Summary:
Added readwhilewriting benchmark to our regression tests.
Changed block cache shards from 16 to 64, as Mark found that cache mutex contention is a big bottleneck.
Test Plan: Ran it.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, MarkCallaghan, xjin
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15075
Summary: @MarkCallaghan's tests indicate that performance with 8k rows in memtable is much worse than empty memtable. I wanted to add a regression tests that measures this effect, so we could optimize it. However, current config shows 634461 QPS on my devbox. Mark, any idea why this is so much faster than your measurements?
Test Plan: Ran the regression test.
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
CC: leveldb, MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14511
Branch detection did not work in Jenkins. I realized that it set
GIT_BRANCH env variable to point to the current branch, so let's try
using this for branch detection.
Summary: When running regression tests on other branches, this will push values to entity rocksdb_build.$git_branch
Test Plan: Ran regression test on regression branch, observed values send to ODS in entity rocksdb_build.regression
Reviewers: kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14493
Summary: Added readrandom benchmark with 300MB block cache, while database has 1GB of data
Test Plan: Ran it
Reviewers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14373
Summary: The old regression tests didn't cover memtable part at all. This is an atempt to also measure memtable performance in regression tests.
Test Plan: Ran regression_build_test.sh
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, reconnect.grayhat
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14325
Summary: As Aaron suggested, there are quite some problems with our Makefile and scripts. So in this diff I did some cleanup for them and revise some part of the scripts/makefile to help people better understand some mysterious parts.
Test Plan:
Ran make in several modes;
Ran the updated scripts.
Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke, akushner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12285
Summary:
Ultimate goals of the coverage report are:
* Report the coverage for all files (done in this diff)
* Report the coverage for recently updated files (not fully finished)
* Report is available in html form (done in this diff, but need some extra work to integrate it in Jenkin)
Task link: https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/tasks/?s=1154818042&t=2604914
Test Plan:
Ran: coverage/coverage_test.sh
The sample output can be found here: https://phabricator.fb.com/P2433892
Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11943
Summary:
Several fixes:
1) Use mktemp to create the files and directories
2) Take the stat file as an argument so that the buildservers
can specify a file in the WORKSPACE and not in /tmp
3) Use nproc to set make -j value.
4) Check for valid values before sending to ODS
5) Cleanup the grep/cut pipeline to just use awk
Test Plan: Verify tests run and complete
Reviewers: sheki, dhruba
Reviewed By: sheki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7995
Summary:
Basic Regression test.
Plan to run this every-night and record qps in ods.
Test Plan: ran locally and checked
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7929
Igor Canadi