Summary:
Regexes are considered potentially problematic for use in
registering RocksDB extensions, so we are removing
ObjectLibrary::Register() and the Regex public API it depended on (now
unused).
In reference to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9389
Why?
* The power of Regexes can make it hard to reason about which extension
will match what. (The replacement API isn't perfect, but we are at least
"holding the line" on patterns we have seen in practice.)
* It is easy to make regexes that don't quite mean what you think they
mean, such as forgetting that the `.` in `foo.bar` can match any character
or that matching is nondeterministic, as in `a🅱️42` matching `.*:[0-9]+`.
* Some regexes and implementations can have disastrously bad
performance. This might not be much practical concern for ObjectLibray
here, but we don't want to encourage potentially dangerous further use
in production code. (Testing code is fine. See TestRegex.)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9439
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: mrambacher
Differential Revision: D33792342
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 4f64dcb04764e639162c8977a5fa196f67754cec
Summary:
* Consolidate use of std::regex for testing to testharness.cc, to
minimize Facebook linters constantly flagging uses in non-production
code.
* Improve syntax and error messages for asserting some string matches a
regex in tests.
* Add a public Regex wrapper class to encapsulate existing usage in
ObjectRegistry.
* Remove unnecessary include <regex>
* Put warnings that use of Regex in production code could cause bad
performance or stack overflow.
Intended follow-up work:
* Replace std::regex with another underlying implementation like RE2
* Improve ObjectRegistry interface in terms of possibly confusing literal
string matching vs. regex and in terms of reporting invalid regex.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8740
Test Plan:
tests updated, basic unit test for public Regex, and some manual
testing of temporary changes to see example error messages:
utilities/backupable/backupable_db_test.cc:917: Failure
000010_1162373755_138626.blob (child.name)
does not match regex
[0-9]+_[0-9]+_[0-9]+[.]blobHAHAHA (pattern)
db/db_basic_test.cc:74: Failure
R3SHSBA8C4U0CIMV2ZB0 (sid3)
does not match regex [0-9A-Z]{20}HAHAHA
Reviewed By: mrambacher
Differential Revision: D30706246
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: ba845e8f563ccad39bdb58f44f04e9da8f78c3fd
Summary:
in PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7419 , we introduce the new Append and PositionedAppend APIs to WritableFile at File System, which enable RocksDB to pass the data verification information (e.g., checksum of the data) to the lower layer. In this PR, we use the new API in WritableFileWriter, such that the file created via WritableFileWrite can pass the checksum to the storage layer. To control which types file should apply the checksum handoff, we add checksum_handoff_file_types to DBOptions. User can use this option to control which file types (Currently supported file tyes: kLogFile, kTableFile, kDescriptorFile.) should use the new Append and PositionedAppend APIs to handoff the verification information.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7523
Test Plan: add new unit test, pass make check/ make asan_check
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D24313271
Pulled By: zhichao-cao
fbshipit-source-id: aafd69091ae85c3318e3e17cbb96fe7338da11d0
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
1. remove AssertEmpty because calling methods on moved objects is discouraged.
2. add a test to assert that the internal buffer is moved instead of being copied.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6399
Test Plan:
make slice_test && ./slice_test
USE_CLANG=1 make analyze
Differential Revision: D19825372
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 2e26f8ce5ec3edbfce067db045e80bd433e704f4
Summary:
It's logically correct for PinnableSlice to support move semantics to transfer ownership of the pinned memory region. This PR adds both move constructor and move assignment to PinnableSlice.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6374
Test Plan:
A set of unit tests for the move semantics are added in slice_test.
So `make slice_test && ./slice_test`.
Differential Revision: D19739254
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: f898bd811bb05b2d87384ec58b645e9915e8e0b1
Summary:
The current implementation of PinnableSlice move assignment have an issue #3163. We are moving away from it instead of try to get the move assignment right, since it is too tricky.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3164
Differential Revision: D6319201
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 8f3279021f3710da4a4caa14fd238ed2df902c48
Summary:
After move assignment, we need to re-initialized the moved PinnableSlice.
Also update blob_db_impl.cc to not reuse the moved PinnableSlice since it is supposed to be in an undefined state after move.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3127
Differential Revision: D6238585
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: bd99f2e37406c4f7de160c7dee6a2e8126bc224e
Peter Dillinger