Summary:
compression_size_percent is an int but was printed as
an unsigned int. So the default of -1 is displayed as a big number.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23679
Summary: To avoid false positive test failures when the file system doesn't support fallocate. In EnvTest.AllocateTest, we first make a simple fallocate call and check the error codes to rule out the possibility that it is not supported. Skip the test if the error code indicates it is not supported.
Test Plan: Run the test and make sure it passes on file systems supporting and not supporting fallocate
Reviewers: yhchiang, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23667
Summary: I want to use open source build rather than fbcode one. This enables me to run `ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 make` and run it with my system g++.
Test Plan:
ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 make
make
Reviewers: sdong, ljin, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23613
Summary: Use PRIu64 to format uint64 in a portable manner
Test Plan: Run "make all check"
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23595
Summary: Fix JNI link error caused by the removal of options.db_stats_log_interval in https://reviews.facebook.net/D21915.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: ljin, ankgup87
Reviewed By: ankgup87
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23505
Summary: Those were introduced with 2fb1fea30f because the flushing behavior changed when max_background_flushes is > 0.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23577
Summary:
MurmurHash becomes expensive when we do millions Get() a second in one
thread. Add this option to allow the first hash function to use identity
function as hash function. It results in QPS increase from 3.7M/s to
~4.3M/s. I did not observe improvement for end to end RocksDB
performance. This may be caused by other bottlenecks that I will address
in a separate diff.
Test Plan:
```
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=0
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.272us (3.7 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.138us (7.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.144us (6.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.123us (8.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.112us (8.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.251us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.107us (9.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.099us (10.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.116us (8.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.095us (10.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.096us (10.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.105us (9.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=1
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.230us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.159us (6.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (12.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.218us (4.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
```
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23451
Summary:
Fixed a signed-unsigned comparison in spatial_db.cc
utilities/spatialdb/spatial_db.cc:542:38: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
make: *** [utilities/spatialdb/spatial_db.o] Error 1
Test Plan:
make spatial_db_test
./spatial_db_test
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, reddragon, igor
Reviewed By: reddragon
Subscribers: reddragon, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23565
Summary:
This is continuing the work done by 27b22f13a3
It's just cleaning up some unnecessary constructors. The most important change is removing Block::Block(const BlockContents& contents) constructor. It was only used from the unit test.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23547
This replaces a mishmash of pointers in the Block and BlockContents classes with
std::unique_ptr. It also changes the semantics of BlockContents to be limited to
use as a constructor parameter for Block objects, as it owns any block buffers
handed to it.
Summary:
This is to avoid cutting file prematurely and resulting file size to be
half of specified.
Test Plan: db_bench
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23541
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
make all check
I will think a way to set up stress test for this
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23055
Summary: as title
Test Plan: options_test
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23283
Summary: We currently don't test mmap reads as part of db_test. Piggyback it on kWalDir test config.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23337
Summary:
Fixed 32-bit overflowing issue when converting jlong to size_t by
capping jlong to std::numeric_limits<size_t>::max().
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: ankgup87, ljin, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23511
Summary: This work on my compiler, but it turns out some compilers don't implicitly add constness, see: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/284. This diff adds constness explicitly.
Test Plan: still compiles
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23409
Summary:
Include WriteBatch into RocksDBSample.java, fix how DbBenchmark.java handles WriteBatch.
Previously DbBenchmark.java does not use WriteBatch when benchmarks is set to fillbatch.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava -j32
make jtest
make jdb_bench
cd java
./jdb_bench.sh --benchmarks=fillbatch
Reviewers: naveenatceg, ljin, sdong, ankgup87
Reviewed By: ankgup87
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22983
Summary:
Hope these scripts will allow people to run/repro benchmark easily
I think it is time to re-run flash benchmarks and report results
Please comment if any other benchmark runs are needed
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23139
Summary: This diff just moves the write thread control out of the DBImpl. I will need this as I will control column family data concurrency by only accessing some data in the write thread. That way, we won't have to lock our accesses to column family hash table (mappings from IDs to CFDs).
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23301
Summary:
Add make install. If INSTALL_PATH is not set, then rocksdb will be
installed under "/usr/local" directory (/usr/local/include for headers
and /usr/local/lib for library file(s).)
Test Plan:
Develop a simple rocksdb app, called test.cc, and do the followings.
make clean
make static_lib -j32
sudo make install
g++ -std=c++11 test.cc -lrocksdb -lbz2 -lz -o test
./test
sudo make uninstall
make clean
make shared_lib -j32
sudo make install
g++ -std=c++11 test.cc -lrocksdb -lbz2 -lz -o test
./test
make INSTALL_PATH=/tmp/path install
make INSTALL_PATH=/tmp/path uninstall
and make sure things are installed / uninstalled in the specified path.
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23211
whu_liuchang