Summary:
RocksDB does auto-readahead for iterators on noticing more than two sequential reads for a table file if user doesn't provide readahead_size. The readahead starts at 8KB and doubles on every additional read up to max_auto_readahead_size. However at each level, if iterator moves over next file, readahead_size starts again from 8KB.
This PR introduces a new ReadOption "adaptive_readahead" which when set true will maintain readahead_size at each level. So when iterator moves from one file to another, new file's readahead_size will continue from previous file's readahead_size instead of scratch. However if reads are not sequential it will fall back to 8KB (default) with no prefetching for that block.
1. If block is found in cache but it was eligible for prefetch (block wasn't in Rocksdb's prefetch buffer), readahead_size will decrease by 8KB.
2. It maintains readahead_size for L1 - Ln levels.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9056
Test Plan:
Added new unit tests
Ran db_bench for "readseq, seekrandom, seekrandomwhilewriting, readrandom" with --adaptive_readahead=true and there was no regression if new feature is enabled.
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D31773640
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 7332d16258b846ae5cea773009195a5af58f8f98
Summary:
IteratorIterator::IsOutOfBound() and IteratorIterator::MayBeOutOfUpperBound() are two functions that related to upper bound check. It is hard for users to reason about this complexity. Consolidate the two functions into one and assign an enum as results to improve readability.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7200
Test Plan: Run all existing test. Would run crash test with atomic for a while.
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D22833181
fbshipit-source-id: a0c724267056adbd0476bde74650e6c7226077e6
Summary:
The ```for``` loop in ```VerifyChecksumInBlocks``` only checks ```index_iter->Valid()``` which could be ```false``` either due to reaching the end of the index or, in case of partitioned index, it could be due to a checksum mismatch error when reading a 2nd level index block. Instead of throwing away the index iterator status, we need to return any errors back to the caller.
Tests:
Add a test in block_based_table_reader_test.cc.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6909
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D21833922
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: bc778ebf1121dbbdd768689de5183f07a9f0beae
Summary:
Define a private member variable only in debug mode. Without fix, build will fail
```
In file included from table/block_based/partitioned_index_iterator.cc:9:
./table/block_based/partitioned_index_iterator.h:125:32: error: private field 'icomp_' is not used [-Werror,-Wunused-private-field]
const InternalKeyComparator& icomp_;
```
Test plan (dev server)
1. make check
2. Make sure fixed in Travis
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6547
Reviewed By: siying
Differential Revision: D20480027
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 288bc94280e240c3136335b6c73eb1ccb0db459d
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
Akanksha Mahajan