Summary:
gtest does not use exceptions to fail a unit test by design, and `ASSERT*`s are implemented using `return`. As a consequence we cannot use `ASSERT*` in a function that does not return `void` value ([[ https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/AdvancedGuide#Assertion_Placement | 1]]), and have to fix our existing code. This diff does this in a generic way, with no manual changes.
In order to detect all existing `ASSERT*` that are used in functions that doesn't return void value, I change the code to generate compile errors for such cases.
In `util/testharness.h` I defined `EXPECT*` assertions, the same way as `ASSERT*`, and redefined `ASSERT*` to return `void`. Then executed:
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make all -j55 -k 2> build.log
% perl -naF: -e 'print "-- -number=".$F[1]." ".$F[0]."\n" if /: error:/' \
build.log | xargs -L 1 perl -spi -e 's/ASSERT/EXPECT/g if $. == $number'
% make format
```
After that I reverted back change to `ASSERT*` in `util/testharness.h`. But preserved introduced `EXPECT*`, which is the same as `ASSERT*`. This will be deleted once switched to gtest.
This diff is independent and contains manual changes only in `util/testharness.h`.
Test Plan:
Make sure all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make check
```
Reviewers: igor, lgalanis, sdong, yufei.zhu, rven, meyering
Reviewed By: meyering
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33333
Summary: Those were introduced with 2fb1fea30f because the flushing behavior changed when max_background_flushes is > 0.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23577
Summary:
Fixed the following compile error.
tools/reduce_levels_test.cc:89:31: error: no matching function for call to 'InitFromCmdLineArgs'
LDBCommand* level_reducer = LDBCommand::InitFromCmdLineArgs(args);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./util/ldb_cmd.h:56:22: note: candidate function not viable: requires 3 arguments, but 1 was provided
static LDBCommand* InitFromCmdLineArgs(
^
./util/ldb_cmd.h:62:22: note: candidate function not viable: requires 4 arguments, but 1 was provided
static LDBCommand* InitFromCmdLineArgs(
^
1 error generated.
Test Plan:
make reduce_levels_test
./reduce_levels_test
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19251
Summary: When I debug the unit test failures when enabling background flush thread, I feel the function names can be made clearer for people to understand. Also, if the names are fixed, in many places, some tests' bugs are obvious (and some of those tests are failing). This patch is to clean it up for future maintenance.
Test Plan: Run test suites.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, xjin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13431
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary: simple sed command to replace NULL in tools directory. Was missed by the previous codemod.
Test Plan: it compiles
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9621
Summary:
I changed the reduce_num_levels logic to avoid "compactRange()" call if the current number of levels in use (levels that contain files) is smaller than the new num of levels.
And that change breaks the assert in reduce_levels_test
Test Plan: run reduce_levels_test
Reviewers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: emayanke, sheki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D6651
Summary: as subject.
Test Plan: manually test it, will add a testcase
Reviewers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D6345
Igor Sugak