Summary:
Why don't we automatically reopen DB when running crash test (running in our nightly build)? If I understand correctly, crashtest is manually reopenning the DB, but then the DB does not check its consistency when you kill db_stress process and then re-run it again.
Does this make sense?
Test Plan: not reall
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16167
Summary: Adding in the iterpercent flag to tests.
Test Plan: make crash_test
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13035
Summary:
Most code change in this diff is code cleanup/rewrite. The logic changes include:
(1) add universal compaction to db_crashtest2.py
(2) randomly set --test_batches_snapshots to be 0 or 1 in db_crashtest2.py. Old codes always use 1.
(3) use different tmp directory as db directory in different runs. I saw some intermittent errors in my local tests. Use of different tmp directory seems to be able to solve the issue.
Test Plan: Have run "make crashtest" for multiple times. Also run "make all check"
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: emayanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12369
Summary: I changed the db_stress configs, but forgot to update the scripts using the old configs.
Test Plan: 'make blackbox_crash_test' and 'make whitebox_crash_test' start running normally now (I haven't run them til the end, though).
Reviewers: vamsi
Reviewed By: vamsi
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12303
Summary: filter_deletes options introduced in db_stress makes it drop Deletes on key if KeyMayExist(key) returns false on the key. code change was simple and tested so not wasting reviewer's time.
Test Plan: maek crash_test; python tools/db_crashtest[1|2].py
CC: dhruba, vamsi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11769
Summary: As title, now that db_stress supports --map_read properly
Test Plan: make crash_test
Reviewers: vamsi, emayanke, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11391
Summary: These extra options caught some bugs. Will be run via Jenkins now with the crash_test
Test Plan: ./make crashtest
Reviewers: dhruba, vamsi
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11151
Summary: To know which options the crashtest was run with. Also changed print to sys.stdout.write which is more standard.
Test Plan: python tools/db_crashtest.py
Reviewers: vamsi, akushner, dhruba
Reviewed By: akushner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D10119
Summary: make crash_test will now invoke the crash_test. Also some cleanup in the db_crashtest.py file
Test Plan: make crash_test
Reviewers: akushner, vamsi, sheki, dhruba
Reviewed By: vamsi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9987
Summary:
When I run db_crashtest, I am seeing lot of warnings that say db_stress completed
before it was killed. To fix that I made ops per thread a very large value so that it keeps
running until it is killed.
I also set #reopens to 0. Since we are killing the process anyway, the 'simulated crash'
that happens during reopen may not add additional value.
I usually see 10-25K ops happening before the kill. So I increased max_key from 100 to
1000 so that we use more distinct keys.
Test Plan:
Ran a few times.
Revert Plan: OK
Task ID: #
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9909
Summary: The script runs and kills the stress test periodically. Default values have been used in the script now. Should I make this a part of the Makefile or automated rocksdb build? The values can be easily changed in the script right now, but should I add some support for variable values or input to the script? I believe the script achieves its objective of unsafe crashes and reopening to expect sanity in the database.
Test Plan: python tools/db_crashtest.py
Reviewers: dhruba, vamsi, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: vamsi
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9369
Igor Canadi