Summary:
When using `PRIu64` type of printf specifier, current code base does the following:
```
#ifndef __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#define __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#endif
#include <inttypes.h>
```
However, this can be simplified to
```
#include <cinttypes>
```
as long as flag `-std=c++11` is used.
This should solve issues like https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5159
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5402
Differential Revision: D15701195
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: 6dac0a05f52aadb55e9728038599d3d2e4b59d03
Summary:
In prepare phase of 2PC, the db promises to remember the prepared data, for possible future commits. To fulfill the promise the prepared data must be persisted in the WAL so that they could be recovered after a crash. The log that contains a prepare batch that is not committed yet, is marked so that it is not garbage collected before the transaction commits/rollbacks. The bug was that the write to the log file and the mark of the file was not atomic, and WAL gc could have happened before the WAL log is actually marked. This patch moves the marking logic to PreReleaseCallback so that the WAL gc logic that joins both write threads would see the WAL write and WAL mark atomically.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5121
Differential Revision: D14665210
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 1d66aeb1c66a296cb4899a5a20c4d40c59e4b534
Summary:
Fix how CompactionIterator::findEarliestVisibleSnapshots handles released snapshot. It fixing the two scenarios:
Scenario 1:
key1 has two values v1 and v2. There're two snapshots s1 and s2 taken after v1 and v2 are committed. Right after compaction output v2, s1 is released. Now findEarliestVisibleSnapshot may see s1 being released, and return the next snapshot, which is s2. That's larger than v2's earliest visible snapshot, which was s1.
The fix: the only place we check against last snapshot and current key snapshot is when we decide whether to compact out a value if it is hidden by a later value. In the check if we see current snapshot is even larger than last snapshot, we know last snapshot is released, and we are safe to compact out current key.
Scenario 2:
key1 has two values v1 and v2. there are two snapshots s1 and s2 taken after v1 and v2 are committed. During compaction before we process the key, s1 is released. When compaction process v2, snapshot checker may return kSnapshotReleased, and the earliest visible snapshot for v2 become s2. When compaction process v1, snapshot checker may return kIsInSnapshot (for WritePrepared transaction, it could be because v1 is still in commit cache). The result will become inconsistent here.
The fix: remember the set of released snapshots ever reported by snapshot checker, and ignore them when finding result for findEarliestVisibleSnapshot.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4890
Differential Revision: D13705538
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: e577f0d9ee1ff5a6035f26859e56902ecc85a5a4
Summary:
This adds support for writing unprepared batches based on size defined in `TransactionOptions::max_write_batch_size`. This is done by overriding methods that modify data (Put/Delete/SingleDelete/Merge) and checking first if write batch size has exceeded threshold. If so, the write batch is written to DB as an unprepared batch.
Support for Commit/Rollback for unprepared batch is added as well. This has been done by simply extending the WritePrepared Commit/Rollback logic to take care of all unprep_seq numbers either when updating prepare heap, or adding to commit map. For updating the commit map, this logic exists inside `WriteUnpreparedCommitEntryPreReleaseCallback`.
A test change was also made to have transactions unregister themselves when committing without prepare. This is because with write unprepared, there may be unprepared entries (which act similarly to prepared entries) already when a commit is done without prepare.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4104
Differential Revision: D8785717
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: c02006e281ec1ce00f628e2a7beec0ee73096a91
Summary:
This adds support for recovering WriteUnprepared transactions through the following changes:
- The information in `RecoveredTransaction` is extended so that it can reference multiple batches.
- `MarkBeginPrepare` is extended with a bool indicating whether it is an unprepared begin, and this is passed down to `InsertRecoveredTransaction` to indicate whether the current transaction is prepared or not.
- `WriteUnpreparedTxnDB::Initialize` is overridden so that it will rollback unprepared transactions from the recovered transactions. This can be done without updating the prepare heap/commit map, because this is before the DB has finished initializing, and after writing the rollback batch, those data structures should not contain information about the rolled back transaction anyway.
Commit/Rollback of live transactions is still unimplemented and will come later.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4078
Differential Revision: D8703382
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 7e0aada6c23bd39299f1f20d6c060492e0e6b60a
Summary:
This is implemented by extending ReadCallback with another function `MaxUnpreparedSequenceNumber` which returns the largest visible sequence number for the current transaction, if there is uncommitted data written to DB. Otherwise, it returns zero, indicating no uncommitted data.
There are the places where reads had to be modified.
- Get and Seek/Next was just updated to seek to max(snapshot_seq, MaxUnpreparedSequenceNumber()) instead, and iterate until a key was visible.
- Prev did not need need updates since it did not use the Seek to sequence number optimization. Assuming that locks were held when writing unprepared keys, and ValidateSnapshot runs, there should only be committed keys and unprepared keys of the current transaction, all of which are visible. Prev will simply iterate to get the last visible key.
- Reseeking to skip keys optimization was also disabled for write unprepared, since it's possible to hit the max_skip condition even while reseeking. There needs to be some way to resolve infinite looping in this case.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3955
Differential Revision: D8286688
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 25e42f47fdeb5f7accea0f4fd350ef35198caafe
Zhongyi Xie