Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
bc575c614c
main
oxigraph-8.1.1
oxigraph-8.3.2
oxigraph-main
${ noResults }
11 Commits (bc575c614cb341b41b9df798d15625ab7eca9d48)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Changyu Bi
|
fd165c869d |
Add memtable per key-value checksum (#10281)
Summary: Append per key-value checksum to internal key. These checksums are verified on read paths including Get, Iterator and during Flush. Get and Iterator will return `Corruption` status if there is a checksum verification failure. Flush will make DB become read-only upon memtable entry checksum verification failure. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10281 Test Plan: - Added new unit test cases: `make check` - Benchmark on memtable insert ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/memtable_write ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -disable_wal=true -max_write_buffer_number=100 -num=10000000 -min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 # avg over 10 runs Baseline: 1166936 ops/sec memtable 2 bytes kv checksum : 1.11674e+06 ops/sec (-4%) memtable 2 bytes kv checksum + write batch 8 bytes kv checksum: 1.08579e+06 ops/sec (-6.95%) write batch 8 bytes kv checksum: 1.17979e+06 ops/sec (+1.1%) ``` - Benchmark on only memtable read: ops/sec dropped 31% for `readseq` due to time spend on verifying checksum. ops/sec for `readrandom` dropped ~6.8%. ``` # Readseq sudo TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/memtable_read ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq,readseq"[-X20]" -disable_wal=true -max_write_buffer_number=100 -num=10000000 -min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 readseq [AVG 20 runs] : 7432840 (± 212005) ops/sec; 822.3 (± 23.5) MB/sec readseq [MEDIAN 20 runs] : 7573878 ops/sec; 837.9 MB/sec With -memtable_protection_bytes_per_key=2: readseq [AVG 20 runs] : 5134607 (± 119596) ops/sec; 568.0 (± 13.2) MB/sec readseq [MEDIAN 20 runs] : 5232946 ops/sec; 578.9 MB/sec # Readrandom sudo TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/memtable_read ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom,readrandom"[-X10]" -disable_wal=true -max_write_buffer_number=100 -num=1000000 -min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 readrandom [AVG 10 runs] : 140236 (± 3938) ops/sec; 9.8 (± 0.3) MB/sec readrandom [MEDIAN 10 runs] : 140545 ops/sec; 9.8 MB/sec With -memtable_protection_bytes_per_key=2: readrandom [AVG 10 runs] : 130632 (± 2738) ops/sec; 9.1 (± 0.2) MB/sec readrandom [MEDIAN 10 runs] : 130341 ops/sec; 9.1 MB/sec ``` - Stress test: `python3 -u tools/db_crashtest.py whitebox --duration=1800` Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D37607896 Pulled By: cbi42 fbshipit-source-id: fdaefb475629d2471780d4a5f5bf81b44ee56113 |
2 years ago |
|
Changyu Bi
|
0ff7713112 |
Handoff checksum during WAL replay (#10212)
Summary: Added checksum protection for write batch content read from WAL to when per key-value checksum is computed on the write batch. This gives full coverage on write batch integrity of WAL replay to memtable. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10212 Test Plan: - Added unit test and the existing tests (replay code path covers the change in this PR): `make -j32 check` - Stress test: ran `db_stress` for 30min. - Perf regression: ``` # setup TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/100MB_WAL_DB/ ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -write_buffer_size=1048576000 # benchmark db open time TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/100MB_WAL_DB/ /usr/bin/time ./db_bench -use_existing_db=true -benchmarks=overwrite -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -writes=1 -report_open_timing=true For 20 runs, pre-PR avg: 3734.31ms, post-PR avg: 3790.06 ms (~1.5% regression). Pre-PR OpenDb: 3714.36 milliseconds OpenDb: 3622.71 milliseconds OpenDb: 3591.17 milliseconds OpenDb: 3674.7 milliseconds OpenDb: 3615.79 milliseconds OpenDb: 3982.83 milliseconds OpenDb: 3650.6 milliseconds OpenDb: 3809.26 milliseconds OpenDb: 3576.44 milliseconds OpenDb: 3638.12 milliseconds OpenDb: 3845.68 milliseconds OpenDb: 3677.32 milliseconds OpenDb: 3659.64 milliseconds OpenDb: 3837.55 milliseconds OpenDb: 3899.64 milliseconds OpenDb: 3840.72 milliseconds OpenDb: 3802.71 milliseconds OpenDb: 3573.27 milliseconds OpenDb: 3895.76 milliseconds OpenDb: 3778.02 milliseconds Post-PR: OpenDb: 3880.46 milliseconds OpenDb: 3709.02 milliseconds OpenDb: 3954.67 milliseconds OpenDb: 3955.64 milliseconds OpenDb: 3958.64 milliseconds OpenDb: 3631.28 milliseconds OpenDb: 3721 milliseconds OpenDb: 3729.89 milliseconds OpenDb: 3730.55 milliseconds OpenDb: 3966.32 milliseconds OpenDb: 3685.54 milliseconds OpenDb: 3573.17 milliseconds OpenDb: 3703.75 milliseconds OpenDb: 3873.62 milliseconds OpenDb: 3704.4 milliseconds OpenDb: 3820.98 milliseconds OpenDb: 3721.62 milliseconds OpenDb: 3770.86 milliseconds OpenDb: 3949.78 milliseconds OpenDb: 3760.07 milliseconds ``` Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D37302092 Pulled By: cbi42 fbshipit-source-id: 7346e625f453ce4c0e5d708776cd1fb2af6b068b |
2 years ago |
|
Levi Tamasi
|
c73d2a9d18 |
Add API for writing wide-column entities (#10242)
Summary: The patch builds on https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9915 and adds a new API called `PutEntity` that can be used to write a wide-column entity to the database. The new API is added to both `DB` and `WriteBatch`. Note that currently there is no way to retrieve these entities; more precisely, all read APIs (`Get`, `MultiGet`, and iterator) return `NotSupported` when they encounter a wide-column entity that is required to answer a query. Read-side support (as well as other missing functionality like `Merge`, compaction filter, and timestamp support) will be added in later PRs. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10242 Test Plan: `make check` Reviewed By: riversand963 Differential Revision: D37369748 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: 7f5e412359ed7a400fd80b897dae5599dbcd685d |
2 years ago |
|
Andrew Kryczka
|
5d6005c780 |
Add WriteOptions::protection_bytes_per_key (#10037)
Summary: Added an option, `WriteOptions::protection_bytes_per_key`, that controls how many bytes per key we use for integrity protection in `WriteBatch`. It takes effect when `WriteBatch::GetProtectionBytesPerKey() == 0`. Currently the only supported value is eight. Invoking a user API with it set to any other nonzero value will result in `Status::NotSupported` returned to the user. There is also a bug fix for integrity protection with `inplace_callback`, where we forgot to take into account the possible change in varint length when calculating KV checksum for the final encoded buffer. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10037 Test Plan: - Manual - Set default value of `WriteOptions::protection_bytes_per_key` to eight and ran `make check -j24` - Enabled in MyShadow for 1+ week - Automated - Unit tests have a `WriteMode` that enables the integrity protection via `WriteOptions` - Crash test - in most cases, use `WriteOptions::protection_bytes_per_key` to enable integrity protection Reviewed By: cbi42 Differential Revision: D36614569 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: 8650087ceac9b61b560f1e5fafe5e1baf9c725fb |
2 years ago |
|
Changyu Bi
|
9882652b0e |
Verify write batch checksum before WAL (#10114)
Summary: Context: WriteBatch can have key-value checksums when it was created `with protection_bytes_per_key > 0`. This PR added checksum verification for write batches before they are written to WAL. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10114 Test Plan: - Added new unit tests to db_kv_checksum_test.cc: `make check -j32` - benchmark on performance regression: `./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom[-X20] -db=/dev/shm/test_rocksdb -write_batch_protection_bytes_per_key=8` - Pre-PR: ` fillrandom [AVG 20 runs] : 198875 (± 3006) ops/sec; 22.0 (± 0.3) MB/sec ` - Post-PR: ` fillrandom [AVG 20 runs] : 196487 (± 2279) ops/sec; 21.7 (± 0.3) MB/sec ` Mean regressed about 1% (198875 -> 196487 ops/sec). Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D36917464 Pulled By: cbi42 fbshipit-source-id: 29beb74edf65f04b1a890b4f650d873dc7ed790d |
2 years ago |
|
sdong
|
49628c9a83 |
Use std::numeric_limits<> (#9954)
Summary: Right now we still don't fully use std::numeric_limits but use a macro, mainly for supporting VS 2013. Right now we only support VS 2017 and up so it is not a problem. The code comment claims that MinGW still needs it. We don't have a CI running MinGW so it's hard to validate. since we now require C++17, it's hard to imagine MinGW would still build RocksDB but doesn't support std::numeric_limits<>. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9954 Test Plan: See CI Runs. Reviewed By: riversand963 Differential Revision: D36173954 fbshipit-source-id: a35a73af17cdcae20e258cdef57fcf29a50b49e0 |
3 years ago |
|
Levi Tamasi
|
db536ee045 |
Propagate errors from UpdateBoundaries (#9851)
Summary: In `FileMetaData`, we keep track of the lowest-numbered blob file referenced by the SST file in question for the purposes of BlobDB's garbage collection in the `oldest_blob_file_number` field, which is updated in `UpdateBoundaries`. However, with the current code, `BlobIndex` decoding errors (or invalid blob file numbers) are swallowed in this method. The patch changes this by propagating these errors and failing the corresponding flush/compaction. (Note that since blob references are generated by the BlobDB code and also parsed by `CompactionIterator`, in reality this can only happen in the case of memory corruption.) This change necessitated updating some unit tests that involved fake/corrupt `BlobIndex` objects. Some of these just used a dummy string like `"blob_index"` as a placeholder; these were replaced with real `BlobIndex`es. Some were relying on the earlier behavior to simulate corruption; these were replaced with `SyncPoint`-based test code that corrupts a valid blob reference at read time. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9851 Test Plan: `make check` Reviewed By: riversand963 Differential Revision: D35683671 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: f7387af9945c48e4d5c4cd864f1ba425c7ad51f6 |
3 years ago |
|
Yanqin Jin
|
3122cb4358 |
Revise APIs related to user-defined timestamp (#8946)
Summary: ajkr reminded me that we have a rule of not including per-kv related data in `WriteOptions`. Namely, `WriteOptions` should not include information about "what-to-write", but should just include information about "how-to-write". According to this rule, `WriteOptions::timestamp` (experimental) is clearly a violation. Therefore, this PR removes `WriteOptions::timestamp` for compliance. After the removal, we need to pass timestamp info via another set of APIs. This PR proposes a set of overloaded functions `Put(write_opts, key, value, ts)`, `Delete(write_opts, key, ts)`, and `SingleDelete(write_opts, key, ts)`. Planned to add `Write(write_opts, batch, ts)`, but its complexity made me reconsider doing it in another PR (maybe). For better checking and returning error early, we also add a new set of APIs to `WriteBatch` that take extra `timestamp` information when writing to `WriteBatch`es. These set of APIs in `WriteBatchWithIndex` are currently not supported, and are on our TODO list. Removed `WriteBatch::AssignTimestamps()` and renamed `WriteBatch::AssignTimestamp()` to `WriteBatch::UpdateTimestamps()` since this method require that all keys have space for timestamps allocated already and multiple timestamps can be updated. The constructor of `WriteBatch` now takes a fourth argument `default_cf_ts_sz` which is the timestamp size of the default column family. This will be used to allocate space when calling APIs that do not specify a column family handle. Also, updated `DB::Get()`, `DB::MultiGet()`, `DB::NewIterator()`, `DB::NewIterators()` methods, replacing some assertions about timestamp to returning Status code. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8946 Test Plan: make check ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq,fillrandom,readrandom,readseq,deleterandom -user_timestamp_size=8 ./db_stress --user_timestamp_size=8 -nooverwritepercent=0 -test_secondary=0 -secondary_catch_up_one_in=0 -continuous_verification_interval=0 Make sure there is no perf regression by running the following ``` ./db_bench_opt -db=/dev/shm/rocksdb -use_existing_db=0 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=256 -level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=256 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=256 -disable_wal=1 -duration=10 -benchmarks=fillrandom ``` Before this PR ``` DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdb] fillrandom : 1.831 micros/op 546235 ops/sec; 60.4 MB/s ``` After this PR ``` DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdb] fillrandom : 1.820 micros/op 549404 ops/sec; 60.8 MB/s ``` Reviewed By: ltamasi Differential Revision: D33721359 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: c131561534272c120ffb80711d42748d21badf09 |
3 years ago |
|
Yanqin Jin
|
2a2b3e03a5 |
Allow WriteBatch to have keys with different timestamp sizes (#8725)
Summary: In the past, we unnecessarily requires all keys in the same write batch to be from column families whose timestamps' formats are the same for simplicity. Specifically, we cannot use the same write batch to write to two column families, one of which enables timestamp while the other disables it. The limitation is due to the member `timestamp_size_` that used to exist in each `WriteBatch` object. We pass a timestamp_size to the constructor of `WriteBatch`. Therefore, users can simply use the old `WriteBatch::Put()`, `WriteBatch::Delete()`, etc APIs for write, while the internal implementation of `WriteBatch` will take care of memory allocation for timestamps. The above is not necessary. One the one hand, users can set up a memory buffer to store user key and then contiguously append the timestamp to the user key. Then the user can pass this buffer to the `WriteBatch::Put(Slice&)` API. On the other hand, users can set up a SliceParts object which is an array of Slices and let the last Slice to point to the memory buffer storing timestamp. Then the user can pass the SliceParts object to the `WriteBatch::Put(SliceParts&)` API. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8725 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: ltamasi Differential Revision: D30654499 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: 9d848c77ad3c9dd629aa5fc4e2bc16fb0687b4a2 |
3 years ago |
|
Drewryz
|
3b27725245 |
Fix a minor issue with initializing the test path (#8555)
Summary: The PerThreadDBPath has already specified a slash. It does not need to be specified when initializing the test path. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8555 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D29758399 Pulled By: jay-zhuang fbshipit-source-id: 6d2b878523e3e8580536e2829cb25489844d9011 |
3 years ago |
|
Andrew Kryczka
|
78ee8564ad |
Integrity protection for live updates to WriteBatch (#7748)
Summary: This PR adds the foundation classes for key-value integrity protection and the first use case: protecting live updates from the source buffers added to `WriteBatch` through the destination buffer in `MemTable`. The width of the protection info is not yet configurable -- only eight bytes per key is supported. This PR allows users to enable protection by constructing `WriteBatch` with `protection_bytes_per_key == 8`. It does not yet expose a way for users to get integrity protection via other write APIs (e.g., `Put()`, `Merge()`, `Delete()`, etc.). The foundation classes (`ProtectionInfo.*`) embed the coverage info in their type, and provide `Protect.*()` and `Strip.*()` functions to navigate between types with different coverage. For making bytes per key configurable (for powers of two up to eight) in the future, these classes are templated on the unsigned integer type used to store the protection info. That integer contains the XOR'd result of hashes with independent seeds for all covered fields. For integer fields, the hash is computed on the raw unadjusted bytes, so the result is endian-dependent. The most significant bytes are truncated when the hash value (8 bytes) is wider than the protection integer. When `WriteBatch` is constructed with `protection_bytes_per_key == 8`, we hold a `ProtectionInfoKVOTC` (i.e., one that covers key, value, optype aka `ValueType`, timestamp, and CF ID) for each entry added to the batch. The protection info is generated from the original buffers passed by the user, as well as the original metadata generated internally. When writing to memtable, each entry is transformed to a `ProtectionInfoKVOTS` (i.e., dropping coverage of CF ID and adding coverage of sequence number), since at that point we know the sequence number, and have already selected a memtable corresponding to a particular CF. This protection info is verified once the entry is encoded in the `MemTable` buffer. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7748 Test Plan: - an integration test to verify a wide variety of single-byte changes to the encoded `MemTable` buffer are caught - add to stress/crash test to verify it works in variety of configs/operations without intentional corruption - [deferred] unit tests for `ProtectionInfo.*` classes for edge cases like KV swap, `SliceParts` and `Slice` APIs are interchangeable, etc. Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D25754492 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: e481bac6c03c2ab268be41359730f1ceb9964866 |
4 years ago |