Summary:
We go to great lengths to make sure MaybeScheduleFlushOrCompaction() is called outside of write thread. But anyway, it's still called in the mutex, so it's not that much cheaper.
This diff removes the "optimization" and cleans up the code a bit.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40113
Summary:
It is experimental. Allow users to return from a call back function TablePropertiesCollector::NeedCompact(), based on the data in the file.
It can be used to allow users to suggest DB to clear up delete tombstones faster.
Test Plan: Add a unit test.
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: yoshinorim, MarkCallaghan, maykov, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39585
Summary: Before the fix we also marked the bottommost level for compaction. This is wrong because then RocksDB has N+1 levels instead of N as before the compaction.
Test Plan: SuggestCompactRangeTest in db_test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37869
Summary:
Based on feedback from D37083.
Are all of these correct? In some spaces it seems like we're doing SetMaxPossibleForUserKey() although we want the smallest possible internal key for user key.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37341
Summary:
This diff implements a new `DB` method `PromoteL0` which moves all files in L0
to a given level skipping compaction, provided that the files have disjoint
ranges and all levels up to the target level are empty.
This method provides finer-grain control for trivial compactions, and it is
useful for bulk-loading pre-sorted keys. Compared to D34797, it does not change
the semantics of an existing operation, which can impact existing code.
PromoteL0 is designed to work well in combination with the proposed
`GetSstFileWriter`/`AddFile` interface, enabling to "design" the level structure
by populating one level at a time. Such fine-grained control can be very useful
for static or mostly-static databases.
Test Plan: `make check`
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, philipp, MarkCallaghan, yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37107
Summary:
Some Mongo+Rocks datasets in Parse's environment are not doing compactions very frequently. During the quiet period (with no IO), we'd like to schedule compactions so that our reads become faster. Also, aggressively compacting during quiet periods helps when write bursts happen. In addition, we also want to compact files that are containing deleted key ranges (like old oplog keys).
All of this is currently not possible with CompactRange() because it's single-threaded and blocks all other compactions from happening. Running CompactRange() risks an issue of blocking writes because we generate too much Level 0 files before the compaction is over. Stopping writes is very dangerous because they hold transaction locks. We tried running manual compaction once on Mongo+Rocks and everything fell apart.
MarkForCompaction() solves all of those problems. This is very light-weight manual compaction. It is lower priority than automatic compactions, which means it shouldn't interfere with background process keeping the LSM tree clean. However, if no automatic compactions need to be run (or we have extra background threads available), we will start compacting files that are marked for compaction.
Test Plan: added a new unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, MarkCallaghan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: yoshinorim, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37083
Baraa Hamodi