retrieve all objects
within a circular radius centered at a specified gps location.
Test Plan: Simple unit-test attached.
Reviewers: leveldb, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, tecbot, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15567
Summary:
This diff contains a simple jni library for rocksdb which supports open, get,
put and closeusing default options (including Options, ReadOptions, and
WriteOptions.) In the usual case, Java developers can use the c++ rocksdb
library in the way similar to the following:
RocksDB db = RocksDB.open(path_to_db);
...
db.put("hello".getBytes(), "world".getBytes();
byte[] value = db.get("hello".getBytes());
...
db.close();
Specifically, this diff has the following major classes:
* RocksDB: a Java wrapper class which forwards the operations
from the java side to c++ rocksdb library.
* RocksDBException: ncapsulates the error of an operation.
This exception type is used to describe an internal error from
the c++ rocksdb library.
This diff also include a simple java sample code calling c++ rocksdb library.
To build the rocksdb jni library, simply run make jni, and make jtest will try to
build and run the sample code.
Note that if the rocksdb is not built with the default glibc that Java uses,
java will try to load the wrong glibc during the run time. As a result,
the sample code might not work properly during the run time.
Test Plan:
* make jni
* make jtest
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, sdong, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17109
Summary:
By constraining the probes within cache line(s), we can improve the
cache miss rate thus performance. This probably only makes sense for
in-memory workload so defaults the option to off.
Numbers and comparision can be found in wiki:
https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/wiki/index.php/Ljin/rocksdb_perf/2014_03_17#Bloom_Filter_Study
Test Plan: benchmarked this change substantially. Will run make all check as well
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17133
Summary: Fix the bug in MergeUtil which causes mixing values of different keys.
Test Plan:
stringappend_test
make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17235
Summary:
NewFixedPrefixTransform is leaked in default options. Broken by b47812fba6
Also included in the diff some code cleanup
Test Plan:
valgrind env_test
also make check
Reviewers: haobo, danguo, yhchiang
Reviewed By: danguo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17211
Summary:
Previously, we used to sort all files by BySmallestFirst comparator and then re-sort level0 files in the Finalize() (recently moved to end of SaveTo).
In this diff, I chose the correct comparator at the beginning and sort the files correctly in Builder::SaveTo.
I also added a verification that all files are sorted correctly in CheckConsistency()
NOTE: This diff depends on D17037
Test Plan: make check. Will also run db_stress
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17049
Summary:
AssertHeld() was a no-op before. Now it does things.
Also, this change caught a bad bug in SuperVersion::Init(). The method is calling db->mutex.AssertHeld(), but db variable is not initialized yet! I also fixed that issue.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17193
Summary: We don't preallocate MANIFEST file, even though we have an option for that. This diff preallocates manifest file every time we create it
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17163
Summary:
This is the part that was not finished when doing the Options.max_num_files=-1 feature. For iterating non level0 SST files (which was done using two level iterator), table cache is not bypassed. With this patch, the leftover feature is done.
Test Plan: make all check; change Options.max_num_files=-1 in one of the tests to cover the codes.
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba, ljin, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17001
Summary:
Add assert(operands_list.size() >= 2) in MergeOperator::PartialMergeMulti
to ensure it's only be called when we have at least two merge operands.
Test Plan: run merge_test and stringappend_test.
Reviewers: haobo, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17169
Summary:
Currently if client uses kNULLString as the prefix, it will confuse
compaction filter v2. This diff added a bool to indicate if the prefix
has been intialized. I also added a unit test to cover this case and
make sure the new code path is hit.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17151
Summary:
Fix a bug that PartialMergeMulti will try to merge the first operand
with an empty slice.
Test Plan: run stringappend_test and merge_test.
Reviewers: haobo, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17157
Summary:
This diff adds a new CompactionFilterV2 API that roll up the
decisions of kv pairs during compactions. These kv pairs must share the
same key prefix. They are buffered inside the db.
typedef std::vector<Slice> SliceVector;
virtual std::vector<bool> Filter(int level,
const SliceVector& keys,
const SliceVector& existing_values,
std::vector<std::string>* new_values,
std::vector<bool>* values_changed
) const = 0;
Application can override the Filter() function to operate
on the buffered kv pairs. More details in the inline documentation.
Test Plan:
make check. Added unit tests to make sure Keep, Delete,
Change all works.
Reviewers: haobo
CCs: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15087
Summary:
* PartialMerge api now takes a list of operands instead of two operands.
* Add min_pertial_merge_operands to Options, indicating the minimum
number of operands to trigger partial merge.
* This diff is based on Schalk's previous diff (D14601), but it also
includes necessary changes such as updating the pure C api for
partial merge.
Test Plan:
* make check all
* develop tests for cases where partial merge takes more than two
operands.
TODOs (from Schalk):
* Add test with min_partial_merge_operands > 2.
* Perform benchmarks to measure the performance improvements (can probably
use results of task #2837810.)
* Add description of problem to doc/index.html.
* Change wiki pages to reflect the interface changes.
Reviewers: haobo, igor, vamsi
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16815
Summary: Might be useful if client doesn't want to effect running system during backup too much.
Test Plan: added a test case
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17091
Summary: LogBuffer::AddLogToBuffer() uses vsnprintf() in the wrong way, which might cause buffer overflow when log line is too line. Fix it.
Test Plan: Add a unit test to cover most LogBuffer's most logic.
Reviewers: igor, haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: ljin, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17103
Summary:
Everytime a client opens a DB, we do a sanity check that:
* checks the existance of all the necessary files
* verifies that file sizes are correct
Some of the code was stolen from https://reviews.facebook.net/D16935
Test Plan: added a unit test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17097
Lei Jin