4 Commits (96d0773a111a5283ffd4d46d948971e1db25f883)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Akanksha Mahajan	04b2c16f9b	Fix bug in rocksdb internal automatic prefetching (#9234) ... Summary: After introducing adaptive_readahead, the original flow got broken. Readahead size was set to 0 because of which rocksdb wasn't be able to do automatic prefetching which it enables after seeing sequential reads. This PR fixes it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Before this patch: b_bench -use_existing_db=true -db=/tmp/prefix_scan -benchmarks="seekrandom" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 -use_direct_reads=true -seek_nexts=327680 -duration=120 -ops_between_duration_checks=1 Initializing RocksDB Options from the specified file Initializing RocksDB Options from command-line flags RocksDB: version 6.27 Date: Tue Nov 30 11:56:50 2021 CPU: 24 * Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) CPUCache: 16384 KB Keys: 32 bytes each (+ 0 bytes user-defined timestamp) Values: 512 bytes each (256 bytes after compression) Entries: 5000000 Prefix: 0 bytes Keys per prefix: 0 RawSize: 2594.0 MB (estimated) FileSize: 1373.3 MB (estimated) Write rate: 0 bytes/second Read rate: 0 ops/second Compression: Snappy Compression sampling rate: 0 Memtablerep: SkipListFactory Perf Level: 1 WARNING: Assertions are enabled; benchmarks unnecessarily slow ------------------------------------------------ DB path: [/tmp/prefix_scan] seekrandom : 5356367.174 micros/op 0 ops/sec; 29.4 MB/s (23 of 23 found) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After the patch: ./db_bench -use_existing_db=true -db=/tmp/prefix_scan -benchmarks="seekrandom" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 -use_direct_reads=true -seek_nexts=327680 -duration=120 -ops_between_duration_checks=1 Initializing RocksDB Options from the specified file Initializing RocksDB Options from command-line flags RocksDB: version 6.27 Date: Tue Nov 30 14:38:33 2021 CPU: 24 * Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) CPUCache: 16384 KB Keys: 32 bytes each (+ 0 bytes user-defined timestamp) Values: 512 bytes each (256 bytes after compression) Entries: 5000000 Prefix: 0 bytes Keys per prefix: 0 RawSize: 2594.0 MB (estimated) FileSize: 1373.3 MB (estimated) Write rate: 0 bytes/second Read rate: 0 ops/second Compression: Snappy Compression sampling rate: 0 Memtablerep: SkipListFactory Perf Level: 1 WARNING: Assertions are enabled; benchmarks unnecessarily slow ------------------------------------------------ DB path: [/tmp/prefix_scan] seekrandom : 456504.277 micros/op 2 ops/sec; 359.8 MB/s (264 of 264 found) Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9234 Test Plan: Ran ./db_bench -db=/data/mysql/rocksdb/prefix_scan -benchmarks="fillseq" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 -use_d irect_io_for_flush_and_compaction=true -target_file_size_base=16777216 and then ./db_bench -use_existing_db=true -db=/data/mysql/rocksdb/prefix_scan -benchmarks="seekrandom" -key_size=32 -value_siz e=512 -num=5000000 -use_direct_reads=true -seek_nexts=327680 -duration=120 -ops_between_duration_checks=1 and compared the results. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D32743965 Pulled By: akankshamahajan15 fbshipit-source-id: b950fba68c91963b7deb5c20acdf471bc60251f5	3 years ago
Akanksha Mahajan	17ce1ca48b	Reuse internal auto readhead_size at each Level (expect L0) for Iterations (#9056) ... Summary: RocksDB does auto-readahead for iterators on noticing more than two sequential reads for a table file if user doesn't provide readahead_size. The readahead starts at 8KB and doubles on every additional read up to max_auto_readahead_size. However at each level, if iterator moves over next file, readahead_size starts again from 8KB. This PR introduces a new ReadOption "adaptive_readahead" which when set true will maintain readahead_size at each level. So when iterator moves from one file to another, new file's readahead_size will continue from previous file's readahead_size instead of scratch. However if reads are not sequential it will fall back to 8KB (default) with no prefetching for that block. 1. If block is found in cache but it was eligible for prefetch (block wasn't in Rocksdb's prefetch buffer), readahead_size will decrease by 8KB. 2. It maintains readahead_size for L1 - Ln levels. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9056 Test Plan: Added new unit tests Ran db_bench for "readseq, seekrandom, seekrandomwhilewriting, readrandom" with --adaptive_readahead=true and there was no regression if new feature is enabled. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D31773640 Pulled By: akankshamahajan15 fbshipit-source-id: 7332d16258b846ae5cea773009195a5af58f8f98	3 years ago
Akanksha Mahajan	a0e0feca62	Improve BlockPrefetcher to prefetch only for sequential scans (#7394) ... Summary: BlockPrefetcher is used by iterators to prefetch data if they anticipate more data to be used in future and this is valid for forward sequential scans. But BlockPrefetcher tracks only num_file_reads_ and not if reads are sequential. This presents problem for MultiGet with large number of keys when it reseeks index iterator and data block. FilePrefetchBuffer can end up doing large readahead for reseeks as readahead size increases exponentially once readahead is enabled. Same issue is with BlockBasedTableIterator. Add previous length and offset read as well in BlockPrefetcher (creates FilePrefetchBuffer) and FilePrefetchBuffer (does prefetching of data) to determine if reads are sequential and then prefetch. Update the last block read after cache hit to take reads from cache also in account. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7394 Test Plan: Add new unit test case Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D23737617 Pulled By: akankshamahajan15 fbshipit-source-id: 8e6917c25ed87b285ee495d1b68dc623d71205a3	4 years ago
sdong	d66908091d	De-template block based table iterator (#6531) ... Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f	5 years ago