Summary:
We'll divide the table tests into 3 buckets, plain table test, block-based table test and general table feature test.
This diff does no real change and only does the rename and reorg.
Test Plan: run table_test
Reviewers: sdong, haobo, igor, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15417
Summary:
Mixing index/filter blocks with data blocks resulted in some known
issues. To make sure in next release our users won't be affected,
we added a new option in BlockBasedTableFactory::TableOption to
conceal this functionality for now.
This patch also introduced a BlockBasedTableReader::OpenOptions,
which avoids the "infinite" growth of parameters in
BlockBasedTableReader::Open().
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, tnovak
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15327
Summary: I'm separating code-cleanup part of https://reviews.facebook.net/D14517. This will make D14517 easier to understand and this diff easier to review.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, sdong, dhruba, tnovak
Reviewed By: tnovak
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15099
Summary:
Some changes to PlainTable format:
(1) support variable key length
(2) use user defined slice transformer to extract prefixes
(3) Run some test cases against PlainTable in db_test and table_test
Test Plan: test db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
CC: dhruba, igor, leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14457
Summary: A bug to fix. IT's already fixed in D14457, but want to check it in sooner to unblock tests
Test Plan: plain_table_db_test
Reviewers: nkg-, haobo
Reviewed By: nkg-
CC: kailiu, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14673
Summary:
This is the last diff that adds the property block to plain table.
The format resembles that of the block-based table: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rocksdb-table-format
[data block]
[meta block 1: stats block]
[meta block 2: future extended block]
...
[meta block K: future extended block] (we may add more meta blocks in the future)
[metaindex block]
[index block: we only have the placeholder here, we can add persistent index block in the future]
[Footer: contains magic number, handle to metaindex block and index block]
<end_of_file>
Test Plan: extended existing property block test.
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14523
Summary:
PlainTable now has a bug of the ordering of indexes for the prefixes in the same bucket. I thought std::map guaranteed key order but it didn't, probably because I didn't use it properly. But seems to me that we don't need to make extra sorting as input prefixes are already sorted. Found by problem by running leaf4 against plain table. Replace the map with a vector. It should performs better too.
After the fix, leaf4 unit tests are passing.
Test Plan:
run plain_table_db_test
Also going to run db_test with plain table in the uncommitted branch.
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14649
Summary: This change will allow other table to reuse the code for meta blocks.
Test Plan: all existing unit tests passed
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14475
Summary:
As we are having different types of tables and they all might share the same structure in block-based table:
[metaindex block]
[index block]
[Footer]
To be able to identify differnt types of tables, we need to parameterize the "magic number" in the `Footer`.
Test Plan:
make check
Summary:
PlainTableReader to use a more customized hash table. This patch assumes the SST file is smaller than 2GB:
(1) Every bucket uses 32-bit integer
(2) no key is stored in bucket
(3) use the first bit of the bucket value to distinguish it points to the file offset or a second level index.
This index schema fits the use case that most of prefixes have very small number of keys
Test Plan: plain_table_db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14343
Summary:
I went through all remaining shared_ptrs and removed the ones that I found not-necessary. Only GenerateCachePrefix() is called fairly often, so don't expect much perf wins.
The ones that are left are accessed infrequently and I think we're fine with keeping them.
Test Plan: make asan_check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14427
Summary: liveness of the statistics object is already ensured by the shared pointer in DB options. There's no reason to pass again shared pointer among internal functions. Raw pointer is sufficient and efficient.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan, igor
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, reconnect.grayhat
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14289
Summary:
Provide a framework to profile a query in detail to figure out latency bottleneck. Currently, in Get(), Put() and iterators, 2-3 simple timing is used. We can easily add more profile counters to the framework later.
Test Plan: Enable this profiling in seveal existing tests.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu, emayanke, vamsi, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14001
Conflicts:
table/merger.cc
Summary:
Provide a framework to profile a query in detail to figure out latency bottleneck. Currently, in Get(), Put() and iterators, 2-3 simple timing is used. We can easily add more profile counters to the framework later.
Test Plan: Enable this profiling in seveal existing tests.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu, emayanke, vamsi, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14001
Summary:
A Simple plain table format. No block structure. When creating the table reader, scanning the full table to create indexes.
Test Plan:Add unit test
Reviewers:haobo,dhruba,kailiu
CC:
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Summary:
For the use cases that prefix filtering is enabled, initializing heaps when doing MergingIterator.Seek() might introduce non-negligible costs. This patch makes it lazily done.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo,dhruba,kailiu
CC:
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Summary:
Previously we introduce a `flush_block_policy_factory` in Options, however, that options is strongly releated to Table based tables.
It will make more sense to move it to block based table's own factory class.
Test Plan: make check to pass existing tests
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14211
Summary:
These bugs were caught by ASAN crash test.
1. The first one, in table/filter_block.cc is very nasty. We first reference entries_ and store the reference to Slice prev. Then, we call entries_.append(), which can change the reference. The Slice prev now points to junk.
2. The second one is a bug in a test, so it's not very serious. Once we set read_opts.prefix, we never clear it, so some other function might still reference it.
Test Plan: asan crash test now runs more than 5 mins. Before, it failed immediately. I will run the full one, but the full one takes quite some time (5 hours)
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14223
Summary:
The primary motivation of the changes is to make it easier to figure out the inside of the tables.
* rename "table stats" to "table properties" since now we have more than "integers" to store in the property block.
* Add filter block size to the basic table properties.
* Whenever a table is built, we'll log the table properties (the sample output is in Test Plan).
* Make an api to expose deleted keys.
Test Plan:
Passed all existing test. and the sample output of table stats:
==================================================================
Basic Properties
------------------------------------------------------------------
# data blocks: 1
# entries: 1
raw key size: 9
raw average key size: 9
raw value size: 9
raw average value size: 0
data block size: 25
index block size: 27
filter block size: 18
(estimated) table size: 70
filter policy: rocksdb.BuiltinBloomFilter
==================================================================
User collected properties: InternalKeyPropertiesCollector
------------------------------------------------------------------
kDeletedKeys: 1
==================================================================
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14187
Summary: This diff invoves some more complicated issues in the posix environment.
Test Plan: works under mac os. will need to verify dev box.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14061
Summary:
By original design, the regular `block options` and index `block options` in table_builder is mutable. We can use ChangeOptions to change the options directly.
However, with my last change, `BlockBuilder` no longer hold the reference to the index_block_options -- as a result, any changes made after the creation of index block builder will be of no effect.
But still the code is very error-prone and developers can easily fall into the trap without aware of it. To avoid this problem from happening in the future, I deleted the `ChangeOptions` and the `index_block_options`, as well as many other changes to make it less misleading.
Test Plan:
make
make check
make release
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13707
Summary: This patch adds an option to table_reader_bench that queries run against DB level (which has one table). It is useful if user wants to see the extra costs DB level introduces.
Test Plan: Run the benchmark with and without the new parameter
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13863
Summary: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13167 broke bloom filters. If filter is not in cache, we want to return true (safe thing). Am I right?
Test Plan: when benchmarking https://reviews.facebook.net/D14031 I got different results when using bloom filters vs. when not using them. This fixed the issue. I will also be putting this change to the other diff, but that one will probably be in review for longer time.
Reviewers: kailiu, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14085
Summary: This diff leverage the existing block cache and extend it to cache index/filter block.
Test Plan:
Added new tests in db_test and table_test
The correctness is checked by:
1. make check
2. make valgrind_check
Performance is test by:
1. 10 times of build_tools/regression_build_test.sh on two versions of rocksdb before/after the code change. Test results suggests no significant difference between them. For the two key operatons `overwrite` and `readrandom`, the average iops are both 20k and ~260k, with very small variance).
2. db_stress.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, haobo, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13167
Summary: The work to make sure mac os compiles rocksdb is not completed yet. But at least we can start cleaning some warnings captured only by g++ from mac os..
Test Plan: ran make in mac os
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14049
Summary: Allow block based table to configure the way flushing the blocks. This feature will allow us to add support for prefix-aligned block.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13875
Summary:
This fixes#3130525. Dhruba's suggestion and Tnovak's implementation :)
The issue was with SkipEmptyDataBlocksForward(), but I also changed SkipEmptyDataBlocksBackward(). Is that OK?
Test Plan: Run the logdevice test
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13911
Summary:
Rocksdb can now support a uncompressed block cache, or a compressed
block cache or both. Lookups first look for a block in the
uncompressed cache, if it is not found only then it is looked up
in the compressed cache. If it is found in the compressed cache,
then it is uncompressed and inserted into the uncompressed cache.
It is possible that the same block resides in the compressed cache
as well as the uncompressed cache at the same time. Both caches
have their own individual LRU policy.
Test Plan: Unit test case attached.
Reviewers: kailiu, sdong, haobo, leveldb
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: xjin, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12675
Summary: Iterator benchmark case is timed incorrectly. Fix it
Test Plan: Run the benchmark
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13845
Kai Liu