Summary:
The very last reference happens in DBImpl::GetOptions()
I built with both DBImpl::GetOptions() and ColumnFamilyData::options() commented out
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29073
Summary:
Add unit support in options helper so we can specify, e.g., 10m for
10 megabytes.
Test Plan: Updated options_test
Reviewers: sdong, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28977
Expose GetIntProperty methods to RocksJava. As the integer(64-Bit)
value is no integer in Java the method is aligned with the return
type which is long.
Summary: Fixed a bug which could hide non-ok status in CompactionJob::Run()
Test Plan: make
Reviewers: sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28995
Summary: This way we can gurantee that old MemTables get destructed before DBImpl gets destructed, which might be useful if we want to make them depend on state from DBImpl.
Test Plan: make check with asserts in JobContext's destructor
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, yhchiang, rven, jonahcohen
Reviewed By: jonahcohen
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28959
Summary:
As we had the discussion some weeks ago. Java needs a test framework and should support code coverage analysis. This pull request includes:
Move Tests from main method functionality to Junit4
Move WriteBatchTest to test package
Adjust the Makefile to run Junit4
Download dependencies from Make (once if not-present)
Adjustment of the rocksjni.pom to run coverage analysis using jacoco
Javadoc excludes now tests
Two bugfixes regarding GC cleanup which came up within the test runs
Make can be used as beforehand to build and run RocksJava. make test runs tests using the command-line version of Junit4.
Maven can be used to retrieve code coverage reports using mvn -f rocksjni.pom package. Code coverage reports can then be found as usual in the site folder.
Testing libraries available within Java
Junit4 (incl. hamcrest-core dependency)
AssertJ (providing fluent syntax for assertions, cglib dependency)
Mockito to provide mocktests
Libraries as said before are not statically within this commit or filesystem instead they are downloaded using curl. Make checks if files are present, if so it will perform tests without downloading the libraries again.
Note: Libraries are only necessary to compile & run tests.
Next steps after merge:
Get the maven build into travis-ci and coveralls.io
Filling up the missing test spots (based on coverage data)
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: yhchiang, ankgup87, adamretter
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28209
Summary: Store links to live files in directory on same disk
Test Plan:
Take snapshot and open it. Added a test GetSnapshotLink in
db_test.
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28713
Summary:
This is just a simple test that passes two files though a compaction. It shows the framework so that people can continue building new compaction *unit* tests.
In the future we might want to move some Compaction* tests from DBTest here. For example, CompactBetweenSnapshot seems a good candidate.
Hopefully this test can be simpler when we mock out VersionSet.
Test Plan: this is a test
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28449
Summary:
Make db_stress built for ROCKSDB_LITE.
The test doesn't pass tough. It seg fault quickly. But I took a look and it doesn't seem to be related to lite version. Likely to be a bug inside RocksDB.
Test Plan: make db_stress
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28797
It seems that on some FS we get more blocks than we ask for. This is
already handled when checking the allocated number of blocks, but
after the file is closed it checks for an exact number of blocks,
which fails on my machine.
I changed the test to add one full page to the size, then calculate
the expected number of blocks and check if the actual number of blocks
is less or equal to that.
Lei Jin