Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
a0ba0aa877
main
oxigraph-8.1.1
oxigraph-8.3.2
oxigraph-main
${ noResults }
7 Commits (a0ba0aa877f0c15d08d7d4470d0d95c2019b5952)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Islam AbdelRahman
|
16e225f70d |
Fix MergeContext::copied_operands_ strings moving
Summary: MergeContext::copied_operands contain strings that MergeContext::operand_list_ Slices point to It's possible that when MergeContext::copied_operands grow, these strings are moved and there place in memory is changed, this will cause MergeContext::operand_list_ to point to invalid memory. fix this problem by using unique_ptr<string> instead of string Test Plan: run tests under mac/clang Reviewers: sdong, yiwu Reviewed By: yiwu Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61023 |
9 years ago |
|
Islam AbdelRahman
|
68a8e6b8fa |
Introduce FullMergeV2 (eliminate memcpy from merge operators)
Summary: This diff update the code to pin the merge operator operands while the merge operation is done, so that we can eliminate the memcpy cost, to do that we need a new public API for FullMerge that replace the std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice> This diff is stacked on top of D56493 and D56511 In this diff we - Update FullMergeV2 arguments to be encapsulated in MergeOperationInput and MergeOperationOutput which will make it easier to add new arguments in the future - Replace std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice> to pass operands - Replace MergeContext std::deque with std::vector (based on a simple benchmark I ran https://gist.github.com/IslamAbdelRahman/78fc86c9ab9f52b1df791e58943fb187) - Allow FullMergeV2 output to be an existing operand ``` [Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key] DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000 [FullMergeV2] readseq : 0.607 micros/op 1648235 ops/sec; 16121.2 MB/s readseq : 0.478 micros/op 2091546 ops/sec; 20457.2 MB/s readseq : 0.252 micros/op 3972081 ops/sec; 38850.5 MB/s readseq : 0.237 micros/op 4218328 ops/sec; 41259.0 MB/s readseq : 0.247 micros/op 4043927 ops/sec; 39553.2 MB/s [master] readseq : 3.935 micros/op 254140 ops/sec; 2485.7 MB/s readseq : 3.722 micros/op 268657 ops/sec; 2627.7 MB/s readseq : 3.149 micros/op 317605 ops/sec; 3106.5 MB/s readseq : 3.125 micros/op 320024 ops/sec; 3130.1 MB/s readseq : 4.075 micros/op 245374 ops/sec; 2400.0 MB/s ``` ``` [Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key] DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=1000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000 [FullMergeV2] readseq : 3.472 micros/op 288018 ops/sec; 2817.1 MB/s readseq : 2.304 micros/op 434027 ops/sec; 4245.2 MB/s readseq : 1.163 micros/op 859845 ops/sec; 8410.0 MB/s readseq : 1.192 micros/op 838926 ops/sec; 8205.4 MB/s readseq : 1.250 micros/op 800000 ops/sec; 7824.7 MB/s [master] readseq : 24.025 micros/op 41623 ops/sec; 407.1 MB/s readseq : 18.489 micros/op 54086 ops/sec; 529.0 MB/s readseq : 18.693 micros/op 53495 ops/sec; 523.2 MB/s readseq : 23.621 micros/op 42335 ops/sec; 414.1 MB/s readseq : 18.775 micros/op 53262 ops/sec; 521.0 MB/s ``` ``` [Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key] [FullMergeV2] $ DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions readseq : 14.741 micros/op 67837 ops/sec; 663.5 MB/s readseq : 1.029 micros/op 971446 ops/sec; 9501.6 MB/s readseq : 0.974 micros/op 1026229 ops/sec; 10037.4 MB/s readseq : 0.965 micros/op 1036080 ops/sec; 10133.8 MB/s readseq : 0.943 micros/op 1060657 ops/sec; 10374.2 MB/s [master] readseq : 16.735 micros/op 59755 ops/sec; 584.5 MB/s readseq : 3.029 micros/op 330151 ops/sec; 3229.2 MB/s readseq : 3.136 micros/op 318883 ops/sec; 3119.0 MB/s readseq : 3.065 micros/op 326245 ops/sec; 3191.0 MB/s readseq : 3.014 micros/op 331813 ops/sec; 3245.4 MB/s ``` ``` [Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key] DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10-operands-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions [FullMergeV2] readseq : 24.325 micros/op 41109 ops/sec; 402.1 MB/s readseq : 1.470 micros/op 680272 ops/sec; 6653.7 MB/s readseq : 1.231 micros/op 812347 ops/sec; 7945.5 MB/s readseq : 1.091 micros/op 916590 ops/sec; 8965.1 MB/s readseq : 1.109 micros/op 901713 ops/sec; 8819.6 MB/s [master] readseq : 27.257 micros/op 36687 ops/sec; 358.8 MB/s readseq : 4.443 micros/op 225073 ops/sec; 2201.4 MB/s readseq : 5.830 micros/op 171526 ops/sec; 1677.7 MB/s readseq : 4.173 micros/op 239635 ops/sec; 2343.8 MB/s readseq : 4.150 micros/op 240963 ops/sec; 2356.8 MB/s ``` Test Plan: COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make check -j64 Reviewers: yhchiang, andrewkr, sdong Reviewed By: sdong Subscribers: lovro, andrewkr, dhruba Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57075 |
9 years ago |
|
Islam AbdelRahman
|
8a1a603fdb |
Eliminate std::deque initialization while iterating over merge operands
Summary: This patch is similar to D52563, When we iterate over a DB with merge operands we keep creating std::queue to store the operands, optimize this by reusing merge_operands_ data member Before the patch ``` ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --db="/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/" --merge_operator="put" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000 DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] mergerandom : 3.757 micros/op 266141 ops/sec; 29.4 MB/s ( updates:10000) DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.413 micros/op 2423538 ops/sec; 268.1 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.451 micros/op 2219071 ops/sec; 245.5 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.420 micros/op 2382039 ops/sec; 263.5 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.408 micros/op 2452017 ops/sec; 271.3 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] mergerandom : 3.947 micros/op 253376 ops/sec; 28.0 MB/s ( updates:10000) DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.441 micros/op 2266473 ops/sec; 250.7 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.471 micros/op 2122033 ops/sec; 234.8 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.440 micros/op 2271407 ops/sec; 251.3 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.429 micros/op 2331471 ops/sec; 257.9 MB/s ``` with the patch ``` ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --db="/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/" --merge_operator="put" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000 DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] mergerandom : 4.080 micros/op 245092 ops/sec; 27.1 MB/s ( updates:10000) DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.308 micros/op 3241843 ops/sec; 358.6 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.312 micros/op 3200408 ops/sec; 354.0 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.332 micros/op 3013962 ops/sec; 333.4 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.300 micros/op 3328017 ops/sec; 368.2 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] mergerandom : 3.973 micros/op 251705 ops/sec; 27.8 MB/s ( updates:10000) DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.320 micros/op 3123752 ops/sec; 345.6 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.335 micros/op 2986641 ops/sec; 330.4 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.339 micros/op 2950047 ops/sec; 326.4 MB/s DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/] readseq : 0.319 micros/op 3131565 ops/sec; 346.4 MB/s ``` Test Plan: make check -j64 Reviewers: yhchiang, andrewkr, sdong Reviewed By: sdong Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D56031 |
9 years ago |
|
Baraa Hamodi
|
21e95811d1 |
Updated all copyright headers to the new format.
|
9 years ago |
|
agiardullo
|
711465ccec |
API to fetch from both a WriteBatchWithIndex and the db
Summary: Added a couple functions to WriteBatchWithIndex to make it easier to query the value of a key including reading pending writes from a batch. (This is needed for transactions). I created write_batch_with_index_internal.h to use to store an internal-only helper function since there wasn't a good place in the existing class hierarchy to store this function (and it didn't seem right to stick this function inside WriteBatchInternal::Rep). Since I needed to access the WriteBatchEntryComparator, I moved some helper classes from write_batch_with_index.cc into write_batch_with_index_internal.h/.cc. WriteBatchIndexEntry, ReadableWriteBatch, and WriteBatchEntryComparator are all unchanged (just moved to a different file(s)). Test Plan: Added new unit tests. Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, sdong, igor Reviewed By: igor Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38037 |
10 years ago |
|
Yueh-Hsuan Chiang
|
cda4006e87 |
Enhance partial merge to support multiple arguments
Summary: * PartialMerge api now takes a list of operands instead of two operands. * Add min_pertial_merge_operands to Options, indicating the minimum number of operands to trigger partial merge. * This diff is based on Schalk's previous diff (D14601), but it also includes necessary changes such as updating the pure C api for partial merge. Test Plan: * make check all * develop tests for cases where partial merge takes more than two operands. TODOs (from Schalk): * Add test with min_partial_merge_operands > 2. * Perform benchmarks to measure the performance improvements (can probably use results of task #2837810.) * Add description of problem to doc/index.html. * Change wiki pages to reflect the interface changes. Reviewers: haobo, igor, vamsi Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb, dhruba Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16815 |
11 years ago |
|
Siying Dong
|
a8029fdc75 |
Introduce MergeContext to Lazily Initialize merge operand list
Summary: In get operations, merge_operands is only used in few cases. Lazily initialize it can reduce average latency in some cases Test Plan: make all check Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba Reviewed By: haobo CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14415 Conflicts: db/db_impl.cc db/memtable.cc |
11 years ago |
|
Siying Dong
|
ef2211a9ca |
[RocksDB Performance Branch] Introduce MergeContext to Lazily Initialize merge operand list
Summary: In get operations, merge_operands is only used in few cases. Lazily initialize it can reduce average latency in some cases Test Plan: make all check Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba Reviewed By: haobo CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14415 |
11 years ago |