Summary:
Since the number of range deletions are reported in
TableProperties, it is confusing to not report the number of merge
operands and point deletions as top-level properties; they are
accessible through the public API, but since they are not the "main"
properties, they do not appear in aggregated table properties, or the
string representation of table properties.
This change promotes those two property keys to
`rocksdb/table_properties.h`, adds corresponding uint64 members for
them, deprecates the old access methods `GetDeletedKeys()` and
`GetMergeOperands()` (though they are still usable for now), and removes
`InternalKeyPropertiesCollector`. The property key strings are the same
as before this change, so this should be able to read DBs written from older
versions (though I haven't tested this yet).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4594
Differential Revision: D12826893
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: 9e4e4fbdc5b0da161c89582566d184101ba8eb68
Summary:
This reverts the previous commit 1d7048c598, which broke the build.
Did a `git revert 1d7048c`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2627
Differential Revision: D5476473
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 4756ff5c0dfc88c17eceb00e02c36176de728d06
Summary: This uses `clang-tidy` to comment out unused parameters (in functions, methods and lambdas) in fbcode. Cases that the tool failed to handle are fixed manually.
Reviewed By: igorsugak
Differential Revision: D5454343
fbshipit-source-id: 5dee339b4334e25e963891b519a5aa81fbf627b2
Summary:
A couple of notes from the diff:
- The namespace block I added at the top of table_properties_collector.cc was in reaction to an issue i was having with PutVarint64 and reusing the "val" string. I'm not sure this is the cleanest way of doing this, but abstracting this out at least results in the correct behavior.
- I chose "rocksdb.merge.operands" as the property name. I am open to suggestions for better names.
- The change to sst_dump_tool.cc seems a bit inelegant to me. Is there a better way to do the if-else block?
Test Plan:
I added a test case in table_properties_collector_test.cc. It adds two merge operands and checks to make sure that both of them are reflected by GetMergeOperands. It also checks to make sure the wasPropertyPresent bool is properly set in the method.
Running both of these tests should pass:
./table_properties_collector_test
./sst_dump_test
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58119
Summary: Pass column family ID through TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateTablePropertiesCollector() so that users can identify which column family this file is for and handle it differently.
Test Plan: Add unit test scenarios in tests related to table properties collectors to verify the information passed in is correct.
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, igor, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: yoshinorim, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48411
Summary:
This is an initial version of bulk load feature
This diff allow us to create sst files, and then bulk load them later, right now the restrictions for loading an sst file are
(1) Memtables are empty
(2) Added sst files have sequence number = 0, and existing values in database have sequence number = 0
(3) Added sst files values are not overlapping
Test Plan: unit testing
Reviewers: igor, ott, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, ott, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39081
Summary:
It is experimental. Allow users to return from a call back function TablePropertiesCollector::NeedCompact(), based on the data in the file.
It can be used to allow users to suggest DB to clear up delete tombstones faster.
Test Plan: Add a unit test.
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: yoshinorim, MarkCallaghan, maykov, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39585
Summary:
Currently users have no idea a key is add, delete or merge from TablePropertiesCollector call back. Add a new function to add it.
Also refactor the codes so that
(1) make table property collector and internal table property collector two separate data structures with the later one now exposed
(2) table builders only receive internal table properties
Test Plan: Add cases in table_properties_collector_test to cover both of old and new ways of using TablePropertiesCollector.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor.sugak, rven, igor
Reviewed By: rven, igor
Subscribers: meyering, yoshinorim, maykov, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35373
Summary:
When using latest clang (3.6 or 3.7/trunck) rocksdb is failing with many errors. Almost all of them are missing override errors. This diff adds missing override keyword. No manual changes.
Prerequisites: bear and clang 3.5 build with extra tools
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 bear make all # generate a compilation database http://clang.llvm.org/docs/JSONCompilationDatabase.html
% clang-modernize -p . -include . -add-override
% make format
```
Test Plan:
Make sure all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% #Use default fb code clang.
% make check
```
Verify less error and no missing override errors.
```lang=bash
% # Have trunk clang present in path.
% ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 CC=clang CXX=clang++ make
```
Reviewers: igor, kradhakrishnan, rven, meyering, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34077
Summary:
This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options.
Here's description of task #4296714:
I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB.
For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys.
The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for.
Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API.
In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe.
Test Plan:
Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one).
Also, all other tests
Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
Summary: This change will allow other table to reuse the code for meta blocks.
Test Plan: all existing unit tests passed
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14475
Summary:
The primary motivation of the changes is to make it easier to figure out the inside of the tables.
* rename "table stats" to "table properties" since now we have more than "integers" to store in the property block.
* Add filter block size to the basic table properties.
* Whenever a table is built, we'll log the table properties (the sample output is in Test Plan).
* Make an api to expose deleted keys.
Test Plan:
Passed all existing test. and the sample output of table stats:
==================================================================
Basic Properties
------------------------------------------------------------------
# data blocks: 1
# entries: 1
raw key size: 9
raw average key size: 9
raw value size: 9
raw average value size: 0
data block size: 25
index block size: 27
filter block size: 18
(estimated) table size: 70
filter policy: rocksdb.BuiltinBloomFilter
==================================================================
User collected properties: InternalKeyPropertiesCollector
------------------------------------------------------------------
kDeletedKeys: 1
==================================================================
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14187
Abhishek Madan