Summary:
RocksDB's `Cache` abstraction currently supports two priority levels for items: high (used for frequently accessed/highly valuable SST metablocks like index/filter blocks) and low (used for SST data blocks). Blobs are typically lower-value targets for caching than data blocks, since 1) with BlobDB, data blocks containing blob references conceptually form an index structure which has to be consulted before we can read the blob value, and 2) cached blobs represent only a single key-value, while cached data blocks generally contain multiple KVs. Since we would like to make it possible to use the same backing cache for the block cache and the blob cache, it would make sense to add a new, lower-than-low cache priority level (bottom level) for blobs so data blocks are prioritized over them.
This task is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10461
Reviewed By: siying
Differential Revision: D38672823
Pulled By: ltamasi
fbshipit-source-id: 90cf7362036563d79891f47be2cc24b827482743
Summary:
RocksDB's `Cache` abstraction currently supports two priority levels for items: high (used for frequently accessed/highly valuable SST metablocks like index/filter blocks) and low (used for SST data blocks). Blobs are typically lower-value targets for caching than data blocks, since 1) with BlobDB, data blocks containing blob references conceptually form an index structure which has to be consulted before we can read the blob value, and 2) cached blobs represent only a single key-value, while cached data blocks generally contain multiple KVs. Since we would like to make it possible to use the same backing cache for the block cache and the blob cache, it would make sense to add a new, lower-than-low cache priority level (bottom level) for blobs so data blocks are prioritized over them.
This task is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10309
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D38211655
Pulled By: gangliao
fbshipit-source-id: 65ef33337db4d85277cc6f9782d67c421ad71dd5
Summary:
This fix addresses https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9299.
If attempting to create a new object via the ObjectRegistry and a factory is not found, the ObjectRegistry will return a "NotSupported" status. This is the same behavior as previously.
If the factory is found but could not successfully create the object, an "InvalidArgument" status is returned. If the factory returned a reason why (in the errmsg), this message will be in the returned status.
In practice, there are two options in the ConfigOptions that control how these errors are propagated:
- If "ignore_unknown_options=true", then both InvalidArgument and NotSupported status codes will be swallowed internally. Both cases will return success
- If "ignore_unsupported_options=true", then having no factory will return success but a failing factory will return an error
- If both options are false, both cases (no and failing factory) will return errors.
In practice this likely only changes Customizable that may be partially available. For example, the JEMallocMemoryAllocator is a built-in allocator that is registered with the system but may not be compiled in. In this case, the status code for this allocator changed from NotSupported("JEMalloc not available") to InvalidArgumen("JEMalloc not available"). Other Customizable builtins/plugins would have the same semantics.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9333
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D33517681
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: 8033052d4a4a7b88c2d9f90147b1b4467e51f6fd
Summary:
- Make MemoryAllocator and its implementations into a Customizable class.
- Added a "DefaultMemoryAllocator" which uses new and delete
- Added a "CountedMemoryAllocator" that counts the number of allocs and free
- Updated the existing tests to use these new allocators
- Changed the memkind allocator test into a generic test that can test the various allocators.
- Added tests for creating all of the allocators
- Added tests to verify/create the JemallocNodumpAllocator using its options.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8980
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D32990403
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: 6fdfe8218c10dd8dfef34344a08201be1fa95c76
Gang Liao