Summary:
Since a RangeDelAggregator is created for each read request, these heap-allocating member variables were consuming significant CPU (~3% total) which slowed down request throughput. The map and pinning manager are only necessary when range deletions exist, so we can defer their initialization until the first range deletion is encountered. Currently lazy initialization is done for reads only since reads pass us a single snapshot, which is easier to store on the stack for later insertion into the map than the vector passed to us by flush or compaction.
Note the Arena member variable is still expensive, I will figure out what to do with it in a subsequent diff. It cannot be lazily initialized because we currently use this arena even to allocate empty iterators, which is necessary even when no range deletions exist.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1539
Differential Revision: D4203488
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 3b36279
Summary:
pinned_iters_mgr_ pins iterators allocated with arena_, so we should order the
instance variable declarations such that the pinned iterators have their destructors
executed before the arena is destroyed.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1528
Differential Revision: D4191984
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 1386f20
Summary:
Adjusted AddToBuilder() to take lower_bound and upper_bound, which serve two purposes: (1) only range deletions overlapping with the interval [lower_bound, upper_bound) will be added to the output file, and (2) the output file's boundaries will not be extended before lower_bound or after upper_bound. Our computation of lower_bound/upper_bound consider both subcompaction boundaries and previous/next files within the subcompaction.
Test cases are here (level subcompactions: https://gist.github.com/ajkr/63c7eae3e9667c5ebdc0a7efb74ac332, and universal subcompactions: https://gist.github.com/ajkr/5a62af77c4ebe4052a1955c496d51fdb) but can't be included in this diff as they depend on committing the API first. They fail before this change and pass after.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1501
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Differential Revision: D4171685
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: ee99db8
Summary:
This fixes a correctness issue where ranges with same begin key would overwrite each other.
This diff uses InternalKey as TombstoneMap's key such that all tombstones have unique keys even when their start keys overlap. We also update TombstoneMap to use an internal key comparator.
End-to-end tests pass and are here (https://gist.github.com/ajkr/851ffe4c1b8a15a68d33025be190a7d9) but cannot be included yet since the DeleteRange() API is yet to be checked in. Note both tests failed before this fix.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1484
Differential Revision: D4155248
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 304b4b9
Summary:
Note: reviewed in https://reviews.facebook.net/D65115
- DBIter maintains a range tombstone accumulator. We don't cleanup obsolete tombstones yet, so if the user seeks back and forth, the same tombstones would be added to the accumulator multiple times.
- DBImpl::NewInternalIterator() (used to make DBIter's underlying iterator) adds memtable/L0 range tombstones, L1+ range tombstones are added on-demand during NewSecondaryIterator() (see D62205)
- DBIter uses ShouldDelete() when advancing to check whether keys are covered by range tombstones
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1464
Differential Revision: D4131753
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: be86559
Summary:
During Get()/MultiGet(), build up a RangeDelAggregator with range
tombstones as we search through live memtable, immutable memtables, and
SST files. This aggregator is then used by memtable.cc's SaveValue() and
GetContext::SaveValue() to check whether keys are covered.
added tests for Get on memtables/files; end-to-end tests mainly in https://reviews.facebook.net/D64761
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1456
Differential Revision: D4111271
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 6e388d4
Summary:
This diff introduces RangeDelAggregator, which takes ownership of iterators
provided to it via AddTombstones(). The tombstones are organized in a two-level
map (snapshot stripe -> begin key -> tombstone). Tombstone creation avoids data
copy by holding Slices returned by the iterator, which remain valid thanks to pinning.
For compaction, we create a hierarchical range tombstone iterator with structure
matching the iterator over compaction input data. An aggregator based on that
iterator is used by CompactionIterator to determine which keys are covered by
range tombstones. In case of merge operand, the same aggregator is used by
MergeHelper. Upon finishing each file in the compaction, relevant range tombstones
are added to the output file's range tombstone metablock and file boundaries are
updated accordingly.
To check whether a key is covered by range tombstone, RangeDelAggregator::ShouldDelete()
considers tombstones in the key's snapshot stripe. When this function is used outside of
compaction, it also checks newer stripes, which can contain covering tombstones. Currently
the intra-stripe check involves a linear scan; however, in the future we plan to collapse ranges
within a stripe such that binary search can be used.
RangeDelAggregator::AddToBuilder() adds all range tombstones in the table's key-range
to a new table's range tombstone meta-block. Since range tombstones may fall in the gap
between files, we may need to extend some files' key-ranges. The strategy is (1) first file
extends as far left as possible and other files do not extend left, (2) all files extend right
until either the start of the next file or the end of the last range tombstone in the gap,
whichever comes first.
One other notable change is adding release/move semantics to ScopedArenaIterator
such that it can be used to transfer ownership of an arena-allocated iterator, similar to
how unique_ptr is used for malloc'd data.
Depends on D61473
Test Plan: compaction_iterator_test, mock_table, end-to-end tests in D63927
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, wanning, yhchiang, lightmark
Reviewed By: lightmark
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62205
Andrew Kryczka