Summary: as title. unit test not polished. this is for a quick live test
Test Plan: live
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13221
Summary: The pupose of this diff is to expose per user-call level precise timing of block read, so that we can answer questions like: a Get() costs me 100ms, is that somehow related to loading blocks from file system, or sth else? We will answer that with EXACTLY how many blocks have been read, how much time was spent on transfering the bytes from os, how much time was spent on checksum verification and how much time was spent on block decompression, just for that one Get. A nano second stopwatch was introduced to track time with higher precision. The cost/precision of the stopwatch is also measured in unit-test. On my dev box, retrieving one time instance costs about 30ns, on average. The deviation of timing results is good enough to track 100ns-1us level events. And the overhead could be safely ignored for 100us level events (10000 instances/s), for example, a viewstate thrift call.
Test Plan: perf_context_test, also testing with viewstate shadow traffic.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12351
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary:
As title. No locking/atomic is needed due to thread local. There is also no need to modify the existing client interface, in order to expose related counters.
perf_context_test shows a simple example of retrieving the number of user key comparison done for each put and get call. More counters could be added later.
Sample output
./perf_context_test 1000000
==== Test PerfContextTest.KeyComparisonCount
Inserting 1000000 key/value pairs
...
total user key comparison get: 43446523
total user key comparison put: 8017877
max user key comparison get: 88939
avg user key comparison get:43
Basically, the current skiplist does well on average, but could perform poorly in extreme cases.
Test Plan: run perf_context_test <total number of entries to put/get>
Reviewers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12225
Haobo Xu